城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200808

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1853-1866.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200808

• "淮海经济区城乡融合发展理论与实践"专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径

马晓冬^1,2,3, 李鑫^1,2,3, 顾晓波¹, 胡睿¹

1.江苏师范大学地理测绘与城乡规划学院,徐州 221116;
2.江苏师范大学城乡融合发展研究院,徐州 221116;
3.江苏师范大学特色镇村建设与土地管理研究基地,徐州 221116

收稿日期:2020-02-20 修回日期:2020-05-19 出版日期:2020-08-28 发布日期:2020-08-28
作者简介:马晓冬（1971- ）,男,江苏徐州人,博士,教授,研究方向为乡村地理与区域规划。E-mail: xiaodgma@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41971221）; 教育部人文社会科学基金项目（19YJCZH089）; 江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK20191468）

The characteristics and path of urban-rural transition in Huaihai Economic Zone from the perspective of urban-rural integration

MA Xiao-dong^1,2,3, LI Xin^1,2,3, GU Xiao-bo¹, HU Rui¹

1. School of Geography, Geomatics & Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China;
2. Institute of Urban-Rural Integrated Development, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China;
3. Research Base on Characteristic Town-Village Construction and Land Management, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China

Received:2020-02-20 Revised:2020-05-19 Online:2020-08-28 Published:2020-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城乡融合不仅是社会经济结构的转换过程,也是城乡持续转型过程。以淮海经济区为研究区,剖析了城乡融合发展面临的困境,通过城乡转型多维定量评价与比较,诊断了研究区城乡融合状态,提出了推进城乡融合发展的路径。结果表明：（1）淮海经济区城乡融合发展面临“两分离一切变”而导致的“三不足”的困境,即传统农区的“居业分离”、资源型城市的“产城分离”和省际交界区的“切变效应”,导致乡村转型的内在动力不足、城市对乡村的辐射带动力不足和城乡公共服务供给的区域协同力不足。（2）城乡转型状态呈现出经济、社会和空间多维相关的特征,转型过程的城乡异速不同步和转型格局的城乡异构非均衡现象并存;采用对比聚类法,划分出城乡转型滞后型、乡村转型滞后型、城市转型滞后型和城乡转型同步型四种类型。（3）推进淮海经济区城乡融合发展的关键是要突破城乡二元结构和区域发展“碎片化”困境,分类推进城乡协同转型发展,加强省际交界区城乡发展的跨域协同。

关键词: 跨域协同, 城乡融合, 淮海经济区, 城乡转型

Abstract: Urban-rural integration is not only the transformation process of social and economic structure, but also the shaping process of urban-rural transitional development, that is to say, urban-rural integration can provide dynamics for urban and rural transitional development, and urban-rural transitional development is the physical performance of urban-rural integration. This paper takes Huaihai Economic Zone (HEZ) as the study area to analyze the difficulties faced by urban-rural integration development, to investigate the status of urban-rural integration development with multi-dimensional quantitative measurement, and lastly to put forward the measures of promoting urban-rural integration development. The results are as follows: (1) The urban-rural integration in HEZ is facing the predicament of 'three deficiencies' caused by the 'two separations and one shear effect', that is, the separation of 'settlements and agriculture' in traditional agricultural areas, the separation of 'production and living' in resource-based cities, and the 'shear effect' in provincial border areas. These deficiencies lead to the insufficient internal dynamics for rural transformation, insufficient power for urban radiation to rural areas, and insufficient regional synergy among different provinces on urban-rural public service supply, respectively. (2) The state of urban-rural transformation in HEZ has the characteristics of multidimensional correlation of various driving factors, asynchronous urban-rural development speed and heterogeneity and disequilibrium in spatial pattern. Through comparison and cluster analysis, urban-rural transformation in HEZ can be classified into four types: urban-rural transformation lag, rural transformation lag, urban transformation lag and urban-rural transformation synchronization. Its spatial distribution has distinct provincial agglomeration characteristics, verifying that the correlation between urban transformation and rural transformation in HEZ is not strong, its coordination is also not enough, and it has the 'shear effect' among provinces. (3) The key measures of promoting the urban-rural transitional development of HEZ from urban-rural integration perspective lie in breaking through the predicament of 'dual structure' in urban-rural areas and the 'fragmentation' of regional development, enhancing the coordinated transformation and development of urban-rural areas by differentiated policies, and strengthening the cross-domain collaboration of urban-rural development in provincial border areas.

Key words: cross-domain collaboration, urban-rural integration, Huaihai Economic Zone, urban-rural transformation

马晓冬, 李鑫, 顾晓波, 胡睿. 城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866.

MA Xiao-dong, LI Xin, GU Xiao-bo, HU Rui. The characteristics and path of urban-rural transition in Huaihai Economic Zone from the perspective of urban-rural integration[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866.

参考文献

[1] 金成武. 中国城乡融合发展与理论融合: 兼谈当代发展经济学理论的批判借鉴. 经济研究, 2019, 54(8): 183-197.
[JIN C W.A critical reference to contemporary theories of development economics: A theoretical synthesis base on Chinese urban-rural integrated development. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(8): 183-197.]
[2] 杨志恒. 城乡融合发展的理论溯源、内涵与机制分析. 地理与地理信息科学, 2019, 35(4): 111-116.
[YANG Z H.Theory, connotation and mechanism of urban-rural integration development. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2019, 35(4): 111-116.]
[3] 何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 5-18.
[HE R W.Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 5-18.]
[4] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.
[LIU Y S.Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the New Era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.]
[5] 叶超. 空间正义与新型城镇化研究的方法论. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 146-154.
[YE C.The methodology on spatial justice and new-type urbanization. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 146-154.]
[6] 陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 中国土地市场对城乡融合发展的影响. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.
[CHEN K Q, LONG H L.Impacts of land market on urban-rural integrated development in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.]
[7] 杨忍, 文琦, 王成, 等. 新时代中国乡村振兴: 探索与思考: 乡村地理青年学者笔谈. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 890-910.
[YANG R, WEN Q, WANG C, et al.Discussions and thoughts of the path to China's rural revitalization in the New Era: Notes of the young rural geography scholars. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 890-910.]
[8] 李文荣, 陈建伟. 城乡等值化的理论剖析及实践启示. 城市问题, 2012, (1): 22-25, 29.
[LI W R, CHEN J W.Theoretical analysis and practical enlightenment of urban-rural equivalents. Urban Problems, 2012, (1): 22-25, 29.]
[9] 戈大专, 龙花楼, 李裕瑞, 等. 城镇化进程中我国粮食生产系统多功能转型时空格局研究: 以黄淮海地区为例. 经济地理, 2018, 38(4): 147-156, 182.
[GE D Z, LONG H L, LI Y R, et al.The spatio-temporal pattern of multifunctional transformation of China's grain production system in the process of urbanization: The case of Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(4): 147-156, 182.]
[10] 贺雪峰. 城乡二元结构视野下的乡村振兴. 北京工业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018, 18(5): 1-7.
[HE X F.Rural vitalization under the urban-rural dualistic structure system. Journal of Beijing University of Technology: Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 18(5): 1-7.]
[11] 景普秋. 资源型区域矿—城—乡冲突及其协调发展研究. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(5): 146-151.
[JING P Q.Studies on mine-urban-rural conflict and coordination development in resource-based regions. Urban Development Studies, 2013, 20(5): 146-151.]
[12] 周伟. 跨域公共问题协同治理: 理论预期、实践难题与路径选择. 甘肃社会科学, 2015, (2): 171-174.
[ZHOU W.Collaborative governance of cross-domain public issues: Theoretical expectations, practical difficulties, and path choices. Gansu Social Sciences, 2015, (2): 171-174.]
[13] 朱传耿, 王振波, 仇方道. 省际边界区域城市化模式研究. 人文地理, 2006, 21(1): 1-5, 128.
[ZHU C G, WANG Z B, QIU F D.Study on urbanization model of provincial border-regions. Human Geography, 2006, 21(1): 1-5, 128.]
[14] 曹智, 李裕瑞, 陈玉福. 城乡融合背景下乡村转型与可持续发展路径探析. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2560-2571.
[CAO Z, LI Y R, CHEN Y F.Approaches to rural transformation and sustainable development in the context of urban-rural integration. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2560-2571.]
[15] 颜丙峰. 产城融合发展的现实考量与路径提升: 以山东省产城融合发展为例. 山东社会科学, 2017, (5): 184-188.
[YAN B F.Practical considerations and path enhancement of industry-city integration development: A case study of industry-city integration development in Shandong province. Shandong Social Sciences, 2017, (5): 184-188.]
[16] FEIOCK R.The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 2013, 41(3): 78-81.

城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径

The characteristics and path of urban-rural transition in Huaihai Economic Zone from the perspective of urban-rural integration

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张新林, 仇方道, 朱传耿. 时空交互视角下淮海经济区城乡融合发展水平演化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1867-1880.
[2]	周佳宁, 毕雪昊, 邹伟. “流空间”视域下淮海经济区城乡融合发展驱动机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1881-1896.
[3]	车冰清, 朱传耿, 仇方道. 淮海经济区城乡空间融合格局及形成机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1897-1907.
[4]	牛善栋, 方斌, 崔翠, 黄仕辉. 乡村振兴视角下耕地利用转型的时空格局及路径分析——以淮海经济区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1908-1925.
[5]	李鑫, 马晓冬, KhuongManh-ha, 祝金燕. 城乡融合导向下乡村发展动力机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1926-1939.
[6]	何杰, 金晓斌, 梁鑫源, 赵庆利, 韩博, 肖颖, 吴小欢, 胡静, 周寅康. 城乡融合背景下淮海经济区乡村发展潜力——以苏北地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1940-1957.
[7]	杨忍, 文琦, 王成, 杜国明, 李伯华, 曲衍波, 李红波, 许家伟, 贺艳华, 马利邦, 李智, 乔陆印, 曹智, 戈大专, 屠爽爽, 陈秧分. 新时代中国乡村振兴：探索与思考——乡村地理青年学者笔谈[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 890-910.
[8]	纪学朋, 黄贤金, 陈逸, 王丹阳, 宋娅娅. 基于陆海统筹视角的国土空间开发建设适宜性评价——以辽宁省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(3): 451-463.
[9]	戈大专, 龙花楼, 乔伟峰. 改革开放以来我国粮食生产转型分析及展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(3): 658-670.
[10]	陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 中国土地市场对城乡融合发展的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.