淮海经济区城乡空间融合格局及形成机制

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200811

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1897-1907.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200811

• "淮海经济区城乡融合发展理论与实践"专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

淮海经济区城乡空间融合格局及形成机制

车冰清¹, 朱传耿¹, 仇方道²

1.南京体育学院体育发展与规划研究院,南京 210014;
2.江苏师范大学地理测绘与城乡规划学院,徐州 221116

收稿日期:2020-02-15 修回日期:2020-04-26 出版日期:2020-08-28 发布日期:2020-08-28
通讯作者: 朱传耿（1963- ）,男,江苏睢宁人,博士,教授,主要从事区域规划与经济地理研究。E-mail: chuangeng@263.net
作者简介:车冰清（1981- ）,男,江苏沛县人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事区域经济合作与城乡融合发展研究。E-mail: chebingqing@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41671122,41901205）

Regional differential characteristics of urban-rural space integration development in Huaihai Economic Zone and its formation mechanism

CHE Bing-qing¹, ZHU Chuan-geng¹, QIU Fang-dao²

1. Sports Development and Planning Academy, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing 210014, China;
2. School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China

Received:2020-02-15 Revised:2020-04-26 Online:2020-08-28 Published:2020-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城乡融合发展是解决城乡差距过大、城乡不平衡不协调问题的关键举措,也是城乡动态均衡的发展过程。聚落镶嵌、交通可达、发展均衡是城乡融合发展的空间表象。基于空间视角构建城乡融合发展的评价指标体系,综合运用景观分析、可达性分析和耦合协调分析等方法揭示淮海经济区城乡空间融合发展的要素格局特征,并结合回归模型探究其形成机制。结论如下：（1）城乡空间融合是城乡结构优化的进程,可以从城乡聚落连通性、城乡交通便捷性和城乡发展均衡性等方面研判城乡空间融合发展的综合水平。（2）淮海经济区城乡空间融合发展的各要素指标存在较大差异,综合水平指标由中心向外围递减,可划分为协调融合型、协调关联型和欠协调分割型三种地域类型。（3）经济发展水平、城乡规模、产业关联是影响该区域城乡空间融合的关键动力因素,而传统农业和工业的推动作用不显著。镇域和村域尺度城乡融合发展的理论和实证研究是后续工作的重要方向。

关键词: 城乡融合, 地域类型, 影响机制, 淮海经济区, 评价指标

Abstract: Urban-rural integration development is the key initiative to solve the problems of excessive income gap between urban and rural areas and unbalanced and uncoordinated urban-rural development, and it is also the inevitable requirement of rural revitalization. This paper discusses the connotation of urban-rural integration development, and constructs an evaluation index system of urban-rural integration development by entropy weight method. Based on these, it reveals the characteristics of the factor pattern of urban-rural integration development in Huaihai Economic Zone in combination of the methods of landscape analysis, spatial analysis and coupling coordination analysis, and explores the influence mechanism of urban-rural integration development combined with regression model, in order to provide a theoretical reference for the urban-rural integration development in the border areas of underdeveloped provinces. The results are as follows: (1) Urban-rural integration is the process of rebuilding urban-rural relationship. The comprehensive level of urban-rural integration development can be described from the connectivity of urban-rural space, the convenience of urban-rural transportation, the balance of urban-rural public services and the livability of urban-rural ecological environment. (2) There are great differences in the indicators of urban-rural integration development in Huaihai Economic Zone. The comprehensive level index decreases from the center to the periphery. According to the spatial correlation and index coordination, Huaihai Economic Zone can be divided into three types: coordinated development region, associated development region and divided development region. (3) The level of economic development, the scale of urban-rural areas, and the industrial linkage are the key dynamic factors affecting the urban-rural integration development. However, the development of traditional agriculture and industry, as well as the urban-rural population structure, have no significant effect on regional urban-rural integration development. The theoretical and empirical research on urban-rural integration development at the scales of town and village is an important direction of follow-up work.

Key words: evaluation index, Huaihai Economic Zone, regional type, urban-rural integration, influence mechanism

车冰清, 朱传耿, 仇方道. 淮海经济区城乡空间融合格局及形成机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1897-1907.

CHE Bing-qing, ZHU Chuan-geng, QIU Fang-dao. Regional differential characteristics of urban-rural space integration development in Huaihai Economic Zone and its formation mechanism[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(8): 1897-1907.

参考文献

[1] 李小建. 欠发达区乡村聚落空间演变. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 1-10.
[LI X J.Spatial Changes of Rural Settlements in China's Less-developed Region. Beijing: Science Press, 2019: 1-10.]
[2] 李旭旦. 人文地理学. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1984: 181-182.
[LI X D. Human Geography.Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 1984: 181-182.]
[3] 金其铭. 聚落地理. 南京:南京师范大学出版社, 1984: 6-10.
[JIN Q M. Settlement Geography.Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University Press, 1984: 6-10.]
[4] MCGEE T G.The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis. The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, 1991: 3-25.
[5] DOUGLASS M.A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural-urban linkages: An agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. Third World Planning Review, 1998, 20(1): 1-33.
[6] LYNCH K.Rural-urban Interaction in the Developing World. London, New York: Routledge, 2005: 13-16.
[7] LIU Y S, LI Y H.Revitalize the world's countryside. Nature, 2017, 548(7667): 275-277.
[8] 车冰清, 陆玉麒, 王毅. 江苏省城乡空间融合的形态演化研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(7): 1022-1031.
[CHE B Q, LU Y Q, WANG Y.Research on spatial form evolution of urban and rural integration development in Jiangsu province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(7): 1022-1031.]
[9] GUO L, CHEHATA N, MALLET C, et al.Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for urban scene classification using random forests. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, 66(1): 56-66.
[10] 关兴良, 方创琳, 周敏, 等. 武汉城市群城镇用地空间扩展时空特征分析. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(9): 1447-1459.
[GUAN X L, FANG C L, ZHOU M, et al.Spatial and temporal characteristics of spatial expansion of urban land in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(9): 1447-1459.]
[11] 于元赫, 李子君, 林锦阔, 等. 沂河流域土地利用时空变化图谱特征分析. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 975-988.
[YU Y H, LI Z J, LIN J K, et al.TUPU characteristics of spatiotemporal variation for land use in the Yihe River Basin. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(5): 975-988.]
[12] LABBE D, MUSIL C.Periurban land redevelopment in Vietnam under market socialism. Urban Studies, 2013, 51(6): 1146-1161.
[13] BITTNE C, SOFER M.Land use changes in the rural-urban fringe: An Israeli case study. Land Use Policy, 2013, 33(4): 11-19.
[14] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.
[LIU Y S.Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the New Era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.]
[15] 陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 中国土地市场对城乡融合发展的影响. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.
[CHEN K Q, LONG H L.Impacts of land market on urban-rural integrated development in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.]
[16] 李伯华, 刘沛林, 窦银娣, 等. 中国传统村落人居环境转型发展及其研究进展. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10): 1886-1900.
[LI B H, LIU P L, DOU Y D, et al.Research progress on transformation development of traditional villages' human settlement in China. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10): 1886-1900.]
[17] 姚青, 舒帮荣, 雍新琴. 淮海经济区城市用地全要素生产率综合评价与影响因素研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(8): 1823-1832.
[YAO Q, SHU B R, YONG X Q.Comprehensive evaluation and influencing factors of urban land utilization total factor productivity in Huaihai Economic Zone. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(8): 1823-1832.]
[18] 薛丽萍, 欧向军, 曾晨, 等. 淮海经济区主要城市经济联系的空间作用分析. 经济地理, 2014, 34(11): 52-57.
[XUE L P, OU X J, ZENG C, et al.The spatial effect of economic linkage between the major cities in Huaihai Economic Area. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(11): 52-57.]
[19] GONG P, CHEN B, LI X, et al.Mapping essential urban land use categories in China (EULUC-China): Preliminary results for 2018. Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(3): 182-187.
[20] 张富刚, 刘彦随. 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 115-122.
[ZHANG F G, LIU Y S.Dynamic mechanism and models of regional rural development in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 115-122.]
[21] 刘明辉, 卢飞. 城乡要素错配与城乡融合发展: 基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究. 农业技术经济, 2019, (2): 33-46.
[LIU M H, LU F.Study on the influence of factor mismatch on urban-rural integration development: Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2019, (2): 33-46.]
[22] 何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.
[HE R W.Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.]

淮海经济区城乡空间融合格局及形成机制

Regional differential characteristics of urban-rural space integration development in Huaihai Economic Zone and its formation mechanism

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	马晓冬, 李鑫, 顾晓波, 胡睿. 城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866.
[2]	张新林, 仇方道, 朱传耿. 时空交互视角下淮海经济区城乡融合发展水平演化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1867-1880.
[3]	周佳宁, 毕雪昊, 邹伟. “流空间”视域下淮海经济区城乡融合发展驱动机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1881-1896.
[4]	牛善栋, 方斌, 崔翠, 黄仕辉. 乡村振兴视角下耕地利用转型的时空格局及路径分析——以淮海经济区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1908-1925.
[5]	李鑫, 马晓冬, KhuongManh-ha, 祝金燕. 城乡融合导向下乡村发展动力机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1926-1939.
[6]	何杰, 金晓斌, 梁鑫源, 赵庆利, 韩博, 肖颖, 吴小欢, 胡静, 周寅康. 城乡融合背景下淮海经济区乡村发展潜力——以苏北地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1940-1957.
[7]	张英浩, 陈江龙, 高金龙, 蒋伟萱. 经济转型视角下长三角城市土地利用效率影响机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6): 1157-1170.
[8]	杨忍, 文琦, 王成, 杜国明, 李伯华, 曲衍波, 李红波, 许家伟, 贺艳华, 马利邦, 李智, 乔陆印, 曹智, 戈大专, 屠爽爽, 陈秧分. 新时代中国乡村振兴：探索与思考——乡村地理青年学者笔谈[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 890-910.
[9]	纪学朋, 黄贤金, 陈逸, 王丹阳, 宋娅娅. 基于陆海统筹视角的国土空间开发建设适宜性评价——以辽宁省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(3): 451-463.
[10]	陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 中国土地市场对城乡融合发展的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.
[11]	王壬, 陈莹, 陈兴伟. 区域水资源可持续利用评价指标体系构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8): 1441-1452.
[12]	王瑛, 陈远生, 朱龙腾, 蒋蕾, 李璐, 沈恬. 北京市高校行业用水评价指标体系构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5): 839-846.
[13]	王国刚, 刘彦随, 刘玉. 城镇化进程中农村劳动力转移响应机理与调控——以东部沿海地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(1): 1-9.
[14]	邱云美. 基于价值工程的生态旅游资源评价研究——以浙江省丽水市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(12): 2158-2168.
[15]	赵媛, 郝丽莎. 我国石油资源空间流动的地域类型分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 93-103.