自然资源学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 1858-1868.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.11.003

• 资源利用与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

经济增长质量与能源效率是一致的吗?

陈夕红1, 李长青1, 张国荣2, 籍卉林3, 白双柱2   

  1. 1. 内蒙古工业大学管理学院, 呼和浩特 010051;
    2. 内蒙古国电电力建设工程有限责任公司, 呼和浩特 010010;
    3. 呼和浩特职业学院, 呼和浩特 010051
  • 收稿日期:2012-11-27 修回日期:2013-02-06 出版日期:2013-11-20 发布日期:2013-11-20
  • 作者简介:陈夕红(1965-),女(汉),重庆人,博士研究生,副教授,研究方向为能源经济。E-mail:chxh_034@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71262022);内蒙古自治区科技领军人才项目(20090401)。

Is the Quality of Economic Growth in Concordance with Energy Efficiency?

CHEN Xi-hong1, LI Chang-qing1, ZHANG Guo-rong2, JI Hui-lin3, BAI Shuang-zhu2   

  1. 1. Management College of Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Huhhot 010051, China;
    2. Inner Mongolia No. 2 Electric Power Construction Engineering Co., Ltd, Huhhot 010010, China;
    3. Hohhot Vocational College, Huhhot 010051, China
  • Received:2012-11-27 Revised:2013-02-06 Online:2013-11-20 Published:2013-11-20
  • Contact: 李长青(1956-),男(汉),湖北人,教授、博士研究生导师,研究方向为能源经济。

摘要: 论文从全社会节能的角度提出全社会能源效率的概念,构建了经济增长质量指标体系,并基于1997—2007 年中国30 个省份的面板数据,采用Malmquist DEA方法测算了广义技术进步指数并进行分解,然后运用面板方法分析了经济增长质量与能源效率的作用机制,研究结果表明经济增长质量与能源效率是不完全一致的,具体表现为:改善环境质量与提高能源效率是一致的,技术进步与产业结构升级能够促进能源效率,但出口比重的增加和生活水平的提高会抑制能源效率的改进。技术进步、技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率对全社会能源效率有正向影响,技术效率的作用大于技术进步,纯技术效率和规模效率的下降削弱了技术进步的正向作用。

关键词: Malmquist DEA, 资源经济学, 全社会能源效率, 经济增长质量

Abstract: This paper proposes the concept of society-wide energy efficiency from the perspective of society-wide energy conservation, and constructs the index system in the quality of economic growth. Based on a panel data at the provincial level from 1997 to 2007, we employ the method of Malmquist DEA to measure and factorize the general index of technology progress, and analyze the mechanism of interaction between the quality of economic growth and energy efficiency. The empirical results suggest that the quality of economic growth and energy efficiency do not always change in the same direction. Specifically, improving environmental quality, technology progress and upgrading industrial structure may promote energy efficiency; but increasing the proportion of exports and improving the quality of life may embarrass energy efficiency. The effects of technical progress, technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency on energy efficiency are positive. The contribution of technical progress to energy efficiency is smaller than that of technical efficiency. Pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency declined from 1997 to 2007, which weakened the positive effect of technological progress. The national energy efficiency growth slowdown is mainly due to the decline of the national pure technical efficiency, which is caused by the decrease of pure technical efficiency of the central and western regions.

Key words: Malmquist DEA, resource economics, the quality of economic growth, society-wide energy efficiency

中图分类号: 

  • F062.1