我国人工林生态系统的水成本核算

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20150557

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 健康的生态系统能够提供水土保持、防风固沙、涵养水源、调节气候、减少环境污染、增加游憩地与文化保护等良好的生态服务价值。然而,生态环境修复与建设不仅需要巨大的经费投入,也需要占用大量的自然资源。为了正确理解人工造林活动的成本问题,论文用7种蒸散发模型首次对我国1949年以来人工造林和自然植被恢复的耗水量及人工造林耗水量的机会成本进行计算,初步了解人工修复活动对水资源供给的影响。结果显示,1952—2011年我国人工造林累计耗水量比自然修复多767×10⁸m³,水机会成本累计536×10⁸元。为了维护生态平衡,生态修复（尤其是人工修复）和经济活动都应关注水资源的成本问题,通过不同措施的成本效益比较,最大限度地降低生态修复成本,这是修复生态学需要面对的重要科学问题之一。

关键词: 成本收益, 可持续发展, 人工造林, 生态服务净价值, 资源节约

Abstract: It’s well known that a healthy ecosystem has potentials in conservation of water and soil, prevention of wind erosion, refining regional water environment, regulating climatic, reducing pollution, increasing recreation and cultural protection, and other ecosystem services. However, ecological environment restoration and construction not only demands a huge amount of investment, but also takes up large quantities of water and soil resource. In order to properly figure out the costs of afforestation programs, for the first time, in this paper we used seven evapotranspiration models to calculate the water consumption of afforestation and natural vegetation and the water cost of afforestation since 1949. We found that the water consumption of afforestation was more than that of natural vegetation by 767×10⁸ m³, and the accumulative opportunity cost of water was 536×10⁸ yuan. To maintain the ecological balance, any ecological restoration, especially artificial restoration, and socio-economic activities should spare no efforts to pay attention on water cost. It is an essential issue encountered by restoration ecology to minimize the cost of restoration and improve the net value of ecosystem service by comparing cost-effectiveness of different measures.

Key words: afforestation, cost-effectiveness, net value of ecological service, resource-saving, sustainable development

中图分类号:

F326.2

鲁晨曦, 张军泽, 赵廷阳, 曹世雄. 我国人工林生态系统的水成本核算[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 743-754.

LU Chen-xi, ZHANG Jun-ze, ZHAO Ting-yang, CAO Shi-xiong. Water Costs of Afforestation and Natural-restoration in China[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 31(5): 743-754.

参考文献

[1] CAO S X, CHEN L, SHANKMAN D, et al. Excessive reliance on afforestation in China’s arid and semi-arid regions: Lessons in ecological restoration [J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2011, 104: 240-245.
[2] LI W H. Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China [J]. Forestry Ecological Management, 2004, 201: 33-41.
[3] NORMILE D. Getting at the roots of killer dust storms [J]. Science, 2007, 317: 314-316.
[4] YU P T, WANG Y H, WU X D, et al. Water yield reduction due to forestation in arid mountainous regions, Northwest China [J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2010, 25(4): 423-430.
[5] 刘佳骏, 董锁成, 李泽红. 中国水资源承载力综合评价研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(2): 258-269.

[6] 陈景和, 王家福, 赵廷翠, 等. 我国与世界森林资源评估分析 [J]. 山东林业科技, 2015(3): 94-96.

[7] 国家林业局森林资源管理司. 第八次森林资源清查结果报告 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2013.

[8] 国家林业局. 应对气候变化林业行动计划. (2009-11-09). http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2009-11/09/content_1459811.htm.

[9] COSTANZA R. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 3-15.
[10] 张振明, 刘俊国. 生态系统服务价值研究进展 [J]. 环境科学学报, 2011(9): 1835-1842.

[11] BANN C. An overview of valuation techniques: Advantages and limitations [J]. Asean Biodiversity, 2002, 2: 8-16.
[12] CARSON R M. BERGSTROM J C. A review of ecosystem valuation techniques [R]. Faculty Series 03-03, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 2003.
[13] CHEE Y E. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services [J]. Biological Conservation, 2004, 120: 549-565.
[14] 徐中民. 生态经济学理论方法与应用 [M]. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2003.

[15] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋. 生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估 [J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(11): 1918-1926.

[16] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁. 全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展 [J]. 资源科学, 2001, 23(6): 5-9.

[17] SANDHU H S, WRATTEN S D, CULLEN R, et al. The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 64: 835-848.
[18] YANG W, CHANG J, XU B, et al. Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 68: 116-125.
[19] ZHENG W, SHI H H, CHEN S, et al. Benefit and cost analysis of mariculture based on Ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 1626-1632.
[20] 赵明, 孟京辉, 陆元昌. 我国人工林近自然经营的可行性与必要性 [J]. 河北林果研究, 2013, 28(2):136-139.

[21] 周霆, 盛炜彤. 关于我国人工林可持续问题 [J]. 世界林业研究, 2008, 21(3): 49-53.

[22] 贾忠奎. 我国人工林长期生产力维持技术研究进展 [J]. 世界林业研究, 2012, 25(1): 49-54.

[23] CAO S X, SUN G, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Greening China Naturally [J]. AMBIO, 2011, 40(7): 828-831.
[24] 胡觉, 彭长清, 甘世书, 等. 我国人工林变化动态及增长潜力分析 [J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(S1): 6-8.

[25] 国家林业局. 中国林业年鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1960—2012.

[26] CHEN Y, XIA J Z, LIANG S L, et al. Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial ecosystems in China [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 140(1): 279-293.
[27] 中国气象局. 中国气象年报 [M]. 北京: 中国气象出版社, 2002—2012.

[28] 政策信息. 关于印发改革农业用水价格有关问题的意见的通知 [J]. 宏观经济管理, 2002(7): 57.

[29] LIU J G, YANG W. Water sustainability for China and beyond [J]. Science, 2012, 337: 649-650.
[30] PAPALE D, VALENTINI R. A new assessment of European forests carbon exchanges by eddy fluxes and artificial neural network spatialization [J]. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9: 525-535.
[31] DAWSON C W, WILBY R. An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modelling [J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1998, 43: 47-66.
[32] 金龙, 申双和, 罗莹, 等. 水面蒸发计算的人工神经网络方法研究 [J]. 南京气象学院学报, 1996, 19(3): 342-347.

[33] RUMELHART D E, HINTON G E, WILLIAMS R J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors [J]. Nature, 1986, 323: 533-536.
[34] VAPNIK V N. Statistical Learning Theory [M]. New York: Wiley, 1998.
[35] MOHANDES M A, HALAWANI T O, REHMAN S, et al. Support vector machines for wind speed prediction [J]. Renew Energy, 2004, 29: 939-947.
[36] TRIPATHI S, SRINIVAS V V, NANJUNDIAH R S. Downscaling of precipitation for climate change scenarios: A support vector machine approach [J]. Journal of Hydrological, 2006, 330: 621-640.
[37] DRAKE J M, RANDIN C, GUISAN A. Modelling ecological niches with support vector machines [J]. Journal Applied Ecology, 2006, 43: 424-432.
[38] YANG F W, WHITE M A, MICHAELIS A R, et al. Prediction of continental-scale evapotranspiration by combining MODIS and AmeriFlux data through support vector machine [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(11): 3452-3461.
[39] XIAO J F, ZHUANG Q L, LAW B E, et al. A continuous measure of gross primary production for the conterminous United States derived from MODIS and AmeriFlux data [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114: 576-591.
[40] WU X D, KUMAR V, QUINLAN J R, et al. Top 10 algorithms in data mining [J]. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2007, 14: 1-37.
[41] WANG K C, WANG P C, LI Z Q, et al. A simple method to estimate actual evapotranspiration from a combination of net radiation, vegetation index, and temperature [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007, 112, doi:10.1029/2006JD008351.
[42] WANG K C, DICKINSON R E, WILD M, et al. Evidence for decadal variation in global terrestrial evapotranspiration between 1982 and 2002: 1. Model development [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2010, 115(D20): 898-907.
[43] YUAN W P, LIU S, YU G, et al. Global estimates of evapotranspiration and gross primary production based on MODIS and global meteorology data [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114: 1416-1431.
[44] FISHER J B, TU K P, BALDOCCHI D D. Global estimates of the land-atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data, validated at 16 FLUXNET sites [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112: 901-919.
[45] 国家林业局森林资源管理司. 中国第七次全国森林资源清查的公告 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2009.

[46] YANG Z, WANG H, SAITO Y, et al. Dam impacts on the Changjiang (Yangtze) River sediment discharge to the sea: The past 55 years and after the Three Gorges Dam [J]. Water Resource Research, 2006, 42, doi:10.1029/2005WR003970.
[47] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2012.

[48] COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
[49] 张五常. 经济解释: 收入与成本——供应的行为 (上篇) [M]. 卷二. 北京: 中信出版社, 2011.

[50] CAO S X. Why large-scale afforestation efforts in China have failed to solve the desertiﬁcation problem [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42: 1826-1831.
[51] ASNER G P, FLINT H R, VITOUSEK P M, et al. Invasive plants transform the three-dimensional structure of rain forests [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(11): 4519-4523.
[52] CHAZDON R L. Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands [J]. Science, 2008, 320: 1458-1460.
[53] 王瑗, 盛连喜, 李科, 等. 中国水资源现状分析与可持续发展对策研究 [J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2008(3): 11-14.

[54] 张正斌, 段子渊, 徐萍, 等. 中国粮食和水资源安全协同战略 [J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 21(12): 1441-1448.

[55] CAMPANA P, KNOX J, GRUNDSTEIN A, et al. The 2007-2009 drought in Athens, Georgia, United States: A climatological analysis and an assessment of future water availability [J]. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 2012, 48(2): 379-390.
[56] GUAN L X, SUN G, CAO S X. China’s bureaucracy hinders environmental recovery [J]. AMBIO, 2011, 40: 96-99.
[57] GAO Y, ZHU X J, YU G R, et al. Water use efficiency threshold for terrestrial ecosystem carbon sequestration in China under afforestation [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014, 195/196: 32-37.