在地理信息技术和遥感数据支持下,对甘肃省2000和2010年的生态资产价值及其空间分布格局进行了定量测度。构建空间生态资产价值经济协调度模型,测算了甘肃省生态资产价值与经济发展水平协调状况。结果表明：1）甘肃省生态系统在2000和2010年的生态资产价值分别为2 430.84×108和2 487.40×108元;2）林地对甘肃省生态资产价值的贡献量最大;陇南市和甘南州的生态资产价值占甘肃省总价值的一半左右;3）生态资产价值的空间分布整体上呈现西北低、东南高的特征,11 a间生态资产价值增加较多的区域主要分布在河西走廊中部和陇东;4）11 a间,甘肃省各市州生态资产价值与GDP比值均出现不同程度的减小,生态资产价值增长与GDP增长不协调;5）生态-经济协调分区中,潜在危机区的面积最大,其次是低度冲突区和关系恶化区。
Abstract
With the fast development of socio-economic, more attention has been focused on the property value of natural resources and environmental benefit. In this regard, Ecological Property Value (EPV), which is considered as one of the most significant resource and wealth in a country, has being concerned more and more in recent years. EPV is one of the bases of social development. Understanding the EPV in a region is very useful in taking effective management to improve the sustainable development. So, it is very important to assess the EPV. Massive vector and raster spatial data are analyzed in the environment of GIS software. Remote sensing data sets, as well as meteorological data, NDVI and GDP, are resampled at a spatial resolution of 1 km. The EPV and its spatial-temporal variation in Gansu Province from 2000 to 2010 are evaluated and the spatial distribution maps of EPV are drawn. This paper develops spatial model of Ecological Economic Harmony (EEH). The EEH is developed to reflect the coordination degree of the EPV and GDP. The results show: 1) The overall amount of EPV in Gansu Province are 2 430.84 billion and 2 487.40 billion in 2000 and 2010 respectively. 2) The forest ecosystem offers the most of EPV. About half of the total EPV in Gansu Province is contributed by Longnan and Gannan. 3) The spatial distribution of EPV in Gansu Province exhibits a declining trend from southeast to northwest, and the EPV in the Hexi Corridor and Longnan area increased rapidly from 2000 to 2010. 4) The ratios of the EPV to GDP in most of cities decreased in different degrees, which shows unmatching of the development of the EPV and the growth of GDP and the tremendous pressure of protection of ecological environment. 5) The present pattern of the coordination of ecological and economic systems expresses that the potential crisis zone occupies the central location and has a broad coverage, followed by low-grade conflict zone and initial degradation zone. There are some uncertainties for evaluating EPV based on quantitative remote sensing retrieval and economic evaluation methods. The uncertainties are mainly from two aspects: the EPV and the criteria for evaluation, and the spatial resolution of remote sensing data and the precision of applied ecological model.
关键词
甘肃省 /
生态-经济协调度 /
生态资产价值
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
eco-economic harmony /
Gansu Province /
ecological property value (EPV)
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 马立新, 覃雪波, 孙楠, 等. 大小兴安岭生态资产变化格局 [J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(24): 7838-7845. [MA L X, QIN X B, SUN N, et al. The pattern of ecological capital in Daxiaoxinganling, Heilongjiang Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(24): 7838-7845. ]
[2] COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[3] 朱文泉, 张锦水, 潘耀忠, 等. 中国陆地生态系统生态资产测量及其动态变化分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(3): 586-594. [ZHU W Q, ZHANG J S, PAN Y Z, et al. Measurement and dynamic analysis of ecological capital of terrestrial ecosystem in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(3): 586-594. ]
[4] 王振波, 方创琳, 王婧. 1991年以来长三角快速城市化地区生态经济系统协调度评价及其空间演化模式 [J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1657-1668. [WANG Z B, FANG C L, WANG J. Evaluation on the coordination of ecological and economic systems and associated spatial evolution patterns in the rapid urbanized Yangtze Delta region since 1991. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1657-1668. ]
[5] 王健民, 王如松. 中国生态资产概论 [M]. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2002. [WANG J M, WANG R S. Summary on Ecological Assets of China. Nanjing: Jiangsu Technology and Science Press, 2002. ]
[6] 潘耀忠, 史培军, 朱文泉, 等. 中国陆地生态系统生态资产遥感定量测量 [J]. 中国科学D辑, 2004, 34(4): 375-384. [PAN Y Z, SHI P J, ZHU W Q, et al. Measurement of ecological capital of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem based on remote sensing. Science in China Series D, 2004, 34(4): 375-384. ]
[7] 孔含笑, 沈镭, 钟帅, 等. 关于自然资产核算的研究进展与争议问题 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(3): 363-376. [KONG H X, SHEN L, ZHONG S, et al. Research progress and controversial issues of natural resources accounting. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(3): 363-376. ]
[8] 高吉喜, 范小杉, 李慧敏, 等. 生态资产资本化: 要素构成·运营模式·政策需求 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(3): 315-322. [GAO J X, FAN X S, LI H M, et al. Research on constituent elements, operation modes and political demands for capitalizing ecological assets. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29(3): 315-322. ]
[9] 高吉喜, 李慧敏, 田美荣. 生态资产资本化概念及意义解析 [J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 41-46. [GAO J X, LI H M, TIAN M R. Concept and significance of ecological assets capitalization. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 29(3): 315-322. ]
[10] 史培军, 张淑英, 潘耀忠, 等. 生态资产与区域可持续发展 [J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2005(2): 131-137. [SHI P J, ZHANG S Y, PAN Y Z. Ecosystem capital and regional sustainable development. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2005(2): 131-137. ]
[11] WANG Z B, FANG C L, CHENG S W, et al. Evolution of coordination degree of eco-economic system and early-warning in the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Journal of Geographical Science, 2013, 23(1): 147-162.
[12] HOLDER J, EHRLICH P R. Human populating and global environment [J]. American Scientist, 1974, 62: 282-297.
[13] WESTAMAN W E. How much are nature’s sercives worth? [J]. Science, 1977, 197: 960-964.
[14] GALLI A, KITZES J, NICCOLUCCI V, et al. Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the Ecological Footprint: A focus on China and India [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 17: 99-107.
[15] LIN D, WACKERNAGEL M, GALLI A, et al. Ecological footprint: informative and evolving—A response to van den Bergh and Grazi (2014) [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 58: 464-468.
[16] BOLUND P, HUNHAMMAR S. Ecosystem services in urban areas [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(2): 293-301.
[17] HOLMLUND C M, HAMMER M. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(2): 253-268.
[18] 潘竟虎. 甘肃省区域生态补偿标准测度 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(12): 3286-3294. [PAN J H. Regional eco-compensation standard in Gansu Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(12): 3286-3294. ]
[19] 甘肃发展年鉴编委会. 甘肃发展年鉴2014 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2014. [Gansu Development Yearbook Editorial Board. Gansu Development Yearbook 2014. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2014. ]
[20] 刘红辉, 江东, 杨小唤, 等. 基于遥感的全国GDP 1 km格网的空间化表达 [J]. 地球信息科学, 2005, 7(2): 120-123. [LIU H H, JIANG D, YANG X H, et al. Spatialization approach to 1 km grid GDP supported by remote sensing. Geo-Information Science, 2005, 7(2): 120-123. ]
[21] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. [XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem service in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. ]
[22] 徐昔保, 陈爽, 杨桂山. 长三角地区1995—2007年生态资产时空变化 [J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(24): 7667-7675. [XU X B, CHEN S, YANG G S. Spatial and temporal change in ecological assets in the Yangtze River Delta of China 1995-2007. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(24): 7667-7675. ]
[23] 苏飞, 张平宇. 基于生态系统服务价值变化的环境与经济协调发展评价——以大庆市为例 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(3): 471-477. [SU F, ZHANG P Y. Assessment of coordinative development between economy and environment based on ecosystem service values change: A case of Daqing City. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(3): 471-477.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(41361040); 甘肃省高校基本科研业务费项目(2014-63); 甘肃省自然科学基金项目(1506RJZA117)
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(760 KB)
AI Summary
