三江源区退化天然草地和人工草地生物量碳密度特征

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20161402

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 185-194.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20161402

• 资源生态 • 下一篇

三江源区退化天然草地和人工草地生物量碳密度特征

张蕊^{1, 2, 3}, 李飞³, 王媛³, 马丽娜⁴, 桑潮⁴, 王力⁴, 郭瑞英³, 赵学勇¹, 尚占环^{3, *}

1. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,奈曼沙漠化研究站,乌拉特荒漠草原研究站,兰州 730000;
2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;
3. 兰州大学生命科学学院,草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室,兰州 730000;
4. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院,草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室,兰州 730020

收稿日期:2016-12-19 修回日期:2017-03-11 出版日期:2018-02-23 发布日期:2018-02-23
通讯作者: 尚占环（1978- ）,男,河北玉田人,博士,教授,主要从事草地生态学、生物多样性研究工作。E-mail:shangzhh@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:张蕊（1988- ）,女,甘肃天水人,博士研究生,研究方向为恢复生态学。E-mail：zhangr12@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划课题（2016YFC0501906）; 国家自然科学基金项目（41671508,41541003）; 青海省重点研发与转化计划项目（2017-NK-149-2）

Characteristics of Biomass Carbon Density of Degraded Natural Grassland and Artificial Grassland in the “Three-River Headwaters” Region

ZHANG Rui^{1, 2, 3}, LI Fei³, WANG Yuan³, MA Li-na⁴, SANG Chao⁴, WANG Li⁴, GUO Rui-ying³, ZHAO Xue-yong¹, SHANG Zhuan-huan³

1. Naiman Desertification Research Station, Urat Desert-grassland Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. School of Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
4. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Received:2016-12-19 Revised:2017-03-11 Online:2018-02-23 Published:2018-02-23
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Projects of China, No. 2016YFC0501906National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41671508 and 41541003Qinghai Key R ɭ and Transformation Program, No. 2017-NK-149-2. ]

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生物量碳密度是生态系统表征碳截存能力的重要功能特征之一。为明晰三江源区高寒草地生物量碳密度特征,选取源区内3个县（玛沁县、甘德县、达日县）的退化天然草地（黑土滩）、退化人工草地、未退化天然草地为研究对象,通过野外调查取样和室内分析相结合的方法,对样区地上生物量、根系生物量及其碳密度进行测定与分析。结果表明：“黑土滩”地上生物量高于退化人工草地和天然草地;“黑土滩”活根和死根生物量都低于天然草地和退化人工草地。退化人工草地、“黑土滩”和天然草地的总生物量碳密度分别为719.47、706.57和2 233.09 g/m²。草地退化不仅改变了生态系统的生物量分配,而且改变了地上部分、活根和死根中的碳密度分配比例。退化人工草地和天然草地的活根和死根碳密度占总生物量碳密度的90%以上,“黑土滩”活根和死根碳密度占79.41%。活根碳密度与总生物量碳密度的比值在3种不同草地群落间的变化较地上植被和死根的大,因此,活根碳密度比例可以作为草地退化的敏感指标。

关键词: “, 黑土滩”, 三江源区, 生物量碳密度, 天然草地, 退化人工草地

Abstract: Biomass carbon density is one of the important features of carbon sequestration ability in ecological system. To describe the characteristics of biomass carbon density in alpine grassland in the “Three-River Headwaters” region, above ground biomass, living root biomass, dead root biomass and their carbon content in black soil land and natural grassland were measured. The results showed that the aboveground biomass in black soil land was higher than the aboveground biomass in degraded artificial grassland and natural grassland; but the living root biomass and dead root biomass in black soil land were lower than the living root biomass in degraded artificial grassland and natural grassland. The total biomass carbon density in degraded artificial grassland, black soil land and natural grassland was 719.47, 706.57 and 2 233.09 g/m², respectively. Grassland degradation not only changed ecosystem biomass allocation, but also changed the carbon density distribution in aboveground vegetation, living roots and dead roots. Root carbon density in degraded artificial grassland and natural grassland accounted for more than 90% of the total biomass carbon density, while the roots carbon density in black soil land accounted for 79.41%. The variation of carbon density in living roots was greater than those in aboveground vegetation and dead roots among three types of grassland, therefore, we initially considered that living roots carbon density may be a sensitive indicator of grassland degradation.

Key words: “Three-river Headwaters ”region, biomass carbon density, black soil land, degraded artificial grassland, natural grassland

中图分类号:

S812

张蕊, 李飞, 王媛, 马丽娜, 桑潮, 王力, 郭瑞英, 赵学勇, 尚占环. 三江源区退化天然草地和人工草地生物量碳密度特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 185-194.

ZHANG Rui, LI Fei, WANG Yuan, MA Li-na, SANG Chao, WANG Li, GUO Rui-ying, ZHAO Xue-yong, SHANG Zhuan-huan. Characteristics of Biomass Carbon Density of Degraded Natural Grassland and Artificial Grassland in the “Three-River Headwaters” Region[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(2): 185-194.

参考文献

[1] 杜加强, 贾尔恒·阿哈提, 赵晨曦, 等. 三江源区近30年植被生长动态变化特征分析 [J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 1-12. [DU J Q, JIAERHENG A, ZHAO C X, et al. Analysis of vegetation dynamics using GIMMS NDVI3g in the Three-rivers Headwater Region from 1982-2012. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(1): 1-12. ]
[2] LI X L, GAO J, BRIERLEY G, et al. Rangeland and degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: Implications for rehabilitation [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2013, 24(1): 72-80.
[3] SHANG Z H, MA Y S, LONG R J, et al. Effect of fencing, artificial seeding and abandonment on vegetation composition and dynamics of ‘black soil land’ in the headwaters of the Yangtze and the Yellow Rivers of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2008, 19: 554-563.
[4] 尚占环. 青藏高原三江源区“黑土滩”二次发生的地下过程及其内部驱动机制研究 [R]. 国家自然科学基金资助项目结题报告, 2015. [SHANG Z H. The research underground process and internal drive mechanism of secondary generation of “Heitutan” in the headwater areas of Yangtze and Yellow rivers in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The concluding report of national natural science fund project, 2015. ]
[5] LONG R J, SHANG Z H, GUO X S, et al. Case study 7: Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau rangeland [M]// SQUIRES V R, LU X S, LU Q, et al. Rangeland Degradation and Recovery in China’S Pastoral Lands. CABI, UK, 2009: 184-196.
[6] LI X L. The Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Four Plant-functional Types (PFTs) in Alpine Meadow as Affected by Human Disturbance, Sanjiangyuan Region, China [D]. Auckland: The University of Auckland, 2012.
[7] 尚占环, 龙瑞军, 马玉寿. 青藏高原江河源区生态环境安全问题分析与探讨 [J]. 草业科学, 2007, 24(3): 1-7. [SHANG Z H, LONG R J, MA Y S. Review on environmental problems in the headwater areas of Yangtze and Yellow rivers in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(3): 1-7. ]
[8] ZHANG Y, DONG S K, GAO Q Z, et al. Responses of alpine vegetation and soils to the disturbance of plateau pika ( Ochotona curzoniae ) at burrow level on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 88: 232-236.
[9] 孙晓芳, 岳天祥, 范泽孟, 等. 全球植被碳储量的时空格局动态 [J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(4): 782-791. [SUN X F, YUE T X, FAN Z M, et al. Spatiotemporal trends in global vegetation carbon storage. Resources Science, 2013, 35(4): 782-791. ]
[10] 陈晓鹏, 尚占环. 中国草地生态系统碳循环研究进展 [J]. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(4): 99-110. [CHEN X P, SHANG Z H. Progress of carbon cycle research in China grassland ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2011, 33(4): 99-110. ]
[11] 王冬. 天然草地生态系统固碳现状及其影响机制 [D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2015. [WANG D. Carbon Storage and Its Impact Mechanism in the Natural Grassland Ecosystem—A Case Study on Gansu Province. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015. ]
[12] 任继周, 林慧龙. 草地土壤有机碳储量模拟技术研究 [J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 280-294. [REN J Z, LIN H L. Study on the simulation methods of grassland soil organic carbon: A review. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(6): 280-294. ]
[13] 程积民, 程杰, 杨晓梅, 等. 黄土高原草地植被碳密度的空间分布特征 [J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(1): 226-237. [CHENG J M, CHENG J, YANG X M, et al. Spatial distribution of carbon density in grassland vegetation of the Loess Plateau of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(1): 226-237. ]
[14] 田福平. 黄土高原单播人工草地碳储量及其土壤速效养分特征研究 [D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2015. [TIAN F P. Study on Carbon Storage and Soil Available Nutrient Characteristics of Monoculture Artificial Grassland in Loess Plateau. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2015. ]
[15] 王启基, 李世雄, 王文颖, 等. 江河源区高山嵩草 ( Kobresia pygmaea ) 草甸植物和土壤碳、氮储量对覆被变化的响应 [J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(3): 885-894. [WANG Q J, LI S X, WANG W Y, et al. The despondences of carbon and nitrogen reserves in plants and soils to vegetations cover change on Kobresia pygmaea meadow of Yellow River and Yangtze River source region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(3): 885-894. ]
[16] SHANG Z H, YANG S H, WANG Y L, et al. Soil seed bank and its relation with above-ground vegetation along the degraded gradients of alpine meadow [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 90: 268-277.
[17] 张蕊, 王媛, 马丽娜, 等. 三江源区退化人工草地、“黑土滩”和天然草地植物群落物种多样性 [J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1171-1178. [ZHANG R, WANG Y, MA L N, et al. Species diversities of plant communities of degraded artificial grassland, “Heitutan” and natural grassland in the “Three-River Headwaters” region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1171-1178. ]
[18] 张蕊. 高寒草地植物氮素利用与草地退化对土壤及根系碳/糖的影响 [D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2015. [ZHANG R. Comparision of Nitrogen Utilization by Alpine Plants and the Influence of Pasture Degradation on Soil and Root Carbon/Carbohydrate in Alpine Meadow. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2015. ]
[19] 马玉寿, 郎百宁, 王启基. “黑土型”退化草地研究工作的回顾与展望[J]. 草业科学, 1999, 16(2): 5-9. [MA Y S, LANG B N, WANG Q J. Review and prospect of the study on ‘black soil type’ deteriorated grassland. Pratacultural Science, 1999, 16(2): 5-9. ]
[20] 李希来. 青藏高原"黑土滩"形成的自然因素与生物学机制 [J]. 草业科学, 2002, 19(1): 20-22. [LI X L. Natural factors and formative mechanism of “Black Beach” formed on grassland in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2002, 19(1): 20-22. ]
[21] 路远. 天祝高寒草甸主要类型的植物量动态及其在24年前的变化 [D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2006. [LU Y. Phytomass Dynamics and the Change Before 24 Years of the Alpine Meadow in Tianzhu. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2006. ]
[22] 孙力安, 梁一民, 刘国彬. 草地地下生物量研究综述 [J]. 国外畜牧学·草原与牧草, 1993(1): 6-13. [SUN L A, LIANG Y M, LIU G B. The review of underground biomass research in grass. Foreign Animal Science, Grassland and Forage Grass, 1993(1): 6-13. ]
[23] 常天军, 王建林, 李鹏, 等. 藏北高寒草地植被的碳密度与碳贮量 [J]. 生态科学, 2007, 26(5): 437-442. [CHANG T J, WANG J L, LI P, et al. Carbon density and reserve of alpine grassland vegetation in northern Tibet. Ecological Science, 2007, 26(5): 437-442. ]
[24] XU M Y, XIE F, WANG K. Response of vegetation and soil carbon and nitrogen storage to grazing intensity in semi-arid grasslands in the agro-pastoral zone of northern China [J]. Plos One, 2014, 9(5): 1-11.
[25] 胡中民, 樊江文, 钟华平, 等. 中国草地地下生物量研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(9): 1095-1101. [HU Z M, FAN J W, ZHONG H P, et al. Progress on grassland underground biomass researches in China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(9): 1095-1101. ]
[26] MOKANY K, RAISON R J, PROKUSHKIN A S. Critical analysis of root: Shoot rations in terrestrial biomass [J]．Global Change Biology, 2006, 11(1): 84-96．
[27] 全小龙, 乔有明, 段中华, 等. 高寒草甸植物碳氮组成及其稳定同位素特征 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(8): 1650-1656. [QUAN X L, QIAO Y M, DUAN Z H, et al. Carbon and nitrogen composition and their isotope characteristics of alpine meadow plants. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(8): 1650-1656. ]
[28] FAN J W, ZHONG H P, HARRIS W, et al. Carbon storage in the grasslands of China based on field measurements of above- and below-ground biomass [J]. Climatic Change, 2008, 86(3): 375-396.
[29] BARDGETT R D, WARDLE D A, YEATES G W, et al. Linking above-ground and belowground interactions: How plant responses to foliar herbivory influence soil organisms [J]. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 1998, 30: 1867-1878.
[30] LI Y Y, DONG S K, WEN L, et al. The effects of fencing on carbon stocks in the degraded alpine grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 128 (20): 393-399.
[31] 张新厚, 范志平, 孙学凯, 等. 半干旱区土地利用方式变化对生态系统碳储量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(12): 2424-2430. [ZHANG X H, FAN Z P, SUN X K, et al. Effects of land use change on ecosystem carbon stock in semi-arid region. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(12): 2424-2430. ]
[32] 红雨, 王华, 包刚. 呼伦贝尔典型草原不同群落类型植被碳密度研究 [J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2015(2): 219-224. [HONG Y, WANG H, BAO G. A study of vegetation carbon density in different plant community types at Hulunbuir typical grassland. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Natural Science Edition), 2015(2): 219-224. ]
[33] WEN L, DONG S K, LI Y Y, et al. The impact of land degradation on the C pools in alpine grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 368(1): 329-340.
[34] ZHANG L, ZHOU G S, JI Y H, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamic simulation of grassland carbon storage in China [J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2016, 59(10): 1946-1958.
[35] LIU S L, ZHANG F W, DU Y G, et al. Ecosystem carbon storage in alpine grassland on the Qinghai Plateau [J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(8): e0160420.
[36] SUN Y R, ZHU J J, YAN Q L, et al. Changes in vegetation carbon stocks between 1978 and 2007 in central Loess Plateau, China [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(4): 1-16.
[37] 周文昌, 崔丽娟, 王义飞, 等. 若尔盖高原泥炭地生态系统碳储量 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(8): 1981-1987. [ZHOU W C, CUI L J, WANG Y F, et al. Carbon storage of the peatland ecosystems in Zoige Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(8): 1981-1987. ]

三江源区退化天然草地和人工草地生物量碳密度特征

Characteristics of Biomass Carbon Density of Degraded Natural Grassland and Artificial Grassland in the “Three-River Headwaters” Region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	卢昱嘉, 陈秧分. 美国对外农业投资格局演变及其影响因素——兼论“一带一路”农业合作[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 654-667.
[2]	杨艳昭, 封志明, 孙通, 汤峰. “一带一路”沿线国家水资源禀赋及开发利用分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6): 1146-1156.
[3]	贾琨, 杨艳昭, 封志明. “一带一路”沿线国家粮食生产的时空格局分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6): 1135-1145.
[4]	罗娅, 熊康宁, 李永垚, 盈斌, 韦清章. 石漠化治理区土地利用变化安全性评价——以花江、红枫湖、鸭池石漠化治理区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(3): 600-612.
[5]	聂莹, 刘清杰, 孙素芬. 经济全球化能够有效抑制“一带一路”沿线国家的生态足迹吗?——来自动态门槛面板模型的经验证据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 301-311.
[6]	许涛, 蔡健榕, 孙晓双, 崔梦月, 雷国良, 姜修洋. 台风“杜鹃”降水δ¹⁸O的云雨区效应初探[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2238-2248.
[7]	吕鑫, 王卷乐, 康海军, 韩雪华. 基于遥感估产的2006—2015年青海果洛与玉树地区草畜平衡分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(10): 1821-1832.
[8]	姚鑫, 赵敏. 城市化对城市森林组成和结构的影响——以上海“城-郊”样带为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1113-1124.
[9]	张福平, 王虎威, 朱艺文, 张枝枝, 李肖娟. 祁连县天然草地地上生物量及草畜平衡研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1183-1192.
[10]	吕鑫, 王卷乐, 康海军, 赵强, 韩雪华, 王玉洁. 基于MODIS NPP的2006—2015年三江源区产草量时空变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(11): 1857-1868.
[11]	孙晓双, 王晓艳, 翟水晶, 雷国良, 姜修洋. 台风“麦德姆”福州降水δ¹⁸O特征及水汽来源分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(6): 1041-1050.
[12]	徐明, 张健, 刘国彬, 邱甜甜, 郑明清. 不同植被恢复模式沟谷地植被-土壤系统耦合关系评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(12): 2137-2146.
[13]	王新歌，席建超，孔钦钦. “实心”与“空心”：旅游地乡村聚落土地利用空间“极化”研究——以河北野三坡旅游区两个村庄为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(1): 90-101.
[14]	刘锦, 李慧, 方韬, 孙青言. 淮河中游北岸地区“四水”转化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(9): 1570-1581.
[15]	李赞红, 阎建忠, 花晓波. 大渡河上游种植制度变化及其影响因素——基于2006与2011年的跟踪研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(10): 1750-1761.