城市化进程中的土地自然资本利用动态分析

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20161360

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 1-13.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20161360

• 资源利用与管理 • 下一篇

城市化进程中的土地自然资本利用动态分析

方恺^{1, 2}, 吴次芳¹, 董亮^{2, 3}

1. 浙江大学公共管理学院,中国杭州 310058;
2. 荷兰莱顿大学环境科学研究所,荷兰莱顿 2333CC;
3. 日本国立环境研究所,日本筑波 305-8506

收稿日期:2016-12-08 修回日期:2017-04-02 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-01-20
作者简介:方恺（1986- ）,男,浙江杭州人,研究员,博士生导师,中国自然资源学会会员（S300001140M）,主要从事资源环境管理研究。E-mail: fangk@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71704157）; 浙江省高校重大人文社科项目攻关计划资助（2016GH005）; 浙江省软科学研究计划项目（2017C35003）; 钱江人才计划（QJC1602010）; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金

The Use of Land Natural Capital in the Context of Urbanization

FANG Kai^{1, 2}, WU Ci-fang¹, DONG Liang^{2, 3}

1. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
2. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden 2333CC, The Netherlands;
3. Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan

Received:2016-12-08 Revised:2017-04-02 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-01-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 71704157; Provincial Major Humanities and Social Science Project in Universities, No. 2016GH005; Soft Science Research Program of Zhejiang Province, No. 2017C35003; Qianjiang Talents Project, No. QJC1602010; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 论文聚焦城市化进程中的土地自然资本利用演变,从生产性视角定义了土地足迹和土地承载力的核算方法,在此基础上运用一个区分自然资本流量与存量、可以进行“产品—地类—区域”尺度转换的三维足迹模型,对2000—2014年贵阳市的土地自然资本利用状况进行了系统分析。结果表明：过去15 a贵阳市的土地自然资本流动性提高了39.4%,存量消耗强度降低了15.7%。耕地自然资本的流量占用规模和存量消耗强度均为最大,农业生产结构逐渐由粮食主导型向蔬果主导型转变;林地取代草地成为自然资本利用第二大地类,其生态盈余是区域自然资本流量增加的主要来源;草地自然资本的存量-流量利用比虽有大幅回落,但仍存在较大的反弹风险;建设地对自然资本流量的占用规模超越草地仅次于林地,并与城市化率在1%的水平上显著正相关;水域的自然资本利用占比最小,且由以存量消耗为主过渡到以流量占用为主。论文从区域和地类两个层面揭示了城乡土地利用变化与自然资本流量占用和存量消耗之间的关系,为提升足迹核算与分析方法的科学性和标准化提供了参考依据。

关键词: 城市化, 贵阳市, 三维模型, 土地足迹, 自然资本

Abstract: The paper focused on the changes in natural capital use of urban and rural lands. It redefined the land footprint and land carrying capacity from the production perspective, and applied a revised 3D land footprint model which can differentiate the flows and stocks of natural capital between the scales of product, land and region. Then, the land natural capital use of Guiyang City in 2000-2014 was investigated. The results show that the mobility of natural capital flows increased by 39.4% while the depletion intensity of natural capital stocks decreased by 15.7%. There was a significant change in the composition of land natural capital use, as proven by the growing diverse sources of natural capital flows. Specifically, the largest appropriation of flows and depletion of stocks of land natural capital was found in cropland. However, the gap between cropland and other four land types was shrinking as a result of the reform of the supply front. The dietary supply patterns in Guiyang transformed from crop-dominated to vegetable-dominated. The expanding flows of natural capital benefitting from ecological surplus allowed the forest to have the second-largest share of natural capital use. The stock-flow utilization ratio of natural capital declined remarkably when it comes to the grassland, irrespective of the considerable risk of rebound. The built-up land attracted many of the natural capital flows and thus replaced grassland to be the third-largest land type in terms of natural capital use. There was a significant positive correlation between the magnitude of natural capital use in built-up land and the urbanization rate of Guiyang. The water body accounted for the least amount of natural capital use, and its natural capital use shifted from stock depletion-dominated to flow appropriation-dominated. The research to some extent exposited the nexus between the land use change and the flow-stock dynamics of natural capital in Guiyang City, and thus provided a reference for further scientific discussions on improving the robustness and standardization of footprint methodologies.

Key words: 3D model, Guiyang City, land footprint, natural capital, urbanization

中图分类号:

F062.2

方恺, 吴次芳, 董亮. 城市化进程中的土地自然资本利用动态分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(1): 1-13.

FANG Kai, WU Ci-fang, DONG Liang. The Use of Land Natural Capital in the Context of Urbanization[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(1): 1-13.

参考文献

[1] 陈明星, 叶超, 周义. 城市化速度曲线及其政策启示——对诺瑟姆曲线的讨论与发展 [J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(8): 1499-1507.
[CHEN M X, YE C, ZHOU Y. Urbanization rate and its policy implication: Discussion and development of Northam’s curve. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(8): 1499-1507. ]
[2] 姚士谋, 张平宇, 余成, 等. 中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题 [J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34 (6): 641-647.
[YAO S M, ZHANG P Y, YU C, et al. The theory and practice of new urbanization in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 641-647. ]
[3] 傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
[FU B J, ZHANG L W. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 441-446. ]
[4] NEWBOLD T, HUDSON L N, HILL S L, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity [J]. Nature, 2015, 520(7545): 45-50.
[5] 蒋仁开, 张冰松, 肖宇, 等. 土地利用规划要引导和促进新型城镇化的健康发展——“新型城镇化背景下的土地利用规划研讨会”综述 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2013, 27(8): 93-96.
[JIANG R K, ZHANG B S, XIAO Y, et al. Land use planning should aim to guide and promote the healthy development of new-type urbanization. China Land Sciences, 2013, 27(8): 93-96. ]
[6] FARLEY J, DALY H. Natural capital: The limiting factor: A reply to Aroso, Blignaut, Milton and Clewell [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2006, 28(1): 6-10.
[7] COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, SUTTON P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 152-158.
[8] 张舟, 吴次芳, 谭荣. 生态系统服务价值在土地利用变化研究中的应用: 瓶颈和展望 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(2): 556-562.
[ZHANG Z, WU C F, TAN R. Application of ecosystem service value in land use change research: Bottlenecks and prospects. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(2): 556-562. ]
[9] 方恺. 基于改进生态足迹三维模型的自然资本利用特征分析——选取11个国家为数据源 [J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(11): 3766-3777. [FANG K. Assessing the natural capital use of eleven nations: An application of a revised three-dimensional model of ecological footprint. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(11): 3766-3777. ]
[10] NICCOLUCCI V, BASTIANONI S, TIEZZI E B P, et al. How deep is the footprint? A 3D representation [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2009, 220(20): 2819-2823.
[11] NICCOLUCCI V, TIEZZI E, PULSELLI F M, et al. Biocapacity vs ecological footprint of world regions: A geopolitical interpretation [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 16: 23-30.
[12] 方恺, 李焕承. 基于生态足迹深度和广度的中国自然资本利用省际格局 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(12): 1995-2005.
[FANG K, LI H C. Provincial pattern of China’s natural capital use: A modification and application of ecological footprint depth and size. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(12): 1995-2005. ]
[13] 方恺. 生态足迹深度和广度: 构建三维模型的新指标 [J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(1): 267-274.
[FANG K. Ecological footprint depth and size: New indicators for a 3D model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(1): 267-274. ]
[14] 方恺. 1999—2008年G20国家自然资本利用空间格局变化 [J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(4): 793-800.
[FANG K. Changes in the spatial distribution of natural capital use among G20 countries from 1999 to 2008. Resources Science, 2014, 36(4): 793-800. ]
[15] 杜悦悦, 彭建, 高阳, 等. 基于三维生态足迹的京津冀城市群自然资本可持续利用分析 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(10): 1186-1196.
[DU Y Y, PENG J, GAO Y, et al. Sustainability evaluation of natural capital utilization based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan region. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(10): 1186-1196. ]
[16] 张星星, 曾辉. 珠江三角洲城市群三维生态足迹动态变化及驱动力分析 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(2): 771-778.
[ZHANG X X, ZENG H. Dynamic of three dimensional ecological footprint in the Pearl River Delta and its driving factors. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2017, 37(2): 771-778. ]
[17] 谢高地, 曹淑艳, 鲁春霞, 等. 中国的生态服务消费与生态债务研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(1): 43-51.
[XIE G D, CAO S Y, LU C X, et al. Human’s consumption of ecosystem services and ecological debt in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(1): 43-51. ]
[18] 方恺, 董德明, 沈万斌. 生态足迹理论在能源消费评价中的缺陷与改进探讨 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(6): 1013-1021.
[FANG K, DONG D M, SHEN W B. Discussion on shortcomings and improvement of ecological footprint theory in energy consumption assessment. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(6): 1013-1021. ]
[19] 王洋, 王少剑, 秦静. 中国城市土地城市化水平与进程的空间评价 [J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(12): 2228-2238.
[WANG Y, WANG S J, QIN J. Spatial evaluation of land urbanization level and process in Chinese cities. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(12): 2228-2238. ]
[20] WIEDMANN T, BARRETT J. A review of the ecological footprint indicator—Perceptions and methods [J]. Sustainability, 2010, 2(6): 1645-1693.
[21] FANG K, HEIJUNGS R, DUAN Z, et al. The environmental sustainability of nations: Benchmarking the water, carbon and land footprints with allocated planetary boundaries [J]. Sustainability, 2015, 7(8): 11285-11305.
[22] SHANNON C E, WEAVER W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication [M]. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
[23] 贵阳市统计局. 贵阳统计年鉴(2001—2015) [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2001—2015.
[Bureau of Statistics of Guiyang. Guiyang Statistical Yearbook (2001-2015). Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2001-2015. ]
[24] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT [DB/OL]. http: //faostat3.fao.org/home/E.
[25] LIN D, HANSCOM L, MARTINDILL J, et al. Working Guidebook to the National Footprint Accounts 2016 Edition [M]. Oakland, USA: Global Footprint Network, 2016.
[26] 樊胜岳, 麻亮亮. 中国大陆足迹家族的环境库兹涅茨曲线分析 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1452-1462.
[FAN S Y, MA L L. Environmental Kuznets Curve analysis of the footprints family in Mainland China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(9): 1452-1462. ]
[27] 方恺. 足迹家族: 概念、类型、理论框架与整合模式 [J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(6): 1647-1659.
[FANG K. Footprint family: Concept, classification, theoretical framework and integrated pattern. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(6): 1647-1659. ]
[28] FANG K, SONG S, HEIJUNGS R, et al. The footprint’s fingerprint: On the classification of the footprint family [J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2016, 23: 54-62.

城市化进程中的土地自然资本利用动态分析

The Use of Land Natural Capital in the Context of Urbanization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	葛世帅, 曾刚, 杨阳, 胡浩. 黄河经济带生态文明建设与城市化耦合关系及空间特征研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(1): 87-102.
[2]	苏伟忠, 马丽雅, 陈爽, 杨桂山. 城市生态空间冲突分析与系统优化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 601-613.
[3]	沈杨, 汪聪聪, 高超, 丁镭. 基于城市化的浙江省湾区经济带碳排放时空分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 329-342.
[4]	范冰雄, 税伟, 杨海峰, 王亚楠, 杜勇, 祁新华, 张小洪, 简小枚, 郭平平. 闽三角城市群自然资本损失评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(1): 153-167.
[5]	杨屹, 胡蝶. 生态脆弱区榆林三维生态足迹动态变化及其驱动因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(7): 1204-1217.
[6]	邢有为, 姜旭朝, 黎晓峰. 环境治理投入对经济增长的异质性影响研究——基于城市化的视角[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(4): 576-587.
[7]	陈秀洪, 刘丙军, 陈刚. 城市化建设对降水特征的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9): 1591-1601.
[8]	姚鑫, 赵敏. 城市化对城市森林组成和结构的影响——以上海“城-郊”样带为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1113-1124.
[9]	贾艳青, 张勃, 张耀宗, 唐敏, 马彬, 王国强, 刘秀丽, 罗正明. 城市化对长三角地区极端气温影响的时空分异研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 814-828.
[10]	陆林, 韩娅, 黄剑锋, 彭红松, 储小乐, 郑玉莲. 基于扎根理论的杭州市梅家坞旅游城市化特征与机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(11): 1905-1918.
[11]	朱凤凯, 张凤荣. 城市化背景下宅基地利用的租值消散与农户行为研究——以北京市朝阳区下辛堡村为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(6): 936-947.
[12]	韩玮, 苏敬. 城市发展对上海太阳辐射特征的影响分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(9): 1485-1495.
[13]	贺艳华, 唐承丽, 周国华, 何胜, 邱永红, 石亮, 张浩中. 基于地理学视角的快速城市化地区空间冲突测度——以长株潭城市群地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(10): 1660-1674.
[14]	吴健生, 蒋培培, 黄秀兰, 彭建, 王政. 广东省粮食供需时空格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(2): 253-265.
[15]	方恺, 李焕承. 基于生态足迹深度和广度的中国自然资本利用省际格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(12): 1995-2005.