农户规模经营意愿与行为的影响机制及差异——基于山东省3县379份农户调查问卷的实证

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200511

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于社会认知理论与计划行为理论构建分析框架,采用山东省五莲、东平和垦利等三县（区）的379份农户调查问卷数据,综合运用主成分分析法、Heckman二阶段模型和比较分析法,探究农户规模经营意愿与行为的主要影响因素及其作用机制与差异,为推进农地适度规模经营提供决策参考。结果表明：（1）案例区被调查农户对土地政策的认知程度普遍较低,且认知水平与结构均存在地域差异。（2）个体特征、资源禀赋和区位因素对规模经营意愿产生显著影响,而政策认知和社会保障因素的影响却不显著;所选四类因素均表现出了对规模经营行为的影响,其中影响力度较大且通过显著性检验的因素主要是“是否参加农业保险”和“新型经营主体认知程度”。（3）27.70%的受访农户存在规模经营意愿与行为不一致的情形,山区与平原农户规模经营的影响机制表现出一定差异,影响农户意愿与行为的因素也有较大不同。（4）建议深入了解农民的政策认知水平与结构、有针对性地加强宣传教育,因地制宜构建信息平台、降低农地流转交易成本,构建面向小农户的农业社会化服务体系,实现“土地+服务”的二元规模化。

关键词: 农地流转, 规模经营, 行为, 山东, 意愿

Abstract: Based on the framework of social cognition theory and planned behavior theory, the principal component analysis method, Heckman two-stage model, and comparative analysis method were adopted using 379 farmer survey questionnaires from three counties (districts) of Wulian, Dongping, and Kenli in Shandong province. The purpose is to explore the main influencing factors, mechanism and difference of farmers' scale management willingness and behavior, and to provide decision-making reference for promoting the moderate farmland scale management. The results showed that: (1) The degree of cognition of land policy by farmers interviewed is generally low in the case study areas, and there are regional differences in the level and structure of cognition. (2) The individual characteristics, resource endowment and location factors all have significant effects on the scale management willingness, while the influences of policy cognition and social security are not significant. The individual characteristics, resource endowment, policy cognition, social security and location factors all have influence on scale management behavior. Among them, the factors that have greater effects and pass the significance test are whether to participate in agricultural insurance and the cognition degree of new business entities. (3) Some 27.70% of the farmers interviewed have inconsistency between scale management willingness and behaviors. There are some differences in the scale management influencing mechanism between mountain and plain farmers, and there are many differences in the factors affecting the farmers' willingness and behavior. (4) It is necessary to thoroughly understand the level and structure of farmers' policy cognition, strengthen publicity and education in a targeted way, build information platforms according to local conditions, reduce transaction costs for the transfer of agricultural land, and build an agricultural socialized service system for small farmers to realize the dual scale of "land + service".

Key words: scale management, behavior, willingness, Shandong province, farmland transfer

吕晓, 臧涛, 张全景. 农户规模经营意愿与行为的影响机制及差异——基于山东省3县379份农户调查问卷的实证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1147-1159.

LYU Xiao, ZANG Tao, ZHANG Quan-jing. Influencing mechanism of the willingness and behavior of farmland scale management: Evidence from Shandong province, China[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(5): 1147-1159.

参考文献

[1] 张明辉, 蔡银莺, 朱兰兰. 农户参与农地流转行为影响因素及经济效应分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(3): 387-394.
[ZHANG M H, CAI Y Y, ZHU L L.Analysis of influencing factor and economic effect of farmers' farmland transfer. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25(3): 387-394.]
[2] 吕晓, 臧涛, 张全景. 土地政策的农户认知及其农地转出响应研究: 基于山东省287份农户问卷调查的实证. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017, 17(5): 100-110, 154.
[LYU X, ZANG T, ZHANG Q J.Farm households' cognition of land policy and its effect on farmland transfer: Based on the investigation of 287 farmer households in Shandong province. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2017, 17(5): 100-110, 154.]
[3] 张兰, 冯淑怡, 陆华良, 等. 农地规模经营影响因素的实证研究: 基于江苏省村庄调查数据. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(11): 32-39, 62.
[ZHANG L, FENG S Y, LU H L, et al.Empirical analysis on influencing factors of farmland scale management: Based on the survey data of sample villages in Jiangsu province. China Land Science, 2015, 29(11): 32-39, 62.]
[4] 韩家彬, 张书凤, 刘淑云, 等. 土地确权、土地投资与农户土地规模经营: 基于不完全契约视角的研究. 资源科学, 2018, 40(10): 2015-2028.
[HAN J B, ZHANG S F, LIU S Y, et al.Land entitlement, land investment, and farmer land scale management from an incomplete contract perspective. Resources Science, 2018, 40(10): 2015-2028.]
[5] 周应恒, 胡凌啸, 严斌剑. 农业经营主体和经营规模演化的国际经验分析. 中国农村经济, 2015, (9): 80-95.
[ZHOU Y H, HU L X, YAN B J.International experience analysis on the evolution of agricultural management subject and scale. Chinese Rural Economy, 2015, (9): 80-95.]
[6] 周娟. 基于农户家庭决策的土地流转与适度规模经营的微观机制分析. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018, 18(5): 88-97, 157-158.
[ZHOU J. On the micro-mechanism of land circulation and scale management: Based on farmer household decision. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 18(5): 88-97, 157-158.]
[7] 赵金国, 岳书铭. 农户规模经营意愿影响因素分析研究. 山东社会科学, 2017, (1): 116-121.
[ZHAO J G, YUE S M.Analysis and research on influencing factors of farmers' scale operation willingness. Shandong Social Sciences, 2017, (1): 116-121.]
[8] 荣文祺, 吕晓. 农户分化与政策认知对农地流转意愿及行为决策机制的影响. 土地经济研究, 2018, (2): 76-93.
[RONG W Q, LYU X.The impact of farmer's differentiation, policy awareness on the willingness and the decision-making mechanism of transfer of agricultural land: A case study of Wulian, Shandong province. Journal of Land Economics, 2018, (2): 76-93.]
[9] 吕晓, 肖慧, 牛善栋. 农户的土地政策认知差异及其影响因素: 基于山东省264户农户的调查数据. 农村经济, 2015, (2): 31-36.
[LYU X, XIAO H, NIU S D.Land policy cognition difference of peasant households and its influencing factors: Based on the survey data of 264 peasant households in Shandong province. Rural Economy, 2015, (2): 31-36.]
[10] 王建华, 刘茁, 浦徐进. 政策认知对生猪养殖户病死猪不当处理行为风险的影响分析. 中国农村经济, 2016, (5): 84-95.
[WANG J H, LIU Z, PU X J.Analysis of the impact of policy cognition on the risk of improper handling of sick and dead pigs of pig farmers. Chinese Rural Economy, 2016, (5): 84-95.]
[11] AJZEN I.The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179.
[12] 丰雷, 江丽, 郑文博. 农户认知、农地确权与农地制度变迁: 基于中国5省758农户调查的实证分析. 公共管理学报, 2019, 16(1): 124-137.
[FENG L, JIANG L, ZHENG W B.Farmers' cognition, rural land registration and rural land institutional change: An empirical study based on 758 farmers survey of 5 Chinese provinces. Journal of Public Management, 2019, 16(1): 124-137.]
[13] 仇童伟, 沈怡, 马贤磊. 土地产权环境对农民产权安全认知偏差的影响: 基于不同类型农户的比较分析. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2016, 16(1): 92-104, 165.
[QIU T W, SHEN Y, MA X L.Impact of land tenure environment on farmers' tenure security cognition bias: Based on a comparative analysis between different types of households. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2016, 16(1): 92-104, 165.]
[14] 刘洪彬, 吕杰. 大城市郊区农户对耕地质量保护认知行为差异及其影响因素: 基于PSER分析框架的实证检验. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017, 17(6): 71-81, 164.
[LIU H B, LYU J.Study on differences and influencing factors of cultivated land quality protection cognitive behavior of farmers in suburbs of big city by analysis framework of PSER. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2017, 17(6): 71-81, 164.]
[15] 游和远. 地权激励对农户农地转出的影响及农地产权改革启示. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(7): 17-23.
[YOU H Y.The impacts of farmland property rights security on farmland transfer and the implications for farmland property rights reform. China Land Science, 2014, 28(7): 17-23.]
[16] WANG Y, CHEN L, LONG K.Farmers' identity, property rights cognition and perception of rural residential land distributive justice in China: Findings from Nanjing, Jiangsu province. Habitat International, 2018, 79: 99-108.
[17] 黄鹏进. 农村土地权属认知中的差序化圈层结构. 湖北社会科学, 2018, (9): 36-45.
[HUANG P J.Structure of differential ordering circle in the cognition of rural land ownership. Hubei Social Sciences, 2018, (9): 36-45.]
[18] 杰弗里·M·伍德里奇. 计量经济学导论: 现代观点. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
[WOOLDRIDGE J M.Introductory Econometric: A Modern Approach. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2003.]
[19] 王佳月, 李秀彬, 辛良杰. 中国土地流转的时空演变特征及影响因素研究. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2067-2083.
[WANG J Y, LI X B, XIN L J.Spatial-temporal variations and influential factors of land transfer in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(12): 2067-2083.]
[20] 张亚丽, 白云丽, 甄霖, 等. 新农保能促进农户土地流转吗?: 基于CHARLS三期面板数据. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 1016-1026.
[ZHANG Y L, BAI Y L, ZHEN L, et al.Could the new rural social pension insurance promote farmers' land transfer?: Based on three waves panel data of CHARLS. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(5): 1016-1026.]
[21] 胡凌啸. 中国农业规模经营的现实图谱: “土地+服务”的二元规模化. 农业经济问题, 2018, (11): 20-28.
[HU L X.The reality of agricultural scale management in China: The mode of "Land+ Service". Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2018, (11): 20-28.]