基于潜在分类模型的湿地生态系统服务公众生态偏好异质性研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20170382

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 747-760.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20170382

基于潜在分类模型的湿地生态系统服务公众生态偏好异质性研究

毛碧琦¹, 敖长林^1,*, 宁家靖¹, 高琴^1,2

1. 东北农业大学管理科学与工程系,哈尔滨 150030;
2. 山东工商学院国际教育学院,山东烟台 264005

收稿日期:2017-04-26 修回日期:2017-11-27 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-05-20
通讯作者: *敖长林（1964- ）,男,黑龙江杜蒙人,教授,博士,研究方向为生态环境管理。E-mail: aochanglin2002@126.com
作者简介:毛碧琦（1992- ）,女,黑龙江鸡西人,博士研究生,研究方向为生态环境管理。E-mail: maobiqi@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71171044）; 山东省自然科学基金项目（ZR2016GM21）

Public Preference Heterogeneity for Wetland Ecosystem Services Based on a Latent Class Model

MAO Bi-qi¹, AO Chang-lin¹, NING Jia-jing¹, GAO Qin^1,2

1. Department of Management Science and Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
2. International Education Institute, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Yantai 264005, China

Received:2017-04-26 Revised:2017-11-27 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-05-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 71171044; Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China, No. ZR2016GM21.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在生态系统服务价值评估研究中,把握公众的生态偏好是当前研究的重要内容。论文以三江平原湿地为研究对象,应用选择实验法获取公众的生态偏好和支付意愿,构建潜在分类模型,探究公众对湿地各项生态系统服务的偏好异质性。研究结果显示：公众对各项湿地生态系统服务存在显著的偏好异质性,资源偏好型的受访者所占比例最大（68.78%）,景观偏好型的受访者对自然景观的支付意愿显著较高,而价格敏感型受访者的支付意愿明显低于其他两类。分析各潜在类别可知,公众的社会经济特征及环境意识对其偏好具有显著影响。教育水平越高的受访者越偏好于资源保护,高收入和到景区旅游次数多的受访者更偏好于景观保护,而价格敏感型受访者的环境意识相对较低。研究不仅为湿地生态系统服务偏好异质性的研究提供新途径,也为相关环境政策的制定提供参考。

关键词: 偏好异质性, 潜在分类模型, 三江平原湿地, 生态系统服务, 选择实验法

Abstract: Recently, preference heterogeneity of the public has become an important indicator in the studies of ecosystem services valuation. This paper aims to assist policymakers in formulating efficient and sustainable management policies of wetland by investigating the public preferences for ecosystem services of Sanjiang Plain Wetland. A choice experiment (CE) is employed to elicit the ecological preferences and willingness to pay of the public, and a latent class model (LCM) is established to investigate heterogeneity of public preferences for wetland ecosystem services. The results reveal the heterogeneities in public preferences for diverse wetland ecosystem services in Sanjiang Plain Wetland. Respondents who prefer protecting resources account for the majority of the total population (68.78%), respondents who prefer protecting landscape are willing to pay more for the nature landscape, and price sensitive respondents have obvious lower willingness to pay than the other two groups of people. Through analysis of the latent classes, it is observed that the socio-economic and environmental awareness of the public has a significant effect on their preferences. Respondents with higher education prefer resource conservation, while respondents with higher incomes and those who have travelled more times to Sanjiang Plain Wetland prefer landscape protection. Also, the environmental awareness of the price-sensitive respondents is relatively low. This research offers a new approach to study public preferences for wetland ecosystem services, and the results provide a reference for relevant environmental policy formulation.

Key words: choice experiment method, ecosystem services, latent class model, preference heterogeneity, Sanjiang Plain Wetland

中图分类号:

X826

毛碧琦, 敖长林, 宁家靖, 高琴. 基于潜在分类模型的湿地生态系统服务公众生态偏好异质性研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(5): 747-760.

MAO Bi-qi, AO Chang-lin, NING Jia-jing, GAO Qin. Public Preference Heterogeneity for Wetland Ecosystem Services Based on a Latent Class Model[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(5): 747-760.

参考文献

[1] RANDER L, BROUWER R, WAGTENDONK A.Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: A meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 56(7): 89-96.
[2] GOPAL B.A conceptual framework for environmental flows assessment based on ecosystem services and their economic valuation[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 53-58.
[3] 崔丽娟, 庞丙亮, 李伟, 等. 扎龙湿地生态系统服务价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(3): 828-836.
[CUI L J, PANG B L, LI W, et al.Evaluation of ecosystem services in the Zhalong Wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 828-836. ]
[4] 李文华. 中国当代生态学研究(生态系统管理卷) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[LI W H.Modern Ecology Research in Chinese (Ecosystem Management). Beijing: Science Press, 2013. ]
[5] TRAIN K E.Recreation demand models with taste differences over people[J]. Land Economics, 1998, 74(2): 230-239.
[6] DIAS V, BELCHER K.Value and provision of ecosystem services from prairie wetlands: A choice experiment approach[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 15: 35-44.
[7] 谭秋成. 度量生态服务价值的选择实验: 方法介绍及案例研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(7): 46-52.
[TAN Q C.Choice experiment as a valuation method for ecosystem services: Introduction and a case study. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(7): 46-52. ]
[8] PRICE J I, JANMAAT J, SUGDEN F, et al.Water storage systems and preference heterogeneity in water-scarce environments: A choice experiment in Nepal’s Koshi River Basin[J]. Water Resources & Economics, 2016, 13: 6-18.
[9] REVELT D, TRAIN K.Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households’ choices of appliance efficiency level[J]. Review of Economics & Statistics, 2006, 80(4): 647-657.
[10] BHAT C R, GOSSEN R.A mixed multinomial logit model analysis of weekend recreational episode type choice[J]. Transportation Research Part B Methodological, 2004, 38(9): 767-787.
[11] NDUNDS E N, MUNGATANA E D.Evaluating the welfare effects of improved wastewater treatment using a discrete choice experiment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 123: 49-57.
[12] BOXALL P C, ADAMOWICZ W L.Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach[J]. Environmental & Resource Economics, 1999, 23(4): 421-446.
[13] BHAT C R.An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel[J]. Transportation Science, 1997, 31(1): 34-48.
[14] MILON J W, SCROGIN D.Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 56(2): 162-175.
[15] BIROL E, KOUNDOURI P, KAROUSAKIS K.Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece[J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60(1): 145-156.
[16] VALERI E, GATTA V, TEOBALDELLI D, et al.Modelling individual preferences for environmental policy drivers: Empirical evidence of Italian lifestyle changes using a latent class approach[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016, 65: 65-74.
[17] VALCK J D, VLAEMINCK P, BROEKX S, et al.Benefits of clearing forest plantations to restore nature? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2014, 125(2): 65-75.
[18] 李京梅, 陈琦, 姚海燕. 基于选择实验法的胶州湾湿地围垦生态效益损失评估[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(1): 68-75.
[LI J M, CHEN Q, YAO H Y.Valuing the loss of ecological benefits from wetland reclamation in Jiaozhou Bay based on choice experiments. Resources Science, 2015, 37(1): 68-75. ]
[19] 苏红岩, 李京梅. 基于改进选择实验法的广西红树林湿地修复意愿评估[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(9): 1810-1819.
[SU H Y, LI J M.Valuing the willingness to restore mangrove wetlands in Guangxi based on improved choice experiments. Resources Science, 2016, 38(9): 1810-1819. ]
[20] 龚亚珍, 韩炜, BENNETT M, 等. 基于选择实验法的湿地保护区生态补偿政策研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(2): 241-251.
[GONG Y Z, HAN W, BENNETT M, et al.Study on eco-compensation policy design for wetland: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(2): 241-251. ]
[21] 杨欣, BURTON M, 张安录. 基于潜在分类模型的农田生态补偿标准测算——一个离散选择实验模型的实证[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(7): 27-36.
[YANG X, BURTON M, ZHANG A L.Estimation of farmland eco-compensation criteria based on latent class model: A case of a discrete choice experiment. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(7): 27-36. ]
[22] 史恒通, 赵敏娟. 生态系统服务功能偏好异质性研究——基于渭河流域水资源支付意愿的分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(8): 36-40.
[SHI H T, ZHAO M J.Preference heterogeneity for ecosystem service function: A case study for environmental improvements of Wei River Basin. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment, 2016, 30(8): 36-40. ]
[23] LANCASTER K J.A new approach to consumer theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1966, 74(2): 132-132.
[24] MARSCHAK J.Binary-choice constraints and random utility indicators [C]// ARROW K J, KARLIN S, SUPPES P. Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences, 1959: Proceedings of the First Stanford Symposium, Stanford Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, IV. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1960: 312-329.
[25] DOHERTY E.Site choices in recreational demand: a matter of utility maximization or regret minimization?[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Policy, 2012, 1(1): 32-47.
[26] BOXALL P C, ADAMOWICZ W L.Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23(4): 421-446.
[27] GARROD G, RUTO E, WILLIS K, et al.Heterogeneity of preferences for the benefits of environmental stewardship: A latent-class approach[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 76(1): 104-111
[28] MANSKI C F.The structure of random utility models[J]. Theory and Decision, 1977, 8(3): 229-254.
[29] MCFADDEN D, TRAIN K.Mixed MNL models for discrete response[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2000, 15(5): 447-470.
[30] PACIFICO D.Fitting nonparametric mixed Logit models via expectation-maximization algorithm[J]. Stata Journal, 2012, 12(2): 284-298.
[31] XU Y M, LI Y, OUYANG W, et al.The impact of long-term agricultural development on the wetlands landscape pattern in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 13: 1922-1932.
[32] 冯磊, 敖长林, 焦扬. 三江平原湿地非使用价值支付意愿的影响因素[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(1): 59-67.
[FENG L, AO C L, JIAO Y.The influence factors of non-use value WTP for Sanjiang Plain Wetland. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(1): 59-67. ]
[33] 敖长林, 王静, 高琴, 等. CVM数据分析中的半参数模型及实证研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(9): 2332-2338.
[AO C L, WANG J, GAO Q, et al.The semi-parametric model and empirical research in CVM. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(9): 2332-2338. ]
[34] 赵士洞, 张永民. 生态系统与人类福祉——千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(9): 895-902.
[ZHAO S D, ZHANG Y M.Ecosystems and human well-being: The achievements, contributions and prospects of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Advances in Earth Science, 2006, 21(9): 895-902. ]
[35] 敖长林, 董育宁, 焦扬, 等. 基于双栏模型的三江平原湿地生态保护价值评估[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(5): 929-938.
[AO C L, DONG Y N, JIAO Y, et al.Ecological value evaluation of the Sanjiang Plain Wetland based on the Double-Hurdle Model. Resources Science, 2016, 38(5): 929-938. ]
[36] JOHNSON F R, KANNINEN B, BINGHAM M, et al.Experimental Design for Stated-Choice Studies[M]. Springer Netherlands, 2006: 159-202.

基于潜在分类模型的湿地生态系统服务公众生态偏好异质性研究

Public Preference Heterogeneity for Wetland Ecosystem Services Based on a Latent Class Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	胡其玉, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务供需的厦漳泉地区生态网络空间优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 342-355.
[2]	赵雪雁, 杜昱璇, 李花, 王伟军. 黄河中游城镇化与生态系统服务耦合关系的时空变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 131-147.
[3]	刘晶晶, 王静, 戴建旺, 翟天林, 李泽慧. 黄河流域县域尺度生态系统服务供给和需求核算及时空变异[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 148-161.
[4]	谢丽霞, 白永平, 车磊, 乔富伟, 孙帅帅, 杨雪荻. 基于价值—风险的黄河上游生态功能区生态分区建设[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 196-207.
[5]	贾建辉, 陈建耀, 龙晓君, 陈记臣. 水电开发对河流生态系统服务的效应评估与时空变化特征分析——以武江干流为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2163-2176.
[6]	刘春芳, 王韦婷, 刘立程, 李鹏杰. 西北地区县域生态系统服务的供需匹配——以甘肃古浪县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2177-2190.
[7]	耿甜伟, 陈海, 张行, 史琴琴, 刘迪. 基于GWR的陕西省生态系统服务价值时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(7): 1714-1727.
[8]	燕守广, 李辉, 李海东, 张银龙. 基于土地利用与景观格局的生态保护红线生态系统健康评价方法——以南京市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1109-1118.
[9]	张宇硕, 吴殿廷, 吕晓. 土地利用/覆盖变化对生态系统服务的影响：空间尺度视角的研究综述[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1172-1189.
[10]	和娟, 师学义, 付扬军. 基于生态系统服务的汾河源头区域生态安全格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(4): 814-825.
[11]	卢龙辉, 陈福军, 许月卿, 黄安, 黄玲. 京津冀“生态系统服务转型”及其空间格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 532-545.
[12]	赵文祯, 韩增林, 闫晓露, 钟敬秋. 基于生态系统服务多情景权衡的生态安全格局构建——以大连市瓦房店为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 546-562.
[13]	王亚慧, 戴尔阜, 马良, 尹乐. 横断山区产水量时空分布格局及影响因素研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 371-386.
[14]	肖武, 张文凯, 吕雪娇, 王新静. 西部生态脆弱区矿山不同开采强度下生态系统服务时空变化——以神府矿区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 68-81.
[15]	李杨帆, 向枝远, 杨奕, 王泉力, 李艺. 基于韧性理念的海岸带生态修复规划方法及应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 130-140.