“国土空间”内涵辨析与国土空间规划编制建议

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210905

自然资源学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 2219-2247.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210905

• 国土空间安全理论探索 • 上一篇下一篇

“国土空间”内涵辨析与国土空间规划编制建议

郝庆¹(), 彭建², 魏冶³, 王丰龙⁴, 姚华松⁵, 李禕⁶, 王伟⁷, 张书海⁸, 邓玲⁹, 赵雲泰¹⁰, 马学广¹¹, 戈大专¹², 戴俊骋¹³, 朱鹤¹⁴, 张茂鑫¹⁵

1.中国社会科学院生态文明研究所,北京 100006
2.北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871
3.东北师范大学地理科学学院,长春 130024
4.华南师范大学地理科学学院,广州 510631
5.广州大学公共管理学院,广州 510006
6.河海大学公共管理学院,南京 211000
7.中央财经大学政府管理学院,北京 100081
8.中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京 100872
9.中国自然资源经济研究院,北京 101149
10.中国国土勘测规划院,北京 100035
11.中国海洋大学国际事务与公共管理学院,青岛 266100
12.南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京 210023
13.中央财经大学文化经济研究院,北京 100081
14.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
15.浙江大学土地与国家发展研究院,杭州 310058

收稿日期:2020-10-26 修回日期:2021-03-05 出版日期:2021-09-28 发布日期:2021-09-15
作者简介:郝庆（1982- ）,男,河北邢台人,博士,副研究员,研究方向为国土空间规划、空间治理、资源环境承载力、生态修复与国土综合整治。E-mail: haoqing319@163.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA086)

The connotation of territory and the suggestions of drawing up spatial planning in the New Era

HAO Qing¹(), PENG Jian², WEI Ye³, WANG Feng-long⁴, YAO Hua-song⁵, LI Yi⁶, WANG Wei⁷, ZHANG Shu-hai⁸, DENG Ling⁹, ZHAO Yun-tai¹⁰, MA Xue-guang¹¹, GE Da-zhuan¹², DAI Jun-cheng¹³, ZHU He¹⁴, ZHANG Mao-xin¹⁵

1. Institute of Ecological Civilization Study, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100006, China
2. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3. School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
4. School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
5. Public Administration School, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
6. Hohai University Institute of Public Administration, Nanjing 211000, China
7. School of Government, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
8. School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
9. Chinese Academy of Natural Resource Economics, Beijing 101149, China
10. China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China
11. School of International Affairs and Public Administration, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China
12. College of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
13. Cultural Economics Research Institute, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
14. Institute of Geography Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
15. Land Academy for National Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2020-10-26 Revised:2021-03-05 Online:2021-09-28 Published:2021-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

科学辨析“国土空间”概念内涵是推进国土空间规划编制、完善国土空间规划理论的前提。应根据国土空间治理需求变化和学科理论发展需要,及时更新完善对“国土空间”的理解。本刊邀请15位青年学者研讨“国土空间”的概念内涵及国土空间规划编制建议,主要观点如下：（1）国土空间是复杂的人地耦合系统,具有构成要素多元性、时空尺度嵌套性等特征。需要用山水林田湖草沙是一个生命共同体的思维,进行国土空间的综合开发利用与系统修复保护,提出基于自然的空间治理方案。（2）国土空间是“流”所构建的网络空间,是不同利益主体组成的关系空间和为精细化治理服务的可计算领域。需要通过“流空间”进行国土空间的整合,推动区域之间资源和要素的共享,实现协同发展;也需要重视人地关系和人际关系的重构,协调多元主体的利益诉求,实现和谐发展;还需要完善国土空间开发管控的技术手段,平衡国土空间规划中的灵活性与统一性矛盾。（3）国土空间是有温度的空间。需要充分感知国土空间的风险性、适宜性、约束性、可达性,编制“以人民为中心”的国土空间规划,提升国土空间的人文关怀、生态功能和美学价值。（4）国土空间是国土空间规划和空间治理的对象,是具体的海洋空间、乡村空间、文化空间等,具有载体属性、资产属性、权利属性等,需要在国土空间规划中实现资源资产统一管理,彰显其经济价值、社会价值和生态价值,满足高质量发展和高品质生活对国土空间的多样化需求。

关键词: 国土空间, 国土空间规划, 空间治理, 人地耦合系统

Abstract:

A better understanding of the connotation of "territory" is a prerequisite for developing the theoretical system and advancing the practical work of spatial planning. It is necessary to constantly update the understanding of "territory" in accordance with the development of disciplines and the changes in the real needs of spatial governance. Therefore, this journal invited 15 young scholars to discuss the connotation of "territory". The main points of view are as follows: (1) Territory is a complex coupled human and natural systems, with the characteristics of pluralism on elements and nesting on spatial and temporal scales. It is necessary to use the thinking of "landscape, forest, field, lake and grass" as a life community to carry out the comprehensive development and utilization and systematic restoration and protection of territory, so that it can become a natural governance platform. (2) Territory is a network space constructed by "flow" and a relational space composed of different stakeholders. It is necessary to integrate the territory through the "space of flows" to promote the sharing of resources and elements between regions to achieve coordinated development; it is also necessary to pay attention to the reconstruction of human and natural relationships and interpersonal relationships, coordinate the interests of multiple subjects, and achieve harmonious development. (3) Territory is a human space. It is necessary to fully perceive the risks, suitability, constraints, and accessibility of the territory. We need compile people-oriented spatial planning to enhance the ecological value, aesthetic value and humanistic care of territory. (4) Territory is the object of spatial planning and governance. It is a specific spatial carrier with marine space, rural space and cultural space, etc. It has attributes such as rights and assets. It is necessary to realize the unified management of resources and assets in the spatial planning, and highlight its economic value, social value and ecological value to achieve the diversified needs of high-quality development and high-quality life for territory.

Key words: territory, spatial planning, spatial governance, coupled human and natural systems

郝庆, 彭建, 魏冶, 王丰龙, 姚华松, 李禕, 王伟, 张书海, 邓玲, 赵雲泰, 马学广, 戈大专, 戴俊骋, 朱鹤, 张茂鑫. “国土空间”内涵辨析与国土空间规划编制建议[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2219-2247.

HAO Qing, PENG Jian, WEI Ye, WANG Feng-long, YAO Hua-song, LI Yi, WANG Wei, ZHANG Shu-hai, DENG Ling, ZHAO Yun-tai, MA Xue-guang, GE Da-zhuan, DAI Jun-cheng, ZHU He, ZHANG Mao-xin. The connotation of territory and the suggestions of drawing up spatial planning in the New Era[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021, 36(9): 2219-2247.

图/表 2

参考文献 51

[1]	郝庆. 对机构改革背景下空间规划体系构建的思考. 地理研究, 2018, 37(10):1938-1946. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201810005
	[ HAO Q. Study on the construction of spatial planning system under the background of institutional reform. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(10):1938-1946.]
[2]	郝庆, 封志明, 邓玲. 基于人文—经济地理学视角的空间规划理论体系. 经济地理, 2018, 38(8):5-10.
	[ HAO Q, FENG Z M, DENG L. Spatial planning theory system from the perspective of human-economic geography. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(8):5-10.]
[3]	陆大道. 变化发展中的中国人文与经济地理学. 地理科学, 2017, 37(5):641-650. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.05.001
	[ LU D D. The changing humanistic and economic geography in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(5):641-650.]
[4]	李双成, 王羊, 蔡运龙. 复杂性科学视角下的地理学研究范式转型. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11):1315-1324. doi: 10.11821/xb201011001
	[ LI S C, WANG Y, CAI Y L. The paradigm transformation of geography from the perspective of complexity sciences. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(11):1315-1324.]
[5]	MAYER A L, PAWLOWSKI C, FATH B D, et al. Applications of Fisher Information to the Management of Sustainable Environmental Systems. London: Springer, 2007.
[6]	吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991, 11(3):1-6.
	[ WU C J. The core of study of geography: Man-land relationship areal system. Economic Geography, 1991, 11(3):1-6.]
[7]	刘海猛, 方创琳, 李咏红. 城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8):1489-1507. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908001
	[ LIU H M, FANG C L, LI Y H. The coupled human and natural cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8):1489-1507.]
[8]	樊杰, 王亚飞, 王怡轩. 基于地理单元的区域高质量发展研究: 兼论黄河流域同长江流域发展的条件差异及重点. 经济地理, 2020, 40(1):1-11.
	[ FAN J, WANG Y F, WANG Y X . High quality regional development research based on geographical units: Discuss on the difference in development conditions and priorities of the Yellow River Basin compared to the Yangtze River Basin. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(1):1-11.]
[9]	彭建, 吕丹娜, 董建权, 等. 过程耦合与空间集成: 国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1):3-13.
	[ PENG J, LYU D N, DONG J Q, et al. Processes coupling and spatial integration: Characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1):3-13.]
[10]	彭建, 李冰, 董建权, 等. 论国土空间生态修复基本逻辑. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(5):18-26.
	[ PENG J, LI B, DONG J Q, et al. Basic logic of territorial ecological restoration. China Land Science, 2020, 34(5):18-26.]
[11]	曹宇, 王嘉怡, 李国煜. 国土空间生态修复: 概念思辨与理论认知. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(7):1-10.
	[ CAO Y, WANG J Y, LI G Y. Ecological restoration for territorial space: Basic concepts and foundations. China Land Science, 2019, 33(7):1-10.]
[12]	CASTELLS M. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-regional Progress. Oxford U K & Cambridge USA: Blackwell, 1989: 146.
[13]	魏冶, 修春亮. 城市网络韧性的概念与分析框架探析. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3):488-502. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.03.013
	[ WEI Y, XIU C L. Study on the concept and analytical framework of city network resilience. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(3):488-502.]
[14]	刘云刚, 王丰龙. 政治地理学中的领域概念辨析. 人文地理, 2019, 34(1):14-19.
	[ LIU Y G, WANG F L. Decomposing the concept of territory in political geography. Human Geography, 2019, 34(1):14-19.]
[15]	GOTTMANN J. The Signiﬁcance of Territory. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1973.
[16]	BRENNER N. Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 1999, 28(1):39-78. doi: 10.1023/A:1006996806674
[17]	LUUKKONEN J. Planning in Europe for 'EU' rope: Spatial planning as a political technology of territory. Planning Theory, 2015, 14(2):174-194. doi: 10.1177/1473095213519355
[18]	FALUDI A. Territorial cohesion: Old (French) wine in new bottles?. Urban Studies, 2004, 41(7):1349-1365. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000214833
[19]	PAASI A, ZIMMERBAUER K. Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space, 2016, 48(1):73-93.
[20]	ELDEN S. Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2007, 25(3):562-80. doi: 10.1068/d428t
[21]	张晓玲, 赵雲泰, 贾克敬. 我国国土空间规划的历程与思考. 中国土地, 2017, (1):14-18.
	[ ZHANG X L, ZHAO Y T, JIA K J. The history and consideration of China's territorial spatial planning. China Land, 2017, (1):14-18.]
[22]	AGNEW J. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1994, 1(1):53-80. doi: 10.1080/09692299408434268
[23]	姚华松, 许学强, 薛德升. 人文地理学研究中对空间的再认识. 人文地理, 2010, 25(2):8-12.
	[ YAO H S, XU X Q, XUE D S. Rethink space in the studies of human geography. Human Geography, 2010, 25(2):8-12.]
[24]	LEFEBVRE H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991: 141-145.
[25]	姚华松, 李志刚, 肖扬, 等. 道路“空间修复”中的空间不平等与空间冲突: 以广州大桥扩桥为例. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(1):103-110.
	[ YAO H S, LI Z G, XIAO Y, et al. Spatial inequality and spatial conflict in "spatial fix" of road. Urban Development Studies, 2018, 25(1):103-110.]
[26]	戴维·哈维. 后现代的状况. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003: 367-370.
	[ HARVEY D. The Condition of Postmodernism. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2003: 367-370.]
[27]	米歇尔·福柯. 规训与惩罚. 上海: 三联书店, 2007: 219-256.
	[ FOUCAULT M. Discipline and Punishment. Shanghai: Sanlian Bookstore, 2007: 219-256.]
[28]	BOURDIEU P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984: 1-18.
[29]	FIREY W. Land Use in Central Boston. Westport Connecticut: Greenwood Press Publishers, 1975: 99-103.
[30]	SOJA E W. Thirdspace. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996: 149-153.
[31]	JACOBS J. The Death and Life of American Cities. New York: Random House, 1961: 120-123.
[32]	YIFU T. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1974: 34-45.
[33]	钟明华, 邓欣欣. 现代化进程中我国城市发展的空间正义原则. 广州大学学报: 社会科学版, 2016, 15(4):36-42.
	[ ZHONG M H, DENG X X. The principle of spatial justice in Chinese urban development in the modernization process. Journal of Guangzhou University: Social Science Edition, 2016, 15(4):36-42.]
[34]	姚华松. 乡土中国的社区营造: 基于鄂东某传统村落的乡村建设实践. 广州大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017, 16(11):52-57.
	[ YAO H S. Community making in rural China: Based on the practice of rural construction in a traditional village of Eastern Hubei. Journal of Guangzhou University: Social Science Edition, 2017, 16(11):52-57.]
[35]	LI Y, JONAS A E G. City-regionalism as countervailing geopolitical processes: The evolution and dynamics of Yangtze River Delta Region, China. Political Geography, 2019, 73:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.014
[36]	WU F L. China's emergent city-region governance: A new form of state spatial selectivity through state-orchestrated rescaling. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2016, 40(6):1134-1151. doi: 10.1111/ijur.v40.6
[37]	JESSOP B. The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016: 5.
[38]	LI Y, WU F L. The transformation of regional governance in China: The rescaling of statehood. Progress in Planning, 2012, 78(2):55-99. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2012.03.001
[39]	HE S, LIN G C. Producing and consuming China's new urban space: State, market and society. Urban Studies, 2015, 52(15), 2757-2773. doi: 10.1177/0042098015604810
[40]	郝庆, 邓玲, 封志明. 国土空间规划中的承载力反思: 概念、理论与实践. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10):2073-2086.
	[ HAO Q, DENG L, FENG Z M. Carrying capacity reconsidered in spatial planning: Concepts, methods and applications. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10):2073-2086.]
[41]	PLASMAN I C. Implementing marine spatial planning: A policy perspective. Marine Policy, 2008, 32(5):811-815. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.016
[42]	马学广, 赵彩霞. 融合,嬗变与实现: 跨界海洋空间规划方法论?. 中国海洋大学学报: 社会科学版, 2019, (5):69-80.
	[ MA X G, ZHAO C X. Integration, evolution and realization: Methodology for transboundary marine spatial planning?. Journal of Ocean University of China: Social Sciences, 2019, (5):69-80.]
[43]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4):637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[ LIU Y S. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the New Era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4):637-650.]
[44]	龙花楼. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8):1019-1028.
	[ LONG H L. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8):1019-1028.]
[45]	龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2547-2559.
	[ LONG H L, GE D Z, WANG J Y. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12):2547-2559.]
[46]	戈大专, 龙花楼. 论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6):1272-1286. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202006013
	[ GE D Z, LONG H L. Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6):1272-1286.]
[47]	杨忍. 广州市城郊典型乡村空间分化过程及机制. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8):1622-1636. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201908010
	[ YANG R. Spatial differentiation and mechanisms of typical rural areas in the suburbs of a metropolis: A case study of Beicun village, Baiyun district, Guangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8):1622-1636.]
[48]	戈大专, 陆玉麒. 面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径. 地理学报, 2021, 76(6):1422-1437. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202106008
	[ GE D Z, LU Y Q. Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6):1422-1437.]
[49]	CRANG M. Cultural Geography London, New York: Routledge, 1998: 7.
[50]	NYE J. Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2008, 616(1):94-109.
[51]	NAS P M, TALAL H P, CLAESSEN H M, et al. Masterpieces of oral and intangible culture: Reflections on the UNESCO world heritage list. Current Anthropology, 2002, 43(1):139-148. doi: 10.1086/338287

“国土空间”内涵辨析与国土空间规划编制建议

The connotation of territory and the suggestions of drawing up spatial planning in the New Era

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 51

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	周素红, 廖伊彤, 郑重. “时—空—人”交互视角下的国土空间公共安全规划体系构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2248-2263.
[2]	杨永春, 张薇, 曹宛鹏, 穆焱杰. 国家安全视角下的我国西部国土空间规划:体系完善与基本导向[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2264-2280.
[3]	吕悦风, 项铭涛, 王梦婧, 吴次芳. 从安全防灾到韧性建设——国土空间治理背景下韧性规划的探索与展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2281-2293.
[4]	李思楠, 赵筱青, 普军伟, 王茜, 苗培培, 谭琨. 西南喀斯特典型区国土空间功能质量评价及耦合协调分析——以广南县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2350-2367.
[5]	詹美旭, 魏宗财, 王建军, 周小天, 彭丹丽. 面向国土空间安全的城市体检评估方法及治理策略——以广州为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2382-2393.
[6]	赵垚, 叶强, 谭春华, 胡赞英, 向辉. 新时期国土空间安全背景下的空间规划系统思考[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2394-2404.
[7]	黄颖, 许旺土, 黄凯迪. 面向国土空间应急安全保障的控制性详细规划指标体系构建——以应对突发公共卫生事件为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2405-2423.
[8]	姜海, 陈磊. 县域国土空间主体功能区土地资源空间配置效率及管制策略——以江苏赣榆为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2424-2436.
[9]	焦胜, 刘奕村, 韩宗伟, 周可婧, 胡亮, 刘铁雄. 基于生态网络—人类干扰的国土空间生态修复优先区诊断——以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2294-2307.
[10]	杨培峰, 焦泽飞. 生态—社会经济系统耦合方法在县域国土空间生态修复规划中的运用——以四川威远县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2308-2319.
[11]	沈体雁, 温璐歌. 基于SCGE的国土空间规划模拟框架CTSPM及其在国土空间安全模拟仿真中的应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2320-2334.
[12]	许乙青, 喻丁一, 冉静. 基于流域协同的国土空间雨洪安全格局构建方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2335-2349.
[13]	林樱子, 彭翀, 王宝强. 基于传播模拟的国土开发空间网络结构韧性优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(9): 2193-2204.
[14]	郑鑫, 王甫园, 王开泳. 游憩导向下国土空间生态修复的理论与模式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(8): 1923-1936.
[15]	陈磊, 姜海. 县域主体功能区治理方案设计与监管体系[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(8): 1988-2005.