不同土地利用方式对赤红壤理化性质的综合影响

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.12.011

自然资源学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 2140-2149.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.12.011

不同土地利用方式对赤红壤理化性质的综合影响

张池¹, 高云华¹, 陈旭飞^1,2, 周波¹, 李进¹, 任宗玲¹, 戴军¹

1. 华南农业大学资源环境学院, 国土资源部建设用地再开发重点实验室/广东省土地利用与整治重点实验室, 广州 510642;
2. 广东省土地开发储备局, 广州 510635

收稿日期:2012-12-04 修回日期:2013-04-27 出版日期:2013-12-20 发布日期:2013-12-19
作者简介:张池（1980-），女，山西太原人，博士后，主要从事土地资源管理、土壤生态等方面的研究。E-mail：zhangchi121@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目（41201305）；中国博士后科学基金面上资助（2012M511819）；广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目（S2012040007806）；广东省教育部产学研结合项目（2011A090200038）。

Comprehensive Effects of Different Land Uses on Physical and Chemical Properties of Lateritic Red Soil

ZHANG Chi¹, GAO Yun-hua¹, CHEN Xu-fei^1,2, ZHOU Bo¹, LI Jin¹, REN Zong-ling¹, DAI Jun¹

1. College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Land and Resources for Construction Land Transformation/Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Land Use and Consolidation, Guangzhou 510642, China;
2. Land Development and Reserve Bureau of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510635, China

Received:2012-12-04 Revised:2013-04-27 Online:2013-12-20 Published:2013-12-19
Contact: 戴军（1958-），男，湖南长沙人，博士，博士生导师，教授，主要从事土地资源管理、土壤生态等方面的研究。E-mail：jundai@scau.edu.cn E-mail:jundai@scau.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过比较不同土地利用方式下赤红壤pH值、粘粒、容重、孔隙度、有机碳、氮磷钾全量及其速效养分含量的差异，并运用主成分分析方法分析各变量的相互关系、土壤综合理化特征及其关键改良因子。研究结果表明：新垦旱地容重最高，粘粒含量和孔隙度最低；有机碳、全量氮磷钾养分和速效氮磷养分含量均处于较低水平（P<0.05）。果园土容重显著低于其他土地利用方式土壤，且全氮、碱解氮和速效磷钾水平均处于较高水平（P<0.05）。桉树林的全钾和速效钾含量显著高于灌木林，而粘粒含量和速效磷含量相对较低（P<0.05）。主成分分析结果显示：新垦旱地、果园和桉树林、灌木林土壤理化综合质量差异显著（P<0.05），其中新垦旱地当前质量相对较差。有机碳、全氮和速效氮养分缺乏是当前新垦旱地土壤理化质量较差的主要原因。较少的速效磷钾养分含量是当前桉树林地、灌木林土壤质量的限制因素。主成分分析不仅能够区分不同土地利用方式下赤红壤理化质量差异，而且也是探查改良土壤质量因子的有效方法。

关键词: 赤红壤, 理化性质, 土地利用方式

Abstract: The study aimed to observe physical and chemical properties of lateritic red soil under different land uses in South China, such as pH, clay contents, bulk density, porosity, organic carbon, total contents of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and their available contents. Relationships between these variables, soil quality under different land uses and their main key factors were evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA). Results showed that: the highest bulk density in soil and the lowest clay content and porosity were observed in the newly cultivated dryland; while the lower contents of soil organic C, total N, P, K, available N and P were found as well (P<0.05). The orchard soils have the lowest bulk density in these four kinds of land uses, and higher contents of total N, available N, P and K were showed in our study (P<0.05). Compared to shrub land, the eucalyptus forest soil has higher total and available K contents but lower clay and available P contents, respectively (P<0.05). PCA results showed that significant differences in soil physical and chemical qualities were observed in newly cultivated dry land, orchard land, eucalyptus forest and shrub land (P<0.05), especially the lowest quality were found in newly cultivated dry land. Lower contents of organic C, nitrogen, available N resulted in the lower soil quality of the newly cultivated dry land. In the meantime, lower contents of available P and K limited the improvement of soil quality in eucalyptus forest and shrub land. PCA can not only distinguish physical and chemical properties of lateritic red soil under different land uses, but also can detect their main factors.

Key words: land use, soil physio-chemical properties, lateritic red soil

中图分类号:

S153

张池, 高云华, 陈旭飞, 周波, 李进, 任宗玲, 戴军. 不同土地利用方式对赤红壤理化性质的综合影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(12): 2140-2149.

ZHANG Chi, GAO Yun-hua, CHEN Xu-fei, ZHOU Bo, LI Jin, REN Zong-ling, DAI Jun. Comprehensive Effects of Different Land Uses on Physical and Chemical Properties of Lateritic Red Soil[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(12): 2140-2149.

参考文献

[1] 司振中, 李貌, 邱维理, 等. 中国耕地资源的区域差异与保护问题[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 25(5): 713-721.[SI Zhen-zhong, LI Mao, QIU Wei-li, et al. Regional difference analysis and preservation of cultivated land resources in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 25(5): 713-721.]
[2] Dexter A R. Soil physical quality[J]. Soil Tillage Research, 2004, 79: 129-130.
[3] Velasquez E, Lavelle P, Andrade M. GISQ, a multifunctional indicator of soil quality[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39: 3066-3080.
[4] 张源沛, 李娜, 季波. 半干旱退化山区不同土地利用方式土壤物理性质的特征分析[J]. 防护林科技, 2009(6): 4-6.[ZHANG Yuan-pei, LI Na, JI Bo. Characteristic analysis on soil physical properties of different land use patterns in semiarid degraded mountain area. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2009(6): 4-6.]
[5] 周玮, 周运超, 鲁秦安. 不同土地利用方式下石灰土土壤团聚体与土壤酶活性的关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31 （5）： 59-64, 162.[ZHOU Wei, ZHOU Yun-chao, LU Qin-an. Relationship between soil enzyme activity and aggregates in calcareous soils under different land use. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 31(5): 59-64, 162.]
[6] 祁迎春, 王益权, 刘军, 等. 不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体组成及几种团聚体稳定性指标的比较[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(1): 340-347.[QI Ying-chun, WANG Yi-quan, LIU Jun, et al. Comparative study on composition of soil aggregates with different land use patterns and several kinds of soil aggregate stability index. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(1): 340-347.]
[7] 陈朝, 吕昌河, 范兰, 等. 土地利用变化对土壤有机碳的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(18): 5358-5371.[CHEN Zhao, LU Chang-he, FAN Lan, et al. Effects of land use change on soil organic carbon: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(18) : 5358-5371.]
[8] 田静, 郭景恒, 陈海清, 等. 土地利用方式对土壤溶解性有机碳组成的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(2): 338-346.[TIAN Jing, GUO Jing-heng, CHEN Hai-qing, et al. Effect of land use on composition of soil dissolved organic carbon. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011, 48(2): 338-346.]
[9] 杨葳, 王子芳, 高明, 等. 重庆市城郊区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分及酶活性的影响——以北碚区歇马镇为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(11): 213-218.[YANG Wei, WANG Zi-fang, GAO Ming, et al. Effects of different land use patterns on soil nutrients and enzyme activity in the suburban area in Chongqing—A case study of Xiema Town, Beibei District. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(11): 213-218.]
[10] 赵瑞芬, 张一弓, 张强, 等. 不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响——以太原市为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(14): 262-266.[ZHAO Rui-fen, ZHANG Yi-gong, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Effects of different land use types on soil nutrients conditions in cultivated land —A case study of Taiyuan. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(14): 262-266.]
[11] 马群, 赵庚星. 集约农区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(11): 1834-1844.[MA Qun, ZHAO Geng-xing. Effects of different land use types on soil nutrients in intensive agricultural region. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(11): 1834-1844.]
[12] 杨萍如, 刘腾辉. 广东赤红壤的特征及其开发利用[J]. 自然资源学报, 1994, 9(2): 112-122.[YANG Ping-ru, LIU Teng-hui, Characteristics of lateritic red earth in Guangdong province and its exploitation and utilization. Journal of Natural Resources, 1994, 9(2): 112-122.]
[13] 钟继红, 郭庆荣, 谭军. 南亚热带丘陵赤红壤理化性质变化及其原因[J]. 地理研究, 2004, 23(3): 312-320.[ZHONG Ji-hong, GUO Qing-rong, TAN Jun. Studies on physical and chemical properties change (degradation) and its affected factors of latored soils in southern subtropical hills. Geographical Research, 2004, 23 (3): 312-320.]
[14] 杨恬, 朱照宇. 珠江三角洲丘陵赤红壤开发中的问题与可持续利用[J]. 热带地理, 2007, 27(5): 395-399, 404.[YANG Tian, ZHU Zhao-yu. Sustainable utilization of hilly latosolic red soil in the Pearl River Delta. Tropical Geography, 2007, 27(5): 395-399, 404.]
[15] Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dolédec S, et al. ADE-4： Multivariate analysis and graphical display software[J]. Statistics and Computing, 1997, 7: 75-83.
[16] R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing[M]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2007.
[17] 陈桂秋, 黄道友, 苏以荣, 等. 红壤丘陵区土地不同利用方式对土壤有机质的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005, 24 (2): 256-260.[CHEN Gui-qiu, HUANG Dao-you, SU Yi-rong, et al. Effects of soil organic matter in hilly red soils from mid-subtropics region under various utilization patterns. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2005, 24 (2): 256-260.]
[18] Murty D, Kirschbaum M U F, McMurtrie R E, et al. Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? A review of the literature[J]. Global Change Biology,2002, 8: 105-123.
[19] Gamboa A M, Galicia L. Differential influence of land use/cover change on topson carbon and microbial activity in low-latitude temperate forests[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 142: 280-290.
[20] 李学垣. 土壤化学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001: 1-51.[LI Xue-yuan. Soil Chemistry. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001: 1-51.]
[21] Marinari S, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B. Influence of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil biological and physical properties[J]. Bioresources Technology, 2000, 72: 9-17.
[22] 罗歆, 代数, 何丙辉, 等. 缙云山不同植被类型林下土壤养分含量及物理性质研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(1): 64-69, 91.[LUO Xin, DAI Shu, HE Bing-hui, et al. Investigation of nutrients and physical properties of the soil under different types of forest vegetation in Jinyun mountain. Journal of Soil and Water, 2011, 25(1): 64-69, 91.]
[23] 徐波, 朱雪梅, 刘倩, 等. 川中丘陵区不同土地利用方式下土壤养分特征研究——以中国科学院盐亭紫色土农业生态试验站小流域为例[J]. 西南农业学报, 2011, 24(2): 663-668.[XU Bo, ZHU Xue-mei, LIU Qian, et al.Study on nutrient characteristics of soils under different land utilization types in hilly area of central Sichuan Basin. Southwest China Journal of Agricultutal Sciences, 2011, 24(2): 663-668.]
[24] 王小兵, 骆永明, 李振高, 等. 长期定位施肥对亚热带丘陵地区红壤旱地质量的影响: I.酸度[J]. 土壤学报, 2011, 48 (1): 98-101.[WANG Xiao-bing, LUO Yong-ming, LI Zhen-gao, et al. Effect of long-term stationary fertilization on upland red soil quality in subtropical hilly regions: I. Acidity. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011, 48(1): 98-101.]
[25] 尹刚强, 田大伦, 方晰, 等. 不同土地利用方式对湘中丘陵区土壤质量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(8): 9-15.[YIN Gang-qiang, TIAN Da-lun, FANG Xi, et al. Effects of land use types on soil quality of the hilly area in central Hunan Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(8): 9-15.]
[26] 刘晓利, 何园球. 不同利用方式和开垦年限下红壤水稳性团聚体及养分变化研究[J]. 土壤, 2009, 41(1): 84-89.[LIU Xiao-li, HE Yuan-qiu. Water-stable aggregates and nutrients in red soil under different reclamation years, Soils, 2009, 41(1): 84-89.]
[27] 王树起, 韩晓增, 乔云发, 等. 不同土地利用方式对三江平原湿地土壤酶分布特征及相关肥力因子的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(4): 150-153, 192.[WANG Shu-qi, HAN Xiao-zeng, QIAO Yun-fa, et al. Characteristics of soil enzyme activity and fertility under different types of land use in wetland of Sanjiang plain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(4): 150-153, 192.]
[28] 张心昱, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 等. 农田生态系统不同土地利用方式与管理措施对土壤质量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(2): 303-309.[ZHANG Xin-yu, CHEN Li-ding, FU Bo-jie, et al. Effects of land use and management practice on farm land soil quality in Yanhuai basin of Beijing. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(2): 303-309.]
[29] Sun Y G, Li X Z, ülo M, et al. Effect of reclamation time and land use on soil properties in Changjiang River Estuary, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2011, 21(4): 403-416.
[30] Jouquet P, Bernard-Reversat F, Bottinelli N, et al. Influence of changes in land use and earthworm activities on carbon and nitr gen dynamics in a steepland ecosystem in northern Vietnam[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2007, 44: 69-77
[31] Bardgett R. The biology of soil[M]//Crawley M J, Little C, Southwood T R E, et al. A Community and Ecosystem Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005: 242.
[32] 姬兴杰, 熊淑萍, 李春明, 等. 不同肥料类型对土壤酶活性与微生物数量时空变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(1): 123-127, 133.[JI Xing-jie, XIONG Shu-ping, LI Chun-ming, et al. Studies on spatial-temporal variations of soil enzyme activities and microorganism's number under different fertilizer types. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(1): 123-127, 133.]
[33] 李娟, 赵秉强, 李秀英, 等. 长期有机无机肥料配施对土壤微生物学特性及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1): 144-152.[LI-Juan, ZHAO Bing-qiang, LI Xiu-ying, et al. Effects of long-term combined application of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil microbiological properties and soil fertility. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(1): 144-152.]
[34] 陈闻, 吴家森, 姜培坤, 等. 不同施肥对雷竹林土壤肥力及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(5): 1021-1028.[CHEN Wen, WU Jia-sen, JIANG Pei-kun, et al. Effects of different fertilization on soil fertility quality, fertilizer use efficiency, and bamboo shoot yields of phyllostachys praecox stand. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011, 48(5): 1021-1028.]
[35] Wright S F, Upadhyaya A. A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprote in produced by hyphae of a rbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Plant Soil, 1998, 198: 97-107.
[36] Lavelle P, Spain A V. Soil Ecology[M]. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

不同土地利用方式对赤红壤理化性质的综合影响

Comprehensive Effects of Different Land Uses on Physical and Chemical Properties of Lateritic Red Soil

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王修康, 戚兴超, 刘艳丽, 刘之广, 宋付朋, 李成亮. 泰山山前平原三种土地利用方式下土壤结构特征及其对土壤持水性的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(1): 63-74.
[2]	刘梦云, 吴健利, 刘丽雯, 虞亚楠. 黄土台塬土地利用方式对土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1564-1576.
[3]	冯广, 艾训儒, 臧润国, 丁易. 鄂西南亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林不同群落类型土壤特征分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(7): 1173-1184.
[4]	曾全超, 李鑫, 董扬红, 安韶山. 黄土高原延河流域不同植被类型下土壤生态化学计量学特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(11): 1881-1891.
[5]	韩璐, 谢俊奇. 基于WNN模型的土地利用方式决策研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(8): 1395-1403.
[6]	张彦军, 郭胜利, 南雅芳, 李泽. 黄土丘陵区小流域土壤碳氮比的变化及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, (7): 1214-1223.
[7]	赵锦梅, 张德罡, 刘长仲. 东祁连山土地利用方式对土壤持水能力和渗透性的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(3): 422-429.
[8]	廖洪凯, 龙健, 李娟. 土地利用方式对喀斯特山区土壤养分及有机碳活性组分的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(12): 2081-2090.
[9]	刘梦云, 常庆瑞, 齐雁冰, 孙宁. 黄土台塬不同土地利用土壤有机碳与颗粒有机碳[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(2): 218-226.
[10]	马群, 赵庚星. 集约农区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(11): 1834-1844.
[11]	孙振宁, 谢云, 段兴武. 生产力指数模型PI在北方土壤生产力评价中的应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(4): 708-717.
[12]	欧阳进良, 宋春梅, 宇振荣, 张凤荣. 黄淮海平原农区不同类型农户的土地利用方式选择及其环境影响——以河北省曲周县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(1): 1-11.
[13]	杨萍如, 刘腾辉. 广东赤红壤的特征及其开发利用[J]. 自然资源学报, 1994, 9(2): 112-122.