西藏生态安全屏障保护与建设工程的宏观生态效应

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20170116

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 西藏高原是我国重要的生态屏障、江河源区与生物物种基因库,为了保障其生态功能的持续有效发挥,2008年开始实施西藏高原生态安全屏障保护与建设工程。论文基于工程规划目标,通过对比监测2000—2008年与2008—2015年西藏高原生态系统及其关键服务的时空变化,科学地评估西藏高原生态工程的生态效应。结果表明：工程实施前、后8 a相比,1）西藏高原生态系统格局稳定少动,生态系统宏观状况趋向良性发展。森林面积持续增加,荒漠面积显著减少,水体与湿地面积从减少转变为增加。2）草地退化趋势明显减弱、草地恢复态势显著,退化草地占比下降了19.9%,恢复草地占比增加了33%。植被覆盖度增加趋势明显,平均提高了1.9%,特别是高寒草甸类。草地载畜压力明显减少,牧草供给能力提升,草畜矛盾有所缓解。3）生态系统水源涵养能力增加,碳汇总量略有提高,防风固沙服务能力稳步上升。然而,降雨量增加导致降雨侵蚀力增强,植被覆盖度增加但植被根系土壤层无法短时期内恢复,从而导致土壤保持服务能力有所下降。4）西藏高原的暖湿化气候有利于减缓荒漠化进程并促进生态系统恢复,而生态安全屏障保护与建设工程的实施对西藏高原生态系统服务能力的提升特别是工程区局部生态恢复具有一定的正面作用。

关键词: 宏观结构, 生态服务, 生态工程, 生态效应, 西藏高原

Abstract: Tibet Plateau is an important ecological barrier of China. It is also the source region of many rivers and the gene bank of biological species. In order to protect the ecological function of Tibet Plateau, Ecological Security Barrier Protection and Construction Project was carried out in Tibet Plateau since 2008. Based on the objective of the project, this paper assessed the ecological effects of the Ecological Security Barrier Protection and Construction Project scientifically by comparing and monitoring the temporal and spatial changes of ecosystem and its key services between 2000-2008 and 2008-2015 in Tibet Plateau. Comparing the ecosystem in eight years before and eight years after the project, it was concluded that: 1) The ecosystem structure of the Tibet Plateau was stable and less dynamic, and the macro patterns of the ecosystem tended better. The area of forest continued to increase, the desert was significantly reduced, and the area of water and wetland decreased firstly and then increased. 2) The trend of grassland degradation was weakened, and the grassland was obviously restored. The proportion of degrading grassland decreased by 19.9% and the proportion of restored grassland increased by 33%. The vegetation coverage increased 1.9% in Tibet Plateau, especially the alpine meadow. The significantly reduced loading pressure of grassland and the enhanced forage supply capacity both alleviated the contradiction between grassland and livestock. 3) The capacity of ecosystem water conservation increased, the total amount of carbon sinks increased slightly, and the capacity of ecosystem sand fixation increased steadily. However, the increasing rainfall enhanced the erosion, so soil layer could not recover in a short period in spite of the increase of vegetation coverage. Thus, the capacity of soil conservation service declined. 4) The warm and humid climate in the Tibet Plateau is conducive to slow down the process of desertification and promote the ecosystem restoration, and the implementation of the Ecological Security Barrier Protection and Construction Project has positive effects on the improvement of the ecosystem service capacity, especially in the local regions of the project.

Key words: ecological effects, ecological projects, ecosystem services, macrostructure, Tibet Plateau

中图分类号:

X826

黄麟, 曹巍, 徐新良, 樊江文, 王军邦. 西藏生态安全屏障保护与建设工程的宏观生态效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(3): 398-411.

HUANG Lin, CAO Wei, XU Xin-liang, FAN Jiang-wen, WANG Jun-bang. The Ecological Effects of Ecological Security Barrier Protection and Construction Project in Tibet Plateau[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(3): 398-411.

参考文献

[1] 刘纪远, 邵全琴, 樊江文. 三江源生态工程的生态成效评估与启示[J]. 自然杂志, 2013, 35(1): 40-46.
[LIU J Y, SHAO Q Q, FAN J W.Ecological construction achievements assessment and its revelation of ecological project in Three Rivers Headwaters Region. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2013, 35(1): 40-46. ]
[2] 李世东, 翟洪波. 世界林业生态工程对比研究[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22(11): 1976-1982.
[LI S D, ZHAI H B.The comparison study on forestry ecological projects in the world. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(11): 1976-1982. ]
[3] 彭文英, 张科利, 陈瑶, 等. 黄土坡耕地退耕还林后土壤性质变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2005, 20(2): 272-278.
[PENG W Y, ZHANG K L, CHEN Y, et al.Research on soil quality change after returning farmland to forest on the loess sloping croplands. Journal of Natural Resources, 2005, 20(2): 272-278. ]
[4] 谢红霞, 李锐, 杨勤科, 等. 退耕还林(草)和降雨变化对延河流域土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(2): 569-576.
[XIE H X, LI R, YANG Q K, et al.Effect of returning farmland to forest (pasture) and changes of precipitation on soil erosion in the Yanhe Basin. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(2): 569-576. ]
[5] 刘迎春, 王秋凤, 于贵瑞, 等. 黄土丘陵区两种主要退耕还林树种生态系统碳储量和固碳潜力[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(15): 4277-4286.
[LIU Y C, WANG Q F, YU G R, et al.Ecosystems carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of two main tree species for the Grain for Green Project on China’s hilly Loess Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(15): 4277-4286. ]
[6] 潘磊, 唐万鹏, 肖文发, 等. 三峡库区不同退耕还林模式林地水文效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012, 32(5): 103-106.
[PAN L, TANG W P, XIAO W F, et al.Woodland hydrological effects of converting cropland to forest in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 32(5): 103-106. ]
[7] 吴云, 曾源, 吴炳方, 等. 基于MODIS数据的三北防护林工程区植被覆盖度提取与分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(9): 1712-1718.
[WU Y, ZENG Y, WU B F, et al.Retrieval and analysis of vegetation cover in the Three-North Regions of China based on MODIS data. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(9): 1712-1718. ]
[8] 李双双, 延军平, 万佳. 近10 年陕甘宁黄土高原区植被覆盖时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(7): 960-970.
[LI S S, YAN J P, WAN J.The spatial-temporal changes of vegetation restoration on Loess Plateau in Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(7): 960-970. ]
[9] 周洪建, 王静爱, 李睿, 等. 基于SPOTVEG NDVI和降水序列的退耕还林(草)效果分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(4): 70-74.
[ZHOU H J, WANG J A, LI R, et al.Analysis of effects of “Grain for Green” program using temporal NDVI and rainfall series. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(4): 70-74. ]
[10] 王朗, 傅伯杰, 吕一河, 等. 生态恢复背景下陕北地区植被覆盖的时空变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(8): 2109-2116.
[WANG L, FU B J, LÜ Y H, et al.Spatio-temporal variations of vegetation cover in northern Shaanxi Province under the background of ecological restoration. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(8): 2109-2116. ]
[11] 邵全琴, 樊江文, 刘纪远, 等. 三江源生态保护和建设一期工程生态成效评估[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 3-20.
[SHAO Q Q, FAN J W, LIU J Y, et al.Assessment on the effects of the first-stage ecological conservation and restoration project in Sanjiangyuan region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 3-20. ]
[12] 孙鸿烈, 郑度, 姚檀栋, 等. 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(1): 3-12.
[SUN H L, ZHENG D, YAO T D, et al.Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(1): 3-12. ]
[13] 刘纪远, 邵全琴, 樊江文. 三江源区草地生态系统综合评估指标体系[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(2): 273-283.
[LIU J Y, SHAO Q Q, FAN J W.The integrated assessment indicator system of grassland ecosystem in the Three-River Headwaters region. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(2): 273-283. ]
[14] 邵全琴, 刘纪远, 黄麟, 等. 2005—2009年三江源自然保护区生态保护和建设工程生态成效综合评估[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(9): 1645-1656.
[SHAO Q Q, LIU J Y, HUANG L, et al.Integrated assessment on the effectiveness of ecological conservation in Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(9): 1645-1656. ]
[15] 钟祥浩, 刘淑珍, 王小丹, 等. 西藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 山地学报, 2006, 24(2): 129-136.
[ZHONG X H, LIU S Z, WANG X D, et al.A research on the protection and construction of the state ecological safe shelter zone on the Tibet Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science, 2006, 24(2): 129-136. ]
[16] 杜军, 马鹏飞, 潘多. 1981—2014年西藏各时次气温的变化趋势分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 422-432.
[DU J, MA P F, PAN D.Spatial-temporal change of air temperature at 02, 08, 14 and 20 Bejing time over Tibet during 1981-2014. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(3): 422-432. ]
[17] 杜军, 马玉才. 西藏高原降水变化趋势的气候分析[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(3): 375-382.
[DU J, MA Y C.Climatic trend of rainfall over Tibetan Plateau from 1971 to 2000. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(3): 375-382. ]
[18] 杜军, 边多, 胡军, 等. 西藏近35年日照时数的变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(5): 492-500.
[DU J, BIAN D, HU J, et al.Climatic change of sunshine duration and its influencing factors over Tibet during the last 35 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(5): 492-500. ]
[19] 唐小萍, 闫小利, 尼玛吉, 等. 西藏高原近40年积雪日数变化特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(7): 951-959.
[TANG X P, YAN X L, NI M J, et al.Changes of the snow cover days on Tibet Plateau in last 40 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(7): 951-959. ]
[20] 樊杰, 徐勇, 王传胜, 等. 西藏近半个世纪以来人类活动的生态环境效应[J]. 科学通报, 2015(32): 3057-3066.
[FAN J, XU Y, WANG C S, et al.The effects of human activities on the ecological environment of Tibet over the past half century. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(32): 3057-3066. ]
[21] 国家发展和改革委员会. 西藏生态安全屏障保护与建设规划(2008—2030年) [Z]. 2009.
[National Development and Reform Commission. Planning on protection and construction of ecological security barrier in Tibet (2008-2030). 2009. ]
[22] 黄麟, 曹巍, 吴丹, 等. 西藏高原生态系统服务时空格局及其变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(4): 543-555.
[HUANG L, CAO W, WU D, et al.The temporal and spatial variations of ecological services in the Tibet Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(4): 543-555. ]
[23] 刘纪远, 徐新良, 邵全琴. 近30年来青海三江源地区草地退化的时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 364-376.
[LIU J Y, XU X L, SHAO Q Q, et al.The spatial and temporal characteristics of grassland degradation in the Three-River Headwaters Region in Qinghai Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(4): 364-376. ]
[24] 王靓, 徐新良, 刘洛. 青藏高原草地退化类型空间分布数据集[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(S1): 61-64.
[WAND L, XU X L, LIU L.Remotely sensed dataset of grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(S1): 159-163. ]
[25] CHEN Z Q, SHAO Q Q, LIU J Y, et al.Analysis of net primary productivity of terrestrial vegetation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, based on MODIS remote sensing data[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2012, 55(8): 1306-1312.
[26] 樊江文, 邵全琴, 刘纪远, 等. 1988—2005年三江源草地产草量变化动态分析[J]. 草地学报, 2010, 18(1): 5-10.
[FAN J W, SHAO Q Q, LIU J Y, et al.Dynamic changes of grassland yield in Three River Headwater Region from 1988 to 2005. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(1): 5-10. ]
[27] 樊江文, 邵全琴, 王军邦, 等. 三江源草地载畜压力时空动态分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(3): 64-72.
[FAN J W, SHAO Q Q, WANG J B, et al.An Analysis of temporal-spatial dynamics of grazing pressure on grassland in Three Rivers Headwater Region. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2011, 33(3): 64-72. ]
[28] 严平, 董光荣, 张信宝, 等. ¹³⁷Cs法测定青藏高原土壤风蚀的初步结果[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(2): 199-204.
[YAN P, DONG G R, ZHANG X B, et al.Preliminary results of ¹³⁷Cs method for determination of soil wind erosion in the Tibetan Plateau. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(2): 199-204. ]
[29] 李元寿, 王根绪, 王军德, 等. ¹³⁷Cs示踪法研究青藏高原草甸土的土壤侵蚀[J]. 山地学报, 2007, 25(1): 114-121.
[LI Y S, WANG G X, WANG J D, et al.¹³⁷Cs trace technique to study soil erosion at alpine meadow of Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Mountain Science, 2007, 25(1): 114-121. ]
[30] 李俊杰, 李勇, 王仰麟, 等. 三江源区东西样带土壤侵蚀的⁽¹³⁷)Cs和⁽²¹⁰)Pb示踪研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009, 22(12): 1452-1459.
[LI J J, LI Y, WANG Y L, et al.Study of soil erosion on the East-West Transects in the Three-Rivers Headwaters Region using ¹³⁷Cs and ²¹⁰Pb tracing. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 22(12): 1452-1459. ]
[31] 王钊齐. 江河源区高寒草甸退化序列上放牧侵蚀研究 [D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2012.
[WANG Z Q.Study on Grazing Erosion of Degraded Alpine Meadow in Jiangheyuan Region. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2012. ]
[32] 吴丹. 中国主要陆地生态系统水源涵养服务研究 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院, 2014.
[WU D.Study on Water Conservation Service of Main Terrestrial Ecosystems in China. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014. ]
[33] 中央办公厅、国务院办公厅. 关于划定并严守生态保护红线的若干意见 [Z]. 2017.
[General Office of CCCPC, General Office of SCPRC. Some opinions on delineation and strict compliance of the ecological red line. 2017. ]