中国大豆进口关税调整对全球水土资源转移的影响评估

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210614

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中美贸易争端背景下,评估中国大豆贸易对全球水和耕地资源的影响,对粮食安全和环境可持续意义重大。基于GTAP（Global Trade Analysis Project）模型,以中国及其主要大豆供应国（美国、巴西、阿根廷、乌拉圭、加拿大）为研究区,模拟中国对美国大豆加征关税前后的情景,评估相应情景下中国大豆进口对全球水和耕地资源的影响。结果表明：在加征关税前后情景下,中国大豆进口总量保持稳定,进口量中供应国之间占比变化较大,特别是加征关税后美国占比明显减少;虚拟耕地进口总量保持稳定,虚拟水进口总量减少;在全球尺度上,从巴西进口大豆水资源利用率最高、从美国进口大豆耕地资源利用率最高。取消除美国外其他四国关税可同时减少全球水和耕地资源的消耗。

关键词: 中美贸易争端, 大豆, 虚拟水, 虚拟耕地, 粮食贸易

Abstract:

International food trade is an important factor affecting food security and environmental sustainability. Soybeans are an important food trade commodity, and the import amount of soybeans has been dramatically affected by the international situation. Since China has become the largest soybean importer, quantitative analysis of the impacts of soybean imports in China on global environment is of great significance, which helps us understand food security and global sustainability, and this is particularly true in the context of China-United States trade disputes. To obtain the soybean import volumes of China from its major suppliers (the United States, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Canada), we first adopted the GTAP (Global Trade Analysis Project) model and its database, and built four soybean tariff scenarios. Then, we calculated the amount of water and farmland used per ton of soybeans produced in each country, and studied the amount of total virtual water and virtual farmland produced in the four scenarios. The results show that the total imported soybeans and total virtual farmland remained stable, while the total virtual water varied considerably among four scenarios. The total soybean imports, virtual water, and virtual farmland from each supplier varied greatly, and the United States experienced the strongest decrease. Soybean produced in Brazil consumed the least water, while the United States consumed the least arable land. Soybean import of China could improve water and farmland resource efficiency, relieve environmental pressure, and enhance food security.

Key words: China-United States trade disputes, soybeans, virtual water, virtual farmland, food trad

刘航, 申格, 杨婧, 吴文斌, 孙晶. 中国大豆进口关税调整对全球水土资源转移的影响评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(6): 1535-1544.

LIU Hang, SHEN Ge, YANG Jing, WU Wen-bin, SUN Jing. Quantitative assessment of the impact of China's soybean import tariff adjustment on global water and farmland[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021, 36(6): 1535-1544.

图/表 5

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

参考文献 43

[1]	谢高地, 成升魁, 肖玉, 等. 新时期中国粮食供需平衡态势及粮食安全观的重构. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(6):895-903.
	[ XIE G D, CHENG S K, XIAO Y, et al. The balance between grain supply and demand and the reconstruction of China's food security strategy. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(6):895-903.]
[2]	ALLAN J A. Virtual water-the water, food, and trade nexus useful concept or misleading metaphor?. Water International, 2003,28(1):106-113. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2003.9724812
[3]	罗贞礼, 龙爱华, 黄璜, 等. 虚拟土战略与土地资源可持续利用的社会化管理. 冰川冻土, 2004,26(5):624-631.
	[ LUO Z L, LONG A H, HUANG H, et al. Virtual land strategy and socialization of management of sustainable utilization of land resources. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2004,26(5):624-631.]
[4]	ZHUO L, HOEKSTRA A Y, WU P, et al. Monthly blue water footprint caps in a river basin to achieve sustainable water consumption: The role of reservoirs. Pubmed, 2019,650(1):891-899.
[5]	刘爱民, 莉薛, 成升魁, 等. 我国大宗农产品贸易格局及对外依存度研究: 基于虚拟耕地资源的分析和评价. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(6):915-926.
	[ LIU A M, LI X, CHENG S K, et al. A study on the trade and external dependence of agricultural products in China: Analysis and evaluation based on virtual land resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(6):915-926.]
[6]	TUNINETTI M, RIDOLFI L, LAIO F. Charting out the future agricultural trade and its impact on water resources. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,714:136626. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136626
[7]	魏怡然, 玲邵, 张宝刚, 等. 北京市虚拟水消费与贸易. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(9):1962-1973.
	[ WEI Y R, LING S, ZHANG B G, et al. Virtual water consumption and trade of Beijing. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(9):1962-1973.]
[8]	贲培琪, 吴绍华, 李啸天, 等. 中国省际粮食贸易及其虚拟耕地流动模拟. 地理研究, 2016,35(8):1447-1456. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201608004
	[ BEN P Q, WU S H, LI X T, et al. China's inter-provincial grain trade and its virtual cultivated land flow simulation. Geographical Research, 2016,35(8):1447-1456.]
[9]	孙才志, 王中慧. 中国和“一带一路”沿线国家农产品虚拟水贸易的驱动因素. 水利经济, 2020,38(1):1-7.
	[ SUN C Z, WANG Z H. Driving factors for virtual water trade of agricultural products between China and countries along "Belt and Road". Geographical Research, 2020,38(1):1-7.]
[10]	王维方, 刘爱民, 强文丽. 中国大豆资源的虚拟土贸易及进口依存度分析. 自然资源学报, 2011,26(7):1139-1147.
	[ WANG W F, LIU A M, QIANG W L. Virtual land trades and external dependences of China's soybean resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011,26(7):1139-1147.]
[11]	金涛. 中国粮食作物种植结构调整及其水土资源利用效应. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(1):14-25.
	[ JIN T. The adjustment of China's grain cropping structure and its effect on the consumption of water and land resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019,34(1):14-25.]
[12]	王秀鹃, 胡继连. 中国粮食虚拟水国际贸易研究: 基于2001—2015年的数据. 山东社会科学, 2018, (2):117-122.
	[ WANG X J, HU J L. Research on China's virtual water international trade in grain: Based on data from 2001 to 2015. Shandong Social Sciences, 2018, (2):117-122.]
[13]	王琼. 中国粮食虚拟耕地进口的测度及其影响因素: 基于大豆、玉米、小麦和大米的分析. 财经理论与实践, 2018,39(3):134-139, 154.
	[ WANG Q. Research on the measurement of the grain virtual cultivated land import and its impact factors in China: Based on soybean, corn, wheat and rice. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2018,39(3):134-139, 154.]
[14]	谭圣林, 邱国玉, 熊育久. 投入产出法在虚拟水消费与贸易研究中的新应用. 自然资源学报, 2014,29(2):355-364.
	[ TAN S L, QIU G Y, XIONG Y J. New application of the input-output framework in the study of virtual water consumption and trade. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014,29(2):355-364.]
[15]	魏小平, 周升起. 农产品贸易中的虚拟资源理论研究进展评述. 齐鲁学刊, 2014, (6):94-98.
	[ WEI X P, ZHOU S Q. Review on the research progress of virtual resources in the procedure of agricultural products trade. Qilu Journal, 2014, (6):94-98.]
[16]	安婷莉, 韩昕雪琦, 高学睿, 等. 虚拟水理论发展及应用前景综述. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2020,18(2):44-61.
	[ AN T L, HAN X X Q, GAO X R, et al. A review of the development and application prospect of virtual water theory. South-to North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2020,18(2):44-61.]
[17]	ZHANG C, ANADON L D. A multi-regional input-output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China. Ecological Economics, 2014,100:159-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.006
[18]	强文丽, 刘爱民, 成升魁, 等. 中国农产品贸易的虚拟土地资源量化研究. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(8):1289-1297.
	[ QIANG W L, LIU A M, CHENG S K, et al. Quantification of virtual land resources in China's crop trade. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013,28(8):1289-1297.]
[19]	DALIN C, KONAR M, HANASAKI N, et al. Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012,109(16):5989-5994.
[20]	ZHANG J Q, ZHAO N Z, LIU X J, et al. Global virtual-land flow and saving through international cereal trade. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016,26(5):619-639. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1289-9
[21]	国际贸易中心. 国际贸易数据. http://wwwintracenorg/leatherline-portal/market-trends/trade-statistics, 2020-4-26.
	[ International Trade Centre. International trade datas. http://wwwintracenorg/leatherline-portal/market-trends/trade-statistics, 2020-4-26.]
[22]	LU F. China-US trade disputes in 2018: An overview. China & World Economy, 2018,26(5):83-103.
[23]	CHONG T T-L, LI X Y. Understanding the China-US trade war: Causes, economic impact, and the worst-case scenario. Economic and Political Studies, 2019,7(2):185-202. doi: 10.1080/20954816.2019.1595328
[24]	肖志敏, 杨军. 中美大豆贸易摩擦的经济影响及其启示: 基于GTAP模型测算. 农业经济与管理, 2019, (3):70-78.
	[ XIAO Z M, YANG J. Evaluating the effect of Sino-US soybean trade frictions and the enlightenment: Based on GTAP model. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2019, (3):70-78.]
[25]	方意, 和文佳, 荆中博. 中美贸易摩擦对中国金融市场的溢出效应研究. 财贸经济, 2019,40(6):55-69.
	[ FANG Y, HE W J, JING Z B. The spillover effects of China-US trade friction on China's financial markets. Finance & Trade Economics, 2019,40(6):55-69.]
[26]	联合国粮食及农业组织. 1996—2017年中国及其主要供应国的大豆贸易数据. http://www.fao.org/faostat, 2020-03-28.
	[ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Soybean trade datas for China and its major suppliers from 1996 to 2017. http://www.fao.org/faostat, 2020-03-28.]
[27]	王亮, 黄德林. 新时代背景下建立中日韩自贸区的经济影响研究: 基于CGE模型的分析. 经济论坛, 2019, (8):94-103.
	[ WANG L, HUANG D L. Research on the economic impact of establishing China-Japan-Korea Free Trade Agreement under the background of new era: Analysis based on CGE model. Economic Forum, 2019, (8):94-103.]
[28]	XIE W, XIONG W, PAN J, et al. Decreases in global beer supply due to extreme drought and heat. Nature Plants, 2018,4(11):964-973. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0263-1
[29]	WU F, GENG Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Assessing sustainability of soybean supply in China: Evidence from provincial production and trade data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,244:119006. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119006
[30]	YAO G, HERTEL T W, TAHERIPOUR F. Economic drivers of telecoupling and terrestrial carbon fluxes in the global soybean complex. Global Environmental Change, 2018,50:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.005
[31]	联合国粮食及农业组织. 2014年中国大豆投入产出数据. http://www.fao.org/faostat, 2020-03-28.
	[ Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Input-output datas of China's soybean in 2014. http://www.fao.org/faostat, 2020-03-28.]
[32]	联合国商品贸易统计数据库. 2014年中国大豆贸易数据. https://comtrade.un.org, 2020-04-20.
	[ UN Comtrade database. Soybean trade datas of China in 2014. https://comtrade.un.org, 2020-04-20.]
[33]	HORRIDGE M. SplitCom-programs to disaggregate a GTAP sector. Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 2005.
[34]	欧洲中期天气象预报中心. 2013—2014年全球气象数据. https://www.ecmwf.int, 2020-02-18.
	[ European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. Global Meteorological Datas from 2013 to 2014. https://www.ecmwf.int, 2020-02-18.]
[35]	PORTMANN F T, SIEBERT S, DöLL p. MIRCA2000: Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high‐resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2010,24(1):1-24.
[36]	HOEKSTRA A Y, HUNG P Q. Virtual water trade. Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2002.
[37]	ALLEN R G, PEREIRA L S. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Italy: FAO, Water Resources, Development and Management Service, 1998.
[38]	DAVIS K F, RULLI M C, SEVESO A, et al. Increased food production and reduced water use through optimized crop distribution. Nature Geoscience, 2017,10(12):919-924. doi: 10.1038/s41561-017-0004-5
[39]	中华人民共和国水利部. 2014年全国水利发展统计公报. http://wwwmwrgovcn/sj/#tjgb, 2014-12-31.
	[ Ministry of Water Resources of People's Republic of China. 2014 Statistic bulletin on China water activities. http://wwwmwrgovcn/sj/#tjgb, 2014-12-31.]
[40]	中华人民共和国国土资源部. 2015中国国土资源公报. http://wwwmnrgovcn/sj/tjgb, 2016-04-21.
	[ Ministry of Natural Resources of People's Republic of China. 2015 Statistic bulletin on China land activities. http://wwwmnrgovcn/sj/tjgb, 2016-04-21.]
[41]	LIU J G, HULL V, BATISTELLA M, et al. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 2013,18(2):26.
[42]	SUN J, MOONEY H, WU W B, et al. Importing food damages domestic environment: Evidence from global soybean trade. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 2018,115(21):5415.
[43]	孙晶, 刘建国, 杨新军, 等. 人类世可持续发展背景下的远程耦合框架及其应用. 地理学报, 2020,75(11):130-138.
	[ SUN J, LIU J G, YANG X J, et al. Sustainability in the anthropocene: Telecoupling framework and its applications. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(11):130-138.]

	情景描述
情景1	无关税情景,即中美双方取消对方大豆进口关税,但中美与其他四国大豆保持原关税不变
情景2	中国对美国大豆加征25%关税,并保持其他四国大豆原关税不变
情景3	中国对美国大豆加征25%关税,且取消其他四国大豆关税
情景4	中国保持美国大豆原关税不变,且取消其他四国大豆关税

	中国	巴西	美国	阿根廷	乌拉圭	加拿大
水/(m³·t^-1)	1968	298	1138	577	414	902
耕地面积/(hm²·t^-1)	0.56	0.35	0.31	0.36	0.42	0.37