基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究——以福州新区为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20171197

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2098-2109.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20171197

基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究——以福州新区为例

戴文远^{a, b, c}, 江方奇^{b, *}, 黄万里^{a, b, c}, 廖李红^b, 姜坤^b

a. 福建师范大学地理研究所,福州 350007;
b. 福建师范大学地理科学学院,福州 350007;
c. 福建师范大学湿润亚热带生态地理过程教育部重点实验室,福州 350007

收稿日期:2017-11-14 修回日期:2018-06-19 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2018-12-20
通讯作者: 江方奇（1994- ）,男,安徽安庆人,硕士研究生,主要从事区域开发与国土整治方向研究。E-mail: 1581162799@qq.com
作者简介:戴文远（1972- ）,男,福建莆田人,副教授,主要从事土地资源利用、土地覆被变化等方向研究。E-mail: dwygeo@fjnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
福建省科技厅公益类重点项目（2017R1034-2）; 福建省自然科学基金项目（2018J01741）

Study on Transition of Land Use Function and Ecosystem Service Value Based on the Conception of Production, Living and Ecological Space: A Case Study of the Fuzhou New Area

DAI Wen-yuan^{a, b, c}, JIANG Fang-qi^b, HUANG Wan-li^{a, b, c}, LIAO Li-hong^b, JIANG Kun^b

a. Institute of Geography, Ministry of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
b. School of Geographical Sciences, Ministry of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
c. Key Laboratory of Humid Subtropical Eco-geographical Process, Ministry of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China

Received:2017-11-14 Revised:2018-06-19 Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-20
Supported by:
Key Public Welfare Project of Fujian Science and Technology Department, No. 2017R1034-2; Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, No. 2018J01741

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分析土地利用功能转型及带来的生态服务价值转变,是快速城镇化地区土地资源开发利用和“三生空间”管控的重要依据。论文基于福州新区2000、2009和2015年3期Landsat ETM+/OLI遥感数据和“三生”土地利用主导功能分类体系,应用GIS定量研究了福州新区15 a土地利用功能转型特征及生态系统服务价值时空演变,结果表明： 1）15 a间福州新区的生活生产空间增长迅速,面积增加了11 224.63 hm²,增长率达82.31%;生态生产空间面积出现先下降后增长趋势,总体增长了19.94%;生活生产空间的增长源于对生态空间和生产生态空间的侵占,生态生产空间的增长源于对湿地、海域等生态空间的侵占。2）15 a间福州新区生态系统服务价值下降了21.69%,其中生态空间下降总量最大,减少了6.822 8亿元,生活生产空间下降幅度最大,下降了92.10%。3）区域生态系统服务价值存在提高和下降两种相反趋势,导致研究区生态系统服务价值降低的主要原因是生活生产空间对生态空间和生产生态空间的侵占,贡献率分别达38.60%和18.77%,其次为生态生产空间对生态空间的侵占。4）推进福州新区“三生空间”协同布局,应加强区内生态林地、闽江河口、海岸线等重点生态空间的保护,稳步推进新区核心区域生活空间基础设施优化,集约利用生产空间,增加产出效益。

关键词: 福州新区, 三生空间, 生态系统服务价值, 土地利用功能转型

Abstract: Transition of land use function and transformation of ecosystem services value provide basis for management and layout of production-living-ecological space in rapid urbanization areas. Based on three periods of Landsat ETM+/OLI remote sensing data of the Fuzhou New Area in 2000, 2009 and 2015 and land use classification system based on the leading function of “production-living-ecological space”, the characteristics of land use function transition and the spatio-temporal evolution of ecosystem service value in 15 years in the Fuzhou New Area were quantitatively studied. The results showed that: 1) The area of living and production space in the Fuzhou New Area expanded 11 224.63 hm² in 15 years, with a growth rate of 82.31%, while the area of ecological and production space increased firstly and then followed by a decrease, with a total increase of 19.94%. The growth of the living space resulted from the occupation of the ecological space and production space, while the growth of ecological and production space is derived from the wetland and the sea area. 2) The ecosystem service value in Fuzhou New Area decreased by 21.69% in 15 years. The decrease of ecological space was the largest in amount, which was 682.28 million yuan. The decline of living production space was the largest in percentage in the 15 years, which was 92.10%. 3)Regional ecosystem service value reflected two opposite trends at the same time: improvement and deterioration. The main reasons for the decline of the ecosystem service value in the study area stemmed from the encroachments of living-production space in ecological space and production-ecological space from the living space whose contribution rates were 38.60% and 18.77%, respectively. 4) Measures should be taken to promote the coordinated layout scheme of “production-living-ecological space”, strengthen the ecological forest, Minjiang estuary and coastline in the protected areas, and steadily promote the optimization of living space infrastructure in the core areas and townships in the new area, intensively use production space and increase the output benefit. The research results will provide a scientific basis for coordinated land resources development and eco-environmental protection in the coastal rapid urbanization area.

Key words: ecosystem services value, production-living-ecological space, the Fuzhou New Area, transition of land use function

中图分类号:

X171

戴文远, 江方奇, 黄万里, 廖李红, 姜坤. 基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究——以福州新区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2098-2109.

DAI Wen-yuan, JIANG Fang-qi, HUANG Wan-li, LIAO Li-hong, JIANG Kun. Study on Transition of Land Use Function and Ecosystem Service Value Based on the Conception of Production, Living and Ecological Space: A Case Study of the Fuzhou New Area[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(12): 2098-2109.

参考文献 28

[1]	管青春, 郝晋珉, 石雪洁, 等. 中国生态用地及生态系统服务价值变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 195-207.[GUAN Q C, HAO J M, SHI X J, et al.Study on the changes of ecological land and ecosystem service value in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(2): 195-207. ]
[2]	龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 131-138.[LONG H L.Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 131-138. ]
[3]	COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, SUTTON P, et al.Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26(1): 152-158.
[4]	雷璇, 杨波, 蒋卫国, 等.东洞庭湿地植被格局变化及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(3): 461-470.[LEI X, YANG B, JIANG W G, et al.Vegetation pattern changes and their influencing factors in the East Dongting Lake wetland. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(3): 461-470. ]
[5]	蒋卫国, 潘英姿, 侯鹏, 等. 洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康综合评价[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(6): 1665-1672.[JIANG W G, PAN Y Z, HOU P, et al.Assessment and analysis of wetland ecosystem health in Dongting Lake. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(6): 1665-1672. ]
[6]	孟妍. 黄河三角洲土地利用变化对生态脆弱性的影响研究 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2014.[MENG Y.Impact of Land Use Change on Ecological Vulnerability in the Yellow River Delta. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014. ]
[7]	龙花楼. 中国乡村转型发展与土地利用 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012.[LONG H L.Rural Transformation Development and Land Use in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2012. ]
[8]	LONG H L, LIU Y Q, HOU X G, et al.Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: Implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China[J]. Habitat International, 2014, 44: 536-544.
[9]	肖玉, 谢高地, 安凯, 等. 基于功能性状的生态系统服务研究框架[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 353-362.[XIAO Y, XIE G D, AN K, et al.A research framework of ecosystem services based on functional traits. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(4): 353-362. ]
[10]	ESTOQUE R C, MURAYAMA Y.Landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes: Implications for environmental sustainability planning for the rapidly urbanizing summer capital of the Philippines[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2013, 116(4): 60-72.
[11]	BRAAT L C, DE GROOT R.The ecosystem services agenda: Bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 4-15.
[12]	刘永强, 廖柳文, 龙花楼, 等. 土地利用转型的生态系统服务价值效应分析——以湖南省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(4): 691-700.[LIU Y Q, LIAO L W, LONG H L, et al.Effects of land use transitions on ecosystem services value: A case study of Hunan Province. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(4): 691-700. ]
[13]	宁立新, 周云凯, 白秀玲, 等. 鄱阳湖区景观格局季相变化及其优化调控研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(3): 439-453.[NING L X, ZHOU Y K, BAI X L, et al.Research on the seasonal variations and optimization of landscape pattern in Poyang Lake Region, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(3): 439-453. ]
[14]	陈龙, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 基于主导功能的江苏省土地利用转型特征与驱动力[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2): 155-162, 106.[CHEN L, ZHOU S L, ZHOU B B, et al.Characteristics and driving forces of regional land use transition based on the leading function classification: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(2): 155-162, 106. ]
[15]	杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等. 基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应——以长江三角洲核心区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(1): 97-106.[YANG Q K, DUAN X J, WANG L, et al.Land use transformation based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects: A case study in the Yangtze River Delta. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(1): 97-106. ]
[16]	胡锋, 安裕伦, 赵海兵. 基于土地利用转型视角的“亚喀斯特”区域生态环境效应研究——以黔中部分地区为例[J]. 地球与环境, 2016, 44(4): 447-454.[HU F, AN Y L, ZHAO H B, et al.Research on characteristics of ecological environment effect on a “semi-karst” region based on land use transition: A case in central Guizhou Province, China. Earth and Environment, 2016, 44(4): 447-454. ]
[17]	国家发展和改革委员会价格司. 全国农产品成本收益资料汇编2016 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2016.[Price Department of the National Development and Reform Commission. National Compilation of Agricultural Cost-Benefit Data 2016. Beijing: China Statistics Publishing House, 2016. ]
[18]	NELSON E, MENDOZA G, REGETZ J, et al.Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7(1): 4-11.
[19]	BENNETT E M, PETERSON G D, GORDON L J.Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12(12): 1394-1404.
[20]	张红旗, 许尔琪, 朱会义. 中国“三生用地”分类及其空间格局[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338.[ZHANG H Q, XU E Q, ZHU H Y, et al.At n ecological-living-industrial land classification system and its spatial distribution in China. Resources Science, 2015, 37(7): 1332-1338. ]
[21]	廖李红, 戴文远, 陈娟, 等. 平潭岛快速城市化进程中三生空间冲突分析[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(10): 1823-1833.[LIAO L H, DAI W Y, CHEN J, et al.Analysis on spatial conflict of ecological-production-living spaces of Pingtan Island with the process of rapid urbanization. Resources Science, 2017, 39(10): 1823-1833. ]
[22]	谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196.[XIE G D, LU C X, LENG Y F, et al.Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2): 189-196. ]
[23]	COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 25(1): 3-15.
[24]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 31(8): 1243-1254.[XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al.Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 31(8): 1243-1254. ]
[25]	谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖, 等. 我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 10-13.[XIE G D, XIAO Y, ZHEN L, et al.Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 10-13. ]
[26]	陈鹏. 厦门湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 湿地科学, 2006, 4(2): 101-107.[CHEN P.Evaluation on service value of wetland ecosystem in Xiamen City. Wetland Science, 2006, 4(2): 101-107. ]
[27]	周飞, 陈士银, 吴明发, 等. 湛江市土地利用综合效益及其演化评价[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2007, 26(4): 89-92.[ZHOU F, CHEN S Y, WU M F, et al.Evaluating on land use multiple efficiency and its evolvement in Zhanjiang. Areal Research and Development, 2007, 26(4): 89-92. ]
[28]	王航, 秦奋, 朱筠, 等. 土地利用及景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(4): 1286-1296.[WANG H, QIN F, ZHU J, et al.The effects of land use structure and landscape pattern change on ecosystem service values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(4): 1286-1296. ]

基于“三生空间”的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究——以福州新区为例

Study on Transition of Land Use Function and Ecosystem Service Value Based on the Conception of Production, Living and Ecological Space: A Case Study of the Fuzhou New Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	耿甜伟, 陈海, 张行, 史琴琴, 刘迪. 基于GWR的陕西省生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1714-1727.
[2]	荔琢, 蒋卫国, 王文杰, 吕金霞, 邓越. 基于生态系统服务价值的京津冀城市群湿地主导服务功能研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(8): 1654-1665.
[3]	陈万旭, 李江风, 朱丽君. 长江中游地区生态系统服务价值空间分异及敏感性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 325-337.
[4]	刘春芳, 王奕璇, 何瑞东, 王晨. 基于居民行为的三生空间识别与优化分析框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10): 2113-2122.
[5]	管青春, 郝晋珉, 石雪洁, 高阳, 王宏亮, 李牧. 中国生态用地及生态系统服务价值变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 195-207.
[6]	史洋洋, 吕晓, 黄贤金, 于淼. 江苏沿海地区耕地利用转型及其生态系统服务价值变化响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 961-976.
[7]	石春娜, 姚顺波, 陈晓楠, 薛彩霞, 龚直文. 基于选择实验法的城市生态系统服务价值评估——以四川温江为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 767-778.
[8]	赵海凤, 徐明. 四川省森林生态系统对野生珍稀濒危动物的保护价值计量研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 789-799.
[9]	李广东, 方创琳, 王少剑, 张蔷. 城乡用地遥感识别与时空变化研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(4): 703-718.
[10]	普拉提·莫合塔尔, 海米提·依米提. 土地利用变化下的生态系统服务敏感性研究——以克里雅绿洲为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1849-1858.
[11]	赖元长, 李贤伟, 冯帅, 王鹏, 唐骄萍, 赵安玖, 赖家明. 退耕还林工程对四川盆周低山丘陵区生态系统服务价值的影响——以洪雅县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(5): 755-768.
[12]	胡和兵, 刘红玉, 郝敬锋, 安静. 城市化对流域生态系统服务价值空间异质性的影响——以南京市九乡河流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(10): 1715-1725.
[13]	甘芳, 周宇晶, 危起伟, 樊恩源, 杜浩. 水生野生动物自然保护区河流生态系统服务功能价值评价——以长江湖北宜昌中华鲟自然保护区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(4): 574-584.
[14]	常学礼, 赵文智, 李秀梅, 李守波. 基于生态服务价值的张掖绿洲生态安全评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(3): 396-406.
[15]	王静, 尉元明, 孙旭映. 过牧对草地生态系统服务价值的影响——以甘肃省玛曲县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(1): 109-117.