大都市郊野乡村多功能评价及其空间布局——以上海89个郊野镇为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20191103

自然资源学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2281-2290.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191103

大都市郊野乡村多功能评价及其空间布局——以上海89个郊野镇为例

谷晓坤¹, 陶思远², 卢方方³, 周小平⁴

1. 上海交通大学中国城市治理研究院,国际与公共事务学院,上海 200030;
2. 上海同测规划设计勘测有限公司,上海 200023;
3. 上海市地质调查研究院,上海 200072;
4. 北京师范大学政府管理学院,北京 100875

收稿日期:2019-05-09 修回日期:2019-09-10 出版日期:2019-11-28 发布日期:2019-11-28
通讯作者: 周小平（1976- ）,女,湖南沅江人,博士,教授,研究方向为城乡土地利用与规划。E-mail: xiaopingzhou@126.com
作者简介:谷晓坤（1980- ）,女,河北宁晋人,博士,研究方向为城乡土地利用与规划、乡村转型与空间治理。E-mail: guxk1980@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71673184）; 上海市浦江人才计划（18PJC075）; 教育部人文社科基金项目（15YJCZH051）; 上海交通大学中央高校基本科研业务费（16JCCS25）

Multi-functional evaluation of metropolitan suburbs and its spatial difference: A case study of 89 towns in Shanghai

GU Xiao-kun¹, TAO Si-yuan², LU Fang-fang³, ZHOU Xiao-ping⁴

1. China Institute for Urban Governance, School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China;
2. Shanghai Tongfang Planning and Design Survey Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200023, China;
3. Shanghai Geological Survey Institute, Shanghai 20072, China;
4. School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2019-05-09 Revised:2019-09-10 Online:2019-11-28 Published:2019-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 客观评价大都市郊野乡村多功能及空间布局特征,是分类制订精细化乡村振兴策略的关键之一。通过构建大都市郊野乡村“生态环境—休闲文化—农业生产—经济发展—生活保障”多功能评价方法,使用多源空间数据、统计数据及调查数据,评价上海郊野89个镇的多功能值,提出镇域多功能发展类型及空间布局特征。结果表明：（1）上海市89个镇多功能发展存在显著差异。各项功能按照均值排序为生态环境（0.7674）>经济发展（0.6054）>农业生产（0.5882）>生活保障（0.5238）>休闲文化（0.2525）;（2）生态环境高值区域主要分布在崇明岛、青浦西部和奉贤南部,农业生产高值区主要位于浦东南部、奉贤及金山、崇明南部和青浦,经济发展高值区主要位于中心城周边和新城周边区域的28个镇,生活保障低值区主要位于紧邻中心城与最偏远区域两类共29个镇,休闲文化高值区主要位于与中心城距离最偏远的松江、青浦、金山;（3）郊野镇多功能发展可划分为高均衡型、低均衡型和非均衡—混合发展型、非均衡—传统维持型和非均衡—城市化型共五种模式,仅浦江镇等10个镇为多功能高均衡发展模式,占11.24%。论文建立的评价方法及研究结论可为探索精细化都市郊野乡村振兴政策提供理论依据。

关键词: 上海, 大都市郊野, 乡村多功能, 乡村振兴, 空间分异, 城市治理

Abstract: With the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization as well as enhancement of geographic differentiation and diversity of man-earth areal system, functions and regional development orientations in metropolitan suburbs have shown an increasingly strong trend towards diversification. It is one of the keys to draw up the Rural Revitalization policy objectively to evaluate the multi-functional system and then sum up pattern of metropolitan suburbs. The multi-functional evaluation method of metropolitan suburbs was constructed. The multi-source spatial data, statistical data and survey data were used to evaluate the multi-functional values of the 89 towns in Shanghai. The results showed that: (1) There were significant differences in the development of multifunction among 89 towns in Shanghai. The order of mean values is listed as ecological environment function (0.7674) > economic development function (0.6054) > agricultural production function (0.5882) > life guarantee function (0.5238) > leisure culture function (0.2525). (2) The high value areas of the ecological environment were mainly distributed in Chongming Island, Western Qingpu and Southern Fengxian. The high value areas of agricultural production were mainly located in Southern Pudong, Fengxian, Jinshan, Southern Chongming and Qingpu. The high value areas of economic development was mainly located in the vicinity of central city. The low value areas of life security were mainly located in the towns close to the central city and the most remote towns. The high value area of leisure culture was mainly located in Songjiang, Qingpu and Jinshan, which are the most remote from the central city. (3) A total of 89 towns could be divided into 4 types: balanced, mixed, compound and dominant. Among the 8 subdivision patterns, only 10 towns like Pujiang town were multi-functional and presented a highly balanced development pattern, accounting for 11.24%. Thus, the final but main part of this paper envisions the innovative policies and practices in metropolitan suburbs including the diversified rural renewal, homestead regulation, and low efficiency industrial land reduction.

Key words: rural revitalization, spatial differentiation, rural multi-function, metropolitan suburbs, Shanghai, urban governance

谷晓坤, 陶思远, 卢方方, 周小平. 大都市郊野乡村多功能评价及其空间布局——以上海89个郊野镇为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2281-2290.

GU Xiao-kun, TAO Si-yuan, LU Fang-fang, ZHOU Xiao-ping. Multi-functional evaluation of metropolitan suburbs and its spatial difference: A case study of 89 towns in Shanghai[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 34(11): 2281-2290.

参考文献

[1] IKER E, ITZIAR B R, OIHANA G.Conflicting values in rural planning: A multifunctionality approach through social multi-criteria evaluation. Peer-reviewed Version Available at Sustainability 2018, 10, 1430, Doi: 10.3390/su10051431.
[2] United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro, 1992.
[3] European Commission.Contribution of the European Community on the multifunctional character of agriculture?. Directorate General of Agriculture, European Commission: Brussel, Belgium, 1999.
[4] HORLINGS L G, MARSDEN T K.Exploring the "New Rural Paradigm" in Europe: Eco-economic strategies as a counterforce to the global competitiveness agenda. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2014, 21: 4-20.
[5] GÓMEZ S A, BELMONTES J A, NICOLAU J M. Assessing landscape values: A proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecological Model, 2003, 168: 319-341.
[6] GÓMEZ S A, GONZÁLEZ G A. A comprehensive assessment of multifunctional agricultural land-use systems in Spain using a multi-dimensional evaluative model. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment, 2007, 120: 82-91.
[7] HOLMES J.Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22: 142-160.
[8] AUBRY C, RAMAMONJISOA J, DABAT M, et al.Urban agriculture and land use in cities: An approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar). Land Use Policy, 2012, 29: 429-439.
[9] ZASADA I.Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 2011, 28(4): 639-648.
[10] IVESA C I, KENDALB D.Values and attitudes of the urban public towards peri-urban agricultural land. Land Use Policy, 2013, 34: 80-90.
[11] 刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.
[LIU Y S.Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(6): 563-570.]
[12] 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 131-138.
[LONG H L.Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 131-138.]
[13] 刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.
[LIU Y S, LIU Y, CHEN Y F.Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389.]
[14] 王枫, 董玉祥. 基于灰色关联投影法的土地利用多功能动态评价及障碍因子诊断: 以广州市为例. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(10): 1698-1713.
[WANG F, DONG Y X.Dynamic evaluation of land use functions based on grey relation projection method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators: A case study of Guangzhou city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(10): 1698-1713.]
[15] 李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟, 等. 经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素: 以江苏省为例. 地理学报, 2014, 69(6): 797-807.
[LI P X, CHEN W, SUN W, et al.Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions: A case study of Jiangsu province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(6): 797-807.]
[16] 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.
[FANG Y G, LIU J S.Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.]
[17] LONG H L, LIU Y S, LI X B, et al.Building new countryside in China: A geographical perspective. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27: 457-470.
[18] 杨忍, 陈燕纯. 中国乡村地理学研究的主要热点演化及展望. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 601-616.
[YANG R, CHEN Y C.Change in key research area and prospect of Chinese rural geography. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 601-616.]
[19] GU X K, TAO S Y, DAI B.Spatial accessibility of country parks in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 27: 373-382.
[20] 谷晓坤, 刘静, 代兵, 等. 大都市郊区工业用地减量化适宜性评价方法与实证. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1317-1325.
[GU X K, LIU J, DAI B, et al.Suitability assessment of reducing industrial land in Shanghai metropolitan region. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(8): 1317-1325.]
[21] HEIMLICH R E, BARNARD C H.Agricultural adaptation to urbanisation? Farm types and agricultural sustainability in US metropolitan areas. In: Audrina I (ed.). Rural Sustainable Development in America. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1997: 283-303.
[22] WILSON G A.From "weak" to "strong" multifunctionality: Conceptualizing farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. Journal of Rural Studies, 2008, 24: 367-383.
[23] 程琳, 李锋, 邓华锋. 中国超大城市土地利用状况及其生态系统服务动态演变. 生态学报, 2011, 31(20): 6194-6203.
[CHENG L, LI F, DENG H F.Dynamics of land use and its ecosystem services in China's megacities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(20): 6194-6203.]

大都市郊野乡村多功能评价及其空间布局——以上海89个郊野镇为例

Multi-functional evaluation of metropolitan suburbs and its spatial difference: A case study of 89 towns in Shanghai

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	璩路路, 王永生, 刘彦随, 马晴. 乡村振兴导向的水土资源承载力评价及其优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 300-314.
[2]	徐维祥, 李露, 周建平, 刘程军. 乡村振兴与新型城镇化耦合协调的动态演进及其驱动机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2044-2062.
[3]	朱晓丹, 叶超, 李思梦. 可持续城市研究进展及其对国土空间规划的启示[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2120-2133.
[4]	李婷婷, 龙花楼, 王艳飞, 屠爽爽. 黄淮海平原农区宅基地扩展时空特征及整治潜力分析——以禹城市5个村庄为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2241-2253.
[5]	牛善栋, 方斌, 崔翠, 黄仕辉. 乡村振兴视角下耕地利用转型的时空格局及路径分析——以淮海经济区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1908-1925.
[6]	蒋伟萱, 高金龙, 陈江龙, 张英浩. 基于土地利用视角的乡村居业协同多尺度分析——以徐州市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 2002-2013.
[7]	王成, 樊荣荣, 龙卓奇. 重庆市乡村生产空间系统风险评价及其空间分异格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1119-1131.
[8]	张悦悦, 李翠珍, 周德, 夏浩. 乡村振兴视域下农村土地利用利益相关者分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1132-1146.
[9]	李裕瑞, 卜长利, 曹智, 刘烜赫, 刘彦随. 面向乡村振兴战略的村庄分类方法与实证研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 243-256.
[10]	赵春雨, 温瑞霞, 杨娜. 皖西地区贫困空间分异的影响机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2916-2928.
[11]	刘玉, 蒋治, 王浩森. 北京农业地域功能空间分异及影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(10): 2444-2459.
[12]	胡小芳, 李小雅, 赵红敏, 邓磊, 王天宇, 杨铄, 李景旺. 民宿价格的空间分异特征及影响因素——以湖北省恩施州为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(10): 2473-2483.
[13]	杨忍, 文琦, 王成, 杜国明, 李伯华, 曲衍波, 李红波, 许家伟, 贺艳华, 马利邦, 李智, 乔陆印, 曹智, 戈大专, 屠爽爽, 陈秧分. 新时代中国乡村振兴：探索与思考——乡村地理青年学者笔谈[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 890-910.
[14]	陈万旭, 李江风, 朱丽君. 长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 325-337.
[15]	陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 中国土地市场对城乡融合发展的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.