基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210206

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

耦合生态系统服务供需和景观生态安全格局,解构城市群地区生态空间结构,是优化农业—城镇—生态网络空间布局的基础。基于生态系统服务供需理论,以福建东南沿海厦漳泉城市群为例,综合生态系统服务最重要区域和生态红线边界确定供给源地,结合自然、经济多要素构建消费格局,应用最小累积阻力模型建立景观生态安全格局,识别需求分区、生态流网络、关键节点等组分,采用分层叠加分析重构厦漳泉地区生态网络空间。结果显示：（1）供给源地占研究区总面积的41.64%,生态缓冲区、生态敏感区和生产生活区分别占22.67%、31.58%和4.11%;（2）供给源地集中于中西部丘陵山区,耗费低值区与供给源地分布一致,而高值区呈“井”字形分布特征,集中于沿海一带;（3）生态流通道网状化程度较高,中西部主要由森林构成,东部沿海区域主要由城镇水系和绿地系统、周边农田构成,驱动因素类型和强度均呈现显著的空间异质性;（4）提出构建厦漳泉地区“九区四组团一带九廊道多中心”的生态网络空间优化布局,协调区域间生产生活生态功能组合,促进经济—生态空间协同发展。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 生态网络空间, 最小累积阻力模型, 厦漳泉地区

Abstract:

Coupling the supply and demand of ecosystem service with the security pattern of landscape ecology, and deconstructing the ecological space structure of urban agglomerations are the basis for optimizing the spatial arrangement of agriculture-urban areas-ecology networks. Based on the theory of supply and demand for ecosystem service, ecosystem service supply area was determined by fusing the most important areas of the integrated ecosystem services and the boundaries of the ecological red line, by taking Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou Urban Agglomeration in the southeast coast of Fujian province as an example. In combination of natural and economic factors, the consumption pattern can be constructed. The minimum cumulative resistance model was further applied to establish a landscape ecology security pattern in order to identify landscape components, such as demand zones, network of ecological flows, and key nodes. Furthermore, the ecological network space of Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou region was reconstructed by utilizing layered overlay analysis. The results showed that: (1) The supply area occupied 41.64% of the study area, in addition, ecological buffer zones, ecological sensitive zones, and production and living zones accounted for 22.67%, 31.58%, and 4.11%, respectively. (2) The source of supply was mainly distributed in the hilly and mountainous areas of the central and western regions, where the low-cost areas of ecosystem service were located. The high-cost areas concentrated in the coastal regions were characterized by an octothorpe shaped distribution pattern. (3) Ecological flow paths were highly meshed. They were mainly composed of forests in the central and western regions, and urban water system, green space systems and surrounding farmland in the eastern coastal areas. Both the type and intensity of the driving factors suggested significant spatial heterogeneity. (4) Constructing an ecological network space optimization layout of "nine zones, four groups, one belt, nine corridors and multi-centers" in the study region was also proposed in this research, so as to coordinate the production-living-ecological function among the region and facilitate the synergetic development of the economic-ecological space.

Key words: ecosystem services, ecological networks, MCR model, Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou region

胡其玉, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 342-355.

HU Qi-yu, CHEN Song-lin. Optimizing the ecological networks based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services in Xiamen-Zhangzhou-Quanzhou region[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021, 36(2): 342-355.

图/表 7

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

参考文献 42

[1]	景永才, 陈利顶, 孙然好. 基于生态系统服务供需的城市群生态安全格局构建框架. 生态学报, 2018,38(12):4121-4131. doi: 10.5846/stxb201803090469
	[ JING Y C, CHEN L D, SUN R H. A theoretical research framework for ecological security pattern construction based on ecosystem services supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(12):4121-4131.]
[2]	SCHIRPKE U, CANDIAGO S, VIGL L E, et al. Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,651(1):928-941. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.235
[3]	HAO H, CHEN B, MA Z, et al. Assessing the ecological security of the estuary in view of the ecological services: A case study of the Xiamen Estuary. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017,137:12-23.
[4]	彭保发, 郑俞, 刘宇. 耦合生态服务的区域生态安全格局研究框架. 地理科学, 2018,38(3):361-367. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.03.005
	[ PENG B F, ZHENG Y, LIU Y. Coupling ecosystem services and regional ecological security pattern. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(3):361-367.]
[5]	OUYANG Z, ZHENG H, XIAO Y, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 2016,352(6292):1455-1459. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2295 pmid: 27313045
[6]	马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展. 地理学报, 2017,72(7):1277-1289. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707012
	[ MA L, LIU H, PENG J, et al. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(7):1277-1289.]
[7]	KHAN I, ZHAO M, KHAN S U, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of preferences for improvements in river basin ecosystem services and its validity for benefit transfer. Ecological Indicators, 2018,93:627-637. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.018
[8]	COSTANZA R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 2008,141(2):350-352. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020
[9]	肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 等. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展. 生态学报, 2016,36(10):3096-3102. doi: 10.5846/stxb201411172274
	[ XIAO Y, XIE G D, LU C X, et al. Involvement of ecosystem service flows in human wellbeing based on the relationship between supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(10):3096-3102.]
[10]	曾辉, 陈立顶, 丁圣彦. 景观生态学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2017: 107-132.
	[ ZENG H, CHEN L D, DING S Y. Landscape Ecology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2017: 107-132.]
[11]	任志远, 刘焱序. 基于价值量的区域生态安全评价方法探索: 以陕北能源区为例. 地理研究, 2013,32(10):1771-1781. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201310001
	[ REN Z Y, LIU Y X. Exploring the regional ecological security evaluation methods based on values: A case study in the energy region of Northern Shaanxi. Geographical Research, 2013,32(10):1771-1781.]
[12]	SERNA-CHAVEZ H M, SCHULP C J E, VAN BODEGOM P M, et al. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2014,39:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024
[13]	甄霖, 刘雪林, 魏云洁. 生态系统服务消费模式、计量及其管理框架构建. 资源科学, 2008,30(1):100-106.
	[ ZHEN L, LIU X L, WEI Y J. Consumption of ecosystem services: Models, measurement and management framework. Resources Science, 2008,30(1):100-106.]
[14]	FANG X, ZHAO W, FU B, et al. Landscape service capability, landscape service flow and landscape service demand: A new framework for landscape services and its use for landscape sustainability assessment. Progress in Physical Geography, 2015,39(6):817-836.
[15]	武爱彬, 赵艳霞, 沈会涛, 等. 京津冀区域生态系统服务供需格局时空演变研究. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018,34(11):968-975.
	[ WU A B, ZHAO Y X, SHEN H T, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern evolution of ecosystem service supply and demand in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018,34(11):968-975.]
[16]	MEHRING M, OTT E, HUMMEL D. Ecosystem services supply and demand assessment: Why social-ecological dynamics matter. Ecosystem Services, 2018,30:124-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.009
[17]	PULIGHE G, FAVA F, LUPIA F. Insights and opportunities from mapping ecosystem services of urban green spaces and potentials in planning. Ecosystem Services, 2016,22:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.004
[18]	HEGETSCHWEILER K T, DE VRIES S, ARNBERGER A, et al. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017,21:48-59.
[19]	BALZAN M V, CARUANA J, ZAMMIT A. Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state. Land Use Policy, 2018,75:711-725. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.025
[20]	方创琳, 周成虎, 顾朝林, 等. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径. 地理学报, 2016,71(4):531-550.
	[ FANG C L, ZHOU C H, GU C L, et al. Theoretical analysis of interactive coupled effects between urbanization and eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(4):531-550.]
[21]	BARÓ F, PALOMO I, ZULIAN G, et al. Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: A case study in the Barcelona Metropolitan region. Land Use Policy, 2016,57:405-417. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006
[22]	BAGSTAD K J, VILLA F, BATKER D, et al. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society, 2014,19:(2):64, Doi: 10.5751/ES-06523-190264.
[23]	杨姗姗, 邹长新, 沈渭寿, 等. 基于生态红线划分的生态安全格局构建: 以江西省为例. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(1):250-258.
	[ YANG S S, ZOU C X, SHEN W T, et al. Construction of ecological security patterns based on ecological red line: A case study of Jiangxi province. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016,35(1):250-258.]
[24]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.
	[ XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015,30(8):1243-1254.]
[25]	谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 2008,23(5):911-919. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.019
	[ XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.]
[26]	LOOMIS J, KENT P, STRANGE L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics, 2004,33(1):103-117. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7
[27]	刘慧敏, 刘绿怡, 丁圣彦. 人类活动对生态系统服务流的影响. 生态学报, 2017,37(10):3232-3242. doi: 10.5846/stxb201602250325
	[ LIU H M, LIU L Y, DING S Y. The impact of human activities on ecosystem services flow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(10):3232-3242.]
[28]	GEIJZENDORFFER I R, MARTÍN-LÓPEZ B, ROCHE P K. Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments. Ecological Indicators, 2015,52:320-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016
[29]	黄隆杨, 刘胜华, 方莹, 等. 基于“质量—风险—需求”框架的武汉市生态安全格局构建. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(2):615-626.
	[ HUANG L Y, LIU S H, FANG Y, et al. Construction of Wuhan's ecological security pattern under the "quality-risk-requirement" framework. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019,30(2):615-626.]
[30]	马明, 顾康康, 李咏. 基于生态安全格局的城乡生态空间布局与优化: 以宣城市为例. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019,40(4):93-102.
	[ MA M, GU K K, LI Y. Urban and rural ecological space layout and optimization based on ecological security pattern: Taking Xuancheng city as an example. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019,40(4):93-102.]
[31]	蒙吉军, 王雅, 王晓东, 等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的贵阳市景观生态安全格局构建. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016,25(7):1052-1061. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201607006
	[ MENG J J, WANG Y, WANG X D, et al. Construction of landscape ecological security pattern in Guiyang based on MCR model. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016,25(7):1052-1061.]
[32]	WEI W, CHEN D, WANG L, et al. Global synthesis of the classifications, distributions, benefits and issues of terracing. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016,159:388-403. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.010
[33]	郑达贤, 汤小华. 福建省生态功能区划研究. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2007: 41-56.
	[ ZHENG X D, TANG X H. Eco-functional Regionalization of Fujian Province. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2007: 41-56.]
[34]	李潇然, 李阳兵, 王永艳, 等. 三峡库区县域景观生态安全格局识别与功能分区: 以奉节县为例. 生态学杂志, 2015,34(7):1959-1967.
	[ LI X R, LI Y B, WANG Y Y, et al. Identification of ecological security patterns for county-level landscapes and function division of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area: A case in Fengjie. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015,34(7):1959-1967.]
[35]	蔡青, 曾光明, 石林, 等. 基于栅格数据和图论算法的生态廊道识别. 地理研究, 2012,31(8):1523-1534.
	[ CAI Q, ZENG G M, SHI L, et al. Identifying ecological corridors using shortest path algorithm based on raster data. Geographical Research, 2012,31(8):1523-1534.]
[36]	刘慧敏, 范玉龙, 丁圣彦. 生态系统服务流研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(7):2161-2171.
	[ LIU H M, FAN Y L, DING S Y. Research progress of ecosystem service flow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(7):2161-2171.]
[37]	杨天荣, 匡文慧, 刘卫东, 等. 基于生态安全格局的关中城市群生态空间结构优化布局. 地理研究, 2017,36(3):441-452. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703004
	[ YANG T R, KUANG W H, LIU W D, et al. Optimizing the layout of eco-spatial structure in Guanzhong Urban Agglomeration based on the ecological security pattern. Geographical Research, 2017,36(3):441-452.]
[38]	朱鹤健. 我国亚热带山地生态系统脆弱区生态恢复的战略思想: 基于长汀水土保持11年研究成果. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(9):1498-1506. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.09.005
	[ ZHU H J. Strategies on eco-restoration in the subtropical mountain ecosystem fragility areas, China: Based on the achievement of eleven years' research in Changting county. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013,28(9):1498-1506.]
[39]	池源, 石洪华, 孙景宽, 等. 城镇化背景下海岛资源环境承载力评估. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(8):1374-1384.
	[ CHI Y, SHI H H, SUN J K, et al. Evaluation on island resources and environment carrying capacity under the background of urbanization. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(8):1374-1384.]
[40]	DUCHARDT C J, PORENSKY L M, AUGUSTINE D J, et al. Disturbance shapes avian communities on a grassland-sagebrush ecotone. Ecosphere, 2018,9(10):e02483, Doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2483. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2483
[41]	陈峰, 李红波, 张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价. 地理学报, 2019,74(3):432-445. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201903003
	[ CHEN F, LI H B, ZHANG A L. Ecological risk assessment based on terrestrial ecosystem services in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(3):432-445.]
[42]	陶岸君, 王兴平. 面向协同规划的县域空间功能分区实践研究: 以安徽省郎溪县为例. 城市规划, 2016,40(11):101-112.
	[ TAO A J, WANG X P. Spatial function zoning practice at county level oriented at collaborative planning: A case study of Langxi county, Anhui province. City Planning Review, 2016,40(11):101-112.]

评价因子	单位	权重	阻力值
评价因子	单位	权重	10	30	50	70	90
人口密度	人·km^-2	0.251	0~50	50~500	500~3000	3000~6000	>6000
土地利用类型	—	0.251	森林、湿地、水域	灌木林、草地	耕地	裸地等	建设用地
距交通干线距离	m	0.027	>5000	2000~5000	1000~2000	500~1000	<500
距水源涵养区距离	km	0.251	0~1	1~3	3~5	5~10	>10
坡度	(°)	0.054	0~5	5~10	10~25	25~35	>35
高程	m	0.054	0~200	200~400	400~600	600~1000	>1000
土壤侵蚀强度	—	0.114	微弱	轻度	中度	强度	极强和剧烈

核心概念	解释说明
九区	生态保育核心区与水土保持敏感区	将生态保育核心区与水土保持敏感区划分为西北部水源涵养与生态保育、中部水土流失敏感、西南部水源涵养与生态保育三大区
	生态—农业交错区	将生态—农业交错区划分为中北部生态农业、安溪高地生态农业、中南部生态农业三大区
	城郊集约农业区	将城郊集约农业区划分为惠安集约农业生产、厦—漳外围集约农业生产、东南部集约农业生产三大区
四组团	一核	厦门市中心城区
	双翼	泉州市和漳州市中心
	一重心	漳江河口城镇中心
一带九廊	一带	海岸生态防护带
一带九廊	九廊道	人工—自然生态廊道、自然生态廊道共同形成“五横四纵”生态廊道网络
多中心	城镇中心	市区城镇中心
	城镇中心	县级城镇中心
	生态关键中心	—