镇域经济发展与土地集约利用水平综合测度及其关联特征分析——以江苏省109个抽样乡镇为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200309

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 614-625.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200309

镇域经济发展与土地集约利用水平综合测度及其关联特征分析——以江苏省109个抽样乡镇为例

尹旭^1,2, 李裕瑞^1,2,3, 袁涛⁴, 王婧⁵

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;
3. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101;
4. 中国地质大学（北京）土地科学技术学院,北京 100083;
5. 北京市社会科学院管理研究所,北京 100101

收稿日期:2019-02-22 修回日期:2019-07-16 出版日期:2020-03-28 发布日期:2020-03-28
通讯作者: 李裕瑞（1983- ）,男,四川隆昌人,博士,副研究员,硕士生导师,研究方向为乡村地理与工程。E-mail: lyr2008@163.com
作者简介:尹旭（1993- ）,男,河北迁安人,博士研究生,研究方向为资源利用与区域可持续发展。E-mail: yinxubj@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41571166,41731286）

Quantitative measurement of economic development and land use intensity and their correlation characteristics in 109 sampled towns of Jiangsu province

YIN Xu^1,2, LI Yu-rui^1,2,3, YUAN Tao⁴, WANG Jing⁵

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
4. School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
5. Institute of Management, Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100101

Received:2019-02-22 Revised:2019-07-16 Online:2020-03-28 Published:2020-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 经济持续发展和土地集约利用是新型城镇化战略关注的重要问题,而长期以来对于小城镇发展道路的诸多争辩和关切也集中在发展规模、用地效率等。采用多因素综合评价法测度江苏省109个抽样乡镇的经济发展水平和土地集约利用水平,并借助相关分析等探讨二者关联特征。研究发现:（1）镇域经济发展水平与土地集约利用水平显著正相关（P<0.01）。人口规模增加对经济发展水平和土地集约利用水平提升的“指数增长”效应要明显优于建成区面积扩张带来的“线性增长”效应,在人口规模达到5万~6万后镇域经济发展水平和土地集约利用水平明显提升。（2）镇域经济发展水平与土地集约利用水平的关联度呈现差异化特征。苏南地区显著高于苏中和苏北,人口规模越大两者的关联度越高,全国重点镇的关联度高于非重点镇和乡,三产均衡发展型和工业主导型乡镇的关联度高,而农业主导型乡镇的关联度较低。上述研究发现对于镇域社会经济健康发展的启示在于要统筹布局、重点推进、提升活力,着力增强人口吸引力,达到人口门槛规模,进而促进三产融合与集约集聚发展。

关键词: 乡镇, 土地集约利用, 经济发展, 关联特征, 江苏省

Abstract: Township is an important regional unit for the realization of new urbanization and rural vitalization in the new era. Both sustainable economic development and land use intensity are major issues in the new urbanization stage. Many concerns about the healthy development of towns are focused on the efficiency of economic development and the scale of land use. Therefore, the multi-factor comprehensive evaluation method was used to measure the level of economic development and land use intensity of 109 sampled towns in Jiangsu province. Furthermore, the correlation characteristics between land use intensity and economic development were discussed based on correlation analysis. The results show that: (1) The correlation of economic development and land use intensity of sampled towns is significantly positive (r=0.841, P<0.01), the better the economic development, the more intensive the land use. The "exponential growth" effect of increasing population size on economic development and land use intensity is more significant than the "linear growth" due to the expansion of built-up area. After the population size of towns reaches roughly 50 to 60 thousand, the level of economic development and land use intensity would accelerate significantly. (2) In terms of the average scores of economic development and land use intensity in different types of towns, as in economic regions, Southern Jiangsu > Central Jiangsu > Northern Jiangsu; in terms of development types, national key towns > non-key towns > xiang (township, a type of towns in China, more similar to rural community); as for industries, secondary industry > tertiary industry > balanced development industry > primary industry. (3) The degree of correlation between the two parts presents a differentiated feature. Southern Jiangsu has a significantly higher degree than Central and Northern Jiangsu; the larger the population in size, the higher the correlation between the two parts. However, the correlation caused by the increased built-up of towns is not obvious. Besides, the correlation degree of the national key towns is significantly higher than that of the non-key towns, and the correlation degree of balanced development industry and industry-oriented townships is relatively high, while that of agriculture-oriented townships is the lowest. The implications for the healthy development of towns is that the towns should focus on the coordination of plans, polarized development, enhance the attraction to population, and reach the ideal population threshold.

Key words: economic development, land use intensity, correlation characteristics, township, Jiangsu province

尹旭, 李裕瑞, 袁涛, 王婧. 镇域经济发展与土地集约利用水平综合测度及其关联特征分析——以江苏省109个抽样乡镇为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 614-625.

YIN Xu, LI Yu-rui, YUAN Tao, WANG Jing. Quantitative measurement of economic development and land use intensity and their correlation characteristics in 109 sampled towns of Jiangsu province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(3): 614-625.

参考文献

[1] 李裕瑞, 尹旭. 镇域发展研究进展与展望. 经济地理, 2019, 39(7): 1-8.
[LI Y R,YIN X.Current progress and future prospect of research in town development. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(7): 1-8.]
[2] VAN LEEUWEN E S. Urban-Rural Interactions: Towns as Focus Points in Rural Development. London: Physica-Verlag, 2010.
[3] 彭震伟. 小城镇发展与实施乡村振兴战略. 城乡规划, 2018, (1): 11-16.
[PENG Z W.Small towns development and implementation of rural revitalization strategy. Urban and Rural Planning, 2018, (1): 11-16.]
[4] 冯健, 张小林. 苏南小城镇发展与现代乡村社区变迁研究. 地理科学进展, 1999, 18(3): 222-229.
[FENG J, ZHANG X L.A research on development of township and changes of modern rural community of Southern Jiangsu province. Progress in Geography, 1999, 18(3): 222-229.]
[5] YANG C, LIAO H.Industrial agglomeration of Hong Kong and Taiwanese manufacturing investment in China: A town-level analysis in Dongguan. The Annals of Regional Science, 2010, 45(3): 487-517.
[6] 杜宁, 赵民. 发达地区乡镇产业集群与小城镇互动发展研究. 国际城市规划, 2011, 26(1): 28-36.
[DU N, ZHAO M.On the interactive development between rural industrial clusters and townships in coastal provinces of China. Urban Planning International, 2011, 26(1): 28-36.]
[7] 周扬, 朱喜钢, 郭紫雨, 等. 从“三集中”到“有机集中”: 对苏南小城镇工业用地集聚集约发展的再思考: 以常州市礼嘉镇为例. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(4): 18-26.
[ZHOU Y, ZHU X G, GUO Z Y, et al.From "three concentration" to "organic concentration": A rethink about the gathering intensive development of industrial land of Southern Jiangsu small-town. Urban Development Studies, 2018, 25(4): 18-26.]
[8] TONTS M, PLUMMER P, LAWRIE M.Socio-economic wellbeing in Australian mining towns: A comparative analysis. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012, 28(3): 288-301.
[9] 丁志伟, 张改素, 王发曾. 郑州都市区镇域经济差异的空间分析. 经济地理, 2013, 33(7): 29-35.
[DING Z W, ZHANG G S, WANG F Z.The spatial analysis on towns' economic differences in Zhengzhou Metropolitan area. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(7): 29-35.]
[10] SHEN L Y, CHEN Y, LI H, et al.Development orientations for attracting investments: A perspective of less-developed townships in China. Cities, 2018, 76: 84-95.
[11] 赵鹏军, 刘迪. 中国小城镇基础设施与社会经济发展的关联分析. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1245-1256.
[ZHAO P J, LIU D.Analysis of the relationships between infrastructure and socioeconomic development in towns of China. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(9): 1245-1256.]
[12] 李元. 小城镇建设要走集约用地的道路. 小城镇建设, 2000, (10): 15-16.
[LI Y.The construction of small towns must follow the road of intensive land use. Development of Small Cities & Towns, 2000, (10): 15-16.]
[13] 邵晓梅, 王静. 小城镇开发区土地集约利用评价研究: 以浙江省慈溪市为例. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(1): 75-81.
[SHAO X M, WANG J.Appraisal of intensive land use of development zones in small towns: A case study of Cixi in Zhejiang province. Progress in Geography, 2008, 27(1): 75-81.]
[14] 韦俊敏, 胡宝清, 张中秋. 新型城镇化背景下小城镇土地精明利用评价与应用: 以广西上林县为例. 资源科学, 2014, 36(8): 1563-1571.
[WEI J M, HU B Q, ZHANG Z Q.Evaluation and application of smart land use in small towns under Chinese new-type urbanization: A case study in Shanglin county of Guangxi province. Resources Science, 2014, 36(8): 1563-1571.]
[15] 周坚. 基于SEE模型的小城镇土地集约利用评价研究: 以遵义县为例. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(10): 71-76.
[ZHOU J.Evaluation on land intensive use in small towns based on the SEE model: Taking Zunyi county for an example. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2016, 37(10): 71-76.]
[16] 赵晖. 说清小城镇: 全国121个小城镇详细调查. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
[ZHAO H.Illustration of Smalltowns: Survey from 121 Towns in China. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2017.]
[17] 蔡俊, 郑华伟, 刘友兆, 等. 中国经济发展与城市土地集约利用的协调发展评价研究. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2011, 27(3): 350-355.
[CAI J, ZHENG H W, LIU Y Z, et al.Study on the evaluation of coordinated development between economic development and urban land intensive use in China. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture, 2011, 27(3): 350-355.]
[18] 姚成胜, 李政通, 杜涵, 等. 长三角地区土地集约利用与经济发展协调性. 经济地理, 2016, 36(2): 159-166.
[YAO C S, LI Z T, DU H, et al.Coordination between land intensive use and economic development in Yangtze River Delta. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(2): 159-166.]
[19] 范胜龙, 张莉, 曾在森, 等. 不同经济发展水平地区开发区土地集约利用的影响因素研究: 以福建省为例. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(6): 51-58.
[FAN S L, ZHANG L, ZENG Z S, et al.Factors influencing land intensive use of development zone in regions with different levels of economic development: A case study in Fujian province. China Land Sciences, 2017, 31(6): 51-58.]
[20] 张小力. 江苏省小城镇发展差异及其成长路径分析. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.
[ZHANG X L.Analysis on the development differences and growth paths of small-towns in Jiangsu province. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2013.]
[21] 赵丽, 付梅臣, 张建军, 等. 乡镇土地集约利用评价及驱动因素分析. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(2): 89-94.
[ZHAO L, FU M C, ZHANG J J, et al.Evaluation of land intensive use and analysis of driving force factors at town level. Transactions of the CSAE, 2008, 24(2): 89-94.]
[22] 朱天明, 杨桂山, 苏伟忠, 等. 兴化市小城镇土地集约利用综合评价研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(1): 24-29.
[ZHU T M, YANG G S, SU W Z, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of land intensiveuse in towns of Xinghua. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2010, 19(1): 24-29.]
[23] 郭婧锐, 周伟. 青海省土地集约利用与经济发展时空差异分析. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(2): 194-199.
[GUO J R, ZHOU W.Spatiotemporal analysis of disparities between intensive land use and economic development in Qinghai province. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(2): 194-199.]
[24] 张浩, 冯淑怡, 曲福田. 耕地保护、建设用地集约利用与城镇化耦合协调性研究. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 1002-1015.
[ZHANG H, FENG S Y, QU F T.Research on coupling coordination among cultivated land protection, construction land intensive use and urbanization. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(6): 1002-1015.]
[25] 倪九派, 李萍, 魏朝富, 等. 基于AHP和熵权法赋权的区域土地开发整理潜力评价. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(5): 202-209.
[NI J P, LI P, WEI Z F, et al.Potentialities evaluation of regional land consolidation based on AHP and entropy weight method. Transactions of the CSAE, 2009, 25(5): 202-209.]
[26] LUO W C.The evaluation model of a country's health care system based on AHP and entropy weight method. International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, 2014, 52(4): 70-83.
[27] 朱姝, 冯艳芬, 王芳, 等. 粤北山区相对贫困村的脱贫潜力评价及类型划分: 以连州市为例. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1304-1316.
[ZHU S, FENG Y F, WANG F, et al.Evaluation and classification of poverty alleviation potential of relatively poor villages in mountainous areas of Northern Guangdong province: A case study of Lianzhou city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(8): 1304-1316.]
[28] 龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 426-434.
[LONG H L, LIU Y S, ZOU J.Assessment of rural development types and their rurality in eastern coastal China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 426-434.]
[29] 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国县域统计年鉴: 乡镇卷. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2017.
[National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook: Township. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2017.]
[30] 吴郁玲, 曲福田. 中国城市土地集约利用的影响机理: 理论与实证研究. 资源科学, 2007, 29(6): 106-113.
[WU Y L, QU F T.Mechanism of intensive urban land use in China: Theoretical and practical study. Resources Science, 2007, 29(6): 106-113.]

镇域经济发展与土地集约利用水平综合测度及其关联特征分析——以江苏省109个抽样乡镇为例

Quantitative measurement of economic development and land use intensity and their correlation characteristics in 109 sampled towns of Jiangsu province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	徐维祥, 徐志雄, 刘程军. 黄河流域地级城市土地集约利用效率与生态福利绩效的耦合性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 114-130.
[2]	李博, 张文忠, 余建辉, 刘倩倩. 能源富集区市域经济发展水平空间格局演变——基于晋陕蒙甘宁地区[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 668-682.
[3]	荣慧芳, 陶卓民. 基于网络数据的乡村旅游热点识别及成因分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2848-2861.
[4]	韩博, 金晓斌, 项晓敏, 赵庆利, 林金煌, 洪长桥, 金志丰, 胡静, 周寅康. 基于“要素—景观—系统”框架的江苏省长江沿线生态修复格局分析与对策[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 141-161.
[5]	张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 刘晶, 单薇, 周寅康. 1995-2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 689-706.
[6]	李欣, 方斌, 殷如梦, 荣慧芳. 江苏省县域“三生”功能时空变化及协同/权衡关系[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2363-2377.
[7]	姜磊, 柏玲, 吴玉鸣. 中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析——兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 788-799.
[8]	原野, 赵中秋, 师学义, 牛姝烨, 祝培甜, 荣联伟. 基于乡镇地域主导功能定位的农村居民点整理策略研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(12): 2089-2099.
[9]	郭瑞敏, 千怀遂, 张灵, 李明霞. 不同生态位城市用地扩张和经济发展的互动关系研究——以广东省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 800-811.
[10]	李强, 彭文英, 王建强, 赵烨. 乡镇企业发达区耕地健康评价与驱动机理研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(9): 1499-1510.
[11]	李涛, 陶卓民, 刘锐, 何海真, 吴娇, 程姗姗, 王泽云. 江苏省农业旅游发展演化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1391-1402.
[12]	张俊峰, 张安录. 土地资源空间异质性与经济发展水平的关系研究——以武汉城市圈为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(5): 725-735.
[13]	张秀英, 钟太洋, 黄贤金, 李新会, 张小敏, 王颖, 彭威, 张林静. 江苏省海域养殖增殖用海定级研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(9): 1542-1551.
[14]	余凤龙, 黄震方, 曹芳东, 吴丽敏, 陶玉国. 中国城镇化进程对旅游经济发展的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8): 1297-1309.
[15]	徐菁, 黄震方, 靳诚. 景区建设对区域经济发展的响应格局演变——以江苏省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(6): 956-966.