自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1132-1146.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200510

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

乡村振兴视域下农村土地利用利益相关者分析

张悦悦1,2, 李翠珍1,2, 周德1,2, 夏浩1,2   

  1. 1.浙江工商大学公共管理学院,杭州 310018;
    2.浙江工商大学土地研究所,杭州 310018
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-02 出版日期:2020-05-28 发布日期:2020-05-28
  • 通讯作者: 李翠珍(1979- ),女,河北定州人,博士,副教授,研究方向为土地利用与管理、农户生计变化。E-mail: licuizhen2003@126.com
  • 作者简介:张悦悦(1991- ),女,安徽凤台人,硕士,研究方向为农户生计与土地利用。E-mail: zhangyuey11@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    2018教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(18YJA630049); 浙江省新兴优势(特色)专业工程项目(2014); 浙江工商大学公共管理学院行政管理重点学科建设经费

Analysis of rural land use stakeholders in a perspective of rural revitalization

ZHANG Yue-yue1,2, LI Cui-zhen1,2, ZHOU De1,2, XIA Hao1,2   

  1. 1. School of Public Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
    2. Land Institute, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
  • Received:2019-04-02 Online:2020-05-28 Published:2020-05-28

摘要: 乡村振兴的实施使得农村土地利用与管理面临更多的挑战。应用利益相关者分析、博弈均衡分析和实证案例分析,探讨乡村振兴视域下土地利用各利益相关者的关系演变。研究结果显示:(1)1949年至今,农村地区土地利用利益相关者主体数量增加,博弈关系呈现复杂化、多样化和多向化;(2)乡村振兴时期主要有六种博弈关系,并探讨了案例村实施下山脱贫、发展乡村旅游、新型经营主体进驻、城市居民促进农村发展四种博弈决策过程;(3)乡村振兴视域下,农村地区发展应关注基础设施配套、土地利用效率与生态环境协调、农户生计可持续性等问题。乡村振兴中应注重实现土地利用各利益相关者的最优均衡,降低各方风险,保护生态环境并寻求多方利益平衡。

关键词: 土地利用, 博弈均衡, 丘陵生态功能区, 利益相关者, 乡村振兴

Abstract: Land use and management in rural areas is facing more challenges in the implementation of rural revitalization strategy. Therefore, this paper applied stakeholder analysis, game equilibrium analysis, and empirical case analysis to explore the relationship evolution of various land use stakeholders in the context of rural revitalization. The results are as follows: (1) Since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the number of rural land use stakeholders has increased, the game relationships present a feature of complexity, diversification and multidirectionality. (2) There are mainly six kinds of game relationships in the rural revitalization period. We discussed four kinds of game in the process of decision-making in the study area, namely poverty alleviation, development of rural tourism, entry of new business agents, and rural development promoted by urban residents. (3) In the context of rural revitalization, related policies should focus more on infrastructure construction, the coordination of land use efficiency and ecological environment, the sustainability of farmers' livelihoods, etc. The conclusion is that we should be devoted to achieving the optimal balance of land use stakeholders, reducing the risks of stakeholders, protecting the ecological environment and seeking balanced interests among stakeholders in the process of rural revitalization.

Key words: land use, game equilibrium, rural revitalization, stakeholders, hilly ecological functional areas