关于我国四大足迹理论研究变化的文献计量分析

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20151196

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 纵观全球,社会经济发展迅速,人类活动对生态环境可持续发展的影响不断增加。足迹理论可将这种影响定量化,为解决生态环境问题奠定基础,主要包括生态足迹、水足迹、碳足迹以及能源足迹等。论文基于文献计量分析方法,研究了我国四大足迹理论2000—2015年间的主要研究进展。研究表明：1）在我国,生态足迹理论在2000年首先出现,研究论文年均162篇,并促进水足迹和碳足迹的产生,现三者都已发展较成熟;能源足迹逐渐成为寻求经济发展与生态环境平衡的新突破口。2）各类足迹研究内容包括理论概念、方法、评估以及应用等;其中,生态足迹、碳足迹的应用指数整体高于理论指数,表明两者理论研究整体水平低于其方法技术应用水平;而水足迹、能源足迹相反。3）四类足迹具有相通性,未来应重点发展综合足迹理论,全面评估可持续发展。

关键词: 能源足迹, 生态足迹, 水足迹, 碳足迹, 文献计量分析

Abstract: The world has experienced rapid economical development and social progress, which led to the increasingly profound impact of human activities on sustainable development of ecological environment. Quantifying the impact is crucial to solve the ecological and environment problems during sustainable development. Footprint methodology is a quantitative analysis method including ecological footprint, water footprint, carbon footprint and energy footprint. It will lay the foundation for solving the problems of ecological environment. In this paper, basing on the bibliometrics analysis, we analyzed the research contents of four kinds of footprint methodologies published in CNKI during 2000-2015. Results showed that: 1) The idea of ecological footprint is the earliest in China, emerging in 2000, with 162 papers annually. It led to the production of water footprint and carbon footprint to a certain extent. Now the three methodologies all have been developed maturely, and the energy footprint has gradually become a new breakthrough in finding the balance between the economy development and ecological environment. 2) The research contents of four kinds of footprint contain the conception, method, assessment and application. The application indexes of ecological footprint and carbon footprint are higher than their theoretical indexes, indicating that ecological footprint and carbon footprint have more practical values. While the theoretical indexes of water footprint and energy footprint are higher than their application indexes. 3) There are some similarities among four types of footprints, and it will be of great significance to establish the comprehensive footprint theory to estimate sustainable development.

Key words: bibliometrics, carbon footprint, ecological footprint, energy footprint, water footprint

中图分类号:

孙艳芝, 沈镭. 关于我国四大足迹理论研究变化的文献计量分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1463-1473.

SUN Yan-zhi, SHEN Lei. Bibliometric Analysis on Research Progress of Four Footprint Methodologies in China[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 31(9): 1463-1473.

参考文献

[1] 王录仓, 高静. 高寒牧区村域生态足迹——以甘南州合作市为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(12): 3795-3805. [WANG L C, GAO J. The ecological footprint of alpine pastures at the village-level: A case study of Hezuo in Gannan Autonomous Prefecture, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(12): 3795-3805. ]
[2] REES W E. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out [J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2): 121-130.
[3] WACKERNAGEL M, REES W. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth [M]. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers, 1996.
[4] HOEKSTRA A Y, HUNG P Q. Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade [R]. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 11. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands, 2002.
[5] WIEDMANN T, MINX J. A definition of “carbon footprint” [R]. ISAUK Research Report 07-01. Durham: ISAUK Research and Consulting, 2007.
[6] FERNG J J. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(1): 53-69.
[7] 孙静, 白雪, 朱春雁, 等. 生态足迹、碳足迹相关经验对水足迹评价的启示 [J]. 标准科学, 2014(8): 25-29. [SUN J, BAI X, ZHU C Y, et al. Enlightenment from ecological footprint and carbon footprint assessment experience for water footprint assessment. Standard Science, 2014(8): 25-29. ]
[8] CHAPAGAIN A K, ORRAN S. Improved water footprint methodology linking global consumption to local water resources: A case of Spanish tomatoes [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(2): 1219-1228.
[9] HOEKSTRA A Y. Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade [R]. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands, 2003.
[10] 林剑艺, 孟凡鑫, 崔胜辉, 等. 城市能源利用碳足迹分析——以厦门市为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2012(12): 3782-3794. [LIN J Y, MENG F X, CUI S H, et al. Carbon footprint analysis on urban energy use: A case study of Xiamen, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(12): 3782-3794. ]
[11] 杨继松, 胡晓钧, 吴昊. 辽宁省能源足迹变动的分析 [J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(6): 2216-2219. [YANG J S, HU X J, WU H. Analysis of energy ecological footprint change in Liaoning Province. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009,18(6): 2216-2219. ]
[12] 李智, 鞠美庭, 刘伟, 等. 中国1996—2005年能源生态足迹与效率动态测度与分析 [J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(6): 54-60. [LI Z, JU M T, LIU W, et al. Dynamic measurement of ecological footprint of energy resources and its economic efficiency in last ten years, China. Resources Science, 2007, 29(6): 54-60. ]
[13] 张乐勤, 李荣富, 荣慧芳, 等. 安徽省近10年能源足迹测度及驱动因子分析 [J]. 环境科学研究, 2012, 25(4): 474-480. [ZHANG L Q, LI R F, RONG H F, et al. Analysis and measurement of factors driving energy ecological footprints in Anhui Province over the last decade. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2012, 25(4): 474-480. ]
[14] 桓汉青, 陈冬冬, 陈超凡, 等. 四川省能源消耗的碳足迹分析 [J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(4): 96-101. [HENG H Q, CHEN D D, CHEN C F, et al. Analysis on carbon footprint of energy consumption in Sichuan Province. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2014, 36(4): 96-101. ]
[15] 方恺. 足迹家族: 概念、类型、理论框架与整合模式 [J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(6): 1647-1659. [FANG K. Footprint family: Concept, classification, theoretical framework and integrated pattern. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(6): 1647-1659. ]
[16] 陈枫楠, 沈镭. 基于期刊文献检索的国内资源经济学研究述评 [J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(7): 1339-1346. [CHEN F N, SHEN L. Review of resources economics based on CNKI literatures. Resources Science, 2013, 35(7): 1339-1346. ]
[17] NEDERHOF A J. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review [J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(1): 81-100.
[18] 李江, 刘源浩, 黄萃, 等. 用文献计量研究重塑政策文本数据分析——政策文献计量的起源、迁移与方法创新 [J]. 公共管理学报, 2015(2): 138-144, 159. [LI J, LIU Y H, HUANG C, et al. Remolding the policy text data through documents quantitative research: The formation, transformation and method innovation of policy documents quantitative research. Journal of Public Management, 2015(2): 138-144, 159. ]
[19] 王曰芬, 路菲, 吴小雷. 文献计量和内容分析的比较与综合研究 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2005, 49(9): 72-75. [WANG Y F, LU F, WU X L. Comparative and synthetic on content analysis and bibliometrics. Library and Information Service, 2005, 49(9): 72-75. ]
[20] 郑文晖. 文献计量法与内容分析法的比较研究 [J]. 情报杂志, 2006(5): 31-33. [ZHENG W H. A comparative study on content analysis and bibliometrics. Journal of Information, 2006(5): 31-33. ]
[21] 田亚平, 常昊. 中国生态脆弱性研究进展的文献计量分析 [J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(11): 1515-1525. [TIAN Y P, CHANG H. Bibliometric analysis of research progress on ecological vulnerability in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(11): 1515-1525. ]
[22] 郝发义. 具有可操作性的碳足迹计算方法及具体实践 [J]. 印刷技术, 2008(16): 31-34. [HAO F Y. Carbon footprint calculation method and concrete practice. Printing Technology, 2008(16): 31-34. ]
[23] 曾昭. 基于水足迹的水资源短缺评价 [D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2014. [ZENG Z. Assessing Water Scarcity Based on the Concept of Water Footprint. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2014. ]
[24] Odum E P. Trends expected in stressed ecosystems [J]. Bioscience, 1985, 35(7): 419-422.
[25] 刘淼, 胡远满, 常禹, 等. 基于能值理论的生态足迹方法改进 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(3): 447-457. [LIU M, HU Y M, CHANG Y, et al. Modification of ecological footprint assessment based on emergy: A case study in the upper reach of Minjiang River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(3): 447-457. ]
[26] 王建源, 陈艳春, 李曼华, 等. 基于能值分析的山东省生态足迹 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(9): 1505-1510. [WANG J Y, CHEN Y C, LI M H, et al. Ecological footprint of Shandong Province based on emergy analysis. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(9): 1505-1510. ]
[27] 徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋. 甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析 [J]. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5): 607-616. [XU Z M, ZHANG Z Q, CHENG G D. The calculation and analysis of ecological footprints of Gansu Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2000, 55(5): 607-616. ]
[28] 叶田, 杨海真,王洪洋. 生态足迹理论对生态城市建设的启示 [J]. 环境科学与技术, 2006(1): 89-91, 120. [YE T, YANG H Z, WANG H Y. Ecological footprint theory and eco-city construction. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006 (1): 89-91, 120. ]
[29] 孟晓军, 刘志辉,秦春艳. 基于生态足迹分析方法的区域生态安全测度研究——以新疆为例 [J]. 新疆农业科学, 2007, 44(4): 516-519. [MENG X J, LIU Z H, QIN C Y. A study of the region's eco-security measure based on ecological footprint analysis—Taking Xinjiang as an example. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 44(4): 516-519. ]
[30] 卢俊宇, 黄贤金, 陈逸, 等. 基于能源消费的中国省级区域碳足迹时空演变分析 [J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(2): 326-336. [LU J Y, HUANG X J, CHEN Y, et al. Spatiotemporal changes of carbon footprint based on energy consumption in China. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(2): 326-336. ]
[31] 孙艳芝, 鲁春霞, 谢高地,等. 北京市水足迹 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(2): 524-531. [SUN Y Z, LU C X, XIE G D, et al. Water footprint in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(2): 524-531. ]
[32] ALLAN J A. Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible [M]// Overseas Development Administration (ODA). Priorities for Water Resources Allocation and Management. London: ODA, 1993: 13-26.
[33] 郭运功, 汪冬冬, 林逢春. 上海市能源利用碳排放足迹研究 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(2): 103-108. [GUO Y G, WANG D D, LIN F C. Carbon footprint of energy use in Shanghai. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(2): 103-108. ]
[34] 陈实. 中国能源碳足迹的驱动因素及其控制研究 [D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2014. [CHEN S. Research on the Drivers and Control of Chinese Energy Carbon Footprint. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2014. ]
[35] 邹艳芬. 中国能源生态足迹效率估计 [J]. 中国矿业, 2009, 18(8): 57-59, 64. [ZHOU Y F. Evaluating Chinese efficiency of energy ecological footprint. China Mining Magazine, 2009, 18(8): 57-59, 64. ]
[36] 赵先超. 湖南省能源消费碳排放系统分析与调控 [D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2014. [ZHAO X C. System Analysis and Regulation of Energy Consumption Carbon Emissions of Hunan Province. Changsha: Hunan Normal University, 2014. ]