国土空间规划管制与区域经济协调发展研究—一个分析框架

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160789

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 厘清国土空间规划管制与区域经济协调发展之间的关系,是我国国土空间规划管制有效开展的重要前提。论文主要结合国内外最新的实证研究文献,在国土空间规划管制对区域经济协调发展影响的“表现形式—作用机理—协调机制”这一逻辑框架下,分析了国土空间规划管制与区域经济协调发展的关联机理。研究结果表明：1）国土空间规划管制影响区域经济协调发展主要表现在发展受限制区域的土地产权受到抑制和资源环境保护的外部性未能有效地内在化;2）国土空间规划管制影响区域经济协调发展的作用机制在于保护型区域生产的生态产品可贸易性较差,使其落入比较优势陷阱;3）国土空间规划管制下的区域经济协调机制主要包括土地发展权漂移、税费调节和地役权保护。从理论和实践上来看,空间规划管制从诞生起,就面临效率的争议,但在资源环境保护的巨大压力之下,国土空间规划管制在实践层面又非不可调和,关键在于区域经济协调机制的设计。这对我国在建立“多规合一”的国土空间规划体系的时代背景下,为避免新的区域经济协调发展问题具有重要的政策含义。

关键词: 比较优势陷阱, 产权抑制, 国土空间规划管制, 区域经济协调发展, 土地发展权

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyze the associated mechanism on spatial regulation of land use planning and coordinated development of regional economy, so as to clarify the relationship between spatial regulation of land use planning and coordinated development of regional economy. Based on the latest empirical research literatures, we studied spatial regulation of land use planning and regional economic development under the logic framework of “manifestation-mechanism-coordination mechanism”. The results indicate: 1) The effects of spatial regulation of land use planning on the coordinated development of regional economy was mainly embodied in the fact that the land property rights in the restricted area is restrained and the externality of environment and resources protection has failed to be internalized effectively. 2) The mechanism that spatial regulation of land use planning affects the coordinated development of regional economy is caused by the poor tradability of the ecological products in the protected regions. The protected area falls into the trap of comparative advantage. 3) Under the spatial regulation of land use planning, the coordination mechanisms of regional economy mainly include drift of land development rights, tax regulation and protection of the easement. In theory and in practice, spatial regulation of land use planning has been facing the dispute of efficiency since its birth. However, under the immense pressure of resources and environmental protection, the national spatial planning is not irreconcilable at the practical level. The key is the design of the coordination mechanism of regional economy. This paper has important policy implications to avoid new problems in harmonious development of different region at the background of building national spatial planning system.

Key words: land development rights, property restraint, spatial regulation of land use planning, the coordinated development of regional economy, the trap of comparative advantage

中图分类号:

TU982

余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 国土空间规划管制与区域经济协调发展研究—一个分析框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1445-1456.

YU Liang-liang, CAI Yin-ying. Research on Spatial Regulation of Land Use Planning and Coordinated Development of Regional Economy: An Analytical Framework[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(8): 1445-1456.

参考文献

[1] 薄文广, 安虎森, 李杰. 主体功能区建设与区域协调发展: 促进亦或冒进 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(10): 121-128. [BO W G, AN H S, LI J. Construction of major functional zones and Chinese regional coordinated development: Promotive or aggressive. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(10): 121-128. ]
[2] CHAN E H W, HOU J. Developing a framework to appraise the critical success factors of transfer development rights (TDRs) for built heritage conservation [J]. Habitat International, 2015, 46: 35-43.
[3] STOBBE T E, EAGLE A J, COTTELEER G, et al. Farmland preservation verdicts-rezoning agricultural land in British Columbia [J]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2011, 59(4): 555-72.
[4] SCHILLING B J, ATTAAVANICH W, SULLIVAN K P, et al. Measuring the effect of farmland preservation on farm profitability [J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 41(4): 84-96.
[5] QUIGLEY J M,RAPHAEL S. Regulation and the high cost of housing in California [J]. American Economic Review, 2005, 95(2): 323-328.
[6] DEATON B J, VYN R J. The effect of strict agricultural zoning on agricultural land values: The case of Ontario's Greenbelt [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2010, 92(1): 941-955.
[7] 张鹏. 规划管制与土地发展权关系研究评述 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(10): 74-78, 81. [ZHANG P. Literature review on the relation between planning regulation and land development rights. China Land Science, 2010, 24(10): 74-78, 81. ]
[8] 罗罡辉, 李贵才, 仝德. 土地用途管制调整与权益主体行为研究 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2013, 27(4): 8-14. [LUO G H, LI G C, TONG D. The interaction between the adjustment of land use control and the actions of relevant actors. China Land Science, 2013, 27(4): 8-14. ]
[9] 张全景, 欧名豪, 王万茂. 中国土地用途管制制度的耕地保护绩效及其区域差异研究 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(9): 8-13. [ZHANG Q J, OU M H, WANG W M. Study on cultivated land preservation performance of land use control system and its regional differences in China. China Land Science, 2008, 22(9): 8-13. ]
[10] 曹瑞芬, 蔡银莺, 张安录, 等. 中国土地用途管制绩效的时空差异性分析 [J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(6): 1125-1133. [CAO R F, CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L, et al. Spatial-temporal differences of land use control performance in China. Resources Science, 2013, 35(6): 1125-1133. ]
[11] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE, GROOT R D, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387(1): 253-260.
[12] BARAL H, KEENAN R J, SHARMA S K, et al. Economic evaluation of ecosystem goods and services under different landscape management scenarios [J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 39(3): 54-64.
[13] KRAGT M E, ROBERTSON M J. Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices [J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 102(2): 147-157.
[14] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196. [XIE G D, LU C X, LENG Y F, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2): 189-196. ]
[15] 刘利花, 尹昌斌, 钱小平. 稻田生态系统服务价值测算方法与应用--以苏州市域为例 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(1): 92-99. [LIU L H, YIN C B, QIAN X P. Calculation methods of paddy ecosystem service value and application: A case sudy of Suzhu City. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(1): 92-99. ]
[16] 王燕, 高吉喜, 王金生, 等. 新疆国家级自然保护区土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(5): 1439-1446. [WANG Y, GAO J X, WANG J S, et al. Responses of ecosystem services value to land use change in national nature reserves in Xinjiang, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(5): 1439-1446. ]
[17] 陈克龙, 李双成, 周巧富, 等. 近25年来青海湖流域景观结构动态变化及其对生态系统服务功能的影响 [J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(2): 274-280. [CHEN K L, LI S C, ZHOU Q F, et al. Analyzing dynamics ofecosystem service values based on variations of landscape patterns in Qinghai Lake area in recent 25 years. Resources Science, 2008, 30(2): 274-280. ]
[18] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 冯淑怡. 农村生态资源的生态服务价值评估及时空特征分析 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(7): 133-139. [LIANG L T, QU F T, FENG S Y. Rural ecosystem service value in China: Evaluation and temporal and spatial characteristics. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(7): 133-139. ]
[19] 刘春腊, 刘卫东, 陆大道, 等. 2004-2011年中国省域生态补偿差异分析 [J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(12): 1897-1910. [LIU C L, LIU W D, LU D D, et al. China's provincial eco-compensation difference in 2004-2011. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(12): 1897-1910. ]
[20] 尹翔硕, 汤毅. 比较优势、可贸易性与贸易不平衡 [J]. 世界经济文汇, 2013(3): 29-41. [YIN X S, TANG Y. Comparative advantage, tradability and trade imbalance. World Economic Papers, 2013(3): 29-41. ]
[21] 丁溪, 韩秋. 比较优势与比较优势陷阱--基于黑龙江省外贸进出口数据分析 [J]. 国际贸易问题, 2015(2): 84-93. [DING X, HAN Q. Comparative advantage, comparative advantage trap: An empirical analysis based on foreign trade of Heilongjiang Province. Journal of International Trade, 2015(2): 84-93. ]
[22] JOU J B, TAN L. Taxation on land value and development when there are negative externalities from development [J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2008, 36(1): 103-120.
[23] LINKOUS E R. Transfer of development rights in theory and practice: The restructuring of TDR to incentivize development [J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 51: 162-171.
[24] JANSSEN-JANSEN L B. Space for Space, a transferable development rights initiative for changing the Dutch landscape [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 87(3): 192-200.
[25] HENGER R, BIZER K. Tradable planning permits for land-use control in Germany [J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(3): 843-852.
[26] LIU X, LYNCH L. Do agricultural land preservation programs reduce farmland loss? Evidence from a propensity score matching estimator [J]. Land Economics, 2011, 87(2): 183-201.
[27] FEATHER P, BARNARD C H. Retaining open space with purchasable development rights programs [J]. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2003, 25(2): 369-384.
[28] 杨继瑞, 汪锐, 马永坤. 统筹城乡实践的重庆“地票”交易创新探索 [J]. 中国农村济, 2011 (11): 4-9, 22. [YANG J R, WANG R, MA Y K. Land quota transaction: An exploration in innovation of Chongqing municipality during the practice of balancing urban and rural development. Chinese Rural Economy, 2011(11): 4-9, 22. ]
[29] 汪晖, 陶然. 论土地发展权转移与交易的“浙江模式”--制度起源、操作模式及其重要含义 [J]. 管理世界, 2009(8): 39-52. [WANG H, TAO R. On “the Zhejiang Model” of the transfer and transaction of land development. Management World, 2009(8): 39-52. ]
[30] 顾汉龙, 冯淑怡, 张志林, 等. 我国城乡建设用地增减挂钩政策与美国土地发展权转移政策的比较研究 [J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(6): 143-148, 183. [GU H L, FENG S Y, ZHANG Z L, et al. A comparative study between the hook of urban construction land increase and rural residenial land decrease policy in China and transferable development rights policy in US. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(6): 143-148, 183. ]
[31] 张蔚文, 李学文. 外部性作用下的耕地非农化权配置--“浙江模式”的可转让土地发展权真的有效率吗? [J]. 管理世界, 2011(6): 47-62.
[32] ANDERSON J E. Taxes and fees as forms of land use regulation [J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2005, 31(4): 413-427.
[33] ANDERSON J E, GRIFFING M F. Use-value assessment tax expenditures in urban areas [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2000, 48(3): 443-452.
[34] FARMER J R, MERETSKY V, KNAPP D, et al. Why agree to a conservation easement? Understanding the decision of conservation easement granting [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 138(S1): 11-19.
[35] BARNES A, SUTHERLAND LA, TOMA L, et al. The effect of the common agricultural policy reforms on intentions towards food production: Evidence from livestock farmers [J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 50(4): 548-558.
[36] MOUYSSET L. Agricultural public policy: Green or sustainable? [J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 102(6): 15-23.
[37] PRAGER K, REED M, SCOTT A. Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale-rethinking agri-environmental payments [J]. Land Use Policy, 2012, 29(1): 244-249.
[38] FARLEY J, AQUINO A, DANIELS A, et al. Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(11): 2075-2084.
[39] 余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 耕地保护经济补偿政策的初期效应评估--东、西部地区的实证及比较 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(12): 16-23. [YU L L, CAI Y Y. Assessing the effect of economic compensation for farmland protection policy: An empirical research and comparison of the eastern and western regions of China. China Land Science, 2014, 28(12): 16-23. ]
[40] 余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 基于农户满意度的耕地保护经济补偿政策绩效评价及障碍因子诊断 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(7): 1092-1103. [YU L L, CAI Y Y. Performance evaluation and obstacle indicator diagnoses of economic compensation for farmland protection policybased on farmers' satisfation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(7): 1092-1103. ]
[41] 林坚, 许超诣. 土地发展权、空间管制与规划协同 [J]. 城市规划, 2014, 38(1): 26-34. [LIN J, XU C Y. Land developmentrights, space control, and synergetic planning. City Planning Review, 2014, 38(1): 26-34. ]