滨海地区畜禽养殖户污染防治意愿影响因素及其响应机理—以盐城市为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20190913

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 养殖户污染防治意愿是采取畜禽养殖污染物处理方式的基础。明确滨海地区养殖户污染防治意愿的关键因素,辨析污染防治意愿形成机理,对制定有效政策有着重要意义。以盐城市为例,基于121份调查问卷,运用结构方程分析养殖户污染防治意愿的形成机制与影响机理。结果表明：（1）个体特征、社会影响及感知、养殖户健康风险感知对于污染防治意愿有直接正向影响;（2）个体特征对养殖户环境风险感知、健康风险感知有正向影响,与社会影响及感知有共变关系,并通过这些因素间接影响养殖户污染防治意愿;（3）养殖户健康风险感知是影响滨海地区畜禽养殖污染防治意愿最主要的因素,借助路径：养殖对于人体健康影响的感知→健康风险感知→养殖户污染防治意愿可以有效提高区域养殖污染防治。

关键词: 滨海地区, 路径分析, 污染防治意愿, 影响因素

Abstract: The prevention and control will of the farmers is the basis for the treatment of the pollutants from livestock and poultry. Defining the key factors of it in the coastal areas and analyzing the formation mechanism of it are important for the formulation of effective policies. The willingness of farmers to control pollution is a subjective perception and is difficult to measure directly. Structural equation indicates potential variables or conceptualizes latent variables by corresponding measurable indices, and allows the existence of errors or residuals between external latent variables and internal latent variables. By combining regression analysis, path analysis, factor analysis and other methods, the equation can clearly analyze the role of independent variables on dependent variables and the interaction of dependent variables. So, this thesis, taking Yancheng city as an example and based on 121 livestock survey questionnaires, uses the structural equation model to analyze the formation mechanism and impact mechanism of farmers' pollution prevention will. The results showed that: (1) In terms of the overall effect, individual characteristics, environmental risk perception, health risk perception and social impact and perception all have a significant positive effect on farmers' willingness of pollution prevention. (2) The individual characteristics have a positive effect on the environmental risk perception and health risk perception, and have a covariant relationship with social impact and perception. At the same time, it indirectly influences farmers' will of pollution prevention and control through these factors. (3) The health risk perception of the farmers is the most important factor of pollution prevention. If the health risk perception increases 1 unit, the farmers' risk of pollution will increase 0.459 units. Among all the observable variables affecting health risk perception, the effect on human health perception was the greatest, being 0.835. The path of "human health perception → health risk perception → farmers' willingness to prevent pollution" can effectively improve regional livestock pollution prevention and control.

Key words: coastal areas, path analysis, influencing factors, pollution control willingness

徐新悦, 岳梦凡, 李建国, 刘丽丽. 滨海地区畜禽养殖户污染防治意愿影响因素及其响应机理—以盐城市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(9): 1974-1986.

XU Xin-yue, YUE Meng-fan, LI Jian-guo, LIU Li-li. Analysis of factors influencing the willingness of livestock and poultry farmers to control pollution in coastal areas: A case study of Yancheng, Jiangsu[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 34(9): 1974-1986.

参考文献

[1] 邱乐丰, 龙文莉, 方豪, 等. 基于种养平衡的杭州市畜禽养殖环境承载力研究. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(8): 1410-1419.
[QIU L F, LONG W L, FANG H, et al.Regional environmental carrying capacity for livestock and poultry breeding based on planting-breeding balance in Hangzhou city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(8): 1410-1419.]
[2] 张晖, 胡浩. 农业面源污染的环境库兹涅茨曲线验证: 基于江苏省时序数据的分析. 中国农村经济, 2009, (4): 48-53.
[ZHANG H, HU H.The authentication of the kuznets curve inagriculture non-point source pollution: Based on the Analysis on the time series data of Jiangsu province. China Rural Economy, 2009, (4): 48-53.]
[3] 严莲英, 刘桂华, 秦松, 等. 畜禽粪便堆肥中抗生素和重金属残留及控制研究进展. 江西农业学报, 2016, 28(9): 90-94.
[YAN L Y, LIU G H, QIN S, et al.Research progress in residue and control of antibiotics and heavy metals in animal manure. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2016, 28(9): 90-94.]
[4] 王鹏, 于潇. 农户参与畜禽养殖污染整治意愿及其影响因素: 基于福建南平地区286份调查问卷. 湖南农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2013, (6): 44-49.
[WANG P, YU X.Desire and factors influencing farmers participating in livestock and poultry breeding pollution treatment based on 286 questionnaires of Nanping, Fujian. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Social Sciences, 2013, (6): 44-49.]
[5] 张晖, 虞祎, 胡浩. 基于农户视角的畜牧业污染处理意愿研究: 基于长三角生猪养殖户的调查. 农村经济, 2011, (10): 92-94.
[ZHANG H, YU Y, HU H.Desire of animal husbandry pollution treatment based on the view of farmers: Based on the research of Yangtze River Delta. Rural Economy, 2011, (10): 92-94.]
[6] 何如海, 江激宇, 张士云, 等. 规模化养殖下的污染清洁处理技术采纳意愿研究: 基于安徽省3市奶牛养殖场的调研数据. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2013, (3): 47-53.
[HE R H, JIANG J Y, ZHANG S Y, et al.On the farmer's adoption-willingness for manure disposal technology under mass breeding: Based on the survey data of dairy farms in three cities of Anhui province. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2013, (3): 47-53.]
[7] 孔凡斌, 张维平, 潘丹. 养殖户畜禽粪便无害化处理意愿及影响因素研究: 基于5省754户生猪养殖户的调查数据. 农林经济管理学报, 2016, 15(4): 454-463.
[KONG F B, ZHANG W P, PAN D.Factors influencing farmers' willingness to adopt harmless disposal of livestock manure: Based on 754 pig farmers in five provinces. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2016, 15(4): 454-463.]
[8] 潘丹. 规模养殖与畜禽污染关系研究: 以生猪养殖为例. 资源科学, 2015, 37(11): 2279-2287.
[PAN D.The relationship between intensification of livestock production and livestock pollution for pig-breeding. Resources Science, 2015, 37(11): 2279-2287.]
[9] 林丽梅, 刘振滨, 杜焱强, 等. 生猪规模养殖户污染防治行为的心理认知及环境规制影响效应. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(1): 156-166.
[LIN L M, LIU Z B, DU Y Q, et al.Psychological cognition of pollution prevention of family-oriented scale pig breeders and environmental regulation influence effects. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(1): 156-166.]
[10] 李建国, 王文超, 濮励杰, 等. 滩涂围垦对盐沼湿地碳收支的影响研究进展. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(6): 599-614.
[LI J G, WANG W C, PU L J, et al.Coastal reclamation and saltmarsh carbon budget: Advances and prospects. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(6): 599-614.]
[11] 方仁建, 沈永明. 围垦对海滨地区景观演变及其质心移动的影响: 以盐城保护区部分区域为例. 自然资源报, 2015, 30(5): 772-783.
[FANG R J, SHEN Y M.Effects of coast beach reclamation on the change of landscape pattern and its spatial centroids: A case study in coastal wetland of part of Yancheng national natural reserve. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(5): 772-783.]
[12] 潘丹. 鄱阳湖生态经济区畜禽养殖土壤环境承载力及污染风险研究. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(2): 254-259.
[PAN D.Environment carrying capacity and pollution risk of livestock breeding in ecological economic zone of Poyang Lake. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 36(2): 254-259.]
[13] AJZEN I.The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
[14] 闫岩. 计划行为理论的产生、发展和评述. 国际新闻界, 2014, 36(7): 113-129.
[YAN Y.A review on the origins and development of the theory of planned behavior. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 2014, 36(7): 113-129.]
[15] 程开明. 结构方程模型的特点及应用. 统计与决策, 2006, (10): 22-25.
[CHENG K M.The characteristics and applications of structural equation modeling. Statistics & Decision, 2006, (10): 22-25.]
[16] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: Amos的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 2-30.
[WU M L.Structual Equation Modeling: AMOS Operation and Application. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010: 2-30.]
[17] 孔凡斌, 张维平, 潘丹. 农户畜禽养殖污染无害化处理意愿与行为一致性分析: 以5省754户生猪养殖户为例. 现代经济探讨, 2018, (4): 125-132.
[KONG F B, ZHANG W P, PAN D.The consistency of farmer's willingness and behavior for harmless disposal of livestock pollution: A survey of 754 pig farmers in five provinces. Modern Economic Research, 2018, (4): 125-132.]
[18] KURUPPU N, LIVERMAN D.Mental preparation for climate adaptation: The role of cognition and culture in enhancing adaptive capacity of water management in Kiribati. Global Environmental Change, 2011, 21(2): 657-669.
[19] 赵雪雁, 薛冰. 高寒生态脆弱区农户对气候变化的感知与适应意向: 以甘南高原为例. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7): 2329-2339.
[ZHAO X Y, XUE B.Farmer's perception and adaptation intention for climate change in high-cold eco-fragile region: A case of Gannan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(7): 2329-2339.]
[20] 邬兰娅, 齐振宏, 黄炜虹. 环境感知、制度情境对生猪养殖户环境成本内部化行为的影响: 以粪污无害化处理为例. 华中农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017, (5): 28-35.
[WU L Y, QI Z H, HUANG W H.The influence of environmental perception and institutional context on pig farmers' internalization of environmental cost behavior: An example of waste disposal. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2017, (5): 28-35.]
[21] 黄芳铭. 结构方程模式理论与应用. 北京: 中国税务出版社, 2005: 269-270.
[HUANG F M.Theory and Application of Structural Equation Model. Beijing: China Taxation Publishing House, 2005: 269-270.]
[22] RAINESEUDY R.Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2000, 7(1): 124-141.
[23] 张郁, 齐振宏, 孟祥海, 等. 生态补偿政策情境下家庭资源禀赋对养猪户环境行为影响: 基于湖北省248个专业养殖户(场)的调查研究. 农业经济问题, 2015, (6): 82-91.
[ZHANG Y, QI Z H, MENG X H, et al.Study on the influence of family endowments on the environmental behavior of massive pig farmers under the situation of ecological compensation policy: Based on the survey of 248 massive pig farmers in Hubei province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2015, (6): 82-91.]
[24] 孟祥海, 况辉, 孟桃, 等. 规模化畜禽养殖场污染防治意愿影响因素分析. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(6): 1502-1507.
[MENG X H, KUANG H, MENG T, et al.Factors affecting willingness of farms for preventing environmental pollution of large-scale livestock. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 54(6): 1502-1507.]
[25] 刘雪芬, 杨志海, 王雅鹏. 畜禽养殖户生态认知及行为决策研究: 基于山东、安徽等6省养殖户的实地调研. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(10): 169-176.
[LIU X F, YANG Z H, WANG Y P.Ecological congition and behaviour decision of pourtry farmers: Based on field research of farmers in six provinces such as Shandong and Anhui. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(10): 169-176.]
[26] 舒畅. 基于经济与生态耦合的畜禽养殖废弃物治理行为及机制研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017.
[SHU C.The governance behavior and mechanism of livestock and poultry breeding waste based on economic and ecological coupling. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2017.]