SCS-CN模型中土壤参数的作用机制研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.10.012

自然资源学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 1778-1787.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.10.012

SCS-CN模型中土壤参数的作用机制研究

李润奎¹, 朱阿兴², 陈腊娇³, 刘军志², 宋现锋¹, 林耀明²

1. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;
3. 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所, 北京 100094

收稿日期:2011-12-31 修回日期:2013-04-27 出版日期:2013-10-20 发布日期:2013-10-20
作者简介:李润奎(1983- ),男,河南鲁山人,博士,讲师,主要从事GIS 在环境中的应用研究。E-mail:lirk@ucas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划"973项目"(2007CB407207);国家自然科学基金项目(41201038,40971236,41023010);科学技术部国际科技合作项目(2010DFB24140);资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室自主创新项目;中国博士后科学基金项目(2012M510588)。

Effects of Soil Parameters in SCS-CN Runoff Model

LI Run-kui¹, ZHU A-xing², CHEN La-jiao³, LIU Jun-zhi², SONG Xian-feng¹, LIN Yao-ming²

1. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
2. State Key Lab of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
3. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, CAS, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2011-12-31 Revised:2013-04-27 Online:2013-10-20 Published:2013-10-20
Contact: 宋现锋(1969- ),博士,教授,从事地理信息系统研究。E-mail: xfsong@ucas.ac.cn E-mail:xfsong@ucas.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤参数是地表径流模型中的关键参数,对径流过程模拟有重要影响,因此有必要明确土壤参数的作用机制。论文结合SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) 模型,以广泛应用的径流曲线数模型(SCS-CN) 为例,对土壤参数在SCS-CN模型中的作用进行了理论推导、分析和实例研究。分析表明,土壤饱和含水量参数与田间持水量参数的比值,是影响不同土壤湿度下地表产流能力的重要因素,两者比值越大,土壤含水量对地表产流能力的调节越弱,导致基于不同土壤模拟的地表径流量随土壤湿度的波动而上下反转。以实际流域为例,发现不同土壤数据模拟地表径流间差别的显著季节性特征;阐明该差别季节性变化的内在机制,验证了理论分析结论。为深入理解产流过程、合理选择土壤数据、模型参数优化及模拟结果解释提供了参考。

关键词: SCS-CN模型, 土壤, 土壤含水量, 地表径流, SWAT模型

Abstract: Soil data is one of the major input datasets for surface runoff simulation and has large impact on variation of the calculated results. It's important and helpful to understand seasonal variations of the impacts of soil data on calculated surface runoff. This study theoretically analyzed the effects of soil data on daily SCS-Curve Number (CN) runoff model in SWAT model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool), and a case study was also conducted to verify the analysis. Results show that the daily adjusted curve number is largely affected by ratio of two soil hydrologic parameters, saturated soil water content (SAT) to field capacity (FC). Large ratio of SAT/FC leads to smaller variation magnitude of curve number according to a given variation of soil water content, and differences of simulated runoff between soils with different SAT/FC change seasonally as adjusted by soil water content. A case study adopted two different soil datasets for runoff simulation was conducted in Brewery Creek watershed (about 19.5 km²), and the experimental results matched that of the theoretical analysis well.

Key words: SCS-CN, SWAT model, soil water content, surface runoff, soil data

中图分类号:

TV121⁺.2

李润奎, 朱阿兴, 陈腊娇, 刘军志, 宋现锋, 林耀明. SCS-CN模型中土壤参数的作用机制研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(10): 1778-1787.

LI Run-kui, ZHU A-xing, CHEN La-jiao, LIU Jun-zhi, SONG Xian-feng, LIN Yao-ming. Effects of Soil Parameters in SCS-CN Runoff Model[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(10): 1778-1787.

参考文献

[1] US Soil Conservation Service. National Engineering Handbook[M]. Chapter 10. Section 4: Hydrology. Washington D C: Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1972.
[2] Garen D C, Moore D S. Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: Uses, abuses, and future directions[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2005, 41(2): 377-388.
[3] Rallison R E, Miller N. Past, present and future SCS runoff procedure[M]//V P Singh. Rainfall Runoff Relationship. Water Resources Publication, Littleton, Co., 1981: 353-364.
[4] Arnold J G, Srinivasan R, Muttiah R S, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998, 34(1): 73-89.
[5] Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, et al. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2002, 27: 645-654.
[6] Sherman L K. The unit hydrograph method[M]//Meinzer O E. Physics of the Earth. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1949: 514-525.
[7] Ponce V M, Hawkins R H. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?[J] Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1996, 1(1): 11-19.
[8] Rallison R E. Origin and evolution of the SCS runoff equation[C]//Proceeding of ASCE Irrigation and Drainage Division Symposium on Watershed Management, Vol. II. ASCE, New York, 1980: 912-924.
[9] US Soil Conservation Service. National Engineering Handbook[M]. Section 4, Hydrology. Washington D C: Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1954.
[10] Boughton W. A review of the USDA SCS curve number method[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1989, 27 (3): 511-523.
[11] US Soil Conservation Service. National Engineering Handbook[M]. Chapter 10. Supplement A, Section 4: Hydrology. Washington D C: Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1956.
[12] Musgrave G W. How much of the rain enters the soil?[M]//Water: The Yearbook of Agriculture 1955. Washington D C: U.S. Gov. Print. Off. U.S., Department of Agriculture, 1955: 151-159.
[13] Woodward D E, Hawkins R H, Quan Q D. Curve number method: Origins, applications and limitations[C]//Hydrologic Modeling for the 21st Century. Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, July 28 to August 1, Las Vegas, Nevada. 2002.
[14] USDA NRCS. National Engineering Handbook[EB/OL]. Title 210-VI. Part 630, Chapter 7, Hydrologic Soil Groups. 2009. Washington D C: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.info.usda.gov/22526.wba. 2011-07-25.
[15] McCuen R H. Hydrologic Analysis and Design[M]. 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2004.
[16] USDA NRCS. National Engineering Handbook[EB/OL]. Title 210-VI. Part 630, Chapter 9, Hydrologic Soil-Cover Complexes. 2004. Washington D C: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.info.usda.gov/17758.wba. 2011-07-25.
[17] 刘士余, 左长清, 朱金兆. 地被物对土壤水分动态和水量平衡的影响研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(3): 424-433.[ LIU Shi-yu, ZUO Chang-qing, ZHU Jin-zhao. A study on effects of ground cover on dynamics of soil moisture and water balance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2007, 22(3): 424-433. ]
[18] Kannan N, Santhi C, Williams J R, et al. Development of a continuous soil moisture accounting procedure for curve number methodology and its behaviour with different evapotranspiration methods[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2008, 22(13): 2114-2121.
[19] Neitsch S L, Arnold J G, Kiniry J R, et al. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2005[EB/OL]. Temple, Tex.: USDA-ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory. www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/doc.html. 2006-11-01.
[20] Zhu A X, Hudson B, Burt J E, et al. Soil mapping using GIS, expert knowledge, and fuzzy logic[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2001, 65(5): 1463-1472.

SCS-CN模型中土壤参数的作用机制研究

Effects of Soil Parameters in SCS-CN Runoff Model

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	周才钰, 许有鹏, 刘鹏飞, 王强, 王杰. 东部湿润区典型小流域土地利用的土壤水效应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 490-500.
[2]	王晓艺, 苏正安, 马菁, 杨鸿琨, 何周窈, 周涛. 河北坝上与坝下不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1360-1368.
[3]	汪言在, 董一帆, 苏正安. 基于土地利用与植被恢复情景的土壤侵蚀演变特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(6): 1369-1380.
[4]	马维伟, 孙文颖. 尕海湿地植被退化过程中有机碳及相关土壤酶活性变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1250-1260.
[5]	杨静涵, 刘梦云, 张杰, 张萌萌, 曹润珊, 曹馨悦. 黄土高原沟壑区小流域土壤养分空间变异特征及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 743-754.
[6]	陈卓鑫, 王文龙, 郭明明, 王天超, 郭文召, 王文鑫, 康宏亮, 杨波, 赵满. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对不同地貌部位土壤可蚀性的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 387-398.
[7]	王大伟, 白军红, 赵庆庆, 卢琼琼, 张树岩. 黄河三角洲不同类型湿地土壤盐分的剖面分异特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 438-448.
[8]	李冬雪, 李雨芩, 张珂豪, 马旭, 张树岩, 刘伟华, 车纯广, 崔保山. 黄河口典型潮沟土壤碳氮分布特征规律[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 460-471.
[9]	陆荣杰, 王莺, 吴家森, 姜培坤. 不同经营方式毛竹林氮流失年动态规律[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6): 1296-1305.
[10]	陶雯, 张旭博, 孙志刚, 李仕冀, 刘晓洁, 张崇玉, 欧阳竹, 成升魁. 华北引黄灌区粮食产量与农业土壤资源质量时空分布特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 829-838.
[11]	张倩, 刘冰洁, 余璐, 王瑞瑞, 郑浩, 罗先香, 李锋民. 生物炭对滨海湿地盐碱土壤碳氮循环的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(12): 2529-2543.
[12]	白军红, 叶晓飞, 胡星云, 王伟, 张玲. 黄河口典型芦苇湿地土壤磷的吸附动力学特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(12): 2580-2587.
[13]	王浩, 罗格平, 王伟胜, PACHIKINKonstantin, 李耀明, 郑宏伟, 胡伟杰. 基于多源遥感数据的锡尔河中下游农田土壤水分反演[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(12): 2717-2731.
[14]	安乐生, 赵宽, 李明. 表征全吸力范围的土壤水分特征曲线模型评估及其转换函数构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(12): 2732-2742.
[15]	赵峰侠, 张瑞, 徐明, 郑云普. 山西历山山地草甸生物多样性、优势种和土壤因素对群落生产力的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2415-2426.