三峡工程的能值足迹与生态承载力

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160190

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应用水电工程的能值足迹模型,构建生态盈余（EP）、生态影响系数（γ）、生态平衡时间（T_e）、生态盈余时间（T_s）参数,实现对三峡工程建设期和运行期生态效应的定量评价。研究表明：1）三峡工程建设期的能值足迹占用为5.92×10⁸ hm²,水库移民是其主要方面（占56.12%）,做好移民工作是三峡工程成败的关键。2）2014年,三峡工程的生态承载力供给为4.38×10⁷ hm²,对社会、经济和环境贡献最大的是水力发电（占59.48%）,其次是库区航运、对下游的补水和防洪效益,分别占15.45%、9.74%和7.36%。3）库区水质污染是三峡工程运行期的最大影响因素,每年的能值足迹占用为1.04×10⁷ hm²（占70.94%）,其中,COD、TN、TP和Hg分别占28.7%、26.50%、5.75%和5.37%;其次是生态及地质灾害等的防治（占21.68%）;泥沙淤积的影响比预计的小（占6.20%）。控制入库水污染物并对已经入库的水污染物采取减量化措施,是控制和减小三峡工程对社会、经济和环境影响的关键。4）在维持2012—2014年平均投入产出、合理使用年限为150 a的情况下,三峡工程将在2026年实现生态平衡;生态影响系数为0.15,影响等级为Ⅰ级,三峡工程对社会、经济和环境的影响是积极有利的。

关键词: 能值足迹, 三峡工程, 生态承载力, 生态效应

Abstract: Four parameters, namely, ecological profit (EP), ecological impact coefficient (γ), ecological balance time (T_e) and ecological surplus time(T_s), are calculated based on the emergy footprint model to quantitatively evaluate the ecological effect of the Three Gorges Project (TGP) during construction period and operation period. Studies have shown that: 1) The emergy footprint of TGP construction is 4.99×10⁸hm², and the reservoir resettlement is the main aspect, accounting for 56.12%. Migration is the key issue having respect to the success or failure of the TGP. 2) The largest contribution of the TGP is hydroelectricity, whose ecological capacity is 4.53 × 10⁷hm² in 2014, accounting for 59.48%, followed by the shipping (15.45%), replenishment to downstream (9.74%) and flood control benefit (7.36%). 3) Water pollution in the Three Gorges Reservoir area is the largest influencing factors during the project operation, whose emergy footprint is 1.04 × 10⁷hm²·a^-1, accounting for 70.94%. Wherein, COD, TN, TP and Hg account for 28.7%, 26.50%, 5.75% and 5.37%, respectively. The second largest one is the prevention and control of ecological and geological disasters (21.68%). The influence of the sediment deposition is smaller than expected (6.20%). Controlling the injection of pollutants and decrease the injected pollutants are the key measures to control and reduce the impact of the TGP on the society, economy and the environment. 4) The TGP will achieve ecological balance in 2026 based on the average input-output from 2012 to 2014 and the reasonable service life of 150 year. The ecological impact coefficient is 0.15 at the level I of impact. There is a positive and beneficial influence of the TGP on the society, economy and environment.

Key words: ecological capacity, ecological effect, emergy footprint, Three Gorges Project

中图分类号:

贺成龙. 三峡工程的能值足迹与生态承载力[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 329-341.

HE Cheng-long. Emergy Footprint and Ecological Capacity of the Three Gorges Project[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(2): 329-341.

参考文献

[1] 中国长江三峡集团公司. 环境保护年报2014 [EB/OL]. http://www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/046006/2014HJBH.pdf [China Three Gorges Corporation. Environmental annual report 2014. www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/046006/2014HJBH.pdf ]
[2] 郑守仁. 三峡工程竣工验收预计2016年上半年完成 [EB/OL]. http://www.ctgpc.com.cn/xwzx/news.php?mnewsid=86790 [ZHENG S R. The final acceptance of Three Gorges Project expected to be completed in the first half 2016.www.ctgpc.com.cn/xwzx/news.php?mnewsid=86790 ]
[3] 肖建红, 施国庆, 毛春梅, 等. 三峡工程生态供给足迹与生态需求足迹计算 [J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2006, 30(5): 774-777. [XIAO J H, SHI G Q, MAO C M, et al. Calculation of ecological supply footprint and ecological demand footprint in Three Gorges Project. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering Edition), 2006, 30(5): 774-777. ]
[4] BROWN M T, MCCLANAHAN T R. Emergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals [J]. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 91: 105-130.
[5] 曾容, 赵彦伟, 杨志峰, 等. 基于能值分析的大坝生态效应评价——以尼尔基大坝为例 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2010, 30(4): 890-896. [ZENG R, ZHAO Y W, YANG Z F, et al. Emergy based assessment of ecological effects of dams: A case study of the Nierji Dam. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010, 30(4): 890-896. ]
[6] WU J H, HE C L, XU W L. Emergy footprint evaluation of hydropower projects [J]. Science China: Technological Sciences, 2013, 56(9): 2336-2342.
[7] ODUM H T. Self-organization, transformity and information [J]. Science, 1988, 242: 1132-1139.
[8] ODUM H T, PETERSON N. Simulation and evaluation with energy systems blocks [J]. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 93: 155-173.
[9] 韦丽丽, 周琼, 谢从新, 等.三峡库区重金属的生物富集、生物放大及其生物因子的影响 [J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(1): 325-334. [WEI L L, ZHOU Q, XIE C X, et al. Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of heavy metals in three gorges reservoir and effect of biological factors. Environmental science, 2016, 37(1): 325-334. ]
[10] 叶少文, 杨洪斌, 陈永柏, 等. 三峡水库生态渔业发展策略与关键技术研究分析 [J]. 水生生物学报, 2015, 39(5): 1035-1040. [YE S W, YANG H B, CHEN Y B, et al. Analysis on the development strategies and key techniques of ecological fisheries in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica,2015, 39(5): 1035-1040. ]
[11] ODUM H T, BROWN M T, BRANDT-WILLIAMS S. Handbook of emergy evaluation, Folio #1, introduction and global budget [R]. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 2000.
[12] 中华人民共和国审计署. 长江三峡工程竣工财务决算草案审计结果 [EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2013-06/07/content_2421795.htm. [National Audit Office of the Peoples’ Republic of China. Final accounts draft audit results of Three Gorges Project. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2013-06/07/content_2421795.htm. ]
[13] 艾绍强. 三峡库区: 失去生栖地的珍稀植物 [EB/OL]. http://www.nationalgeographic.com.cn/environment/habitats/3468.html. [AI S Q. Three Gorges Reservoir Area: Rare plants lost habitat. http://www.nationalgeographic.com.cn/environment/habitats/3468.html. ]
[14] 李秀清, 李宏松. 三峡工程淹没区文物概况 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1998, 7(1): 76-82. [LI X Q, LI H S. Overview of the cultural relics in the flooded area of the Three-Gorge Project. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 1998, 7(1): 76-82. ]
[15] 王敏, 肖建红, 于庆东, 等. 水库大坝建设生态补偿标准研究——以三峡工程为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(1): 37-49. [WANG M, XIAO J H, YU Q D, et al. Research of eco-compensation standard of reservoir dam construction: A case of the Three Gorges Project. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(1): 37-49.]
[16] 百问三峡编委会. 百问三峡 [M]. 北京: 科学普及出版社, 2012. [Editorial Committee of Hundred Questions the Three Gorges. Hundred Questions the Three Gorges. Beijing: Science Popularization Press, 2012. ]
[17] KANG D, PARK S S. Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multi-purpose dam proposal in Korea [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 66: 293-306.
[18] 贺成龙. 水电工程的能值足迹模型研究及其应用 [D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2013. [HE C L. Emergy Footprint Model and Its Application of Hydropower Projects. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2013. ]
[19] 中国长江三峡集团公司. 长江三峡工程运行实录2003—2012 [EB/OL]. http://www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/061/89527.pdf. [China Three Gorges Corporation. Three Gorges Project run record 2003-2012. www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/061/89527.pdf. ]
[20] 中国长江三峡集团公司. 长江三峡工程运行实录2013 [EB/OL]. http://www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/061/89528.pdf. [China Three Gorges Corporation. Three Gorges Project run record 2013. www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/061/89528.pdf. ]
[21] 中国长江三峡集团公司. 长江三峡工程运行实录2014 [EB/OL]. http://www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/061/94076.pdf. [China Three Gorges Corporation. Three Gorges Project run record 2014. www.ctgpc.com.cn/news/files/061/94076.pdf. ]
[22] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. 长江三峡工程生态与环境监测公报 [EB/OL]. http://www.cnemc.cn/publish/totalWebSite/0492/363/newList_1.html# [Ministry of Environment Protection of the Peoples’ Republic of China. Three Gorges Project Ecological and Environmental monitoring bulletin. http://www.cnemc.cn/publish/totalWebSite/0492/363/newList_1.html#. ]
[23] 长江三峡旅游发展有限责任公司. 三峡大坝旅游区11个月接待游客过200万 [EB/OL]. http://www.sxdaba.com/News.aspx?kid=1824. [ Yangtze River Three Gorges Tourism Development Co., Ltd. Three Gorges Dam Tourist Area 11 months over 2 million tourists. http://www.sxdaba.com/News.aspx?kid=1824. ]
[24] 唐东军, 张义军. 三峡船闸连续12年实现安全高效运行货运总量达到1.11亿吨 [EB/OL]. http://www.ctgpc.com.cn/xwzx/news.php?mnewsid=94141. [TANG D J, ZHANG Y J. The three gorges ship lock achieved safe and efficient operation for 12 years; freight volume reached 111 million tons. http://www.ctgpc.com.cn/xwzx/news.php?mnewsid=94141. ]
[25] BURANAKARN V. Evaluation of Recycling and Reuse of Building Materials Using the Emergy Analysis Method [D]. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 1998.
[26] 何伟, 宋豪. 三峡库区的水源新特点及涵养模式创新研究 [J]. 探索, 2015(6): 154-158. [HE W, SONG H. New features and innovation of the water conservation in Three Gorges Reservoir area. Probe, 2015(6): 154-158. ]
[27] 王树文, 祁源莉, SHAH F A. 三峡工程对生态环境与生态系统的影响及政策分析模型研究 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(5):106-113. [WANG S W, QI Y L, SHAH F A. Research on the models of policy analysis and the influences on ecological environment and ecosystem of the Three Gorges Project. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(5): 106 -113. ]
[28] 许秋瑾, 郑丙辉, 朱延忠, 等. 三峡水库支流营养状态评价方法 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2010, 30(4): 453-457. [XU Q J, ZHENG B H, ZHU Y Z, et al. Nutrient status evaluation for tributary of Three Gorges Reservoir. China Environmental Science, 2010, 30(4): 453-457. ]
[29] 吕怡兵, 宫正宇, 连军, 等. 长江三峡库区蓄水后水质状况分析 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2007, 20(1): 1-6. [LÜ Y B, GONG Z Y, LIAN J, et al. Status of water quality in the Three Gorges after the water storage period. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 20(1): 1-6. ]
[30] 中华人民共和国水利部. 水利水电工程合理使用年限及耐久性设计规范 (SL654—2014) [M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2014. [Ministry of Water Resources of the Peoples’ Republic of China. Code for Rational Service Life and Durability Design of Water Resources and Hydropower Project (SL654-2014). Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2014. ]
[31] NI J P, SHAO J A. The drivers of land use change in the migration area, Three Gorges Project, China: Advances and prospects [J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2013, 24(1): 136-144.
[32] LI Z W, NIE X D, ZHANG Y, et al. Assessing the influence of water level on schistosomiasis in Dongting Lake region before and after the construction of Three Gorges Dam [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016, 188: 28-37.
[34] XIA Y G, LLORET J, LI Z J, et al. Status of two Coreius species in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2016, 34(1): 19-33.