大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值响应研究

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20170715

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1376-1389.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20170715

大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值响应研究

陈明叶¹, 刘素红², 于连海¹, 冯金周¹, 于佩鑫², 高宝嘉^1,*

1. 河北农业大学林学院,河北保定 071000;
2. 北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京 100875

收稿日期:2017-07-18 修回日期:2017-12-20 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-08-20
通讯作者: 高宝嘉（1958- ）,男,教授,博士,研究方向为森林生态、森林保护和生态系统生态学。E-mail: baojiagao@163.com
作者简介:陈明叶（1988- ）,女,河北张家口人,博士研究生,研究方向为生态系统结构与功能。E-mail: chenmy53719@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41171262）;河北省科技厅项目（14274203D,1601001）

Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Ecosystem Structure Change in Fuping Basin of the Daqinghe River

CHEN Ming-ye¹, LIU Su-hong², YU Lian-hai¹, FENG Jin-zhou¹, YU Pei-xin², GAO Bao-jia¹

1. College of Forestry, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071000, China;
2. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2017-07-18 Revised:2017-12-20 Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-08-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41171262;Hebei Science and Technology Department Project, No. 14274203D and 1601001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态系统通过物质循环、能量流动和信息传递为人类提供必要的生态服务功能,其结构变化可引起生态系统过程和服务功能的改变。研究区域的生态服务功能对生态系统结构变化的响应规律对高效配置环境资源和合理制定环境政策具有重要意义。论文以大清河阜平流域为研究对象,利用1985—2015年每隔5 a的遥感影像,采用监督分类法及价值量法,研究了该区域生态系统结构、服务功能近30 a的变化规律趋势,分析了研究区服务功能对生态系统结构变化的响应规律。结果表明：1）1985—2015年研究区生态系统结构发生明显变化,建设用地、林地、耕地、水域生态系统呈正变化,变化幅度分别为139.57%、90.66%、68.79%、6.55%;未利用地、草地生态系统呈负变化,变化幅度分别为-83.48%、-54.92%;其中林地面积的增加主要是由草地和未利用地转变而来,耕地面积增加主要由未利用地构成,建设用地的扩张主要占用耕地和未利用地。2）研究区服务价值变化趋势以2000年为界,前15 a呈增加趋势,后15 a呈减少趋势。2000年总服务价值最高,为58.08亿元;不同时期林地服务价值对研究区总服务价值贡献率最大,其次是耕地和草地;单项服务价值中,保持土壤服务价值贡献率最大,其次是维持生物多样性、气体调节和气候调节服务价值。3）研究区服务价值的增加得益于草地→林地的服务价值流向和未利用地→林地的价值流向,服务价值的损失来自于耕地转变为建设用地的服务价值损失和林地转变为耕地的服务价值损失。

关键词: 大清河阜平流域, 价值量法, 生态系统服务, 生态系统结构

Abstract: Ecosystem provides necessary ecological service function through material cycle, energy flow and information transmission, and the change of the ecosystem structure can change the ecosystem process and service function. It is of great significance to study the response process of ecosystem service function to the change of ecosystem structure for the efficient allocation of environmental resources and the rational formulation of environmental policy. In this paper, the change of ecosystem structure and service function in Fuping Basin of the Daqinghe River in recent 30 years was studied by using remote sensing images. The results showed that: 1) The ecosystem structure in the study area changed obviously during 1985-2015. Construction land, forest land, cultivated land and water area increased 139.57%, 90.66%, 68.79% and 6.55% respectively. Unused land and grassland decreased -83.48% and -54.92%, respectively. The increase in forest land was mainly at the cost of grassland and unused land that 622.67 km² of grassland and 431.45 km² of unused land were turned into forest land, the transfer rates being 28.8% and 18.22%, respectively. The expansion of cultivated land was mainly at the cost of unused land and grassland that 1 063.50 km² of unused land and 831.41 km² of grassland were turned into cultivated land. Construction land was mostly transferred from cultivated land and unused land that 441.91 km² of cultivated land and 259.51 km² of unused land were turned into construction land. Over the 30 years, unused land mainly turned into cultivated land and forest land. 2) The value of ecosystem services in the study area in 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 was 44.29×10⁸, 44.62×10⁸, 44.65×10⁸, 58.08×10⁸, 51.71×10⁸, 53.22×10⁸, 52.72×10⁸ yuan respectively. The highest value was in 2000. Forest land contributed the largest amount of the ecosystem value in the study area, followed by cultivated land and grassland. As for the value of single ecosystem service, soil formation and protection had the largest contribution rate, followed by biodiversity maintenance, gas regulation and climate regulation. 3) The increase of service value in the study area was due to the conversion of the grassland to woodland and the unused land to woodland. The loss of the service value was due to the conversion of the cultivated land to the construction land and the loss of forest land into cultivated land.

Key words: ecosystem service value, ecosystem structure, Fuping Basin of the Daqing River, value method

中图分类号:

X826

陈明叶, 刘素红, 于连海, 冯金周, 于佩鑫, 高宝嘉. 大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值响应研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1376-1389.

CHEN Ming-ye, LIU Su-hong, YU Lian-hai, FENG Jin-zhou, YU Pei-xin, GAO Bao-jia. Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Ecosystem Structure Change in Fuping Basin of the Daqinghe River[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(8): 1376-1389.

参考文献

[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Frameworks[M]. Washington D C: World Resources Institute, 2005.
[2] COSTANZA R, D ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1): 3-15.
[3] PIMENTAL D, WILSON C, MCCULUM A.Economic and Environmental benefits of biodiversity[J]. Bioscience, 1997, 47(11): 747-757.
[4] SUTTON P C, COSTANZA R.Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 509-527.
[5] DIXON J.Analysis and Management of Watersheds [M]. The Environment and Emerging Development Issues: Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendrom Press, 1997.
[6] PAUUTANAYAK S K.Valuing watershed services: Concepts and empirics from Southeast Asia Agriculture[J]. Ecosystem and Environment, 2004, 104(1): 171-184.
[7] TURNER R, VANDEN BERGH J, SODEQVIST T, et al.Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 35(1): 7-23.
[8] LOOMIS J, KENT P, STRANGE L, et al.Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Result from a contingent valuation survey[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33(1): 103-117.
[9] NING Z H, CHAMBERS R, ABDOLLAHI K, et al.Modeling air pollutant removal, carbon storage, and CO₂ sequestration potential of urban forests in Scotlandville, Louisiana, USA[J]. Forest Biogeosciences and Forestry, 2016, 9(6): 860-867.
[10] SHERROUSE B C, SEMMENS D J.Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Version 3.0 (SolVES 3.0): Documentation and User Manual[M]. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey, 2015.
[11] TALLIS H T, RICKETTS T, GUERRY A D, et al.InVEST 2. 1 Beta User’s Guide[M]. Stanford: The Natural Capital Project, 2011.
[12] 欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5): 607-613.
[OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K, MIAO H.A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(5): 607-613. ]
[13] 李文华, 张彪, 谢高地. 中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 1-10.
[LI W H, ZHANG B, XIE G D.Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and perspectives. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(1): 1-10. ]
[14] 李文华. 生态系统服务功能价值评价的理论、方法与应用 [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008.
[LI W H.Ecosystem Services Value Evaluation Theory, Method and Application. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2008. ]
[15] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254.
[XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al.Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254. ]
[16] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
[XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al.Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. ]
[17] 普拉提·莫合塔尔, 海米提·依米提. 土地利用变化下的生态系统服务敏感性研究——以克里雅绿洲为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1849-1858.
[POLAT M, HAMID Y.Ecosystem services sensitivity to land-use change: A case study of the Keriya Oasis. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(11): 1849-1858. ]
[18] 肖强, 肖洋, 欧阳志云, 等. 重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1): 216-223.
[XIAO Q, XIAO Y, OUYANG Z Y, et al.Value assessment of the function of the forest ecosystem services in Chongqing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(1): 216-223. ]
[19] 刘兴元, 龙瑞军, 尚占环. 草地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估方法研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 167-174.
[LIU X Y, LONG R J, SHANG Z H.Evaluation method of ecological services function and their value for grassland ecosystems. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(1): 167-174. ]
[20] 史洋洋, 吕晓, 黄贤金, 等. 江苏沿海地区耕地利用转型及其生态系统服务价值变化响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 961-976.
[SHI Y Y, LÜ X, HUANG X J, et al.Arable land use transitions and its response of ecosystem services value change in Jiangsu coastal areas. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(6): 961-976. ]
[21] 曾杰, 李江风, 姚小薇. 武汉城市圈生态系统服务价值时空变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(3): 883-889.
[ZENG J, LI J F, YAO X W.Spatio-temporal dynamics of ecosystem service value in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(3): 883-889. ]
[22] 赵苗苗, 赵海凤, 李仁强, 等. 青海省1998—2012年草地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(3): 418-433.
[ZHAO M M, ZHAO H F, LI R Q, et al.Assessment on grassland ecosystem services in Qinghai Province during 1998-2012. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(3): 418-433. ]
[23] 傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 1-9.
[FU B J, YU D D.Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 1-9. ]
[24] 戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡: 方法、模型与研究框架[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 35(11): 1250-1259.
[DAI E F, WANG X L, ZHU J J, et al.Progress and perspective on ecosystem services trade-offs. Geographical Research, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259. ]
[25] 李鹏, 姜鲁光, 封志明, 等. 生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16): 5219-5229.
[LI P, JIANG L G, FENG Z M, et al.Research progress on trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services: An overview. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(16): 5219-5229. ]
[26] 李双成. 生态系统服务地理学 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
[LI S C.The Geography of Ecosystem Services. Bei-jing: Science Press, 2014. ]
[27] 孙雪萍. 生态系统服务流动性分析——以张承地区水资源供给服务为例 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2016.
[SUN X P.Analysis of Ecosystem Services Mobility: A Case Study of Water Resources Supply Services in Zhangjiakou and Chengde Area. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016. ]
[28] 李晓赛, 朱永明, 赵丽, 等. 基于价值系数动态调整的青龙县生态系统服务价值变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(3): 373-381.
[LI X S, ZHU Y M, ZHAO L, et al.Ecosystem services value change in Qinglong County from dynamically adjusted value coefficients. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(3): 373-381. ]
[29] SHI Y, WANG R S, HUANG J L, et al.An analysis of the spatial and temporal changes in Chinese terrestrial ecosystem service functions[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2012, 57(17): 2120-2131.
[30] BAI Y, XU H L, LING H B.Eco-service value evaluation based on Eco-economic functional regionalization in a typical basin of northwest arid area, China[J]. Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2014, 71(8): 3715-3726.
[31] 曾宪芷, 杨跃军, 张国红, 等. 对太行山绿化工程建设的思考[J]. 林业经济, 2010, 9(7): 52-54.
[ZENG X Z, YANG Y J, ZHANG G H, et al.On the greening project of Taihang Mountains. Forestry Economics, 2010, 9(7): 52-54. ]
[32] 许宁, 张广录, 刘紫玉. 基于地形梯度的河北省太行山区土地利用时空变异研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(10): 1284-1292.
[XU N, ZHANG G L, LIU Z Y.Spatial-temporal variability of land use with terrain gradient in Taihang Mountain, Hebei Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(10): 1284-1292. ]
[33] 许月明, 胡建, 赵卫红. 保定市西部山区土地节约集约利用分析评价及对策研究[J]. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(10): 117-118.
[XU Y M, HU J, ZHAO W H.Analysis and counter measures of land intensive and economical utilization in the western mountain of Baoding. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 14(10): 117-118. ]
[34] 彭文甫, 周介铭, 罗怀良, 等. 城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值损益估算——以成都市为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2011, 18(4): 43-51.
[PENG W F, ZHOU J M, LUO H L, et al.Estimation on gain and losses of ecosystem service value of urban land use—A case study of Chengdu City. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 18(4): 43-51. ]
[35] 苏雄志, 丁超, 门明新, 等. 保定市土地可持续利用时空差异研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(2): 299-305.
[SU X Z, DING C, MEN M X, et al.Analysis of the spatial and temporal differences of sustainable land use in Baoding. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 46(2): 299-305. ]
[36] 王晨绯. 生态系统服务: 搭建人与自然的桥梁 [N]. 中国科学报, 2017-02-27(5).
[WANG C F. Ecosystem services: The bridge between human and nature. Chinese Science News, 2017-02-27(5). ]
[37] 肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 等. 基于供需关系的生态系统服务空间流动研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102.
[XIAO Y, XIE G D, LU C X, et al.Involvement of ecosystem service flows in human wellbeing based on the relationship between supply and demand. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 3096-3102. ]

大清河阜平流域生态系统结构变化的服务价值响应研究

Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Ecosystem Structure Change in Fuping Basin of the Daqinghe River

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	胡其玉, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 342-355.
[2]	赵雪雁, 杜昱璇, 李花, 王伟军. 黄河中游城镇化与生态系统服务耦合关系的时空变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 131-147.
[3]	刘晶晶, 王静, 戴建旺, 翟天林, 李泽慧. 黄河流域县域尺度生态系统服务供给和需求核算及时空变异[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 148-161.
[4]	谢丽霞, 白永平, 车磊, 乔富伟, 孙帅帅, 杨雪荻. 基于价值—风险的黄河上游生态功能区生态分区建设[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 196-207.
[5]	贾建辉, 陈建耀, 龙晓君, 陈记臣. 水电开发对河流生态系统服务的效应评估与时空变化特征分析——以武江干流为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2163-2176.
[6]	刘春芳, 王韦婷, 刘立程, 李鹏杰. 西北地区县域生态系统服务的供需匹配——以甘肃古浪县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2177-2190.
[7]	耿甜伟, 陈海, 张行, 史琴琴, 刘迪. 基于GWR的陕西省生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1714-1727.
[8]	燕守广, 李辉, 李海东, 张银龙. 基于土地利用与景观格局的生态保护红线生态系统健康评价方法——以南京市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1109-1118.
[9]	张宇硕, 吴殿廷, 吕晓. 土地利用/覆盖变化对生态系统服务的影响：空间尺度视角的研究综述[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1172-1189.
[10]	和娟, 师学义, 付扬军. 基于生态系统服务的汾河源头区域生态安全格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 814-825.
[11]	卢龙辉, 陈福军, 许月卿, 黄安, 黄玲. 京津冀“生态系统服务转型”及其空间格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 532-545.
[12]	赵文祯, 韩增林, 闫晓露, 钟敬秋. 基于生态系统服务多情景权衡的生态安全格局构建——以大连市瓦房店为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 546-562.
[13]	王亚慧, 戴尔阜, 马良, 尹乐. 横断山区产水量时空分布格局及影响因素研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 371-386.
[14]	肖武, 张文凯, 吕雪娇, 王新静. 西部生态脆弱区矿山不同开采强度下生态系统服务时空变化——以神府矿区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 68-81.
[15]	李杨帆, 向枝远, 杨奕, 王泉力, 李艺. 基于韧性理念的海岸带生态修复规划方法及应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 130-140.