大都市郊区工业用地减量化适宜性评价方法与实证

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20170719

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1317-1325.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20170719

大都市郊区工业用地减量化适宜性评价方法与实证

谷晓坤¹, 刘静², 代兵³, 柴铎⁴

1. 上海交通大学 a. 中国城市治理研究院,b. 国际与公共事务学院,上海 200030;
2. 上海市建设用地和土地整理事务中心,上海 200003;
3. 上海市地质调查研究院,上海 200072;
4. 中央财经大学政府管理学院,北京 102206

收稿日期:2017-07-18 修回日期:2017-11-14 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-08-20
作者简介:谷晓坤（1980- ）,女,河北宁晋人,博士后,主要研究方向为城乡土地整治与规划、土地管理与乡村发展。E-mail: guxk1980@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（71673184）;教育部人文社科基金项目（15YJCZH051）;上海交通大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助（16JCCS25）

Suitability Assessment of Reducing Industrial Land in Shanghai Metropolitan Region

GU Xiao-kun¹, LIU Jing², DAI Bing³, CHAI Duo⁴

1.a. China Institute for Urban Governance, b. School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China;
2. Shanghai Land Consolidation and Rehabitation Center, Shanghai 200003, China;
3. Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey, Shanghai 200072, China;
4. School of Government, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2017-07-18 Revised:2017-11-14 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-08-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 71673184;Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China, No. 15YJCZH051;Basic Research Funds for Central Universities of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 16JCCS25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 工业用地减量化是节约集约用地管理制度下大都市用地转型的必然,也是地方实践在土地整治领域的创新尝试。论文建立大都市郊区工业用地减量化适宜性评价方法,以上海市浦东新区大团镇为例,客观评价其减量化的适宜等级。研究结果表明：1）工业用地减量化的5个影响因素中,污染与能耗因素值差异最大,布局合理性因素值差异最小,主体意愿性因素的空间分布差异最明显;2）218个工业地块划分成5个适宜度等级,随着适宜度提高,相应工业地块零星程度加剧,地块平均规模由适宜度一级的9 507 m²逐渐下降至五级的3 300 m²;3）一级适宜占24.06%,二级适宜占21.51%,三级适宜占29.45%,四级适宜占12.63%,五级适宜占12.35%。适宜等级所占面积的分布接近于正态分布特征。研究结论：论文所建立方法可作为大都市郊区工业用地退出的评估工具,有助于提高工业用地减量化的统筹协调性。

关键词: GIS, 工业用地减量化, 上海, 适宜性, 土地整治

Abstract: Due to the extensive expansion of urbanization since 1990s in Shanghai, there are serious problem in industrial land use, such as low efficient, high pollution risk and decentralized spatial layout. As the first city in China committing to limit the total amount of land allocated for construction, Shanghai plays a critical role in informing reducing industrial land. Reducing industrial land emphasized that the land use should be returned from industrial land to ecological land or agricultural land. Taking Datuan Town in Pudong of Shanghai as an example, this study provides a suitability evaluation method for reducing industrial land in metropolitan suburbs. Geographical Information System tools are used to analyze the 218 industrial land parcels in the whole town. Results indicate that: 1) Among the five factors influencing the reduction suitability of the 218 industrial land parcels, the values of pollution and energy consumption showed the biggest difference, while the value of rationality of layout had the smallest difference, and willingness of land right owners had the biggest difference in spatial distribution. 2) When the suitability grade of reduction of industrial land increases, the industrial land parcels become more sporadic. The average area of parcels varieties from 9 507 m² in suitability grade 1 to 3 300 m² in suitability grade 5. 3) According to the evaluation index value and its spatial distribution, five suitable grades are classified. The total area of parcels in the first grade is 24.06%, in the second grade is 21.51%, in the third grade is 29.45%, in the fourth grade is 12.63% and in the fifth grade is 12.35%. The distribution of the area in different grades is close to the normal distribution. 4) The industrial lands which are suitable for reducing before 2020 are mainly located in Zhaoqiao Village, Shaocun Village, Tuanxin Village, Jinyuan Village and Jinshi Village. The industrial lands which are not suitable for reducing before 2020 are mainly distributed in Tuanxi Village, Guoyuan Village, Longshu Village, Zhennan Village and Chezhan village. The method proposed in this paper not only can be used to evaluate the suitability of reducing industrial land in one city, but also can be used to compare the suitability reducing industrial land among similar cities so as to improve the coordination of the industrial reduction on a larger scale.

Key words: GIS, land consolidation, reducing industrial land, Shanghai, suitability

中图分类号:

F299.23

谷晓坤, 刘静, 代兵, 柴铎. 大都市郊区工业用地减量化适宜性评价方法与实证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1317-1325.

GU Xiao-kun, LIU Jing, DAI Bing, CHAI Duo. Suitability Assessment of Reducing Industrial Land in Shanghai Metropolitan Region[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(8): 1317-1325.

参考文献

[1] CEN. Glossary of Terms for Holistic Management of Brownfield Regeneration (GoT-HOMBRE) [Z]. CEN Workshop Agreement 74, 2014.
[2] DE SOUSA C A. Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 62(4): 181-198.
[3] NIJKAMP P, RODENBURG C A, WAGTENDONK A J.Success factors for sustainable urban brownfield development: A comparative case study approach to polluted sites[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(2): 235-252.
[4] ATKINSON G, DOICK K J, BURNINGHAM K, et al.Brownfield regeneration to greenspace: Delivery of project objectives for social and environmental gain[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2014, 13(3): 586-594.
[5] ADAMS D, DE SOUSA C, TIESDELL S.Brownfield development: A comparison of North American and British approaches[J]. Urban Studies, 2010, 47(1): 75-104.
[6] EISENBEIS D.Brownfield redevelopment and coordinated land use planning policy in Portland, Oregon and Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia [R/OL]. https://www.ils-forschung.de/files_publikationen/pdfs/Eisenbeis-Brownfields-Policy-PDX-Duesseldorf.pdf. 2015.
[7] 刘红梅, 孟鹏, 马克星, 等. 经济发达地区建设用地减量化研究——基于“经济新常态下土地利用方式转变与建设用地减量化研究计”的思考[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(12): 11-17.
[LIU H M, MENG P, MA K L, et al.Study on reduction of construction land in the developed area: Reviews of the workshop on “land use pattern changing and construction land reduction in the new normal”. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(12): 11-17. ]
[8] 王克强, 马克星, 刘红梅. 上海市建设用地减量化运作机制研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016, 30(5): 3-10.
[WANG K Q, MA K X, LIU H M.Study on the operating mechanism of construction land reduction in Shanghai city. China Land Sciences, 2016, 30(5): 3-10. ]
[9] 石忆邵, 刘丹璇. 上海市工业用地减量化规划构想及关键问题分析[J]. 上海国土资源, 2016, 37(2): 1-4.
[SHI Y S, LIU D X.Reduction in the amount of industrial land in Shanghai: Ideas and key problems. Shanghai Land and Resources, 2016, 37(2): 1-4. ]
[10] MALIENE V, WIGNALL L, MALYS N.Brownfield regeneration: Waterfront site developments in Liverpool and Cologne[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 2012, 20(1): 5-16.
[11] PIZZOL L, ZABEO A, KLUSÁČEK P, et al. Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool to support effective brownfield regeneration[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 166: 178-192.
[12] 刘静, 陆靖慧, 叶子, 等. 上海市“198”区域工业用地减量化对镇村利益的影响分析及对策研究[J]. 上海国土资源, 2015, 36(4): 39-42.
[LIU J, LU J H, YIE Z, et al.The impact and countermeasure of industrial land reduction on the interests of towns and villages in the “198” area of Shanghai. Shanghai Land and Resources, 2015, 36(4): 39-42. ]
[13] 郭旭, 田莉. 产权重构视角下的土地减量规划与实施——以上海新浜镇为例[J]. 城市规划, 2016(9): 22-31.
[GUO X, TIAN L.Land decremental planning and implementation from the perspective of property right reconfiguration: A case study on Xinbang Town, Shanghai. City Planning Review, 2016(9): 22-31. ]
[14] 徐蕴慧. 大都市郊区工业用地整治评价——以上海市为例 [D]. 北京: 中国人民大学, 2016.
[XU Y H.Evaluation of Megacity Countryside Industrial Land Consolidation—Study Based on Shanghai Case. Beijing: Renmin University of China, 2016. ]
[15] 党丽娟, 徐勇, 汤青, 等. 广西西江沿岸后备适宜建设用地潜力及空间分布[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(3): 387-397.
[DANG L J, XU Y, TANG Q, et al.Potential and spatial distribution of suitable construction land along the Xijiang Riverside in Guangxi. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(3): 387-397. ]
[16] GU X K, TAO S Y, DAI B.Spatial accessibility of country parks in Shanghai, China[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 27: 373-382.
[17] 代兵. 大城市多功能基本农田规划理论与方法 [D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2010.
[DAI B.Theory and Method of Multi-function Prime Farmland Planning in the Metropolitan Area. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010. ]
[18] 谷晓坤, 刘静, 张正峰, 等. 大都市郊区景观生态型土地整治模式设计[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(6): 205-211.
[GU X K, LIU J, ZHANG Z F, et al.Mode design of landscape ecological land consolidation in the Metropolitan’s suburb. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014, 30(6): 205-211. ]

大都市郊区工业用地减量化适宜性评价方法与实证

Suitability Assessment of Reducing Industrial Land in Shanghai Metropolitan Region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘大鹏, 马斌, 王悦. 工业城市防护绿色空间布局适宜性评价——以内蒙古包头市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 420-434.
[2]	徐超璇, 鲁春霞, 黄绍琳. 张家口地区生态脆弱性及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1288-1300.
[3]	肖攀, 彭轲, 赵幸悦子, 王新峰, 梁川, 程刚. 长江中游岸线资源与开发利用适宜性评价分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 788-798.
[4]	张海朋, 何仁伟, 刘运伟, 方方. 青藏高原高寒牧区聚落用地适宜性评价及其重构——以藏北那曲县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 698-712.
[5]	项广鑫, 符金豪, 曾丽婷, 蒋星祥, 曾毅. 基于“双评价”的城镇开发边界划定技术——以湘潭县中心城区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(10): 2401-2414.
[6]	刘俊, 张恒锦, 金朦朦, 李宁馨. 旅游地农户生计资本评估与生计策略选择——以海螺沟景区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(8): 1735-1747.
[7]	韩博, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, 项晓敏, 刘晶, 曹帅, 周寅康. 土地整治项目区耕地资源优化配置研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 718-731.
[8]	纪学朋, 黄贤金, 陈逸, 王丹阳, 宋娅娅. 基于陆海统筹视角的国土空间开发建设适宜性评价——以辽宁省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(3): 451-463.
[9]	张凯旋, 范雯, 施佳颖. 上海郊野森林游憩适宜性评价及开发引导途径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2270-2280.
[10]	谷晓坤, 陶思远, 卢方方, 周小平. 大都市郊野乡村多功能评价及其空间布局——以上海89个郊野镇为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2281-2290.
[11]	陈晓雨婧, 吴燕红, 夏建新. 甘肃省资源环境承载力监测预警[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2378-2388.
[12]	郝庆, 邓玲, 封志明. 国土空间规划中的承载力反思：概念、理论与实践[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10): 2073-2086.
[13]	范冰雄, 税伟, 杨海峰, 王亚楠, 杜勇, 祁新华, 张小洪, 简小枚, 郭平平. 闽三角城市群自然资本损失评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(1): 153-167.
[14]	权瑞松. 基于情景模拟的上海土地利用变化预测及其水文效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(9): 1552-1562.
[15]	陈国鹏, 鲜骏仁, 李广. 林窗对岷江冷杉幼苗种群优势度增长与周期性波动的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(9): 1542-1551.