不同产权制度下青藏高原地区草地资源使用的效率与公平性分析

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20141650

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 论文基于四川省若尔盖牧区两个村落的田野调查,通过草地资源使用的效率和公平性指标,比较草场使用权全村共有和牧户私有这两种产权制度下的经济与社会效益。研究表明,在青藏高原牧区,草场使用权全村共有较牧户私有在资源使用的效率与公平性两个方面均能获得更好的表现。这是因为全村共有的使用权制度更契合当地的自然与社会实情,这包括草地资源时空差异大的自然条件、藏传佛教浸润下的文化氛围以及较强的社区自组织管理能力的社会背景。因此,建议我国在制定与推行草场使用权制度时,应考虑制度实施地的自然环境与社会文化等各方面背景因素,不能简单地在所有牧区强行推进一种产权制度。

关键词: 草地资源, 产权制度, 公平性, 青藏高原, 效率

Abstract: Based on field studies in Ruoergai County of Sichuan Province, this paper conducts a comparative analysis on the efficiency and equity of rangeland resource in two different rangeland property systems: private rangeland use-right and community rangeland use-right. The findings of this research demonstrate that community collective use of rangeland is more effective in promoting rangeland management equity and efficiency compared to the privatized use-right regime. This is mainly because the community collective regime is more suitable to the local natural and social characteristics, including the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of rangeland resource distribution, the strong role of pastoralism culture that are embedded in the Tibetan Buddhism, and the ability of community self-organization in rangeland management. Given this, we recommend that policy makers should take local natural characteristics and socio-cultural backgrounds into consideration when designing and implementing rangeland property right regimes, and avoid implementing uniform property arrangement in all pastures across the whole country.

Key words: efficiency, equity, property right system, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, rangeland resources

中图分类号:

S812.5

蔡虹, 李文军. 不同产权制度下青藏高原地区草地资源使用的效率与公平性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(8): 1302-1309.

CAI Hong, LI Wen-jun. A Study on Efficiency and Equity of Rangeland Management on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in Different Property Right Systems[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 31(8): 1302-1309.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG C, LI W, FAN M. Adaptation of herders to droughts and privatization of rangeland-use rights in the arid Alxa Left Banner of Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 126(14): 182-190.
[2] LI W, HUNTSINGER L. China’s grassland contract policy and its impacts on herder ability to benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic feedbacks [J]. Ecology and Society, 2011, 16(2), http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art1/.
[3] LI W, LI Y. Managing rangeland as a complex system: How government interventions decouple social systems from ecological systems [J]. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04531-170109.
[4] LI W, ALI S H, ZHANG Q. Property rights and grassland degradation: A study of the Xilingol Pasture, Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 85(2): 461-470.
[5] BIJOOR N, LI W J, ZHANG Q, et al. Small-scale co-management for the sustainable use of Xilingol Biosphere Reserve, Inner Mongolia [J]. AMBIO, 2006, 35(1): 25-29.
[6] 赖玉珮, 李文军. 草场流转对干旱半干旱地区草原生态和牧民生计影响研究——以呼伦贝尔市新巴尔虎右旗M嘎查为例 [J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(6): 1039-1048.

[7] YAN Z, WU N, DORJI Y, et al. A review of rangeland privatisation and its implications in the Tibetan Plateau, China [J]. Nomadic Peoples, 2005, 9(1/2): 1-2.
[8] SNEATH D. Changing Inner Mongolia: Pastoral Mongolian Society and the Chinese State [M]. Oxford University Press , 2000.
[9] BANKS T. Property rights and the environment in pastoral China: Evidence from the field [J]. Development and Change, 2001, 32(4): 717-740.
[10] BANKS T. Property rights reform in rangeland China: Dilemmas on the road to the household ranch [J]. World Development, 2003, 31(12): 2129-2142.
[11] RICHARD C, YAN Z L, DU G Z. The paradox of the individual household responsibility system in the grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau, China [C]// USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-39. 2006: 83-91.
[12] YEH E T. Tibetan range wars: Spatial politics and authority on the grasslands of Amdo [J]. Development and Change, 2003, 34(3): 499-523.
[13] SHEEHY D P, MILLER D, JOHNSON D A. Transformation of traditional pastoral livestock systems on the Tibetan steppe [J]. Sécheresse, 2006, 16(3): 142-151.
[14] 王晓毅. 从承包到“再集中”——中国北方草原环境保护政策分析 [J]. 中国农村观察, 2009(3): 36-46.

[15] CAO J J, YEH E T, HOLDEN N M, et al. The effects of enclosures and land-use contracts on rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2013, 97(12): 3-8.
[16] 曹建军. 青藏高原地区草地可持续利用研究 [D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2011.

[17] 李文军, 张倩. 解读草原困境: 对于干旱半干旱草原利用和管理若干问题的认识 [M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2009.

[18] 达林太,娜仁高娃,阿拉腾巴格那. 制度与政策的历史演变对内蒙古草原生态环境的影响 [J]. 科技创新导报, 2008(10): 114-118.

[19] NING W, RICHARD C E. The privatisation process of rangeland and its impacts on the pastoral dynamics in the Hindu Kush Himalaya: The case of western Sichuan, China [C]// ELDRIDGE D, FREUDENBERGER D. People and Rangelands. Proceedings of VI International Rangelands Congress, Townsville, Australia, 1999: 14-21.
[20] XIE Y, LI W. Why do herders insist On Otor? Maintaining mobility in Inner Mongolia [J]. Nomadic Peoples, 2008, 12(2): 35-52.
[21] 汪韬,李文军,李艳波. 干旱半干旱区牧民对气候变化的感知及应对行为分析——基于内蒙古克什克腾旗的案例研究 [J]. 北京大学学报 (自然科学版), 2012(2): 285-295.

[22] 王晓毅. 制度变迁背景下的草原干旱——牧民定居、草原碎片与牧区市场化的影响 [J]. 中国农业大学学报 (社会科学版), 2013(1): 18-30.

[23] YEH E T, GAERRANG. Tibetan pastoralism in neoliberalising China: Continuity and change in Gouli [J]. Area, 2011, 43(2): 165-172.
[24] GONGBUZEREN, LI Y, LI W. China’s rangeland management policy debates: What have we learned? [J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2015, 68(4): 305-314.
[25] DONG S K, WEN L, ZHU L, et al. Indigenous yak and yak-cattle crossbreed management in high altitude areas of Northern Nepal: A case study from Rasuwa District [J]. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2009, 4(10): 957-967.
[26] BASSETT T J. Mobile pastoralism on the brink of land privatization in Northern Côte d’Ivoire [J]. Geoforum, 2009, 40(5): 756-766.
[27] BOONE R B, BURNSILVER S B, THORNTON P K, et al. Quantifying declines in livestock due to land subdivision [J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2005, 58(5): 523-532.
[28] FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ M E, LE FEBRE S. Mobility in pastoral systems: Dynamic flux or downward trend? [J]. The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2006, 13(5): 341-362.
[29] KERVEN C, SHANBAEV K, ALIMAEV I, et al. Livestock Mobility and Degradation in Kazakhstan’s Semi-arid Rangelands [M]. Springer, 2008: 113-140.
[30] SCOONES I. Living with Uncertainty: New Directions in Pastoral Development in Africa [M]. London: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., 1995.
[31] DEININGER K, BINSWANGER H. The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: Principles, experience, and future challenges [J]. World Bank Research Observer, 1999, 14(2): 247-276.
[32] RIBOT J C. Theorizing access: Forest profits along Senegal’s charcoal commodity chain [J]. Development and Change, 1998, 29(2): 307-341.
[33] BALAND J, PLATTEAU J. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? [M]. Food & Agriculture Org, 1996.
[34] IRIMIE D L, ESSMANN H F. Forest property rights in the frame of public policies and societal change [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2009, 11(2): 95-101.
[35] SCHLAGER E, OSTROM E. Property-rights regimes and natural resources—A conceptual analysis [J]. Land Econo-mics, 1992, 68(3): 249-262.
[36] SIKOR T, NGUYEN T Q. Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam’s central highlands [J]. World Development, 2007, 35(11): 2010-2025.
[37] RIBOT J C, PELUSO N L. A theory of access [J]. Rural Sociology, 2003, 68(2): 153-181.
[38] MWANGI E. Subdividing the commons: Distributional conflict in the transition from collective to individual property rights in Kenya’s Maasailand [J]. World Development, 2007, 35(5): 815-834.
[39] DONG S K, LASSOIE J P, YAN Z L, et al. Indigenous rangeland resource management in the mountainous areas of Northern Nepal: A case study from the Rasuwa District [J]. The Rangeland Journal, 2007, 29(2): 149-160.
[40] WILLIAMS D M. Beyond Great Walls: Environment, Identity, and Development on the Chinese Grasslands of Inner Mongolia [M]. Stanford University Press, 2002.