区域产业结构转型升级水平与旅游扶贫效率耦合关系——以武陵山片区为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200708

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以武陵山片区42个国家级贫困县（市、区）为案例地,综合运用SBM模型、改进的熵值法与耦合协调模型,揭示产业结构转型升级水平与旅游扶贫效率耦合协调关系的时空演化特征。结果表明:（1）武陵山片区整体及各分片区产业结构转型升级指数均呈波浪式变化,湖北片区、重庆片区以及武陵山片区整体的旅游扶贫效率呈上升态势,而湖南片区和贵州片区略有下降;（2）产业结构转型升级水平与旅游扶贫效率不耦合、不协调的县域单元主要集中在武陵山片区中部,数量逐年减少,实现耦合和协调的县域数量显著增加并向边缘地带形成集聚态势;（3）不耦合失调（类型1）向耦合协调（类型2）转变是核心转变路径,促使类型2的地区数量显著增多,并逐渐在研究区域边缘形成带状分布。研究可为集中连片特困地区产业结构优化升级和跨越贫困陷阱提供参考借鉴。

关键词: 旅游扶贫效率, 耦合协调模型, 武陵山片区, SBM模型, 产业结构转型升级

Abstract: Eliminating poverty and upgrading the industrial structure are major challenges faced by contiguous poverty-stricken areas in the three-year campaign against poverty. Since the national strategy of targeted poverty alleviation was put forward, the tourism industry has become one of the crucial avenues through which residents increase their income, optimize the industrial structure, promote economic development, and escape the poverty trap. It is therefore urgent to study the coupling coordination relationship between industrial structure transformation and upgrade and tourism poverty alleviation efficiency. Taking the 42 national poverty-stricken counties in the Wuling Mountain Area as examples, the SBM model and improved entropy method are applied to measure the tourism poverty alleviation efficiency and industrial structure transformation and upgrading index, respectively. The coupling coordination model is then employed to describe the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the coupling coordination relationship between industrial structure transformation and upgrade and tourism poverty alleviation efficiency in the Wuling Mountain Area. The results are as follows. (1) The industrial structure transformation and upgrading index of the study area as a whole and each sub-area shows irregular changes, and the future development trend is not obvious. Tourism poverty alleviation efficiency declined slightly at the end of the sample period in Hunan and Guizhou subareas, while Hubei and Chongqing subareas showed a significant upward trend. (2) The uncoupled and uncoordinated county units of industrial structure transformation and upgrade and tourism poverty alleviation efficiency are concentrated in the central part of Wuling Mountain Area, and the number of units decreased annually. The number of counties that achieved coupling and coordination increased significantly and presented an agglomeration trend to the edge zone. (3) The transition from uncoupling disorder (type 1) to coupling coordination (type 2) is the core transformation path, which leads to the fact that the number of type 2 regions increased significantly, and gradually formed a band distribution at the edges of the study area. Finally, based on the above research results, it is suggested that the poverty-stricken areas should actively strengthen the integrated development of tourism industry and other industries, and give full play to the two-way radiation effect of industrial structure transformation and upgrade and tourism poverty alleviation efficiency. This would reconstruct and optimize the coupling path and spatial distribution pattern of the two, which enables the coordinated development of industrial structure changes and poverty alleviation through tourism. In turn, this realizes the optimization and adjustment of the industrial structure in poor areas and allows for smooth poverty alleviation.

Key words: industrial structure transformation and upgrading, SBM model, Wuling Mountain Area, coupling coordination model, tourism poverty alleviation efficiency

王凯, 朱芳书, 甘畅, 席建超. 区域产业结构转型升级水平与旅游扶贫效率耦合关系——以武陵山片区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1617-1632.

WANG Kai, ZHU Fang-shu, GAN Chang, XI Jian-chao. The coupling coordination relationship between industrial structure transformation and upgrade level and tourism poverty alleviation efficiency: A case study of Wuling Mountain Area[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(7): 1617-1632.

参考文献

[1] 杨懿, 田里, 钟晖. “荷兰病”型旅游地: 内涵解析与识别流程. 当代经济管理, 2017, 39(4): 47-52.
[YANG Y, TIAN L, ZHONG H.The connotation analysis on and the identifying procedures for the tourism destinations of Dutch Disease type. Contemporary Economic Management, 2017, 39(4): 47-52.]
[2] ASHLEY C, ROE D, GOODWIN H.Pro-poor Tourism Strategies: Making Tourism Work for the Poor: A Review of Experience. London: ODI, IIED, CRT, 2001: 22-23.
[3] SOFIELD T, BAUER J, DE LACY T, et al.Sustainable Tourism-Eliminating Poverty (ST-EP): An Overview. Australia: CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd, 2004: 1-10.
[4] 席建超, 赵美风, 李连璞, 等. 旅游诱导下乡村能源消费模式转型与综合效益评估: 六盘山旅游扶贫试验区的案例实证. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(6): 898-910.
[XI J C, ZHAO M F, LI L P, et al.Study on the rural energy consumption transition and benefit evaluation induced by tourism: A case study of Liupan Mountain pro-poor tourism experimental region. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(6): 898-910.]
[5] MAHADEVAN R, SUARDI S.Panel evidence on the impact of tourism growth on poverty, poverty gap and income inequality. Current Issues in Tourism, 2019, 22(3): 253-264.
[6] 刘俊, 楼枫烨. 旅游开发背景下世居少数民族社区边缘化: 海南三亚六盘黎族安置区案例. 旅游学刊, 2010, 25(9): 44-50.
[LIU J, LOU F Y.On the marginalization of ethnic minority community under the backdrop of tourism development: A case study of Liupan Li Nationality resettlement area, Sanya, Hainan. Tourism Tribune, 2010, 25(9): 44-50.]
[7] GASCON J.Pro-poor tourism as a strategy to fight rural poverty: A critique. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2015, 15(4): 499-518.
[8] 李亚娟, 虞虎, 陈田, 等. 民族社区旅游研究进展及展望. 人文地理, 2018, 33(2): 1-10.
[LI Y J, YU H, CHEN T, et al.Research progress and prospect of ethnic community tourism. Human Geography, 2018, 33(2): 1-10.]
[9] HAMPTON M P.Heritage local communities and economic development. Annals of Tourism Research, 2005, 32(3): 735-759.
[10] ROGERSON C M.Tourism and local economic development: The case of the highlands meander. Development Southern Africa, 2002, 19(1): 143-167.
[11] 陈超凡, 王赟. 连片特困区旅游扶贫效率评价及影响因素: 来自罗霄山片区的经验证据. 经济地理, 2020, 40(1): 226-233.
[CHEN C F, WANG Y.Tourism-oriented poverty alleviation efficiency and its determinants of Chinese contiguous destitute area: Empirical evidence from Luoxiao Mountain Area. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(1): 226-233.]
[12] 王凯, 甘畅, 王梦晗, 等. 湖北省旅游扶贫效率时空格局及其影响因素. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(4): 863-871.
[WANG K, GAN C, WANG M H, et al.Spatio-temporal pattern and the influencing factors of tourism poverty alleviation efficiency in Hubei province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(4): 863-871.]
[13] 王凯, 朱芳书, 甘畅, 等. 旅游扶贫效率与资源优势度的空间耦合关系: 以武陵山湖南片区32个贫困县为例. 中南林业科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2019, 13(2): 66-73.
[WANG K, ZHU F S, GAN C, et al.Spatial coupling relationship between tourism poverty alleviation efficiency and the superiority degree of tourism resources: A case study of 32 poverty counties in Wuling Mountain Area of Hunan province. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology: Social Sciences, 2019, 13(2): 66-73.]
[14] 游达明, 邸雅婷, 姜珂. 我国区域科技创新资源配置效率的实证研究: 基于产出导向的SBM模型和Malmquist生产率指数. 软科学, 2017, 31(8): 71-75, 85.
[YOU D M, DI Y T, JIANG K.The empirical study of Chinese regional scientific and technological innovation resources allocation efficiency: Based on output-oriented SBM and Malmquist productivity index. Soft Science, 2017, 31(8): 71-75, 85.]
[15] 李烨. 中国乡村旅游业扶贫效率研究. 农村经济, 2017, (5): 72-78.
[LI Y.Research on rural tourism poverty alleviation efficiency in China. Rural Economy, 2017, (5): 72-78.]
[16] 向从武, 冯伟林. 西南民族地区旅游扶贫成效与益贫机制构建. 贵州社会科学, 2019, (3): 149-154.
[XIANG C W, FENG W L.The effect and mechanism construction of tourism poverty alleviation in Southwest Minority Areas. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2019, (3): 149-154.]
[17] 王英, 单德朋, 郑长德. 旅游需求波动、风险管理与非线性减贫效应研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(6): 160-168.
[WANG Y, SHAN D P, ZHENG C D.Tourism demand fluctuation, risk management and non-linear poverty reduction effect. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(6): 160-168.]
[18] 王冠孝, 梁留科, 李锋, 等. 区域旅游业与信息化的耦合协调关系实证研究. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(8): 1339-1350.
[WANG G X, LIANG L K, LI F, et al.An empirical research on the coupling coordinative relationship between regional tourism and informationization. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(8): 1339-1350.]
[19] 赵磊, 唐承财. 产业结构变迁、旅游业与经济增长: 来自中国的经验证据. 资源科学, 2017, 39(10): 1918-1929.
[ZHAO L, TANG C C.China's tourism industry, industrial structure and economic growth. Resources Science, 2017, 39(10): 1918-1929.]
[20] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响. 经济研究, 2011, 46(5): 4-16, 31.
[GAN C H, ZHENG R G, YU D F.An empirical study on the effects of industrial structure on economic growth and fluctuations in China. Economic Research Journal, 2011, 46(5): 4-16, 31.]
[21] 于斌斌. 产业结构调整与生产率提升的经济增长效应: 基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析. 中国工业经济, 2015, (12): 83-98.
[YU B B.Economic growth effects of industrial restructuring and productivity improvement: Analysis of dynamic spatial panel model with Chinese city data. China Industrial Economics, 2015, (12): 83-98.]
[22] 李创新, 马耀峰, 张颖, 等. 1993—2008年区域入境旅游流优势度时空动态演进模式: 基于改进熵值法的实证研究. 地理研究, 2012, 31(2): 257-268.
[LI C X, MA Y F, ZHANG Y, et al.Dynamic evolution mode of regional dominance indexes of Chinese inbound tourism flows during 1993 to 2008: An empirical research based on modified entropy technology. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(2): 257-268.]
[23] 袁航, 茶洪旺, 郑婷婷. 创新数量、创新质量与中国产业结构转型互动关系研究: 基于PVAR模型的实证分析. 经济与管理, 2019, 33(2): 78-85.
[YUAN H, CHA H W, ZHENG T T.Research on the interactive relationship among innovation quantity, innovation quality and industrial structure transformation and upgrading. Economy and Management, 2019, 33(2): 78-85.]
[24] TONE K.A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 130(3): 498-509.
[25] 肖黎明, 张仙鹏. 强可持续理念下绿色创新效率与生态福利绩效耦合协调的时空特征. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 312-324.
[XIAO L M, ZHANG X P.Spatio-temporal characteristics of coupling coordination between green innovation efficiency and ecological welfare performance under the concept of strong sustainability. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(2): 312-324.]
[26] 刘丹丽, 汪侠, 吴小根, 等. 全球贫困国家旅游竞争力与经济发展的耦合协调度及时空变化. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(10): 1381-1391.
[LIU D L, WANG X, WU X G, et al.Coupling coordination between tourism competitiveness and economic development in global poverty-stricken countries and spatiotemporal changes. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(10): 1381-1391.]
[27] 李二玲, 崔之珍. 中国区域创新能力与经济发展水平的耦合协调分析. 地理科学, 2018, 38(9): 1412-1421.
[LI E L, CUI Z Z.Coupling coordination between China's regional innovation capability and economic development. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(9): 1412-1421.]
[28] 保继刚, 甘萌雨. 改革开放以来中国城市旅游目的地地位变化及因素分析. 地理科学, 2004, 24(3): 365-370.
[BAO J G, GAN M Y.Analysis on urban destinations in China: Status change and factors for the change since the Reform Era. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(3): 365-370.]
[29] 时朋飞, 李星明, 熊元斌. 区域美丽中国建设与旅游业发展耦合关联性测度及前景预测: 以长江经济带11省市为例. 中国软科学, 2018, (2): 86-102.
[SHI P F, LI X M, XIONG Y B.Coupling measurement and prospect forecast of regional "Beautiful China" construction and tourism industry development: A case study of 11 provinces along the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China Soft Science, 2018, (2): 86-102.]
[30] 游诗咏, 林仲源, 韩兆洲. 广东省城市旅游效率的时空特征及其增长机制. 资源科学, 2017, 39(8): 1545-1559.
[YOU S Y, LIN Z Y, HAN Z Z.Spatial-temporal characteristics and growth mechanism of urban tourism efficiency in Guangdong province. Resources Science, 2017, 39(8): 1545-1559.]
[31] 王志标, 李丹丹. 武陵山片区旅游扶贫效果分析. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(8): 122-132.
[WANG Z B, LI D D.Analysis on the effect of poverty alleviation by tourism in Wuling Mountain Region. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(8): 122-132.]
[32] 冯伟林, 陶聪冲. 西南民族地区旅游扶贫绩效评价研究: 以重庆武陵山片区为调查对象. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(6): 157-163.
[FENG W L, TAO C C.The performance evaluation on poverty alleviation through tourism in Southwest Minority Area: Taking Chongqing Wuling Mountain Area as an example. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017, 38(6): 157-163.]