不同农地整治模式对耕地生产价值和生态价值的影响——基于天门、潜江部分农户的实证分析

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20191107

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于耕地生产价值和生态价值理论及其评估方法,构建农地整治背景下耕地生产价值和生态价值的分析框架,利用湖北省天门市和潜江市的农户问卷调查数据,采用DID模型和OLS模型,分析不同农地整治模式影响耕地生产价值和生态价值的作用机理。研究发现：（1）农地整治能较大促进耕地生产价值的提高,且新型经营主体主导模式的促进作用要优于政府主导模式;（2）农地整治能显著促进耕地生态价值的提高,但两种模式的促进效应没有明显不同;（3）耕地生产价值的提升有助于耕地生态价值的提高。基于此,今后不仅要继续加大农地综合整治的投资力度,还要在农地综合整治中重视生态整治,更要创新农地整治实施模式。

关键词: 农地整治, 双重差分模型, 模式, 生产价值, 生态价值

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to explore influencing mechanism of different rural land consolidation (RLC) projects on the cultivated land production value and ecological value based on the theories of cultivated land production value and ecological value and its evaluation method. Using the survey data of some farmers in the cities of Tianmen and Qianjiang of Hubei province, the DID model and OLS model are employed to conduct this research. The results show that: (1) The RLC projects have brought great promotion effect on the production value of cultivated land. Moreover, the promotion effect of the new agricultural management subject leading mode is better than that of the government leading mode. (2) Although there is no significant difference in the improvement effect on the ecological value of cultivated land between the two modes of rural land consolidation, the RLC projects have notable positive effect on the ecological value of cultivated land. (3) The improvement of cultivated land production value helps to increase the ecological value of cultivated land. In conclusion, it is suggested that we not only need to increase investment in the rural land comprehensive consolidation, but also should highlight ecological consolidation in the rural land comprehensive consolidation, and innovate the implementation mode of rural land consolidation.

Key words: mode, ecological value, rural land consolidation, production value, DID model

谢金华, 杨钢桥, 汪箭, 许玉光. 不同农地整治模式对耕地生产价值和生态价值的影响——基于天门、潜江部分农户的实证分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2333-2347.

XIE Jin-hua, YANG Gang-qiao, WANG Jian, XU Yu-guang. Impact of different rural land consolidation modes on cultivated land production value and ecological value based on an empirical analysis of some farmers in Tianmen and Qianjiang[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 34(11): 2333-2347.

参考文献

[1] 王成, 彭清, 唐宁, 等. 2005-2015年耕地多功能时空演变及其协同与权衡研究: 以重庆市沙坪坝区为例. 地理科学, 2018, 38(4): 20-25.
[WANG C, PENG Q, TANG N, et al.Spatio-temporal evolution and the synergy and trade-off relationship of cultivated land multi-function in 2005-2015: A case of Shapingba district, Chongqing city. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(4): 20-25.]
[2] 宋小青, 欧阳竹. 耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(7): 859-868.
[SONG X Q, OUYANG Z.Connotation of multifunctional cultivated land and its implications for cultivated land protection. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(7): 859-868.]
[3] 姜广辉, 张凤荣, 孔祥斌, 等. 耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(8): 42-47.
[JIANG G H, ZHANG F R, KONG X B, et al.The different levels and the protection of multi-functions of cultivated land. China Land Science, 2011, 25(8): 42-47.]
[4] 蔡运龙, 霍雅勤. 中国耕地价值重建方法与案例研究. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1084-1092.
[CAI Y L, HUO Y Q.Reevaluating cultivated land in China: Method and case studies. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(10): 1084-1092.]
[5] 文高辉, 杨钢桥, 李文静, 等. 基于农民视角的农地整理项目绩效评价及其障碍因子诊断: 以湖北省毛嘴等三个项目为例. 资源科学, 2014, 36(1): 26-34.
[WEN G H, YANG G Q, LI W J, et al.An evaluation of rural land consolidation projects performance and its obstacle indicators based on farmers' perspective: A case of 3 projects in Hubei. Resources Science, 2014, 36(1): 26-34.]
[6] 汪文雄, 李敏, 余利红, 等. 农地整治项目农民有效参与的实证研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(7): 128-137.
[WANG W X, LI M, YU L H, et al.Farmers' effective participation in rural land consolidation projects. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(7): 128-137.]
[7] 郧文聚, 宇振荣. 土地整治加强生态景观建设理论、方法和技术应用对策. 中国土地科学, 2011, 25(6): 4-9.
[YUN W J, YU Z R.Theory, method, technological application of landscape and ecological engineering of land consolidation. China Land Science, 2011, 25(6): 4-9.]
[8] 谷晓坤, 范春晓, 柴铎, 等. 不同类型区农用地整治对农田生产能力的影响. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(5): 745-753.
[GU X K, FAN C X, CHAI D, et al.Evaluation for the production ability of agricultural land in different types of agricultural land consolidation area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(5): 745-753.]
[9] 张正峰, 王琦, 谷晓坤. 秀山自治县土地整治生态系统服务价值响应研究. 中国土地科学, 2012, 26(7): 50-55.
[ZHANG Z F, WANG Q, GU X K.Ecosystem-services value response of land comprehensive consolidation in Xiushan autonomous county. China Land Sciences, 2012, 26(7): 50-55.]
[10] 赵微, 闵敏, 李俊鹏. 土地整理区域生态系统服务价值损益规律研究. 资源科学, 2013, 35(7): 1415-1422.
[ZHAO W, MIN M, LI J P.Regulation of ecosystem services in land consolidation regions. Resources Science, 2013, 35(7): 1415-1422.]
[11] 王瑷玲, 刘文鹏, 纪广韦, 等. 山东低山丘陵土地整治区耕地生态价值评价. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(s1): 244-250.
[WANG A L, LIU W P, JI G W, et al.Evaluation on ecological value of arable land in hilly land consolidation region of Shandong province. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(s1): 244-250.]
[12] 汪文雄, 朱欣, 余利红, 等. 不同模式下农地整治前后土地利用效率的比较研究. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(7): 1104-1117.
[WANG W X, ZHU X, YU L H, et al.Comparative study on land use efficiency before and after rural land consolidation in different modes. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(7): 1104-1117.]
[13] 曾艳, 杨钢桥. 资产专用性、不确定性与农地整治模式选择. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(6): 14-22.
[ZENG Y, YANG G Q.Asset specificity, uncertainty and farmland consolidation mode selection. China Land Sciences, 2016, 30(6): 14-22.]
[14] 乔荣锋, 高进云, 张安录. 山地丘陵地区农地资源价值评估: 以湖北省宜昌市为例. 资源科学, 2006, 28(6): 97-103.
[QIAO R F, GAO J Y, ZHANG A L.Evaluation of agricultural land in the mountainous and hilly region: A case study of Yichang city. Resources Sciences, 2006, 28(6): 97-103.]
[15] 汪箭. 农用地整治对耕地价值的影响研究: 基于天门、潜江和京山的实证分析. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2018.
[WANG J.A study on the impact of farmland consolidation of farmland and value: Based on the empirical analysis from Tianmen, Qianjiang and Jingshan. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2018.]
[16] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
[XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al.Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.]
[17] 谢金华, 杨钢桥, 许玉光. 不同农地整治模式对农户生计策略的影响研究: 以江汉平原和鄂西南山区部分县市为例. 中国农村经济, 2018, (11): 96-111.
[XIE J H, YANG G Q, XU Y G.The impact of different rural land consolidation modes on rural households' livelihood strategies: Examples from some counties and cities from the Jianghan Plain and mountainous areas in Hubei province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (11): 96-111.]
[18] 蔡银莺. 农地生态与农地价值关系: 湖北省不同类型地区的实证研究. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2007.
[CAI Y Y.The relationships between agricultural land ecological characteristics and value-positive analysis in different eco-regions in Hubei province. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University.]
[19] 李广东, 邱道持, 王利平, 等. 生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响: 渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析. 地理学报, 2012, 67(4): 504-515.
[LI G D, QIU D C, WANG L P, et al.Impacts of difference among livelihood assets on the choice of economic compensation pattern for farmer households farmland protection in Chongqing city. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(4): 504-515.]
[20] MCCONNELL K E.Congestion and willingness to pay: A study of beach use. Land Economics, 1977, 53(2): 185-195.
[21] 邝佛缘, 陈美球, 鲁燕飞, 等. 生计资本对农户耕地保护意愿的影响分析: 以江西省587份问卷为例. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(2): 58-66.
[KUANG F Y, CHEN M Q, LU Y F, et al.The impact of farmers' livelihood capital on the willingness of cultivated land protection: Based on the investigation data from 587 farmer in Jiangxi province. China Land Sciences, 2017, 31(2): 58-66.]
[22] 陈林, 伍海军. 国内双重差分法的研究现状与潜在问题. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2015, (7): 133-148.
[CHEN L, WU H J.Research status and potential problems of difference-in-difference method in China. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2015, (7): 133-148.]
[23] 周黎安, 陈烨. 中国农村税费改革的政策效果: 基于双重差分模型的估计. 经济研究, 2005, (8): 44-53.
[ZHOU L A, CHEN Y.The policy effect of tax-and-fees reforms in rural China: A difference-in-differences estimation. Economic Research Journal, 2005, (8): 44-53.]
[24] HALKOS G, MATSIORI S.Exploring social attitude and willingness to pay for water resources conservation. Journal of Behavioral & Experimental Economics, 2014, 49: 54-62.