自然资源学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 377-389.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20150315

• 资源经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑环境约束的中国资源型城市全要素能源效率及其差异研究

李博1, 2, 张文忠2, 3, *, 余建辉2, 3   

  1. 1. 天津理工大学国际工商学院,天津 300384;
    2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
    3. 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-03 出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 张文忠(1966- ),男,内蒙古呼和浩特人,博士生导师,研究员,主要从事城市和区域发展研究.E-mail:zhangwz@igsnrr.ac.cn E-mail:mg2011818@126.com
  • 作者简介:李博(1981- ),男,天津市人,博士后,讲师,主要从事区域经济,城市发展,资源环境经济与经济地理研究.E-mail:mg2011818@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41230632,71403290); 中国科学院重点部署项目(KZZD-EW-06); 国家社会科学基金项目(15BGL085); 教育部人文社科研究基金项目(14YJCZH078); 2013年度天津市高校"优秀青年教师资助计划"; 天津理工大学教学改革项目(YB13-48)

A Study on Total Factor Energy Efficiency and Its Difference in Resource-based Cities in China with Consideration of Environmental Constraints

LI Bo1, 2, ZHANG Wen-zhong2, 3, YU Jian-hui2, 3   

  1. 1. International College of Business and Technology, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2015-03-03 Online:2016-03-15 Published:2016-03-15
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41230632 and 71403290; Key Deployment Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.KZZD-EW-06; National Social Science Foundation of China, No.15BGL085; Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education, No.14YJCZH078; 2013 Excellent Young Teachers Program of Colleges and Universities in Tianjin; Education reform project of Tianjin University of Technology, No.YB13-48

摘要: 论文采用考虑非期望产出的SBM模型测算了考虑环境约束的中国资源型城市全要素能源效率,并对全要素能源效率差异进行分解研究.研究发现:第一,多数资源型城市处于非效率状态,不同类别城市间效率差异明显,并且这种差异并未随时间明显改善;第二,按区域分组,区域内差异是造成全要素能源效率总体差异的主因,其中,中部区域组内差异是造成总体差异的最重要因素;第三,按规划综合分类分组,各群组内部差异是造成总体差异的主因,其中,成熟型组内差异是造成总体差异的最重要因素;第四,按资源类型分组,各群组内部差异是造成总体差异的主因,其中,煤炭类组内差异与综合类组内差异是造成总体差异最为重要的前两位因素.在研究结果的基础上,论文探讨了相关的含义.

Abstract: The objectives of this paper are to measure China's total factor energy efficiencies under environmental constraints at city-level, and study the structure and causes of the inter-city differences of the efficiency. The methods of undesirable output SBM model, Theil index, and Theil index decomposition are adopted, and panel data of 102 typical resource-based cities in China from 2004 to 2012 are used in this paper. The results and conclusions are as follows. Firstly, most resource-based cities in China, except for 12 cities including Tangshan, are inefficient in total factor energies. There exist apparent differences in total factor energy efficiencies among the resource-based cities. Dividing all the resource-based cities into different groups based on region, comprehensive classification, and resource type, the average total factor energy efficiencies of resource-based cities within each group is calculated. It finds that there exist apparent differences among city groups. The Theil index of 102 typical resource-based cities during 2004-2012 shows that the difference among groups has not been narrowed. Secondly, when grouping the cities by region, the result of Theil index decomposition shows that the inner-group difference of each region is the major cause of the total energy efficiency difference (from 94.33% to 81.79%), and the inter-group difference is an increasingly important cause of the total energy efficiency difference (from 5.67% to 18.21%). In addition, the total energy efficiency difference of cities in the central region is the most important cause of the total energy efficiency difference (28.44% in 2012). Thirdly, when grouping the cities by comprehensive classification the result of Theil index decomposition shows that the inner-group difference of each class is the major cause of the total energy efficiency difference (from 89.69% to 86.90%), and the inter-group difference is the minor cause of the total energy efficiency difference (from 10.31% to 13.10%). In addition, the total energy efficiency difference in the group of mature cities is the most important cause of the total energy efficiency difference (56.79% in 2012). Fourthly, when grouping the cities by resource type, the result of Theil index decomposition shows that the inner-group difference of each resource type is the major cause of the total energy efficiency difference (from 80.91% to 84.23%), and the inter-group difference is the minor cause of the total energy efficiency difference (from 19.09% to 15.77%). In addition, the total energy efficiency difference of coal resource city group (41.31% in 2012) and comprehensive resource city group (22.38% in 2012) are the two most important causes of the total energy efficiency difference. Furthermore, the total energy efficiency difference of oil and gas resource city group was completely eliminated in 2012. The related implications are discussed based on the results of the empirical study.

中图分类号: 

  • F062.1