基于生态系统服务多情景权衡的生态安全格局构建——以大连市瓦房店为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200304

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 546-562.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200304

• “国土空间生态修复”专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

基于生态系统服务多情景权衡的生态安全格局构建——以大连市瓦房店为例

赵文祯¹, 韩增林^1,2, 闫晓露^2,3, 钟敬秋²

1. 辽宁师范大学地理科学学院,大连 116029;
2. 辽宁师范大学海洋经济与可持续发展研究中心,大连 116029;
3. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳 110016

收稿日期:2019-06-12 修回日期:2019-09-27 出版日期:2020-03-28 发布日期:2020-03-28
通讯作者: 闫晓露（1987- ）,女,黑龙江齐齐哈尔人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事滨海湿地生态服务、滨海湿地综合环境效益等研究。E-mail: xlyan@lnnu.edu.cn
作者简介:赵文祯（1993- ）,男,山西汾阳人,硕士,主要从事生态系统服务及空间格局优化研究。E-mail: wzzhao_lnnu@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41976206）; 辽宁省教育厅海洋专项（H201783631）; 辽宁省自然科学基金指导计划项目（20180551194）; 辽宁省教育厅人文社科研究项目（WQ2019020）

Ecological security pattern construction based on multi-scenario trade-off of ecosystem services: A case study of Wafangdian, Dalian

ZHAO Wen-zhen¹, HAN Zeng-lin^1,2, YAN Xiao-lu^2,3, ZHONG Jing-qiu²

1. School of Geography, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China;
2. Center for Studies of Marine Economy and Sustainable Development, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China;
3. Institute of Applied Ecology, CAS, Shenyang 110016, China

Received:2019-06-12 Revised:2019-09-27 Online:2020-03-28 Published:2020-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以辽宁省瓦房店市为研究单元,在评估2000年与2014年的食物供给、NPP、产水量及土壤保持四种典型生态系统服务基础上,引入OWA模型,模拟出研究区2014年生态系统服务优先保护区作为生态源地;利用最小累积阻力模型识别生态廊道与缓冲区,构建研究区生态安全格局。研究表明:（1）2000-2014年,瓦房店市生态系统服务时空变化显著,除产水量外,其他生态系统服务均有所增强。（2）综合考虑生态系统服务保护效率（E_i>1）与权衡度（0.68）,选取情景5下的优先保护区作为瓦房店的生态源地。（3）瓦房店生态源地面积为564.92 km²;生态廊道总长度为642.62 km,一级廊道（220.76 km）纵贯南北,次级廊道（421.86 km）呈网状连通分布离散的生态源地。研究结果可为瓦房店市生态系统可持续管理和土地利用优化提供决策支持。

关键词: OWA, 生态系统服务, 保护区, 瓦房店市, 生态安全格局

Abstract: Taking Wafangdian county in Liaoning province as the research unit, on the basis of the evaluation of the four typical ecosystem services, including food supply, NPP, water yield and soil conservation in 2000 and 2014, OWA model was introduced to simulate the priority conversation areas of ecosystem services in the study area in 2014 as the ecological source. The MCR model was used to identify the ecological corridor and buffer zone, and the ecological security pattern of the study area was constructed. The results show that: (1) From 2000 to 2014, the spatial and temporal changes of ecosystem services in Wafangdian were significant. Except for water yield, other ecosystem services had been enhanced. (2) Considering the efficiency of ecosystem services protection (E_i>1) and trade-off degree (0.68), the priority conservation areas under scenario 5 were selected as the ecological source of Wafangdian. (3) The ecological source area of Wafangdian was 564.92 km², which is distributed throughout the region; the total length of ecological corridors was 642.62 km, the first level corridors (220.76 km) ran through the north and south of the study area, and the secondary corridors (421.86 km) connected the dispersed ecological sources with net-like distribution. The results can provide decisive supports for sustainable ecosystem management and land use optimization in Wafangdian.

Key words: ecological security pattern, Wafangdian, ecosystem services, OWA, conservation area

赵文祯, 韩增林, 闫晓露, 钟敬秋. 基于生态系统服务多情景权衡的生态安全格局构建——以大连市瓦房店为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 546-562.

ZHAO Wen-zhen, HAN Zeng-lin, YAN Xiao-lu, ZHONG Jing-qiu. Ecological security pattern construction based on multi-scenario trade-off of ecosystem services: A case study of Wafangdian, Dalian[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(3): 546-562.

参考文献

[1] 俞孔坚, 王思思, 李迪华, 等. 北京市生态安全格局及城市增长预景. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1189-1204.
[YU K J, WANG S S, LI D H, et al.The function of ecological security patterns as an urban growth frame work in Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 1189-1204.]
[2] 高世昌. 国土空间生态修复的理论与方法. 中国土地, 2018, (12): 40-43.
[GAO S C.Theories and methods of ecological restoration of territorial space. China Land, 2018, (12): 40-43.]
[3] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
[PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al.Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.]
[4] 王威, 贾文涛. 生态文明理念下的国土综合整治与生态保护修复. 中国土地, 2019, (5): 29-31.
[WANG W, JIA W T.Land comprehensive renovation and ecological protection and restoration under the concept of ecological civilization. China Land, 2019, (5): 29-31.]
[5] 姚婧, 何兴元, 陈玮. 生态系统服务流研究方法最新进展. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 335-342.
[YAO J, HE X Y, CHEN W.The latest progress in ecosystem service flow research methods. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(1): 335-342.]
[6] 景永才, 陈利顶, 孙然好. 基于生态系统服务供需的城市群生态安全格局构建框架. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4121-4131.
[JING Y C, CHEN L D, SUN R H.A theoretical research framework for ecological security pattern construction based on ecosystem services supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4121-4131.]
[7] 傅伯杰, 吕一河, 高光耀. 中国主要陆地生态系统服务与生态安全研究的重要进展. 自然杂志, 2012, 34(5): 261-272.
[FU B J, LYU Y H, GAO G Y.Major research progress on the ecosystem service and ecological safety of main terrestrial ecosystem in China. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2012, 34(5): 261-272.]
[8] 王晓峰, 吕一河, 傅伯杰. 生态系统服务与生态安全. 自然杂志, 2012, 34(5): 273-298.
[WANG X F, LYU Y H, FU B J.Ecosystem services and ecological security. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2012, 34(5): 273-298.]
[9] 吴健生, 马洪坤, 彭建. 基于“功能节点—关键廊道”的城市生态安全格局构建: 以深圳市为例. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1663-1671.
[WU J S, MA H K, PENG J.Improving urban ecological security pattern based on functional nodes-key corridors: A case study of Shenzhen city. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(12): 1663-1671.]
[10] 杨天荣, 匡文慧, 刘卫东, 等. 基于生态安全格局的关中城市群生态空间结构优化布局. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 441-452.
[YANG T R, KUANG W H, LIU W D, et al.Optimizing the layout of eco-spatial structure in Guanzhong Urban Agglomeration based on the ecological security pattern. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 441-452.]
[11] BRAUMAN K A, DAILY G C, DUARTE T K, et al.The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2007, 32(32): 67-98.
[12] BARBIER E B, KOCH E W, SILLIMAN B R, et al.Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science, 2008, 319(5861): 321-323.
[13] RODRIGUEZ J P, BEARD T D, BENNETT E M, et al.Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 709-723.
[14] 戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡: 方法、模型与研究框架. 地理研究, 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016.
[DAI E F, WANG X L, ZHU J J, et al.Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016.]
[15] LAUTENBACH S, VOLK M, GRUBER B, et al.Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs. In: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs). In: 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Modelling for Environment's Sake. Ottawa: 2010.
[16] YAGER R R.On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1988, 18(1): 183-190.
[17] MALCZEWSKI J, RINNER C.Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: A case study of residential quality evaluation. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2005, 7(2): 249-268.
[18] ZHANG L, FU B, LU Y, et al.Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30(3): 535-546.
[19] RICARDO D T, ERSHUN Z, YANG Z H, et al.A local spatial decision support system for developing countries based on MCA, fuzzy sets and OWA: Case study of a municipality in Cuba. Geo-spatial Information Science, 2013, 16(2): 120-129.
[20] LIU Y X, LU Y H, PAU L H, et al.Quantifying the spatio-temporal drivers of planned vegetation restoration on ecosystem services at a regional scale. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 1029-1040.
[21] 李军玲, 郭其乐, 彭记永. 基于MODIS数据的河南省冬小麦产量遥感估算模型. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(10): 1665-1669.
[LI J L, GUO Q L, PENG J Y.Remote sensing estimation model of Henan province winter wheat yield based on MODIS data. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2012, 21(10): 1665-1669.]
[22] 武文欢, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581.
[WU W H, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al.Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos city. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581.]
[23] FIELD C B, BEHRENFELD M J, RANDERSON J T, et al.Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science, 1998, 281(5374): 237-240.
[24] 朱文泉, 潘耀忠, 张锦水. 中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 413-424.
[ZHU W Q, PAN Y Z, ZHANG J S.Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based remote sensing. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 413-424.]
[25] HOYER R, CHANG H J.Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in the Tualatin and Yamhill Basins under climate change and urbanization. Applied Geography, 2014, 53: 402-416.
[26] RENARD K G, FOSTER G R, WEESIES G A, et al.Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Washington DC: Agricultural Handbook, 1997.
[27] 刘焱序, 彭建, 韩忆楠, 等. 基于OWA的低丘缓坡建设开发适宜性评价: 以云南大理白族自治州为例. 生态学报, 2014, 34(12): 3188-3197.
[LIU Y X, PENG J, HAN Y N, et al.Suitability assessment for building land consolidation on gentle hillside based on OWA operator: A case in Dali Bai Nationality Borough in Yunnan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(12): 3188-3197.]
[28] JIANG H, EASTMAN J R.Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2000, 14(2): 173-184.
[29] QIN K Y, LI J, LIU J Y, et al.Setting conservation priorities based on ecosystem services: A case study of the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 3062-3074.
[30] 俞孔坚, 李迪华, 段铁武. 生物多样性保护的景观规划途径. 生物多样性, 1998, 6(3): 205-212.
[YU K J, LI D H, DUAN T W.Landscape approaches in biodiversity conservation. Chinese Biodiversity, 1998, 6(3): 205-212.]
[31] 黄木易, 岳文泽, 冯少茹, 等. 基于MCR模型的大别山核心区生态安全格局异质性及优化. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.
[HUANG M Y, YUE W Z, FENG S R, et al.Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of ecological security based on MCR model and ecological pattern optimization in the Yuexi county of the Dabie Mountain Area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.]
[32] 彭建, 郭小楠, 胡熠娜, 等. 基于地质灾害敏感性的山地生态安全格局构建: 以云南省玉溪市为例. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 627-635.
[PENG J, GUO X N, HU Y N, et al.Constructing ecological security patterns in mountain areas based on geological disaster sensitivity: A case study in Yuxi city, Yunnan province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(2): 627-635.]
[33] YU K J.Security patterns and surface model in landscape ecological planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1996, 36(1): 1-17.
[34] 陈影, 哈凯, 贺文龙, 等. 冀西北间山盆地区景观格局变化及优化研究: 以河北省怀来县为例. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(4): 556-569.
[CHEN Y, HA K, HE W L, et al.Study on the change and optimization of landscape pattern in the basin of Northwest Hebei Mountains: A case study of Huailai county, Hebei province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(4): 556-569.]
[35] 陈昕, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 基于“重要性—敏感性—连通性”框架的云浮市生态安全格局构建. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 471-484.
[CHEN X, PENG J, LIU Y X, et al.Constructing ecological security patterns in Yunfu city based on the framework of importance-sensitivity-connectivity. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 471-484.]

基于生态系统服务多情景权衡的生态安全格局构建——以大连市瓦房店为例

Ecological security pattern construction based on multi-scenario trade-off of ecosystem services: A case study of Wafangdian, Dalian

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	胡其玉, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 342-355.
[2]	赵雪雁, 杜昱璇, 李花, 王伟军. 黄河中游城镇化与生态系统服务耦合关系的时空变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 131-147.
[3]	刘晶晶, 王静, 戴建旺, 翟天林, 李泽慧. 黄河流域县域尺度生态系统服务供给和需求核算及时空变异[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 148-161.
[4]	谢丽霞, 白永平, 车磊, 乔富伟, 孙帅帅, 杨雪荻. 基于价值—风险的黄河上游生态功能区生态分区建设[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 196-207.
[5]	贾建辉, 陈建耀, 龙晓君, 陈记臣. 水电开发对河流生态系统服务的效应评估与时空变化特征分析——以武江干流为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2163-2176.
[6]	刘春芳, 王韦婷, 刘立程, 李鹏杰. 西北地区县域生态系统服务的供需匹配——以甘肃古浪县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2177-2190.
[7]	耿甜伟, 陈海, 张行, 史琴琴, 刘迪. 基于GWR的陕西省生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1714-1727.
[8]	燕守广, 李辉, 李海东, 张银龙. 基于土地利用与景观格局的生态保护红线生态系统健康评价方法——以南京市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1109-1118.
[9]	张宇硕, 吴殿廷, 吕晓. 土地利用/覆盖变化对生态系统服务的影响：空间尺度视角的研究综述[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1172-1189.
[10]	杜腾飞, 齐伟, 朱西存, 王鑫, 张瑜, 张蕾. 基于生态安全格局的山地丘陵区自然资源空间精准识别与管制方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1190-1200.
[11]	和娟, 师学义, 付扬军. 基于生态系统服务的汾河源头区域生态安全格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 814-825.
[12]	孙从建, 郑振婧, 李新功, 孙九林. 黄土塬面保护区潜在蒸发量时空变化及其与气象、环流因子关系分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 857-868.
[13]	卢龙辉, 陈福军, 许月卿, 黄安, 黄玲. 京津冀“生态系统服务转型”及其空间格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 532-545.
[14]	王亚慧, 戴尔阜, 马良, 尹乐. 横断山区产水量时空分布格局及影响因素研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 371-386.
[15]	肖武, 张文凯, 吕雪娇, 王新静. 西部生态脆弱区矿山不同开采强度下生态系统服务时空变化——以神府矿区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 68-81.