泰山山前平原三种土地利用方式下土壤结构特征及其对土壤持水性的影响

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20161291

自然资源学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 63-74.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20161291

泰山山前平原三种土地利用方式下土壤结构特征及其对土壤持水性的影响

王修康, 戚兴超, 刘艳丽^*, 刘之广, 宋付朋, 李成亮

土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室,山东农业大学资源与环境学院,山东泰安271018

收稿日期:2016-11-24 修回日期:2017-08-04 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-01-20
通讯作者: 刘艳丽（1976- ）,女,山东莘县人,副教授,博士,主要从事土壤肥力保持研究。E-mail: yanliliu2013@163.com
作者简介:王修康（1992- ）,男,山东招远人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤施肥效应研究。E-mail: wangxiukang1992@163.com
基金资助:
土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室联合研发基金（SF2015-5）; 教育部博士点基金项目（2012370212003）

Soil Structure and Its Effect on Soil Water Holding Property under Three Land Use Patterns in Piedmont Plain of Mountain Tai

WANG Xiu-kang, QI Xing-chao, LIU Yan-li^*, LIU Zhi-guang, SONG Fu-peng, LI Cheng-liang

National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an271018, China

Received:2016-11-24 Revised:2017-08-04 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-01-20
Supported by:
United Fund of National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer, No. SF2015-5; Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China, No. 2012370212003.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不同土地利用方式因其植被和管理方式差异影响土壤结构特征而改变土壤持水性。选择泰山山前平原农田、林地和荒草地3种土地利用方式,分析不同土壤颗粒组成、颗粒粒径分布与团聚体组成及其水稳定性等土壤结构特征指标,利用原状土样测定,结合土壤水分特征曲线分析土壤持水量、持水强度及水分有效性,通过逐步回归与通径分析明确影响土壤持水性的主要结构特征指标。结果表明,与荒草地相比,农田和林地显著提高了土壤粘粒含量、有机碳含量、土壤毛管孔隙度,降低了土壤容重、> 2 mm水稳性团聚体含量及团聚体的水稳定性。农田土壤的细颗粒组成含量和颗粒比表面积显著高于林地和荒草地土壤。土壤饱和含水量的大小依次为农田>林地>荒草地,农田土壤的田间持水量为31%,分别比林地和荒草地高15%、24%。土壤容积含水量θ与吸力S之间的关系符合幂函数方程θ=A·S^-^B（系数A、B为常数,A值表征土壤持水强度,大小依次为农田>林地>荒草地）。土壤有效水总量与速效水含量大小依次为林地>农田>荒草地。逐步回归与通径分析表明土壤粘粒含量通过直接和间接作用增强土壤持水性,土壤颗粒比表面积和水稳性团聚体的平均重量直径对土壤持水性的影响主要体现在间接作用,土壤水稳性团聚体的平均重量直径是抑制土壤持水性的关键因素。土壤有机碳含量对调节土壤粘粒含量和土壤水稳性团聚体形成具有重要作用。因此,在该区土地开发利用过程中,以提高土壤有机碳含量改善土壤结构性质为原则,建议土地利用方式以农业与林业轮作或间作措施为主,合理开发荒草地,为该区土壤水分管理与土地可持续开发利用提供参考依据。

关键词: 泰山, 土地利用方式, 土壤持水性, 土壤颗粒组成, 土壤有机碳

Abstract: Soil water holding capacity, which is controlled by soil structure properties of land uses types with different vegetation and management systems, plays an important role in soil fertilization and crop root development. This study is to explore changes of water holding capacity and soil physicochemical properties in three land use types in piedmont plain of Mountain Tai, such as soil particle composition, particle size distribution, water stable soil aggregate content. Original soil samples in agricultural soil, forest field and barren land in meadow brown soil region and soil water characteristics curves were used to inspect soil water holding capacity, soil water and soil moisture holding, and supply capacity. The soil physicochemical properties affecting soil water holding capacity were identified by step regression and path coefficient method. Results showed that the agricultural soil and forest field had significant higher clay content, organic carbon content and soil capillary porosity and lower aggregate stability than barren land. Agricultural soil had more composition of fine particles and surface area of soil particles than forest field and barren land. The order of field water holding capacity from high to low was agricultural soil, forest field and barren land, which was 31% in agricultural soil and was 15% and 24% more than those in forest field and barren land. There was a power function correlation between the soil moisture and the potential of soil water, which is θ=A·S^-^B. The value A indicates the intensity of soil water retention with the order from high to low of agricultural soil, forest field and barren land. The order of total available water content and rapid available water percentage from high to low was forest field, agricultural soil and barren land. Step regression and path analysis indicated that soil water retention intensity was positively correlated with soil specific surface area and clay contents and was negative correlated with the stability of soil aggregates. Soil organic carbon played an important role in controlling soil clay content and soil aggregate formation. Consequently, the organic matter input should be increased in order to ameliorate soil structure, and rotation and intercrop should be applied in agricultural and forestry farming in order to improve soil water retention properties. The outcome of this paper provides reference for keeping soil fertility and sustainable application in the region of brown soil.

Key words: land use pattern, Mountain Tai, soil organic carbon, soil particle composition, soil water holding property

中图分类号:

S152

王修康, 戚兴超, 刘艳丽, 刘之广, 宋付朋, 李成亮. 泰山山前平原三种土地利用方式下土壤结构特征及其对土壤持水性的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(1): 63-74.

WANG Xiu-kang, QI Xing-chao, LIU Yan-li, LIU Zhi-guang, SONG Fu-peng, LI Cheng-liang. Soil Structure and Its Effect on Soil Water Holding Property under Three Land Use Patterns in Piedmont Plain of Mountain Tai[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 33(1): 63-74.

参考文献

[1] OJEDA G, MATTANA S, ÀVILA A, et al. Are soil-water functions affected by biochar application? [J]. Geoderma, 2015, 249/250: 1-11.
[2] 康绍忠. 水安全与粮食安全 [J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(8): 880-885.
[KANG S Z. Towards water and food security in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(8): 880-885. ]
[3] 高茂盛, 温晓霞, 黄灵丹, 等. 耕作和秸秆覆盖对苹果园土壤水分及养分的影响 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(4): 547-555.
[GAO M S, WEN X X, HUANG L D, et al. The effect of tillage and mulching on apple orchard soil moisture and soil fertility. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(4): 547-555. ]
[4] YANG F, ZHANG G L, YANG J L, et al. Organic matter controls of soil water retention in an alpine grassland and its significance for hydrological processes [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 519: 3086-3093.
[5] RAWLS W J, PACHEPSKY Y A, RITCHIE J, et al. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention [J]. Geoderma, 2003, 116: 61-76.
[6] 刘艳丽, 李成亮, 高明秀, 等. 不同利用方式对黄河三角洲土壤主要物理特性的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(15): 5183-5190.
[LIU Y L, LI C L, GAO M X, et al. Effect of different land-use patterns on the physical characteristics of the soil in the Yellow River Delta region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(15): 5183-5190. ]
[7] SOUZA J V R S, SAAD J C C, SÁNCHEZ-ROMÁN R M, et al. No-till and direct seeding agriculture in irrigated bean: Effect of incorporating crop residues on soil water availability and retention, and yield [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 170: 158-166.
[8] 董云中, 王永亮, 张建杰, 等. 晋西北黄土高原丘陵区不同利用方式下土壤碳氮储量 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(4): 955-960.
[DONG Y Z, WANG Y L, ZHANG J J, et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen storage of different land use types in northwestern Shanxi Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(4): 955-960. ]
[9] 李鉴霖, 江长胜, 郝庆菊. 土地利用方式对缙云山土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响 [J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(12): 4695-4704.
[LI J L, JIANG C S, HAO Q J. Impact of land use type on stability and organic carbon of soil aggregates in Jinyun Mountain. Environmental Science, 2014, 35(12): 4695-4704. ]
[10] 赵锦梅, 张德罡, 刘长仲. 东祁连山土地利用方式对土壤持水能力和渗透性的影响 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(3): 422-429.
[ZHAO J M, ZHANG D G, LIU C Z. The effect of land use patterns on soil moisture retention capacity and soil infiltration property in eastern Qilian Mountains. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(3): 422-429. ]
[11] 刘春利, 邵明安. 黄土高原六道沟流域不同土地利用方式下土壤水力特性及其对土壤水分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(11): 2400-2407.
[LIU C L, SHAO M A. Soil hydraulic properties and their influences on soil water content under different land uses in Liudaogou Watershed of Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(11): 2400-2407. ]
[12] 李民义, 张建军, 王春香, 等. 晋西黄土区不同土地利用方式对土壤物理性质的影响 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(3): 125-130, 137.
[LI M Y, ZHANG J J, WANG C X, et al. Effects of land use types on soil physical properties in Loess Plateau of western Shanxi. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(3): 125-130, 137. ]
[13] 王全辉, 董元杰, 刘春生, 等. 旅游活动对泰山景区土壤质量的影响 [J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(2): 398-402.
[WANG Q H, DONG Y J, LIU C S, et al. Impacts of tourism activities on soil quality of Mountain Tai scenic area. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(2): 398-402. ]
[14] 辛慧. 泰山森林涵养水源功能与价值评估 [D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2008.
[XIN H. Forest Water Conservation Function and Value Evaluation on Mountain Tai. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2008. ]
[15] 萧月芳, 宋国菡. 泰山土壤重金属元素及砷的分布特征 [J]. 山东农业大学学报, 1993, 24(2): 224-226.
[XIAO Y F, SONG G H. Distribution characteristics of heavy metal elements and arsenic in soils on Mountain Tai. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 1993, 24(2): 224-226. ]
[16] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析 [M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
[Institute of Soil Science, CAS. Analysis of Soil Physicochemical Properties. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1978. ]
[17] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法 [M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[LU R K. Analytical Methods for Soil and Agro-chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. ]
[18] SIX J, CALLEWAERT P, LENDERS S. Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002, 66: 1981-1987.
[19] 张景略, 苗付山. 黄泛平原不同质地土壤的持水特性 [J]. 土壤学报, 1985, 22(4): 350-355.
[ZHANG J L, MIAO F S. The characteristics of moisture retention of soils with different textures in the flood plain of the Huanghe River. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1985, 22(4): 350-356. ]
[20] 刘梦云, 吴健利, 刘丽雯, 等. 黄土台塬土地利用方式对土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性影响 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1564-1576.
[LIU M Y, WU J L, LIU L W, et al. Stability characteristics of soil water-stable aggregates under different land-use patterns on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(9): 1564-1576. ]
[21] 刘艳丽. 长期施肥下水稻土土壤性质变化及其与生产力的关系研究 [D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2007.
[LIU Y L. Changes in Soil Properties and Its Relation with Soil Productivity under Long-term Fertilization in Paddy Fields. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2007. ]
[22] 柳云龙, 吕军, 王人潮. 低丘红壤作物易旱与土壤持水供水特性的关系 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2002, 28(1): 42-46.
[LIU Y L, LÜ J, WANG R C. Research on relationship between crop drought and soil water retention and supply characters in hilly red clayey soil. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Science Edition), 2002, 28(1): 42-46. ]
[23] 易湘生, 李国胜, 尹衍雨, 等. 黄河源区草地退化对土壤持水性影响的初步研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(10): 1708-1719.
[YI X S, LI G S, YIN Y Y, et al. Preliminary study for the influences of grassland degradation on soil water retention in the source region of the Yellow River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(10): 1708-1719. ]
[24] 李成有. 不同耕作措施下土壤持水性及其影响因素 [D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2009.
[LI C Y. Soil Water Retention and Their Influencing Factors with Different Tillage Measure. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2009. ]
[25] 孙彩丽, 薛蓵, 刘国彬, 等. 黄土区不同施肥对土壤颗粒及微团聚体组成的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3): 550-561.
[SUN C L, XUE J, LIU G B, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil particles and microaggregate distribution in loess area. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2014, 20(3): 550-561. ]
[26] 嵇庆才. 江苏地区土壤持水性及水分有效性研究 [D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2006.
[JI Q C. Study of Soil Water Retention and Availability in Jiangsu Province. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2006. ]

泰山山前平原三种土地利用方式下土壤结构特征及其对土壤持水性的影响

Soil Structure and Its Effect on Soil Water Holding Property under Three Land Use Patterns in Piedmont Plain of Mountain Tai

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	马维伟, 孙文颖. 尕海湿地植被退化过程中有机碳及相关土壤酶活性变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1250-1260.
[2]	李冬雪, 李雨芩, 张珂豪, 马旭, 张树岩, 刘伟华, 车纯广, 崔保山. 黄河口典型潮沟土壤碳氮分布特征规律[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 460-471.
[3]	张婧雅, 张玉钧. 自然保护地的文化景观价值演变与识别—以泰山为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(9): 1833-1849.
[4]	黄先飞, 周运超, 张珍明. 土地利用方式下土壤有机碳特征及影响因素——以后寨河喀斯特小流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(6): 1056-1067.
[5]	张圣民, 许明祥, 张志霞, 李彬彬. 黄土高原不同地貌类型区农田土壤有机碳采样布点方法研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(4): 634-643.
[6]	张珍明, 周运超, 黄先飞, 田潇. 喀斯特小流域土壤有机碳密度空间异质性及影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 313-324.
[7]	张萌萌, 刘梦云, 常庆瑞, 刘欢, 张杰. 1985—2015年陕西黄土台塬表层土壤有机碳空间分布[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(11): 2032-2045.
[8]	刘梦云, 吴健利, 刘丽雯, 虞亚楠. 黄土台塬土地利用方式对土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1564-1576.
[9]	金宝石, 高灯州, 杨平, 王维奇, 曾从盛. 闽江河口区互花米草入侵不同年限下湿地土壤有机碳变化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(4): 608-619.
[10]	曾全超, 李鑫, 董扬红, 安韶山. 黄土高原延河流域不同植被类型下土壤生态化学计量学特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(11): 1881-1891.
[11]	张志霞, 许明祥, 师晨迪, 邱宇洁. 黄土丘陵区不同地貌单元土壤有机碳空间变异的尺度效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(7): 1173-1184.
[12]	张志霞, 许明祥, 刘京, 李强. 黄土高原不同地貌区土壤有机碳空间变异与合理取样数研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(12): 2103-2113.
[13]	顾峰雪, 庞瑞, 张远东, 黄玫, 李洁, 郝卫平, 梅旭荣. 1954-2010年西南高山地区土壤碳储量时空动态及对气候变化的响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1930-1943.
[14]	周义贵, 郝凯婕, 李贤伟, 范川, 陈栎霖, 王谢, 王晓红. 川西亚高山不同土地利用类型对土壤微生物量碳动态特征的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1944-1956.
[15]	韩璐, 谢俊奇. 基于WNN模型的土地利用方式决策研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(8): 1395-1403.