过程耦合与空间集成：国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102

自然资源学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 3-13.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102

过程耦合与空间集成：国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知

彭建^1,2, 吕丹娜², 董建权¹, 刘焱序³, 刘前媛², 李冰¹

1. 北京大学城市与环境学院地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室,北京 100871;
2. 北京大学深圳研究生院城市规划与设计学院城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室,深圳 518055;
3. 北京师范大学地理科学学部地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875

收稿日期:2019-10-13 修回日期:2019-12-17 出版日期:2020-01-28 发布日期:2020-01-28
作者简介:彭建（1976- ）,男,四川彭州人,博士,副教授,博士生导师,研究方向为景观生态与土地利用、区域生态持续性评估、综合自然地理学。E-mail: jianpeng@urban.pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
研究阐释党的十九大精神国家社科基金专项课题（18VSJ041）

Processes coupling and spatial integration: Characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology

PENG Jian^1,2, LYU Dan-na², DONG Jian-quan¹, LIU Yan-xu³, LIU Qian-yuan², LI Bing¹

1. Ministry of Education Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Environmental and Urban Sciences, School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2019-10-13 Revised:2019-12-17 Online:2020-01-28 Published:2020-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

新时期国土空间生态修复的核心是整体保护与系统治理,强调生态保护修复与社会经济发展耦合关联的系统性、协同性。景观生态学以景观为研究对象,基于整体综合视角聚焦景观结构与功能演变及其与人类社会相互作用机理,重点关注过程耦合与空间集成。面向国土空间生态修复的战略需求,景观生态学“格局与过程耦合—时空尺度—生态系统服务—景观可持续性”的研究路径能够为国土空间生态修复提供重要学科支撑;依据格局—过程互馈机理识别退化、受损的山水林田湖草生命共同体,基于景观多功能性权衡协调社会—生态需求并确定修复目标,应用生态安全格局优化多层级修复网络体系,建立面向景观可持续性的多尺度级联福祉保障。

关键词: 景观生态学, 空间集成, 国土空间生态修复, 过程耦合

Abstract:

The core of ecological restoration of territorial space is the holistic protection and systematic governance in the new period. It emphasizes the synergies between ecological conservation and socio-economic development. Landscape ecology focuses on the dynamics of landscape structure and function, and the interactive mechanism between them and human society from a comprehensive perspective, especially paying attention to processes coupling and spatial integration. The approach of "coupling patterns and processes-spatial and temporal scale-ecosystem services-landscape sustainability" in landscape ecology can provide significant disciplinary support for ecological restoration of territorial space. In the practice of ecological restoration of territorial space, pattern-process coupling theory should be employed to identify degraded or damaged life community of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes and grasslands. Ecosystem services tradeoffs of multifunctional landscape for balancing social, economic and ecological demands are used to determine ecological restoration targets. For systematic restoration, the ecological security pattern is an effective way to optimize a multi-level restoration network, and the multi-scale cascade framework for human well-being safeguard can be built based on landscape sustainability.

Key words: landscape ecology, ecological restoration of territorial space, processes coupling, spatial integration

彭建, 吕丹娜, 董建权, 刘焱序, 刘前媛, 李冰. 过程耦合与空间集成：国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 3-13.

PENG Jian, LYU Dan-na, DONG Jian-quan, LIU Yan-xu, LIU Qian-yuan, LI Bing. Processes coupling and spatial integration: Characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020, 35(1): 3-13.

参考文献

[1] STEFFEN W, CRUTZEN P J, MCNEILL J R, et al.The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature?. AMBIO, 2007, 36(8): 614-621.
[2] 沈悦, 刘天科, 周璞. 自然生态空间用途管制理论分析及管制策略研究. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(12): 17-24.
[SHEN Y, LIU T K, ZHOU P. Theoretical analysis and strategies of natural ecological space use control. China Land Sciences, 2017, 31(12): 17-24.]
[3] 王静, 周伟奇, 许开鹏, 等. 京津冀地区城市化对植被覆盖度及景观格局的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37(21): 7019-7029.
[WANG J, ZHOU W Q, XU K P, et al.Spatiotemporal pattern of vegetation cover and its relationship with urbanization in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Megaregion from 2000 to 2010. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(21): 7019-7029.]
[4] 王聪, 伍星, 傅伯杰, 等. 重点脆弱生态区生态恢复模式现状与发展方向. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7333-7343.
[WANG C, WU X, FU B J, et al.Ecological restorations in the key ecologically vulnerable regions: Current situation and development direction. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7333-7343.]
[5] LIU J G, LI S X, OUYANG Z Y, et al.Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. PNAS, 2008, 105(28): 9477-9482.
[6] 吴丹丹, 蔡运龙. 中国生态恢复效果评价研究综述. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(4): 622-628.
[WU D D, CAI Y L. Evaluation of ecological restoration effects in China: A review. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(4): 622-628.]
[7] 魏远, 顾红波, 薛亮, 等. 矿山废弃地土地复垦与生态恢复研究进展. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(2): 107-114.
[WEI Y, GU H B, XUE L, et al.Review of studies on reclamation and ecological restoration of abandoned land of mine. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 10(2): 107-114.]
[8] 王志强, 崔爱花, 缪建群, 等. 淡水湖泊生态系统退化驱动因子及修复技术研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(18) : 6253-6264.
[WANG Z Q, CUI A H, MIU J Q, et al.Research progress on the driving factors of freshwater lake ecosystem degradation and associated restoration techniques. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(18): 6253-6264.]
[9] 王克林, 岳跃民, 陈洪松, 等. 喀斯特石漠化综合治理及其区域恢复效应. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7432-7440.
[WANG K L, YUE Y M, CHEN H S, et al.The comprehensive treatment of karst rocky desertification and its regional restoration effects. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7432-7440.]
[10] 王夏晖, 何军, 饶胜, 等. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复思路与实践. 环境保护, 2018, 46(3): 17-20.
[WANG X H, HE J, RAO S, et al.Design of implementation path of ecological engineering for ecological protection and restoration of multi ecological elements. Environmental Protection, 2018, 46(3): 17-20.]
[11] 彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区. 生态学报, 2017, 37(13): 4562-4572.
[PENG J, YANG Y, XIE P, et al.Zoning for the construction of green space ecological networks in Guangdong province based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(13): 4562-4572.]
[12] 刘佳, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等. 基于电路理论的南京城市绿色基础设施格局优化. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4363-4372.
[LIU J, YIN H W, KONG F H, et al.Structure optimization of circuit theory-based green infrastructure in Nanjing, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 4363-4372.]
[13] 侯现慧, 赵敏娟, 刘婧鸣, 等. 基于生态协调性和建设适宜性的山区基本农田布局研究: 以福建省永安市为例. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2167-2182.
[HOU X H, ZHAO M J, LIU J M, et al.Research on the basic farmland distribution in mountainous areas based on ecological harmony and construction suitability. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(12): 2167-2182.]
[14] PENG J, PAN Y J, LIU Y X, et al.Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 110-124.
[15] 黄木易, 岳文泽, 冯少茹, 等. 基于MCR模型的大别山核心区生态安全格局异质性及优化. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.
[HUANG M Y, YUE W Z, FENG S R, et al.Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of ecological security based on MCR model and ecological pattern optimization in the Yuexi county of the Dabie Mountain area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 771-784.]
[16] 曹宇, 王嘉怡, 李国煜. 国土空间生态修复: 概念思辨与理论认知. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(7): 1-10.
[CAO Y, WANG J Y, LI G Y. Ecological restoration for territorial space: Basic concepts and foundations. China Land Science, 2019, 33(7): 1-10.]
[17] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[18] 魏巍, 冯晶. 城市生态修复国际经验和启示. 城市发展研究, 2017, 24(5): 13-19, 55.
[WEI W, FENG J. International experience and enlightenment of urban ecological restoration. Urban Development Studies, 2017, 24(5): 13-19, 55.]
[19] LORENZ A W, JAHNIG S C, HERING D, et al.Re-meandering German lowland streams: Qualitative and quantitative effects of restoration measures on hydromorphology and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management, 2009, 44(4): 745-754.
[20] KOCH J M, HOBBS R J. Synthesis: Is Alcoa successfully restoring a jarrah forest ecosystem after bauxite mining in Western Australia?. Restoration Ecology, 2007, 15(4): 137-144.
[21] 董祚继. 新时代国土空间规划的十大关系. 资源科学, 2019, 41(9): 1589-1599.
[DONG Z J. Ten relations of territorial planning in the new era. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1589-1599.]
[22] 邬建国. 景观生态学: 格局、过程尺度与等级. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.
[WU J G.Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007.]
[23] 彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月, 等. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展: 从认知到决策. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 960-973.
[PENG J, HU X X, ZHAO M Y, et al.Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geograhica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 960-973.]
[24] 孙然好, 李卓, 陈利顶. 中国生态区划研究进展: 从格局、功能到服务. 生态学报, 2018, 38(15): 5271-5278.
[SUN R H, LI Z, CHEN L D. Review of ecological regionalization and classification in China: Ecological patterns, functions, and ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(15): 5271-5278.]
[25] 刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 赵文武, 等. 生态资产核算与生态系统服务评估: 概念交汇与重点方向. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23): 8267-8276.
[LIU Y X, FU B J, ZHAO W W, et al.Ecological asset accounting and ecosystem services evaluation: Concept intersection and key research priorities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(23): 8267-8276.]
[26] 柳荻, 胡振通, 靳乐山. 生态保护补偿的分析框架研究综述. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2): 380-392.
[LIU D, HU Z T, JIN L S. Review on analytical framework of eco-compensation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 380-392.]
[27] 赵文武, 房学宁. 景观可持续性与景观可持续性科学. 生态学报, 2014, 34(10): 2453-2459.
[ZHAO W W, FANG X N. Landscape sustability and landscape sustainability science. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(10): 2453-2459.]
[28] 傅伯杰, 吕一河, 陈利顶, 等. 国际景观生态学研究新进展. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2): 798-804.
[FU B J, LYU Y H, CHEN L D, et al.The latest progress of landscape ecology in the world. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(2): 798-804.]
[29] 黄宁, 王红映, 吝涛, 等. 基于“源—汇”理论的流域非点源污染控制景观格局调控框架: 以厦门市马銮湾流域为例. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10): 3325-3334.
[HUANG N, WANG H Y, LIN T, et al.Regulation framework of watershed landscape pattern for non-point source pollution control based on "source-sink" theory: A case study in the watershed of Maluan Bay, Xiamen city, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(10): 3325-3334.]
[30] 孙天成, 刘婷婷, 褚琳, 等. 三峡库区典型流域“源”“汇”景观格局时空变化对侵蚀产沙的影响研究. 生态学报, 2019, 30(20): 7476-7492.
[SUN T C, LIU T T, CHU L, et al.Effect of temporal and spatial variations in source-sink landscape patterns on soul erosion and sediment yield from typical watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 30(20): 7476-7492.]
[31] 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 赵文武. “源”“汇”景观理论及其生态学意义. 生态学报, 2006, 26(5): 1444-1449.
[CHEN L D, FU B J, ZHAO W W. Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(5): 1444-1449.]
[32] 刘海猛, 方创琳, 李咏红. 城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1489-1507.
[LIU H M, FANG C L, LI Y H. The Coupled Human and Natural Cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions. Acta Geograhica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1489-1507.]
[33] WANG J T, PENG J, ZHAO M Y, et al.Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in Northwestern Yunnan, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 574: 57-64.
[34] PENG J, HU X X, WANG X Y, et al.Simulating the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services trade-offs in Northwestern Yunnan, China. Ecosystem Services, 2019, 39, 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100998.
[35] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.
[PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al.Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407-419.]
[36] WU J G. Linking landscape, land system and design approaches to achieve sustainability. Journal of Land Use Science, 2019, 14(2): 173-189.
[37] DENG H B, ZHENG P, LIU T X, et al.Forest ecosystem services and eco-compensation mechanisms in China. Environmental Management, 2011, 48(6): 1079-1085.
[38] 林慧, 马永欢. 生态补偿制度的改革路径. 中国土地, 2019, (5): 26-28.
[LIN H, MA Y H. The reform path of ecological compensation system. China Land, 2019, (5): 26-28.]

过程耦合与空间集成：国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知

Processes coupling and spatial integration: Characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	许闯胜, 刘伟, 宋伟, 李寒. 差异化开展国土空间生态修复的思考[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 384-394.
[2]	李凯, 侯鹰, Hans Skov-Petersen, Peter S. Andersen. 景观规划导向的绿色基础设施研究进展——基于“格局—过程—服务—可持续性”研究范式[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 435-448.
[3]	吴健生, 王仰麟, 张小飞, 彭建, 刘焱序. 景观生态学在国土空间治理中的应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 14-25.
[4]	摆万奇, 张镱锂, 包维楷. 大渡河上游地区景观格局与动态[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(1): 75-80.
[5]	卢兵友. 典型农村景观生态工程建设效益分析——以山东省西单村为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(1): 54-58.
[6]	王仰麟, 韩荡. 区域农业持续性与持续发展研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 1998, 13(4): 297-303.