自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1881-1896.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200810

• "淮海经济区城乡融合发展理论与实践"专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

“流空间”视域下淮海经济区城乡融合发展驱动机制

周佳宁, 毕雪昊, 邹伟   

  1. 南京农业大学公共管理学院,南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-01 修回日期:2020-04-22 出版日期:2020-08-28 发布日期:2020-08-28
  • 通讯作者: 邹伟(1972- ),男,四川渠县人,博士,教授,研究方向为土地经济与政策。E-mail: njauzw@126.com
  • 作者简介:周佳宁(1990- ),男,安徽池州人,博士研究生,研究方向为土地经济与政策。E-mail: jnzhounjau@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(18AGL014)

Driving mechanism of urban-rural integration in Huaihai Economic Zone: Based on the space of flow

ZHOU Jia-ning, BI Xue-hao, ZOU Wei   

  1. College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2019-11-01 Revised:2020-04-22 Online:2020-08-28 Published:2020-08-28

摘要: 从要素流动多维重构淮海经济区城乡融合评价体系,以动态耦合协调度模型测度城乡融合水平并分析其时空分异规律,最后从“流空间”视角探索城乡融合发展驱动机制。结果表明:(1)研究区城乡融合水平整体较低但趋势向好,其正向空间关联和局域内向集聚特征明显。(2)流空间视角下区域呈多中心网络结构,且在人流和资金流下相对紧密,而物流和信息流下“核—辐”结构突出。(3)推动核心区集聚效应转向扩散效应,发挥各城市节点比较优势,合理调节要素流动强度、方向和质量,并在实施地方和国家政策时配套相关制度,方能实现淮海经济区城乡融合“量”“质”同升。

关键词: 城乡融合, 淮海经济区, 流空间, 驱动机制, 要素流动

Abstract: To restructure the evaluation index system of urban and rural integration from population, space, economy, society and ecological environment, the dynamic coupling coordination model was selected to measure the urban and rural multi-dimensional integration level, and the global Moran index and the local indicators of spatial association (LISA) were used to reveal the spatial distribution characteristics of the urban-rural multi-dimensional integration level in Huaihai Economic Zone. And then, the spatial correlation pattern in the study area was analyzed by the spatial structure index (SSI) from the population flow, logistics flow, capital flow and information flow. And finally, the driving mechanisms of urban-rural integration in the study area were explored by the fixed effect spatial error model (SEM-FE) from the perspective of these four types of flow. The results are as follows: (1) The urban-rural multi-dimensional integration levels are low but go well, the overall level in the research area rose from 0.016 in 2003 to 0.028 in 2017, with an annual rate of 0.08%. When the urban-rural multidimensional integration structure maintains stable in the research period, the economic integration is the highest, while the spatial integration is the lowest. (2) The regional interrelation is close in the context of population flow and capital flow, while it shows a "core-periphery" structure under the material flow and information flow. In general, the spatial structure in Huaihai Economic Zone is a decentralized network with multiple central cities, which lays a good foundation for the future development of urban-rural integration and inter-regional coordinated development. (3) In order to achieve the improvement of quantity and quality of urban-rural integration in Huaihai Economic Zone, we should shift the effect of the core area from agglomeration to diffusion, and need reasonable labor distribution and trading to stimulate the regional comparative advantage fully of each city node. Moreover, it is necessary to assist a series of cultural, economic and political systems in the implementation of local and national policies, because urban and rural integration development is a big cycle system of the socio-economy.

Key words: factor flowing, urban-rural integration, driving forces, space of flow, Huaihai Economic Zone