多区域投入产出分析下中国水足迹地区间比较——基于“总量-相关指标-结构”分析框架

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160117

自然资源学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 76-87.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160117

多区域投入产出分析下中国水足迹地区间比较——基于“总量-相关指标-结构”分析框架

吴兆丹^1,2, 赵敏³, 田泽¹, 马超⁴

1. 河海大学企业管理学院,江苏常州 213022;
2. 江苏省“世界水谷”与水生态文明协同创新中心,南京 211100;;
3. 河海大学商学院,南京 211100;
4. 水利部发展研究中心,北京 100038

收稿日期:2016-02-01 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2017-01-15
作者简介:吴兆丹（1988- ）,女,安徽桐城人,副教授,哥伦比亚大学联合培养博士,主要研究方向为水资源经济及管理。E-mail: xiaofansi@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（41401634, 41301630）; 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目（2014SJD061）

Regional Comparison of Water Footprint in China Based on the Multi-regional Input-output Analysis: In the Analytical Framework of “Amount-Relative Index-Structure”

WU Zhao-dan^1,2, ZHAO Min³, TIAN Ze¹, MA Chao⁴

1. School of Business Administration, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China;
2. Jiangsu Provincial Collaborative Innovation Center of World Water Valley and Water Ecological Civilization, Nanjing 211100, China;
3. Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;
4. Development Research Center of the Ministry of Water Resources of P. R. China, Beijing 100038, China

Received:2016-02-01 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2017-01-15
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 41401634 and 41301630; The General Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province, No. 2014SJD061.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在“总量-相关指标-结构”分析框架下,采用中国大陆30省区（除西藏）42经济部门多区域投入产出及伪基尼系数差异成因分解方法,估算、比较各省区水足迹并分析差异成因,衡量省区降低水足迹（即水足迹总量）的紧迫性并识别调整重点,对具体调整提出建议,为构建中国特色水安全保障体系提供依据。研究表明：1）30省区水足迹均方差系数为51.79%,其中新疆、黑龙江水足迹最高,天津、北京对应最低。2）结合相关指标地区间比较,30省区中宁夏、黑龙江、上海降低水足迹紧迫性最强;天津、山西等提高居民生活直接用水效率紧迫性最强。3）根据部门结构地区间比较,列出各省区降低水足迹中须重点关注的部门,可以看到各省区均须重点调整农林牧渔业、食品制造及烟草加工业用水。4）来源结构地区间比较中,青海、宁夏和新疆的水足迹主要靠当地来供给,其余各地区水足迹均主要源于国内其他地区;可得到各省区上述降低水足迹中应重点关注部门的水足迹主要来源地,如黑龙江、天津、海南等地农林牧渔业水足迹主要源自当地。因此,各地区应结合上述紧迫性、重点关注部门及主要来源分析结果,加强节水工作的针对性。

关键词: 多区域投入产出分析, 伪基尼系数差异成因分解, 有序聚类, 中国特色水安全保障体系, 水足迹

Abstract: In the analytical framework of “amount-relative index-structure”, applying multi-regional input-output analysis as well as the Pseudo Gini Coefficient Difference Causes Decomposition method in 42 economic sectors of 30 provinces (not including Xizang, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan due to no data), the provincial water footprint is evaluated and the reason causing the difference is analyzed; the urgency of water footprint reduction in each province (i.e. water footprint amount reduction) is evaluated and the key point should be adjusted is found; suggestions for specific adjustment are put forward. It is found that the variance coefficient of water footprint in 30 provinces is 51.79%, the water footprint amounts in Xinjiang and Heilongjiang being the largest in 30 provinces, while those in Tianjin and Beijing being the smallest. Comparing the relevant indexes in different regions, there are greatest necessities for Ningxia, Heilongjiang and Shanghai to reduce their water footprints, for Tianjin, Shanxi and some other provinces to improve their household direct water use efficiencies. According to the regional comparison of sector structure, the agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fishery, food manufacturing and tobacco processing industry are sectors should be paid key attention in reducing water footprint in all the 30 provinces. As for the water footprint sources, the water footprints of Qinghai, Ningxia and Xinjiang mainly come from local source, while those of the remaining provinces are all from external sources. The main sources of water footprints of the key sectors in each province can be concluded, for example, the water footprints of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery in Heilongjiang, Tianjin, Hainan are from local sources. Considering the above analysis results of urgency, each province should strengthen the water use adjustment on key sectors and main sources.

Key words: multi-regional input-output analysis, orderly cluster, Pseudo Gini Coefficient Difference Causes Decomposition, water security system with Chinese characteristics, water footprint

中图分类号:

吴兆丹, 赵敏, 田泽, 马超. 多区域投入产出分析下中国水足迹地区间比较——基于“总量-相关指标-结构”分析框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(1): 76-87.

WU Zhao-dan, ZHAO Min, TIAN Ze, MA Chao. Regional Comparison of Water Footprint in China Based on the Multi-regional Input-output Analysis: In the Analytical Framework of “Amount-Relative Index-Structure”[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(1): 76-87.

参考文献

[1] HOEKSTRA A Y, HUNG P Q. Virtual water trade: a quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade [C]// HOEKSTRA A Y, HUNG P Q. Value of Water Research Series No. 11. Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE, 2002: 7-63.
[2] 谭圣林, 刘祖发, 熊育久, 等. 基于多区域投入产出法的广东省水足迹研究 [J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(9): 1564-1570. [TAN S L, LIU Z F, XIONG Y J, et al. Evaluation of water footprint for Guangdong province in an interregional input-output framework. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 22(9): 1564-1570. ]
[3] MEKONNEN M M, GERBENS-LEENES P W, HOEKSTRA A Y. The consumptive water footprint of electricity and heat: A global assessment [J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2015, 1:285-297. doi:10.1039/C5EW00026B.
[4] PALHARES J C P, PEZZOPANE J R M. Water footprint accounting and scarcity indicators of conventional and organic dairy production systems [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 93: 299-307.
[5] MEKONNEN M M, PAHLOW M, ALDAYA M M, et al. Water Footprint Assessment for Latin America and the Caribbean: An analysis of the sustainability, efficiency and equitability of water consumption and pollution [R]. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 66. Delft, the Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE, 2014.
[6] ERCIN A E, Hoekstra A Y. Carbon and Water Footprint: Concepts, Methodologies and Policy Responsed [M]. Paris: UNESCO, 2012.
[7] HOEKSTRA A Y, MEKONNEN M M, CHAPAGAIN A K, et al. Global monthly water scarcity: Blue water footprints versus blue water availability [J]. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(2): 632-688.
[8] 李啸虎, 杨德刚, 夏富强. 干旱区城郊种植业水足迹分析与适宜耕地规模测算——以乌鲁木齐市为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(9): 2860-2869. [LI X H, YANG D G, XIA F Q. Analysis of the water footprint of suburban planting in arid lands and determination of suitable farmland scale: A case study of Urumqi. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(9): 2860-2869. ]
[9] 邓晓军, 韩龙飞, 杨明楠, 等. 城市水足迹对比分析——以上海和重庆为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(2): 189-196. [DENG X J, HAN L F, YANG M N, et al. Comparative analysis of urban water footprint—A case study of Shanghai and Chongqing. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(2): 189-196. ]
[10] 王艳阳, 王会肖, 蔡燕. 北京市水足迹计算与分析 [J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(4): 954-960. [WANG Y Y, WANG H X, CAI Y. Calculation and analysis of water footprint in Beijing City. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(4): 954-960. ]
[11] 王晓萌, 黄凯, 杨顺顺, 等. 中国产业部门水足迹演变及其影响因素分析 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(12): 2114-2126. [WANG X M, HUANG K, YANG S S, et al. Temporal variability and influencing factors of sectoral water footprint in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(12): 2114-2126. ]
[12] 张晓宇, 徐悦. 中国水足迹结构演变研究——基于国家间投入产出模型 [J]. 经济问题探索, 2014(3): 87-93. [ZHANG X Y, XU Y. Study on the evolution of water footprint structure in China—Based on the international input output model. Economic Problems Exploration, 2014(3): 87-93. ]
[13] 潘安娥, 陈丽. 湖北省水资源利用与经济协调发展脱钩分析——基于水足迹视角 [J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(2): 328-333. [PAN A E, CHEN L. Decoupling and water footprint analysis of the coordinated development between water utilization and the economy in Hubei. Resource Science, 2014, 36(2): 328-333. ]
[14] 孙才志, 赵良仕, 邹玮. 中国省际水资源全局环境技术效率测度及其空间效应研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(4): 553-563. [SUN C Z, ZHAO L S, ZOU W. The interprovincial water resources global environmental technology efficiency measurement in China and its spatial effect. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(4): 553-563. ]
[15] 宋智渊, 冯起, 张福平, 等. 敦煌 1980—2012 年农业水足迹及结构变化特征 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(6): 133-138. [SONG Z Y, FENG Q, ZHANG F P, et al. Agriculture water footprint and structural characteristics in Dunhuang from 1980 to 2012. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015, 29(6): 133-138. ]
[16] GE L Q, XIE G D, ZHANG C X, et al. An evaluation of China’s water footprint [J]. Water Resource Management, 2011, 25: 2633-2647.
[17] 石敏俊, 张卓颖, 等. 中国省区间投入产出模型与区际经济联系 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012: 143-156. [SHI M J, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Chinese Inter-provincial Input-output Model and Inter-regional Economic Relationship. Beijing: Science Press, 2012: 143-156. ]
[18] FENG K, SIU Y L, GUAN D, et al. Assessing regional virtual water flows and water footprints in the Yellow River Basin, China: A consumption based approach [J]. Applied Geography, 2012, 32: 691-701.
[19] 刘起运, 陈璋, 苏汝劼, 等. 投入产出分析 [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2006. [LIU Q Y, CHEN Z, SU R J, et al. Input-output Analysis. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2006. ]
[20] 吴兆丹, LALL U, 王张琪, 等. 基于生产视角的中国水足迹地区间差异：“总量-结构-效率”分析框架 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(12): 85-94. [WU Z D, LALL U, WANG Z Q, et al. Regional disparity of water footprint in China in the production perspective: The analytical framework of “amount-structure-efficiency”. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(12): 85-94. ]
[21] 吴兆丹, 王张琪, LALL U. 生产视角下的中国水足迹空间差异研究——基于经济区域分析层次[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(10): 2039-2050. [WU Z D, WANG Z Q, LALL U. Spatial difference of water footprint in China in the production perspective based on the analytical hierarchy of economic regions. Resources Science, 2015, 37(10): 2039-2050. ]
[22] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2008 [EB/OL]. [2015-01-03]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2008/indexch.htm. [National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. [2015-01-03]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2008/indexch.htm. ]
[23] 陈栓. 中国1996—2010年省际水足迹研究 [D]. 大连: 辽宁师范大学, 2013. [CHEN S. Study on Water Footprint on Provincial Scale in China from 1996 to 2010. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University, 2013. ]
[24] 孙才志, 陈栓, 赵良仕. 基于ESDA的中国省际水足迹强度的空间关联格局分析 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(4): 571-582. [SUN C Z, CHEN S, ZHAO L S. Spatial correlation pattern analysis of water footprint intensity based on ESDA model at provincial scale in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(4): 571-582. ]
[25] 蔡振华, 沈来新, 刘俊国, 等. 基于投入产出方法的甘肃省水足迹及虚拟水贸易研究 [J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(20): 6481-6488. [CAI Z H, SHEN L X, LIU J G, et al. Applying input-output analysis method for calculation of water footprint and virtual water trade in Gansu Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(20): 6481-6488. ]
[26] CHAPAGAIN A K, HOEKSTRA A Y. Virtual water flows between nations in relation to trade in livestock and livestock products [C]// HOEKSTRA A Y. Value of Water Research Series No. 13. Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE, 2003. http://www.waterfootprint.org/Reports/Report13.pdf.

多区域投入产出分析下中国水足迹地区间比较——基于“总量-相关指标-结构”分析框架

Regional Comparison of Water Footprint in China Based on the Multi-regional Input-output Analysis: In the Analytical Framework of “Amount-Relative Index-Structure”

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	马维兢, 耿波, 杨德伟, 刘丹丹, 徐凌星, ClaudienHabimanaSimbi, 于慧, ChristianOpp. 部门水足迹及其经济效益的时空匹配特征研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1381-1391.
[2]	孙才志, 刘淑彬. 基于MRIO模型的中国省（市）区水足迹测度及空间转移格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 945-956.
[3]	张凡凡, 张启楠, 李福夺, 傅汇艺, 杨兴洪. 中国水足迹强度空间关联格局及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 934-944.
[4]	王淑新, 何红, 李双, 杜建括. 中国旅游足迹家族研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 424-436.
[5]	杨文娟, 赵荣钦, 张战平, 肖连刚, 曹连海, 王帅, 杨青林. 河南省不同产业碳水足迹效率研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(1): 92-103.
[6]	孙才志, 白天骄, 吴永杰, 赵良仕. 要素与效率耦合视角下中国人均灰水足迹驱动效应研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(9): 1490-1502.
[7]	余灏哲, 韩美. 基于水足迹的山东省水资源可持续利用时空分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(3): 474-483.
[8]	孙艳芝, 沈镭. 关于我国四大足迹理论研究变化的文献计量分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1463-1473.
[9]	孙才志, 白天骄, 韩琴. 基于基尼系数的中国灰水足迹区域与结构均衡性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(12): 2047-2059.
[10]	孟凡浩, 古丽·加帕尔, 包安明, 郭辉, 罗敏, 刘铁. 近50 a塔里木河流域“四源”农业用水与干流生态系统结构变化关系研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(11): 1832-1843.
[11]	王丹阳, 李景保, 叶亚亚, 谭芬芳. 一种改进的灰水足迹计算方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(12): 2120-2130.
[12]	谭圣林, 邱国玉, 熊育久. 投入产出法在虚拟水消费与贸易研究中的新应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(2): 355-364.
[13]	王晓萌, 黄凯, 杨顺顺, 王梓元, 胡婷婷. 中国产业部门水足迹演变及其影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(12): 2114-2126.
[14]	操信春, 吴普特, 王玉宝, 赵西宁. 中国灌区粮食生产水足迹及用水评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1826-1835.
[15]	曾昭, 刘俊国. 北京市灰水足迹评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(7): 1169-1178.