生态治理工程对锡林郭勒草地生态系统文化服务感知的影响研究

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200111

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

锡林郭勒近年来草地退化趋势严重,一系列生态治理工程陆续开展。基于问卷调查法,探究草地文化服务牧户感知情况及其影响因素,对比分析不同治理工程区牧户对草地文化服务感知的差异。结果表明：（1）牧户对草地文化服务的感知受其民族、年龄、文化水平的影响（P<0.05）。蒙古族对生理和精神健康、美学价值的感知高于汉族;年龄较高的群体对生理及精神健康服务、教育及研究价值感知较高,对休闲娱乐的感知较低;高文化水平群体对教育及研究价值感知较高。（2）生态工程影响草地文化服务的牧户感知,“草畜平衡+休牧+禁牧”区牧户对草地多项文化服务（生理及精神健康、灵感、精神及宗教信仰、地方感、休闲娱乐）的感知低于其他治理工程区。

关键词: 锡林郭勒, 牧户感知, 文化服务, 生态治理工程

Abstract:

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are important parts of ecosystem services and are receiving increasing attention. As the ecological barriers in the northern China, Xilin Gol League has witnessed more serious degradation in recent years. A large number of ecological restoration projects (ERPs) have been carried out in Xilin Gol, among which, grazing prohibition, rest grazing, grass-animal balance are the most representative ones. In this study, we used the questionnaire survey method to investigate the perceptions of 144 respondents in Xilin Gol on the CES of grassland ecosystem, and analyzed the factors influencing these perceptions. In addition, we compared the CES of grassland in three ERPs areas ("rest grazing", "rest grazing +grass-animal balance", "rest grazing + grass-animal balance + grazing prohibition"). The results showed that: (1) Respondent's perception of grassland's CES was affected by their ethnicity, age and education level (P<0.05), the perception of Mongolian people on mental and physical health, and the aesthetic services is higher than that of Han ethnic groups; the older group has higher perception than the younger one on mental and physical health, education and science, and low perception on recreational services; the group with high education level has higher perception on education and science services. (2) ERPs affected the CES of grassland, several grassland's CES (mental and physical health, inspiration, spiritual and religious services, sense of place, recreational services) in "rest grazing + grass-animal balance + grazing prohibition" region is lower than that of the other two areas.

Key words: respondents' perceptions, ecological restoration projects, cultural ecosystem services, Xilin Gol

罗琦, 甄霖, 杨婉妮, 徐增让. 生态治理工程对锡林郭勒草地生态系统文化服务感知的影响研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 119-129.

LUO Qi, ZHEN Lin, YANG Wan-ni, XU Zeng-rang. The influence of ecological restoration projects on cultural ecosystem services in the Xilin Gol Grassland[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(1): 119-129.

参考文献

[1] GONG P, WANG J, YU L, et al.Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: First mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013, 34(7): 2607-2654.
[2] HAMADA A E, DIRK D V, GAURAV Z, et al.Grassland species differentially regulate proline concentrations under future climate conditions: An integrated biochemical and modelling approach. New Phytologist, 2015, 208(2): 354-369.
[3] O'MARA F P. The role of grasslands in food security and climate change. Annals of Botany, 2012, 110(6): 1263-1270.
[4] 肖玉, 谢高地, 甄霖, 等. 阴山北麓草原生态功能区防风固沙服务受益范围识别. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(10): 70-82.
[XIAO Y, XIE G D, ZHEN L, et al.Identifying the benefit areas of wind erosion prevention in the key ecological function area of grassland at the northern foot of Yinshan Mountain. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(10): 70-82.]
[5] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 贾良清, 等. 中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价. 生态学报, 2003, 24(6): 1101-1110.
[ZHAO T Q, OUYANG Z Y, JIA L Q, et al.Ecosystem services and their valuation of China grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 24(6): 1101-1110.]
[6] GANG C, ZHOU W, CHEN Y, et al.Quantitative assessment of the contributions of climate change and human activities on global grassland degradation. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72(11): 4273-4282.
[7] BRYAN B A, GAO L, YE Y, et al.China's response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature, 2018, 559(7713): 193-204.
[8] CAO S. Impact of China's large-scale ecological restoration program on the environment and society in arid and semiarid areas of China: Achievements, problems, synthesis, and applications. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 41(4): 317-335.
[9] PETURSDOTTIR T, ARNALDS O, BAKER S C, et al.A social-ecological system approach to analyze stakeholders' interactions within a large-scale rangeland restoration program. Ecology and Society, 2013, 18(2): 29-39.
[10] ZHANG J, NIU J M, BAO T, et al.Human induced dryland degradation in Ordos Plateau, China, revealed by multilevel statistical modeling of normalized difference vegetation index and rainfall time-series. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(2): 219-229.
[11] CHEN B, ZHANG X, TAO J, et al. The impact of climate change and anthropogenic activities on alpine grassland over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014, 189-190: 11-18.
[12] FAN J W, SHAO Q Q, LIU J Y, et al.Assessment of effects of climate change and grazing activity on grassland yield in the Three Rivers Headwaters Region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 2010, 170(1-4): 571-584.
[13] 任继周. 放牧, 草原生态系统存在的基本方式: 兼论放牧的转型. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(8): 1259-1275.
[REN J Z. Grazing, the basic form of grassland ecosystem and its transformation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(8): 1259-1275.]
[14] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington D C: Island Press, 2003.
[15] 吴仁吉. 草原生态系统文化服务研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2017.
[WU R J. Study on cultural ecosystem services of grassland-based on Mongolian grassland cultural. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University, 2017.]
[16] RUSSELL R, GUERRY A D, BALVANERA P, et al.Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2013, 38(1): 473-502.
[17] SATZ D, GOULD R K, CHAN K M A, et al. The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment. Ambio, 2013, 42(6): 675-684.
[18] FISH R, CHURCH A, WINTER M, Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 208-217.
[19] 杨勇, 李兰花, 王保林, 等. 基于改进的CASA模型模拟锡林郭勒草原植被净初级生产力. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(8): 2344-2352.
[YANG Y, LI L H, WANG B L, et al.Simulation of net primary productivity by a satellite data-driven improved CASA model in Xilingol grassland. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(8): 2344-2352.]
[20] 李晋波, 姚楠, 赵英, 等. 不同放牧条件下锡林郭勒典型草原土壤水分分布特征及降水入渗估算. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 61-70.
[LI J B, YAO N, ZHAO Y, et al.Characteristics of soil water distribution and evaluation of recharge rate under different grazing history in the Xilin Gol Steppe. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(10): 61-70.]
[21] 董乙强, 孙宗玖, 安沙舟, 等. 短期禁牧对天山北坡蒿类荒漠群落特征及其稳定性的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5): 996-1003.
[DONG Y Q, SUN Z J, AN S Z, et al.Effect of short-term grazing exclusion on community characteristics and stability in Artemisia Desert on the northern slops of the Tianshan Mountains. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5): 996-1003.]
[22] 康晓虹, 史俊宏, 张文娟, 等. 草原禁牧补助政策背景下牧户生计资本现状及其影响因素研究: 基于内蒙古典型牧区的调查数据. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(11): 61-67.
[KANG X H, SHI J H, ZHANG W J, et al.Research on the current situation of the livelihood capital of the herdsman and its factors influencing the background of grazing prohibition subsidy policy in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid Land Resource and Environment, 2018, 32(11): 61-67.]
[23] 闫志辉. 内蒙古锡林郭勒盟退化、沙化草地现状及治理对策. 草原与草业, 2014, 26(2): 8-11.
[YAN Z H. Present situation and countermeasures of degraded desertification grassland in Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014, 26(2): 8-11.]
[24] 锡林郭勒盟统计局. 锡林郭勒盟数据要情手册. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019: 22-27.
[Xilingol League Statistics Bureau. Xilingol League Data Information Manual. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019: 22-27.]
[25] 杨婉妮, 甄霖. 不同生态恢复措施对草地样带食物消费的影响: 以锡林郭勒盟为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(16): 5885-5896.
[YANG W N, ZHEN L. Impacts of different ecological restoration measures on food consumption in grassland transects: A case study in Xilingol. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(16): 5885-5896.]
[26] ZHNAG M A, BORJIGIN E, ZHANG H. Mongolian nomadic culture and ecological culture: On the ecological reconstruction in the agro-pastoral mosaic zone in Northern China. Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(1): 19-26.
[27] 刘钟龄. 蒙古族草原文化传统的生态学内涵. 草业科学, 2010, 27(1): 1-3.
[LIU Z L. Ecological connotation of Mongolian grassland traditional culture. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(1): 1-3.]
[28] ORENSTEIN D E, GRONER E. In the eye of the stakeholder: Changes in perceptions of ecosystem services across an international border. Ecosystem Services, 2014, 8: 185-196.
[29] ALLENDORF T D, YANG J. The role of ecosystem services in park-people relationships: The case of Gaoligongshan Nature Reserve in Southwest China. Biological Conservation, 2013, 167: 187-193.
[30] DOU Y H, ZHEN L, YU X, et al.Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of Western China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 646: 685-695.
[31] 周建琴, 田赟, 吴雨晴, 等. 不同放牧方式下的草场植被群落特征及其与土壤因子的关系以新巴尔虎左旗为例. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(6): 1117-1126.
[ZHOU J Q, TIAN Y, WU Y Q, et al.Characteristics of grassland vegetation community under different grazing management and its relationship with soil factors: A case study of Xin Barag Zuoqi. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(6): 1117-1126.]
[32] 杨波. 内蒙古翁牛特旗草原禁牧和生态补偿对农户收入的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2015.
[YANG B. Impacts of grazing restoration and ecological compensation on household's income in Wongniute county, Inner Mongolia. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2015.]
[33] 靳乐山, 胡振通. 草原生态补偿政策与牧民的可能选择. 改革, 2014, (11): 100-107.
[JIN L S, HU Z T. Grassland ecological compensation policy and chooses of the herdsmen. Reform, 2014, (11): 100-107.]
[34] 珠娜. 现代化进程中牧区蒙古族劳动力转移及文化适应: 以杭锦旗图古日格嘎查为例. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学, 2010.
[ZHU N. The process of modernization in the transfer of pastoral Mongolian labor force and cultural adaption: Take the Hang Jin Banner Tugurigegacha as a case. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Normal University, 2010.]
[35] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. London: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[36] QI J, CHEN J, WAN S, et al.Understanding the coupled natural and human systems in dryland East Asia. Environmental Research Letters, 2012, 7(1): 015202, Doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/015202. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-93267/7/1/015202/meta.
[37] BOLES S H, XIAO X, LIU J, et al.Land cover characterization of temperate East Asia using multi-temporal VEGETATION sensor data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 90(4): 477-489.
[38] 徐斌, 杨秀春, 陶伟国, 等. 中国草原产草量遥感监测. 生态学报, 2006, 27(2): 405-413.
[XU B, YANG X C, TAO W G, et al.Remote sensing monitoring upon the grass production in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 27(2): 405-413.]
[39] 刘敏, 陈田, 刘爱利. 旅游地游憩价值评估研究进展. 人文地理, 2008, 23(1): 13-19.
[LIU M, CHEN T, LIU A L. Review on economic valuation of outdoor research in tourism areas. Human Geography, 2008, 23(1): 13-19.]
[40] 张玏. 基于定性与定量结合的青海省生态系统美学价值综合评估研究. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.
[ZHANG L. Qinghai ecosystem aesthetic value comprehensive assessment based on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015.]
[41] 何思源, 苏杨, 王蕾, 等. 国家公园游憩功能的实现: 武夷山国家公园试点区游客生态系统服务需求和支付意愿. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(1): 40-53.
[HE S Y, SU Y, WANG L, et al.Realization of recreation in national parks: A perspective of ecosystem services demand and willingness to pay of tourists in Wuyishan Pilot. Journal of Natural Resource, 2019, 34(1): 40-53.]
[42] KUAMR M, KUMAR P. Valuation of the ecosystem services a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 2008, 64(4): 808-819.
[43] PLEASANT M M, GRAY S A, LEPCZYK C, et al.Managing cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 2014, 8: 141-147.