自然资源学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 2634-2651.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211013

• “城乡融合发展”专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

城乡融合评价研究综述:内涵辨识、理论认知与体系重构

周德1,2(), 戚佳玲1,2, 钟文钰1,2   

  1. 1.浙江工商大学公共管理学院土地资源管理系,杭州 310018
    2.浙江工商大学中国土地与城市治理研究院,杭州 310018
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-15 修回日期:2021-06-15 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2021-12-28
  • 作者简介:周德(1980- ),男,安徽枞阳人,博士,副教授,主要从事城乡发展与土地利用转型研究。E-mail: zhoude520@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL283);浙江工商大学研究生科研创新基金项目(2020)

Review of urban-rural integration evaluation: Connotation identification, theoretical analysis, and system reconstruction

ZHOU De1,2(), QI Jia-ling1,2, ZHONG Wen-yu1,2   

  1. 1. Department of Land Resources Management, School of Public Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    2. China Institute of Land and Urban Governance, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
  • Received:2021-03-15 Revised:2021-06-15 Online:2021-10-28 Published:2021-12-28

摘要:

科学的城乡融合评价是城乡融合工作的重要环节,是建立健全城乡融合体制机制的基础。以“内涵辨识—理论认知—体系重构”为逻辑主线,从城乡融合的概念内涵、基础理论、评价指标、评价方法、评价尺度及演化机理等方面,开展城乡融合评价综述。研究表明:学界对城乡融合概念与内涵的认识基本一致,且已有一定理论基础;城乡融合评价指标选取呈现多维化、多属性化特征,但指标体系构建尚未突破静态性层面;定量评价方法较为单一;研究尺度整体偏向中宏观,缺少微观视角下的量化以及不同融合模式对比研究;城乡融合的时空分异格局及其机理研究亟待进一步深化。对此,提出了以下五点展望:(1)加强基础理论体系建设,完善系统研究框架构建;(2)优化多维评价指标体系,识别城乡融合发展模式;(3)深化城乡要素流动机制,推动城乡空间均衡发展;(4)加强微观尺度细节挖掘,健全城乡融合推进机制;(5)强化数字经济赋能作用,创新城乡高质量融合发展机制。

关键词: 城乡融合评价, 内涵辨识, 理论认知, 体系重构, 研究综述

Abstract:

The scientific evaluation of urban-rural integration is the core content of urban-rural integration, and it is the foundation for establishing and improving the institutional mechanism of urban-rural integration. Based on the logical line of "connotation identification-theoretical analysis-system reconstruction", this paper carries out the review of urban-rural integration evaluation including concept connotation, theoretical basis, evaluation index, evaluation method, evaluation scale, spatio-temporal differentiation, and mechanism analysis. At present, the academic understanding of the connotation of urban-rural integration is basically the same. The evaluation index selection of urban-rural integration shows multidimensional and multi-attribute characteristics, but the index system construction has not broken through the static characteristics. Quantitative evaluation method is relatively simple. Generally, current research still remains at the macro scale, but lacks quantitative research from a micro perspective and comparative studies of different fusion modes. The spatial and temporal differentiation pattern and its mechanism of urban-rural integration need to be further deepened. Finally, this paper puts forward five prospects: (1) strengthening the construction of basic theory system and perfecting system research framework; (2) optimizing the multidimensional evaluation index system and identifying the development model of urban-rural integration; (3) deepening the flow mechanism of urban and rural elements and promoting the balanced development of urban and rural space; (4) strengthening the exploration of micro-scale details and improving the promoting mechanism of urban-rural integration; (5) strengthening the empowering role of the digital economy and innovating the development mechanism of high-quality urban-rural integration.

Key words: urban-rural integration evaluation, connotation identification, theoretical analysis, system reconstruction, research review