沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿标准构建——基于能值拓展模型衡量的生态外溢价值

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160583

自然资源学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 742-754.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160583

沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿标准构建——基于能值拓展模型衡量的生态外溢价值

王显金^1,2, 钟昌标^1,*

1. 宁波大学商学院区域经济与社会发展研究院,浙江宁波 315211;
2. 宁波大红鹰学院,浙江宁波 315175

收稿日期:2016-06-06 修回日期:2017-01-22 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2017-05-20
通讯作者: 钟昌标（1963- ）,男,江西赣州人,博士,教授,博士生导师,长江学者,主要从事生态经济学研究和国际贸易学研究。E-mail: zhongchangbiao@nbu.edu.cn
作者简介:王显金（1978- ）,男,江西兴国人,博士研究生,主要从事生态经济学研究。E-mail: dhywxj@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71673182）; 浙江省自然科学基金（LY13A010007）

Construction of Ecological Compensation Standard for Tidal Flat Reclamation —Based on the Spillover Ecological Value Measured by Expansion Emergy Synthesis Model

WANG Xian-jin^1,2, ZHONG Chang-biao¹

1. Regional Economic and Social Development Research Institute, Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;
2. Ningbo Dahongying University, Ningbo 315175, China

Received:2016-06-06 Revised:2017-01-22 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2017-05-20
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.71673182; Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation, No.LY13A010007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 论文综合利用能值分析法、生态足迹法等生态经济学方法,结合Shannon-Wiener指数和生态消费系数构建了沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿能值拓展模型以测算滩涂在各时期的生态外溢价值,并以生态外溢价值改变量作为滩涂围垦生态损害的衡量标准,且以此为生态补偿依据,在生态价值系数调整法的基础上建立了沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿标准。最后以杭州湾新区为例,测算了该区域滩涂围垦过程中各年份生态补偿标准,结果显示,2000—2015年,该区域生态补偿标准从2000年0美元/m²平缓递增到2015年0.05美元/m²。此研究表明,能值拓展模型能有效弥补传统的基于生态服务价值模型的一些不足,使评估标准相对客观化,评估结果动态化和体现对补偿主客体双方意愿的尊重。

关键词: 能值拓展模型, 生态外溢价值, 滩涂围垦

Abstract: While tidal flat reclamation brings huge economic benefits to the coastal provinces and cities, it has a significant negative impact on the coastal environment evolvement. The study of the ecological compensation mechanism for tidal flat reclamation has become an urgent strategic task for the protection of the ecological environment of coastal areas in China, and the compensation standard, which is the key to the success of implementing ecological compensation policies and achieving the desired effect, is of great practical significance. The present studies of ecological compensation standard tend to be based on the ecological service value which often leads to inconsistent evaluation standards, double counting and static evaluation result.
Based on the notion of “equivalence between the damage and compensation of ecosystem service” put forward by HAE, we took the spillover ecological value increment as the theoretical criteria of the ecological compensation standard for tidal flat reclamation. An ecological compensation model for tidal flat reclamation was established to quantify the spillover ecological value in different periods on the basis of methods in ecological economics, such as emergy analysis, ecological footprint, Shannon-Wiener index and ecological consumption coefficient. The loss of the spillover ecological value was taken as the criteria to measure the damage brought about by tidal flat reclamation, and consequently to provide the reference for the ecological compensation. An ecological compensation standard was consequently established for tidal flat reclamation based on ecological value coefficient adjustment.
Finally Hangzhou Bay was chosen for a case study. The results showed that the spillover ecological value of Hangzhou Bay in 2000, 2004, 2009, 2015 was 2.40×10¹⁹, 1.20×10¹⁹, 0.00, -0.21×10¹⁹seJ respectively, the corresponding spillover ecological increments being 0.00, 1.29×10¹⁹, 2.18×10¹⁹, 2.62×10¹⁹seJ, and the ecological compensation standard for the tidal flat reclamation in Hangzhou Bay rose from 0 in 2000 to 0.15 dollar per square meter in 2015. This study shows that expansion emergy synthesis model can effectively avoid some defects of traditional methods based on ecological service value. It ensures a relatively objective evaluation standard (a unified standard), a dynamic evaluation result, and the respect for the will of both parties involved in the compensation. It can provide some reference for further study of the implementation of ecological compensation, the management and sustainable development concerning tidal flat reclamation.

Key words: expansion emergy synthesis model, spillover ecological value, tidal flat reclamation

中图分类号:

P748

王显金, 钟昌标. 沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿标准构建——基于能值拓展模型衡量的生态外溢价值[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(5): 742-754.

WANG Xian-jin, ZHONG Chang-biao. Construction of Ecological Compensation Standard for Tidal Flat Reclamation —Based on the Spillover Ecological Value Measured by Expansion Emergy Synthesis Model[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(5): 742-754.

参考文献

[1] 董加伟. 论传统渔民用海权与土地使用权的冲突及协调——兼论滨海滩涂的法律性质归属 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2014, 28(11): 39-44. [DONG J W. Conflict and coordination between maritime right and use right of traditional fishermen. China Land Sciences, 2014, 28(11): 39-44. ]
[2] COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, GROOTR D, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment [M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2003.
[4] 崔丽娟. 湿地价值评价研究 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. [CUI L J. Research on Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Services. Beijing: Science Press, 2001. ]
[5] 万军, 张惠远, 王金南, 等. 中国生态补偿政策评估与框架初探 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2005, 18(2): 1-8. [WAN J, ZHANG H Y, WANG J N, et al. Policy evaluation and framework discussion of ecological compensation mechanism in China. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2005, 18(2): 1-8. ]
[6] PIGOU A C. The Economics of Welfare [M]. London: Macmillan and Co., 1932: 58-79.
[7] COASE R H. The problem of social cost [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 10: 1-44.
[8] CARSTEN D. Regulations, methods and experiences of land reclamation in German opencast mines [R]. Addressed to Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration for the 21st Century, Beijing International Symposium on Land Reclamatiom, 2000.
[9] MICHA K, DOV Z. The environmental impact of marina development on adjacent beaches: A case study of the Hevzliya Marina, Israel [J]. Applied Geography, 2001, 21(2): 145-156．
[10] JCARTEE C P, WILLIAMS D C. Factors affecting the use of an artificial beach: A case study on Mississippi Gulf Coast [R]. Hattiesburg: University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg, 1978．
[11] ELISABET R, MIRIAM V, ORTEGO M I. Assessing public perception son beach quality according to beach users’ profile: A case study in the Costa Brava (Spain) [J]. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(4): 598-607．
[12] PHILIPS M R, HOUSE C. An evaluation of priorities for beach tourism: Case studies from South Wales, UK [J]. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(2): 176-183．
[13] 金周益, 唐建军, 陈欣. 滩涂围垦的生态评价——以浙江省上虞市沥海滩涂围垦为例 [J]. 科技通报, 2008, 24(6): 806-809. [JIN Z Y, TANG J J, CHEN X. Ecological assessment on tidal flat reclamation: A case study on Shangyu tidal flat, Zhejiang Province, China. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2008, 24(6): 806-809. ]
[14] 吴维登, 张长宽. 厦门市滩涂价值的模糊测算 [J]. 水利经济, 2009, 27(2): 9-11. [WU W D, ZHANG C K. Fuzzy calculation of tidal flat value in Xiamen. Journal of Economies of Water Resources, 2009, 27(2): 9-11. ]
[15] 陈洪全, 张华兵. 江苏盐城沿海滩涂湿地资源开发中生态补偿问题研究 [J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2011(6): 36-37. [CHEN H Q, ZHANG H B. Study on ecological compensation in the development of Yancheng coastal wetlands. Territory & Natural Resources Study, 2011(6): 36-37. ]
[16] 吴世军, 李裕红, 唐碧琴. 泉州湾光滩湿地生态系统服务功能价值研究 [J]. 泉州师范学院学报, 2011, 29(2): 16-20. [WU S J, LI Y H, TANG B Q. Research on the ecosystem services valuation of naked mudflat wetland in Quanzhou Bay. Journal of Quanzhou Normal University, 2011, 29(2): 16-20. ]
[17] 欧阳恩钱, 徐佳佳. 海涂围垦的生态补偿机制初探 [J]. 温州大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 27(3): 12-20. [OUYANG E Q, XU J J. Preliminary investigation about the ecological compensation mechanism of tideland reclamation. Journal of Wenzhou University (Social Sciences), 2014, 27(3): 12-20. ]
[18] 李占玲, 陈飞星, 李占杰, 等. 滩涂湿地围垦前后服务功能的效益分析——以上虞市世纪丘滩涂为例 [J]. 海洋科学, 2004, 28(8): 76-80. [LI Z L , CHEN F X , LI Z J, et al. Benefits analysis of tidal flat functions before and after reclamation—A case of Shijiqiu tidal flat. Marine Sciences, 2004, 28(8): 76-80. ]
[19] 朱泽生, 孙玲. 东台市滩涂生态系统服务价值研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(5): 878-882. [ZHU Z S, SUN L. Ecosystem services value of coastal tidal zone in Dongtai City of Jiangsu Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(5): 878-882. ]
[20] 王静, 徐敏, 张益民. 滩涂围垦养殖的生态损益分析——以江苏条子泥滩涂围垦养殖为例 [J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版), 2012, 35(2): 113-119. [WANG J, XU M, ZHANG Y M. Ecological profit and loss analysis of tidal flat reclamation—Tidal flat reclamation of Tiaozini Sand as a case study. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 35(2): 113-119. ]
[21] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. [XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. ]
[22] 崔丽娟, 庞丙亮, 李伟, 等. 扎龙湿地生态系统服务价值评价 [J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(3): 1-10. [CUI L J, PANG B L, LI W, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services in the Zhalong Wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 1-10. ]
[23] 赵斐斐, 陈东景, 徐敏, 等. 基于CVM的潮滩湿地生态补偿意愿研究——以连云港海滨新区为例 [J]. 海洋环境科学, 2011, 30(6): 872-876. [ZHAO F F, CHEN D J, XU M, et al. Research of tidal wetland ecological compensation based on CVM—Lianyungang Beach New Area. Marine Environmental Science, 2011, 30(6): 872-876. ]
[24] 魏楚, 沈满洪. 基于污染权角度的流域生态补偿模型及应用 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(6): 135-141． [WEI C, SHEN M H. Based on basin ecological compensation model and application of pollution right angle. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(6): 135-141. ]
[25] 文琦. 中国矿产资源开发区生态补偿研究进展 [J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(21): 6058-6066. [WEN Q. Review of ecological compensation in China’s mining exploitation regions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(21): 6058-6066. ]
[26] 李文华, 李芬, 李世东, 等. 森林生态效益补偿的研究现状及展望 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(5): 677-688. [LI W H, LI F, LI S D, et al. The status and prospect of forest ecological benefit compensation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(5): 677-688. ]
[27] 王福兴, 姜丽秋. 生物多样性保护的生态补偿机制 [J]. 经济地理, 2008, 28(4): 667-670. [WANG F X, JIANG L Q. Economic geography analysis on ecological compensation mechanism of biodiversity protection. Economic Geography, 2008, 28(4): 667-670. ]
[28] 李怀恩, 史淑娟, 党志良. 南水北调中线工程陕西水源区生态补偿机制研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(10): 1764-1771. [LI H E, SHI S J, DANG Z L. Study on eco-compensation mechanism in Shaanxi water source of middle line South-to-North water transfer project. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(10): 1764-1771. ]
[29] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Natural Resource Damage Assessment Guidance Document: Scaling Compensatory Restoration Actions (Oil Pollution Act of 1990) [Z]. US Department of Commerce, National Atomospheric and Oceanic Administration, Silver Springs, MD, 1997.
[30] 伏润民, 缪小林. 中国生态功能区财政转移支付制度体系重构——基于拓展的能值模型衡量的生态外溢价值 [J]. 经济研究, 2015(3): 47-61. [FU R M, MIAO X L. A new financial transfer payment system in ecological function areas in China: Based on the spillover ecological value measured by the expansion emergy analysis. Economic Research Journal, 2015(3): 47-61. ]
[31] 李文华, 张彪, 谢高地. 中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 1-10. [LI W H, ZHANG B, XIE G D. Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and perspectives. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(1): 1-10. ]
[32] ODUM H T, ODUM E C, BLISSET M. Ecology and economy: Emergy analysis and public policy in Texas [R]. Austin, USA: Policy Research Project Report, 1987.
[33] REES W ,WACKERNAGEL M. Urban ecological footprint: Why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1996, 16: 223-248.
[34] 李金昌, 姜文来, 靳乐山, 等. 生态价值论 [M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 1999. [LI J C, JIANG W L, JIN L S, et al. Ecological Value Theory. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 1999. ]
[35] 李芬, 李文华, 甄霖. 森林生态系统补偿标准的方法探讨——以海南省为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(5): 735-744. [LI F, LI W H, ZEN L. Estimating eco-compensation requirements for forest ecosystem conservation—A case study of Hainan island. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(5): 735-744. ]
[36] 代明, 刘燕妮, 陈罗俊. 基于主体功能区划和机会成本的生态补偿标准分析 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(8): 1310-1317. [DAI M, LIU Y N, CHEN L J. The study on quantitative standard of eco-compensation under major function-oriented zone planning and opportunity cost. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(8): 1310-1317. ]
[37] CAMPBELL E T, BROWN M T. Environmental accounting of natural capital and ecosystem services for the US National Forest System [J]. Environment Development and Sustainability, 2012, 14: 691-724.
[38] LI L, LU H, TILLEY D R, et al. Effect of time scale on accounting for renewable emergy in ecosystems located in humid and arid climates [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2014, 287: 1-8.
[39] BROWN M T, CAMPBELL D E, VILBISS C D, et al. The geobiosphere emergy baseline: A synthesis [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 339: 92-95. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.018.
[40] 鞠美庭, 王艳霞, 孟伟庆, 等. 湿地生态系统的保护与评估 [M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2009: 111-117. [JU M T, WANG Y X, MENG W Q, et al. Conservation and Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2009: 111-117. ]
[41] 孙涛, 杨志峰. 河口生态系统恢复评价指标体系研究及其应用 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2004, 24(3): 381-384. [SUN T, YANG Z F. Studies on the evaluating index system for estuarine ecosystem restoration and its application. China Environmental Science, 2004, 24(3): 381-384. ]
[42] 朱洪光, 钦佩, 万树文, 等. 江苏海涂两种水生利用模式的能值分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2001, 20(1): 38-44. [ZHU H G, QIN P, WAN S W, et al. Emergy analysis of two models of wetland utilization on seashore in Jiangsu Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001, 20(1): 38-44. ]
[43] 周涛, 王云鹏, 龚健周, 等. 生态足迹的模型修正与方法改进 [J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14): 4592-4603. [ZHOU T, WANG Y P, GONG J Z, et al. Ecological footprint model modification and method improvement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(14): 4592-4603. ]
[44] 贾海波, 唐静亮, 胡颢琰. 1992—2012杭州湾海域生物多样性的变化趋势及原因分析 [J]. 海洋学报, 2014, 36(12): 111-118. [JIA H B, TANG J L, HU H Y. The variation tendency of biodiversity and cause analysis in Hangzhou Bay from 1992 to 2012. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2014, 36(12): 111-118. ]
[45] 田文婷, 王飞, 王新, 等. 钱塘江流域蒸散发遥感估算 [J]. 浙江水利科技, 2015(6): 84-89. [TIAN W T, WANG F, WANG X, et al. Evapotranspiration remote sensing estimation of Qiantang River. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, 2015(6): 84-89. ]
[46] 赵静, 但琦. 数学建模与数学实验 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008. [ZHAO J, DAN Q. Mathematical Modeling and Mathematical Experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2008. ]
[47] JIANG M M, ZHOU J B, CHEN B, et al. Emergy based ecological account for Chinese economy in 2004 [J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2008, 13(10): 2337-2356.

沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿标准构建——基于能值拓展模型衡量的生态外溢价值

Construction of Ecological Compensation Standard for Tidal Flat Reclamation —Based on the Spillover Ecological Value Measured by Expansion Emergy Synthesis Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张濛, 濮励杰, 王小涵, 王琪琪, 于雪. 不同干扰强度对滩涂围垦区土壤颗粒组成的时空分异特征的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 845-854.
[2]	孙超, 刘永学, 李满春, 赵赛帅, 周旻曦. 近25 a来江苏中部沿海盐沼分布时空演变及围垦影响分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(9): 1486-1498.
[3]	许艳, 濮励杰. 江苏海岸带滩涂围垦区土地利用类型变化研究——以江苏省如东县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(4): 643-652.
[4]	陈洪全, 张忍顺, 王艳红. 互花米草生境与滩涂围垦的响应——以海州湾顶区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(2): 280-287.