旅游者环境质量感知的时空偏差

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20191104

自然资源学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2291-2304.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191104

旅游者环境质量感知的时空偏差

张业臣¹, 张宏梅², 宋子斌³, 洪学婷⁴

1. 安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院,芜湖 241003;
2. 上海师范大学旅游学院,上海 200030;
3. 海南大学旅游学院,海口 570228;
4. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京 210023

收稿日期:2019-05-13 修回日期:2019-08-30 出版日期:2019-11-28 发布日期:2019-11-28
通讯作者: 张宏梅（1969- ）,女,安徽合肥人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为旅游者行为、旅游目的地管理、旅游生态环境管理。E-mail: hongmei_221@qq.com
作者简介:张业臣（1990- ）,男,河南商丘人,博士研究生,研究方向为国家公园和生态旅游。E-mail: zhangyechenxiazhi@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41971254）

Spatial and temporal bias of tourists' perception ofenvironmental quality

ZHANG Ye-chen¹, ZHANG Hong-mei², SONG Zi-bin³, HONG Xue-ting⁴

1. School of Geography and Touism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, Anhui, China;
2. School of Tourism, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200030, China;
3. School of Tourism, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China;
4. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2019-05-13 Revised:2019-08-30 Online:2019-11-28 Published:2019-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 环境质量评价研究多为客观、专业化评价,较少从常人角度测量居民或游客对环境质量的评价或感知。而常人的评价可能影响其环境行为,进而促进环境保护。通过调查北京、上海、海南三地游客对居住地、旅游目的地、全国三个空间尺度以及当前、未来两个时间尺度的环境质量感知,分析旅游者环境质量感知的时空偏差。研究发现：（1）受访旅游者当前环境质量感知与全国相比存在乐观偏差,即“空间乐观”;与旅游目的地相比却是悲观倾向,即认为居住地环境质量不如旅游目的地;未来环境质量感知存在明显的乐观倾向,即“时间乐观”。（2）各省市旅游者对当前环境质量感知存在差异,与客观环境质量评价（EQI值）对比,安徽等8个省份的旅游者相对乐观,北京等7个省市旅游者则相对悲观;各省市旅游者未来环境质量感知的乐观偏差程度也存在差异。

关键词: 环境质量, 时空偏差, 环境感知, 旅游者

Abstract: Environmental quality assessment research is mostly based on objective and professional evaluation, and it is less common to measure the evaluation or perception of environmental quality by residents or tourists. Ordinary people's evaluation may affect their environmental behavior, and thus promote environmental protection. This study investigates the spatial and temporal bias of tourists' perceptions of environmental quality by the environmental quality perceptions of residents, destinations, national spatial scales and current and future time scales in Beijing, Shanghai and Hainan. Some valid questionnaires were collected in Beijing (293), Shanghai (281), and Hainan (296). Data were processed using two-way mixed analysis of variance, one-sample T test, and one-way ANOVA. The study found that: (1) The current environmental quality perception of the surveyed tourists is optimistic bias compared with the whole country, that is, "spatial optimism" (the F value of the two-way mixed variance analysis is 101.09, P value<0.001, f ²=0.20). Compared with the destination, it is pessimistic (P=0.005, difference=-0.079), which means that the environmental quality of the place of residence is not as good as that of the tourism destination. There is a clear optimistic tendency for the future environmental quality perception, that is, "temporal optimism" (the future environment quality of the place of residence, mean=0.51, P<0.001; destination future environmental quality, mean=0.55, P<0.001; national future environmental quality, mean=0.46, P<0.001). (2) Tourists in different provinces and cities have different perceptions of current environmental quality. Compared with objective environmental quality assessment (EQI value), tourists in 8 provinces such as Anhui are relatively optimistic, and tourists from 7 provinces and cities such as Beijing are relatively pessimistic. There are also differences in the degree of optimistic bias in the perception of the future environmental quality of tourists. Tourists in Hebei, Shanxi, Henan, and Shaanxi provinces are more optimistic about the future environmental quality, while those in Guangdong, Guangxi, Beijing and other provinces and cities are less optimistic.

Key words: tourists, environmental perception, environmental quality, temporal and spacial bias

张业臣, 张宏梅, 宋子斌, 洪学婷. 旅游者环境质量感知的时空偏差[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2291-2304.

ZHANG Ye-chen, ZHANG Hong-mei, SONG Zi-bin, HONG Xue-ting. Spatial and temporal bias of tourists' perception ofenvironmental quality[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 34(11): 2291-2304.

参考文献

[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005: 1.
[2] DUNLAP R E, GALLUP G H, GALLUP A M.Of global concern: Results of the health and planet survey. Environment, 1993, 35(7-15): 33-40.
[3] 李政大, 袁晓玲, 杨万平. 环境质量评价研究现状、困惑和展望. 资源科学, 2014, 36(1): 175-181.
[LI Z D, YUAN X L, YANG W P.Research status, confusion and prospects in environmental quality evaluation. Resources Science, 2014, 36(1): 175-181.]
[4] RICARDO G M, EULOGIO J R.Environmental perception and cognitive maps. International Journal of Psychology, 2005, 40(1): 1-3.
[5] STEG L, SIEVERS I.Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 2000, 32(2): 250-269.
[6] WEINSTEIN N D.Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39(5): 806-820.
[7] FRANZEN A.Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly, 2003, 84(2): 297-308.
[8] SCHULTZ P W, ZELEZNY L.Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1999, 19(3): 255-265.
[9] 巩劼, 陆林. 旅游环境影响研究进展与启示. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(4): 545-556.
[GONG J, LU L.Development of research on environmental impacts of tourism and its implication. Journal of Natural Resource, 2007, 22(4): 545-556.
[10] 冯学钢, 包浩生. 旅游活动对风景区地被植物—土壤环境影响的初步研究. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(1): 75-78.
[FENG X G, BAO H S.Preliminary research on tourist activity influence upon the soil and cover plant of scenic spot. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(1): 75-78.]
[11] FRANZEN A, VOGL D.Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 2013, 23(5): 1001-1008.
[12] FRANZEN A, MEYER R.Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 2010, 26(2): 219-234.
[13] HEATH Y, GIFFORD R.Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 2006, 38(1): 48-71.
[14] SLOVIC P, FISCHHOFF B, LICHTENSTEIN S.Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1978, 10(4): 281-285.
[15] SLOVIC P, FINUCANE M L, PETERS E.Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 2004, 24(2): 311-322.
[16] KREUTER M W, STRECHER V J.Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: Results from a randomized trial. Health Psychology, 1995, 14(1): 56-63.
[17] ADAM H, ULRIKE H.Unrealistic optimism about future life events: A cautionary note. Psychological Review, 2011, 118(1): 135-154.
[18] JIMENEZ C D, ORTEGA J M.Too positive to change? Examining optimism bias as a barrier to media effects on environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, 43: 216-225.
[19] WEINSTEIN N D.Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 1989, 246(4935): 806-820.
[20] HATFIELD J, JOB S.Optimism bias about environmental degradation: The role of the range of impact of precautions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21(1): 17-30.
[21] PAHL S, HARRIS P R, TODD H A, et al.Comparative optimism for environmental risks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005, 25: 1-11.
[22] GIFFORD R, SCANNELL L, KORMOS C.Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 29(1): 1-12.
[23] SCHULTZ P W, MILFONT T L, CHANCE R C.Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 2012, 46(3): 267-302.
[24] BONAIUTO M, BREAKWELL M, CANO I.Identity processes and environmental threat: The effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1996, 6(3): 157-175.
[25] DOMINICIS S, FORNARA F, CANCELLIERI U.We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, 43: 66-78.
[26] SARABIA F J, RODRIGUEZ C.The role of credibility and negative feelings in comparative perceptual bias related to environmental hazards. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, 47: 1-13.
[27] YANG J J, ZHOU Q, LIU X Y, et al.Biased perception misguided by affect: How does emotional experience lead to incorrect judgments about environmental quality?. Global Environmental Change, 2018, 53: 104-113.
[28] MILFONT T L, ABRAHAMSE W, MCCARTHY N.Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 2011, 40(2): 56-67.
[29] ALEX L.Negative income effect on perception of long-term environmental risk. Ecological Economics, 2014, 107(107): 51-58.
[30] CHAMBERS R, WINDSCHITL D, SULS J.Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is "more likely to happen to me". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003, 29(11): 1343-1356.
[31] GATTIG A.Intertemporal Decision Making: Studies on the Working of Myopia. Amsterdam: Rozenberg, 2002: 105-106.
[32] GISELA B, HANS P.Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation. Journal of Risk Research, 2005, 8(6): 461-479.
[33] 袁晓玲. 中国环境质量综合评价报告2017. 北京: 中国经济出版社, 2018: 27-28.
[YUAN X L.Annual Report of Environmental Quality Comprehensive Evaluation in China, 2017. Beijing: China Economic Publishing House, 2018: 27-28.]
[34] TOSUN C.Host perceptions of impacts: A comparative tourism study. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002, 29(1): 231-253.
[35] COHEN J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale N J: Erlbaum, 1988: 15-16.
[36] UZZELL L.The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2000, 20(4): 307-318.
[37] RABINOVICH A, MORTON A, POSTMES T.Think global, act local: The effect of goal and mindset specificity on willingness to donate to an environmental organization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 29(4): 391-399.
[38] MUSSON C.Local attitudes to population growth in South Buckinghamshire. In: PERRY H B (Ed.), Population and Its Problems: A Pplain Man's Guide. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974: 392-393.
[39] HUGH S, MADILL A."The air's got to be far cleaner here": A discursive analysis of place-identity threat. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 48(4): 601-624.
[40] ARMAS I.Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. Risk Analysis, 2006, 26(5): 1223-1234.
[41] HEINE S J, LEHMAN D R.Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the west feel more invulnerable than the east?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68(4): 595-607.

旅游者环境质量感知的时空偏差

Spatial and temporal bias of tourists' perception ofenvironmental quality

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张圆刚, 余向洋. 生活空间重构旅游者的乡村游憩影响因素与路径——一个模糊集的定性比较分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1633-1646.
[2]	周宏浩, 陈晓红. 中国资源型城市精明发展与环境质量的耦合关系及响应机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(8): 1620-1632.
[3]	王晓君, 吴敬学, 蒋和平. 中国农村生态环境质量动态评价及未来发展趋势预测[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 864-876.
[4]	朱晓东, 韦朝阳, 杨芬. 包头-白云鄂博地区重金属基线值的厘定及其在重金属污染分级评价中的应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(2): 310-320.
[5]	陆林, 虞虎. 湖泊旅游研究进展及启示[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(1): 177-188.
[6]	陆林, 刘莹莹, 吕丽. 旅游地旅游者忠诚度机制模型及实证研究——以黄山风景区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(9): 1475-1483.
[7]	高珊, 黄贤金. 基于PSR框架的1953—2008年中国生态建设成效评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(2): 341-350.
[8]	席建超, 葛全胜, 成升魁, 鲁春霞. 旅游消费生态占用初探——以北京市海外入境旅游者为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(2): 224-229.
[9]	高志强, 刘纪远, 庄大方. 中国土地资源生态环境质量状况分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(1): 93-96.
[10]	聂献忠, 张捷, 吕菽菲, 汤家法. 九寨沟国内旅游者行为特征初步研究及其意义[J]. 自然资源学报, 1998, 13(3): 249-255.
[11]	胡兆量. 自然资源结构与经济重心的地域迁移[J]. 自然资源学报, 1987, 2(3): 205-212.
[12]	杨汉奎. 论风景资源的模糊评价——以贵州省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 1987, 2(1): 49-58.