山西资源型城市创新环境与产业结构转型空间耦合

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200203

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 269-283.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200203

山西资源型城市创新环境与产业结构转型空间耦合

姜海宁^1,2, 张文忠², 余建辉², 张建伟³

1. 浙江师范大学地理与环境科学学院,金华 321004;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101;
3. 安阳师范学院资源环境与旅游学院,安阳 455000

收稿日期:2018-12-04 修回日期:2019-09-05 出版日期:2020-02-28 发布日期:2020-02-28
通讯作者: 张文忠（1966- ）,男,内蒙古呼和浩特人,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为城市与区域发展。E-mail: zhangwz@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:姜海宁（1982- ）,男,江苏徐州人,博士,副教授,研究方向为经济地理。E-mail: jhn841263@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41971160,41871170,41771174）; 浙江省自然科学基金项目（LY19D010009）; 美丽中国生态文明建设科技工程专项（XDA23100302）

Spatial coupling of innovative milieu and industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities in Shanxi province

JIANG Hai-ning^1,2, ZHANG Wen-zhong², YU Jian-hui², ZHANG Jian-wei³

1. College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
3. School of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, Henan, China

Received:2018-12-04 Revised:2019-09-05 Online:2020-02-28 Published:2020-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过构建耦合协调度模型,分析2003年和2016年山西资源型城市创新环境与产业结构转型的空间耦合关系。结果表明：不同优势的城市创新环境质量随着时间的推移均发生不同程度的变化,其中高水平创新环境骤降,中等水平稳步升高,而低水平创新环境并未实现突破性的提升;产业结构高级化指数均呈增大趋势,产业结构合理化指数较高且变化相对复杂;原创新环境与产业结构高级化、合理化耦合度指数均较高且均为高度耦合区,但随着时间的推移,大部分城市逐渐下降;协调发展度较低,整体始终表现为“南北中度失调、中间严重失调”的格局;大部分城市相对发展度指数逐渐上升,山西“南北”区域属于创新环境超前型或同步发展型,而“中间”区域主要为创新环境滞后型的格局并未发生显著变化。因此,应当充分依托城市创新环境或产业结构转型现有的优势,因地制宜地分类指导其资源型城市建设发展,从而实现创新环境与产业结构转型的并进协同发展。

关键词: 创新环境, 资源型城市, 产业结构转型, 空间耦合, 山西

Abstract: In order to analyze the spatial coupling of innovative milieu and industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities in Shanxi province in 2003 and 2016, the coupling coordination degree model was adopted in this paper. The results showed that the quality superiority of innovative milieu about resource-based cities in Shanxi province was changed in different degrees. Among them, the level of innovative milieu with high quality superiority plunged, while the level of innovative milieu with medium quality superiority was rising steadily. The low level innovative milieu, by contrast, did not realize a breakthrough rising at all as time goes on. The degree of industrial structure advancement was increasing, while the degree of industrial structure rationalization was high and relatively complex. The coupling degrees between the original innovative milieu and industrial structure transformation, including industrial structure advancement and industrial structure rationalization, were all high. Therefore, all of the resource-based cities in Shanxi province belonged to high degree coupling regions at this moment. What's more, the coupling degree between the original innovative milieu and industrial structure transformation in most of the cities was going down gradually as time goes on. However, the degrees of coordinated development between innovative milieu and industrial structure advancement, industrial structure rationalization were relatively low. The general pattern of the coordinated development degree in Shanxi province was "north-south moderate imbalance, the middle extreme imbalance" having not changed significantly; Relative development index in most of cities of Shanxi province showed a upward trend. The "north-south" area of Shanxi province belonged to the innovative milieu exorbitant type or simultaneous development between innovative milieu and industrial structure transformation, while the "middle" area mainly belonged to the lagging-type development of innovation milieu. Therefore, we should fully rely on the advantages of existing innovative milieu and industrial structure restructuring ability in every city, guiding the construction and development of resource-based cities according to local conditions, so as to achieve a coordinated and hand-in-hand development of innovative milieu and industrial restructuring.

Key words: Shanxi province, innovative milieu, resource-based cities, industrial structure transformation, spatial coupling

姜海宁, 张文忠, 余建辉, 张建伟. 山西资源型城市创新环境与产业结构转型空间耦合[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 269-283.

JIANG Hai-ning, ZHANG Wen-zhong, YU Jian-hui, ZHANG Jian-wei. Spatial coupling of innovative milieu and industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities in Shanxi province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(2): 269-283.

参考文献

[1] 申玉铭, 杨彬彬, 张云. 资源型城市的生态环境问题与综合整治: 以济宁市为例. 地理研究, 2006, 25(3): 430-438.
[SHEN Y M, YANG B B, ZHANG Y.Study on the eco-environmental problems and its countermeasures in the sustainable development of resources-based cities: A case study of Jining city. Geographical Research, 2006, 25(3): 430-438.]
[2] 苗长虹, 胡志强, 耿凤娟, 等. 中国资源型城市经济演化特征与影响因素: 路径依赖、脆弱性和路径创造的作用. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1268-1281.
[MIAO C H, HU Z Q, GENG F J, et al.Characteristics of economic evolution and the influencing factors of resource-dependent cities in China: The role of path dependence, vulnerability and path creation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7): 1268-1281.]
[3] 余建辉, 李佳洺, 张文忠. 中国资源型城市识别与综合类型划分. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 677-687.
[YU J H, LI J M, ZHANG W Z.Identification and classification of resource-based cities in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 677-687.]
[4] 张文忠, 李业锦. 区域创新环境与企业发展研究. 软科学, 2003, 17(6): 25-28.
[ZHANG W Z, LI Y J.A study on regional innovative milieu and enterprise development. Soft Science, 2003, 17(6): 25-28.]
[5] 王伟, 孙雷. 区域创新系统与产业转型耦合协调度分析: 以铜陵市为例. 地理科学, 2016, 36(2): 204-212.
[WANG W, SUN L.Coupled analysis regional innovation system and resource city industrial transformation: A case study of Tongling city. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(2): 204-212.]
[6] 张文忠, 王岱, 余建辉. 资源型城市接续替代产业发展路径与模式研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2011, 26(2): 134-141.
[ZHANG W Z, WANG D, YU J H.Study on the development path and pattern of substituted industry in resource-based cities. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011, 26(2): 134-141.]
[7] AYDALOT P.Milieux Innovation En Europe. Pairs: Gremi, 1986.
[8] 朱建新, 朱祎宏, 鲁若愚. 创新环境的要素构成及其影响机理. 中国科技论坛, 2016, (3): 119-125.
[ZHU J X, ZHU Y H, LU R Y.Hierarchical structure of the innovation environment and its impact mechanism. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2016, (3): 119-125.]
[9] 胡太山, 解鸿年, 林建元. 高科技区域创新环境构成与发展再思考. 城市规划学刊, 2003, (3): 74-80.
[HU T S, XIE H N, LIN J Y.The composition and rethinking the development of innovative milieu in high-tech area. Urban Planning Forum, 2003, (3): 74-80.]
[10] 翁媛媛, 高汝熹. 科技创新环境的评价指标体系研究: 基于上海市创新环境的因子分析. 中国科技论坛, 2009, (2): 31-35.
[WENG Y Y, GAO R X.Research on the evaluation index system of scientific and technological innovative milieu: Based on factor analysis of innovative milieu in Shanghai. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2009, (2): 31-35.]
[11] 党文娟, 张宗益, 康继军. 创新环境对促进我国区域创新能力的影响. 中国软科学, 2008, (3): 52-57.
[DANG W J, ZHANG Z Y, KANG J J.The impact of regional innovation environment on the regional innovation capability. China Soft Science, 2008, (3): 52-57.]
[12] 千庆兰, 陈颖彪, 董晓敏. 中小企业技术创新行为与创新环境的实证研究: 基于广东省785家中小企业的问卷调查. 地理科学, 2008, 28(4): 488-495.
[QIAN Q L, CHEN Y B, DONG X M.Technology innovation within small and middle enterprises and regional environment. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2008, 28(4): 488-495.]
[13] 薛捷. 区域创新环境对科技型小微企业创新的影响: 基于双元学习的中介作用. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(5): 782-791.
[XUE J.Research on the effect of regional innovation environment on technological small and microenterprises based on the mediation effect of exploration and exploitation learning. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(5): 782-791.]
[14] 甄美荣, 杨晶照. 区域创新环境对区域内企业群落发展的影响机制研究. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(7): 42-46.
[ZHEN M R, YANG J Z.Research on the influence mechanism of regional innovative milieu on the development of regional enterprise community. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2012, 29(7): 42-46.]
[15] 吴玉鸣. 大学知识创新与区域创新环境的空间变系数计量分析. 科研管理, 2010, 31(5): 116-123.
[WU Y M.A spatially varying-coefficient econometric analysis on university knowledge innovation capability and regional innovation milieu in China. Science Research Management, 2010, 31(5): 116-123.]
[16] 谢远涛, 李虹, 邹庆. 我国资源型城市创新指数研究: 以116个地级城市为例. 北京大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2017, 54(5): 146-158.
[XIE Y T, LI H, ZOU Q.A study on the innovation index of resource-based cities in China: Taking 116 cities at the prefecture level for example. Journal of Peking University: Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2017, 54(5): 146-158.]
[17] 王缉慈, 王可. 区域创新环境和企业根植性: 兼论我国高新技术企业开发区的发展. 地理研究, 1999, 18(4): 357-362.
[WANG J C, WANG K.Regional innovative milieu and local embeddedness. Geographical Research, 1999, 18(4): 357-362.]
[18] 马勇, 杜德斌, 周天瑜, 等. 地方创新环境对外资研发活动的影响分析: 深厦甬青连五市的比较. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009, 30(5): 61-67.
[MA Y, DU D B, ZHOU T Y, et al.An analysis on regional innovative milieu affecting foreign R & D investment activity-the comparative study of five cities. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2009, 30(5): 61-67.]
[19] HALSETH G, SULLIVAN L, RYSER L.Service provision as part of resource town transition planning: A case from Northern BC. NRE/CRRF Conference, 2002.
[20] 刘云刚. 大庆市资源型产业结构转型对策研究. 经济地理, 2000, 20(5): 26-29.
[LIU Y G.Studies on the adjustment of the industrial structure of resource type cities in the northeast area-Daqing as an example. Economic Geography, 2000, 20(5): 26-29.]
[21] 安树伟, 魏后凯. 东北资源型城市的产业结构转型. 经济管理, 2006, 26(3): 6-9.
[AN S W, WEI H K.Study on industrial structure transformation of the resource-based cities in the Northeast China. Economic Management, 2006, 26(3): 6-9.]
[22] 庞娟. 资源枯竭型城市产业转型的风险规避与产业创新. 城市问题, 2006, (4): 69-72.
[PANG J.The risk aversion and industrial innovation of industrial transformation about resources-exhausted cities. Urban Problems, 2006, (4): 69-72.]
[23] 邱成利. 创新环境及其对新产业成长的作用机制. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2002, 19(4): 5-7.
[QIU C L.Innovative milieu and its mechanism on new industry growth. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2002, 19(4): 5-7.]
[24] 叶丹, 黄庆华. 区域创新环境对高技术产业创新效率的影响研究: 基于DEA-Malmquist方法. 宏观经济研究, 2017, (8): 132-140.
[YE D, HUANG Q H.Study on the influence of regional innovative milieu on innovation efficiency in high-tech industries. Macroeconomics, 2017, (8): 132-140.]
[25] 张景波. 交通基础设施建设对产业结构转型的影响研究. 云南财经大学学报, 2018, 34(11): 37-48.
[ZHANG J B.Research on the impact of transportation infrastructure construction on industrial structure transformation. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2018, 34(11): 37-48.]
[26] 路畅, 王媛媛, 于渤, 等. 制度环境、技术创新与传统产业升级: 基于中国省际面板数据的门槛回归分析. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(14): 62-68.
[LU C, WANG Y Y, YU B, et al.Institutional environment, technological innovation and traditional industrial upgrading: A threshold test based on interprovincial panel data in China. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(14): 62-68.]
[27] 袁航, 朱承亮. 国家高新区推动了中国产业结构转型升级吗. 中国工业经济, 2018, (8): 60-77.
[YUAN H, ZHU C L.Do national high-tech zones promote the transformation and upgrading of China's industrial structure. China Industrial Economics, 2018, (8): 60-77.]
[28] 侯鹏, 刘思明, 建兰宁. 创新环境对中国区域创新能力的影响及地区差异研究. 经济问题探索, 2014, (11): 73-80.
[HOU P, LIU S M, JIAN L N.The influence and its regional difference of innovative milieu on innovation ability in China. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2014, (11): 73-80.]
[29] 张树静, 张秀峰. 城市创新环境对产学研合作创新的影响. 中国科技论坛, 2018, (4): 25-32.
[ZHANG S J, ZHANG X F.Impact of urban innovation environment on the performance of industry-university-research institute collaborative innovation. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018, (4): 25-32.]
[30] 易信, 刘凤良. 金融发展与产业结构转型: 理论及基于跨国面板数据的实证研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2018, 35(6): 21-39.
[YI X, LIU F L.Financial development and structure transformation. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2018, 35(6): 21-39.]
[31] 张勇, 蒲勇健. 产业结构变迁及其对能源强度的影响. 产业经济研究, 2015, (2): 15-22.
[ZHANG Y, PU Y J.Industrial structure evolution and its impact on energy intensity. Industrial Economics Research, 2015, (2): 15-22.]
[32] 时乐乐, 赵军. 环境规制、技术创新与产业结构升级. 科研管理, 2018, 39(1): 119-125.
[SHI L L, ZHAO J.Environmental regulation, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrading. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(1): 119-125.]
[33] 张媛媛, 谢林林. 新常态下产业结构转型与人力资源需求的动态变化. 发展研究, 2015, (11): 74-79.
[ZHANG Y Y, XIE L L.The changes of demand for human resources from industrial structure transformation. Development Research, 2015, (11): 74-79.]
[34] 付凌晖. 我国产业结构高级化与经济增长关系的实证研究. 统计研究, 2010, 27(8): 79-81.
[FU L H.An empirical research on industry structure and economic growth. Statistical Research, 2010, 27(8): 79-81.]
[35] 干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范. 中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响. 经济研究, 2011, (5): 4-15.
[GAN C H, ZHENG R G, YU D F.An empirical study on the effects of industrial structure on economic growth and fluctuations in China. Economic Research Journal, 2011, (5): 4-15.]
[36] 王冠孝, 梁留科, 李锋, 等. 区域旅游业与信息化的耦合协调关系实证研究. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(8): 1339-1350.
[WANG G X, LIANG L K, LI F, et al.An empirical research on the coupling coordinative relationship between regional tourism and informationization. Journal of Natural Resource, 2016, 31(8): 1339-1350.]
[37] 姜磊, 柏玲, 吴玉鸣. 中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析: 兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 788-799.
[JIANG L, BAI L, WU Y M.Coupling and coordinating degrees of provincial economy, resources and environment in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(5): 788-799.]
[38] 郭艳军, 叶鹰. 主成分分析在确定贝叶斯网络参数中的应用. 湖北工业大学学报, 2009, 24(1): 73-75.
[GUO Y J, YE Y.Using principal component analysis to calculate parameter in Bayesian networks. Journal of Hubei University of Technology, 2009, 24(1): 73-75.]
[39] 刘耀彬, 李仁东, 宋学锋. 中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1): 105-112.
[LIU Y B, LI R D, SONG X F.Analysis of coupling degrees of urbanization and ecological environment in China. Journal of Natural Resource, 2005, 20(1): 105-112.]
[40] 刘传明, 张义贵, 刘杰, 等. 城市综合交通可达性演变及其与经济发展协调度分析. 经济地理, 2011, 31(12): 2028-2033.
[LIU C M, ZHANG Y G, LIU J, et al.Study on the evolution of the city's comprehensive transportation accessibility and the coordination degree with the economic development: The empirical research about Huaian since 1991. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(12): 2028-2033.]
[41] 刘浩, 张毅, 郑文升. 城市土地集约利用与区域城市化的时空耦合协调发展评价: 以环渤海地区城市为例. 地理研究, 2011, 30(10): 1805-1817.
[LIU H, ZHANG Y, ZHENG W S.Evaluation on spatio-temporal development and interaction of intensive urban land use and urbanization: Case studies of the cities in the Bohai Rim region. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(10): 1805-1817.]
[42] 冯江茹, 范新英. 资源型地区产业结构优化测度及对经济增长的影响: 以山西省为例. 中国科技论坛, 2015, (9): 92-96.
[FENG J R, FAN X Y.The measure of industrial structure optimization and effects on economic growth: A case study of Shanxi province. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2015, (9): 92-96.]

山西资源型城市创新环境与产业结构转型空间耦合

Spatial coupling of innovative milieu and industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities in Shanxi province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	段存儒, 曾贤刚. 中国资源型城市转型对劳动力需求的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 606-617.
[2]	李德山, 赵颖文, 李琳瑛. 煤炭资源型城市环境效率及其环境生产率变动分析──基于山西省11个地级市面板数据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 618-633.
[3]	阎晓, 涂建军. 黄河流域资源型城市生态效率时空演变及驱动因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 223-239.
[4]	王凯, 朱芳书, 甘畅, 席建超. 区域产业结构转型升级水平与旅游扶贫效率耦合关系——以武陵山片区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1617-1632.
[5]	于慧, 仲佳, 刘邵权, 杨德伟. 张家口地区排污工业企业集聚与水污染空间耦合特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1416-1424.
[6]	吴景辉, 张戈, 王耕. 能源富集区贸易隐含碳及隐含SO₂排放转移——以山西省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1445-1459.
[7]	湛东升, 吴倩倩, 余建辉, 张文忠, 张娟锋. 中国资源型城市房价时空变化与影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2888-2900.
[8]	王回茴, 李汉廷, 谢苗苗, 许萌, 李少玲, 白中科. 资源型城市工矿用地系统修复的生态安全格局构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 162-173.
[9]	周宏浩, 陈晓红. 中国资源型城市精明发展与环境质量的耦合关系及响应机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(8): 1620-1632.
[10]	孙威, 王晓楠, 刘艳军. 高速铁路对中国资源型城市区位的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(1): 1-13.
[11]	马利邦, 田亚亚, 郭晓东, 陈梅梅, 王永丽. 基于格网的河西绿洲乡村聚落时空演变及其与水土资源的空间耦合关系[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(5): 775-787.
[12]	李霞, 杜世勋, 桑满杰, 郭新亚. 山西省自然保护区生态系统格局及稳定性变化趋势研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 208-218.
[13]	张宇, 曹卫东, 梁双波, 赵落涛. 中部地区资源型城市质量与规模时空差异演化研究——以山西省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 233-245.
[14]	郝祖涛, 冯兵, 谢雄标, 冯忠垒, 王莹. 基于民生满意度的资源型城市转型绩效测度及群体差异研究—以湖北省黄石市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1298-1310.
[15]	朱宇恩, 孟繁健, 王云, 李丽芬, 李华, 谢文翔. 农业生物质炭固碳潜力及经济效益分析——以山西省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(12): 2115-2124.