基于生产可能性边界的黄河三角洲湿地生态系统服务权衡强度

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20191203

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

提出了一种基于生产可能性边界（PPF）的湿地生态系统服务权衡强度计算方法,包括湿地生态系统服务定量评估、权衡关系判定、PPF曲线绘制和权衡强度计算四个步骤。以黄河三角洲湿地为研究对象,对保护情景、现状发展情景及开发情景三种土地利用发展模式下的主导生态系统服务进行了定量化权衡分析。结果表明：各生态系统服务间呈现显著相关关系（R²≥0.9,P<0.01）,各发展情景下,栖息地质量与碳储量之间均为协同关系;物质生产与栖息地质量间均为权衡关系,排序为保护情景<基期<现状发展情景<开发情景;而对于物质生产与碳储量之间,在保护及现状发展情景下存在协同关系;而开发情景下转变为权衡关系。该模型通过灵活比较不同生态服务间权衡关系分析进行系列管理规划的方案优选,为实现区域可持续发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 权衡强度, 生态系统服务, 生产可能性边界, 黄河三角洲湿地

Abstract:

We developed a four-step method to quantify trade-offs among ecosystem services: evaluate the targeted services at different spatial-temporal scales; identify whether a trade-off exists between pairs of ecosystem services; graph the production-possibility frontier curve; and use that curve to calculate the trade-off intensity between services. Using China's Yellow River Delta wetlands as a case study, we examined the potential trade-offs between material production, carbon storage, and habitat quality under three land-use scenarios (business-as-usual, protection, and exploitation). We found significant correlations between all pairs of the three ecosystem services. Trade-offs existed between material production and habitat quality in all scenarios, with the following order of intensity: protection (6.4) < 2015 status quo (21.8) < business as usual (22.5) < exploitation (24.3). Synergies always existed between habitat quality and carbon storage. The material production and carbon storage services were synergistic in the protection and business as usual scenarios, but they exhibited a trade-off in the exploitation scenario, with a trade-off intensity (59.9) comparable to that (60.3) in the 2015 status quo. The methodology can be flexibly used to analyze trade-offs and compare alternative management plans, thereby revealing the optimal management, which provides a scientific basis for achieving sustainable regional development and resource management.

Key words: trade-offs intensity, ecosystem services, production-possibility frontier, Yellow River Delta wetlands

杨薇, 靳宇弯, 孙立鑫, 孙涛, 邵冬冬. 基于生产可能性边界的黄河三角洲湿地生态系统服务权衡强度[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(12): 2516-2528.

YANG Wei, JIN Yu-wan, SUN Li-xin, SUN Tao, SHAO Dong-dong. Determining the intensity of the trade-offs among ecosystem services based on production-possibility frontiers: Model development and a case study[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 34(12): 2516-2528.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

参考文献 35

[1]	FINLAYSON M, CRUZ R D, DAVIDSON N, et al.Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Data Fusion Concepts & Ideas, 2005, 656(1): 87-98.
[2]	BENNETT E M, PETERSON G D, GORDON L J.Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12(12): 1394-1404.
[3]	LU N, FU B, JIN T, et al.Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipitation gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29(10): 1697-1708.
[4]	RODRÍGUEZ J P, JR BEARD T D, BENNETT E M, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology & Society, 2006, 11(1): 709-723.
[5]	CARREÑO L, FRANK F C, VIGLIZZO E F. Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2012, 154(5): 68-77.
[6]	CHISHOLM R A.Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(10): 1973-1987.
[7]	BERTA M L, IRENE I A, MARINA G L, et al.Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. Plos One, 2012, 7(6): e38970.
[8]	BUTLER J R A, WONG G Y, METCALFE D J, et al. An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 180(6): 176-191.
[9]	SREFFAN-DEWENTER I, KESSLER M, BARKMANN J, et al.Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104: 4973-4978.
[10]	RAUDSEPP-HEARNE C, PETERSON G D, TENGÖ M, et al.Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: Why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?. Bioscience, 2010, 60: 576-589.
[11]	JIA X Q, FU B J, FENG X M, et al.The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shanxi, China. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 43(1): 103-113.
[12]	BRADFORD J B, D'AMATO A W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2012, 10(4): 210-216.
[13]	MCCARTHY H R, PATAKI D E, JENERETEE G D.Plant water-use efficiency as metric of urban ecosystem services. Ecological Application, 2011, 21: 3115-3217.
[14]	饶胜, 林泉, 王夏晖, 等. 正蓝旗草地生态系统服务权衡研究.干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(3): 81-86.
	[RAO S, LIN Q, WANG X H, et al.The trade-off between grassland ecosystem services in Zhenglan Banner. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015, 29(3): 81-86.]
[15]	CAVENDER-BARES J, POLASKY S, KING E, et al.A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services. Ecology & Society, 2015, 20(1): 17.
[16]	NELSON E, POLASKY S, LEWIS D J, et al.Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(28): 9471-9476.
[17]	POLASKY S, NELSON E, CAMM J, et al.Where to put things spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141: 1505-1524.
[18]	TALLIS H T, RICKETTS T, GUERRY A D, et al.InVEST 2.5.3 User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project. Stanford, 2013.
[19]	CUI B S, YANG Q C, YANG Z F, et al.Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35(7): 1090-1103.
[20]	刘剑. 东营市湿地景观格局动态变化与安全水平识别. 南京: 中国科学院大学, 2013.
	[LIU J.Landscape pattern dynamic change and safety level identification of wetland in Dongying city. Nanjing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013.]
[21]	李逸凡. 近32年黄河三角洲景观格局变化研究. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
	[LI Y F.Research on landscape change of the Yellow River Delta during the last 32 years. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015.]
[22]	WANG H J, YANG Z S, SAITO Y, et al.Interannual and seasonal variation of the Huanghe (Yellow River) water discharge over the past 50years: Connections to impacts from ENSO events and dams. Global & Planetary Change, 2006, 50(3-4): 212-225.
[23]	蔡冬梅. 黄河三角洲土地利用/覆被变化与生态系统健康评价研究. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.
	[CAI D M.The study on the change of land use/cover and ecosystem health assessment in Yellow River Delta. Nanjing: Dongnan University, 2016.]
[24]	韩美, 张晓慧. 黄河三角洲湿地主导生态服务功能价值估算. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19(6): 37-43.
	[HAN M, ZHANG X H.Value estimates of the dominant ecosystem services in Yellow River Delta Wetland. China Population Resources and Environment, 2009, 19(6): 37-43.]
[25]	孟士婷, 黄庆旭, 何春阳, 等. 区域碳固持服务供需关系动态分析: 以北京为例. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(7): 1191-1203.
	[MENG S T, HUANG Q X, HE C Y, et al.Mapping the changes in supply and demand of carbon sequestration service: A case study in Beijing. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(7): 1191-1203.]
[26]	谢余初, 巩杰, 齐姗姗, 等. 基于InVEST模型的白龙江流域水源供给服务时空分异. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1337-1347.
	[XIE Y C, GONG J, QI S S, et al.Spatio-temporal variation of water supply service in Bailong River Watershed based on InVEST model. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(8): 1337-1347.]
[27]	周方文, 马田田, 李晓文, 等. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地生态系统服务模拟及评估. 湿地科学, 2015, 13(6): 667-674.
	[ZHOU F W, MA T T, LI X W, et al.The simulation and assessment of the ecosystem services in the coastal wetlands of the Yellow River Delta based on InVEST model. Wetland Science, 2015, 13(6): 667-674.]
[28]	董洪芳, 于君宝, 孙志高, 等. 黄河口滨岸潮滩湿地植物-土壤系统有机碳空间分布特征. 环境科学, 2010, 31(6): 1594-1599.
	[DONG H F, YU J B, SUN Z G, et al.Spatial distribution characteristics of organic carbon in the soil plant systems in the Yellow River Estuary tidal flat wetland. Environmental Science, 2010, 31(6): 1594-1599.]
[29]	张绪良, 张朝晖, 徐宗军, 等. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地植被的碳储量和固碳能力. 安全与环境学报, 2012, (6): 145-149.
	[ZHANG X L, ZHANG C H, XU Z X, et al.On the relation between carbon storage and reinforced fixation of the coastal wetland vegetation in the Yellow River Delta Area. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2012, (6): 145-149.]
[30]	许振, 左平, 王俊杰, 等. 6个时期盐城滨海湿地植物碳储量变化. 湿地科学, 2014, 12(6): 709-713.
	[XU Z, ZUO P, WANG J J, et al.Changes of vegetation carbon storage in Yancheng coastal wetlands for six periods. Weltand Science, 2014, 12(6): 709-713.]
[31]	宋红丽. 围填海活动对黄河三角洲滨海湿地生态系统类型变化和碳汇功能的影响. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2015.
	[SONG H L.Influence of reclamation activities on ecosystem type and carbon sink function of the coastal wetland in the Yellow River estuary. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015.]
[32]	曹磊, 宋金明, 李学刚, 等. 中国滨海盐沼湿地碳收支与碳循环过程研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33(17): 5141-5152.
	[CAO L, SONG J M, LI X G, et al.Research progresses in carbon budget and carbin cycle of the coastal salt marshes in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(17): 5141-5152.]
[33]	于君宝, 王永丽, 董洪芳, 等. 基于景观格局的现代黄河三角洲滨海湿地土壤有机碳储量估算. 湿地科学, 2013, 11(1): 1-6.
	[YU J B, WANG Y L, DONG H F, et al.Estimation of soil organic carbon storage in coastal wetlands of modern Yellow River Delta based on landscape pattern. Wetland Science, 2013, 11(1): 1-6.]
[34]	XU X B, YANG G S, TAN Y, et al. Ecological risk assessment of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China from 1985 to 2020. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 554-555: 7-16.
[35]	薛慧. 人工系统生态服务研究. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
	[XUE H.Studies on services from artificial ecosystems. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013.]

	基期	保护情景	BaU情景	开发情景
平均碳密度/(t/hm²)	209.63	231.42	214.79	177.60
总碳储量/10⁶t	7.84	8.65	8.03	6.64