影响中国碳排放绩效的区域特征研究——基于熵值法的聚类分析

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.07.003

自然资源学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 1106-1116.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.07.003

影响中国碳排放绩效的区域特征研究——基于熵值法的聚类分析

王媛¹, 程曦¹, 殷培红², 张雪花³

1. 天津大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 30007;
2. 环境保护部环境与经济政策研究中心, 北京 100029;
3. 天津工业大学环境经济研究所, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2012-06-26 修回日期:2013-01-04 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2013-07-20
通讯作者: 殷培红(1968-),女,北京人,副研究员,博士,主要研究环境演变与资源环境管理。E-mail:peihong_y@163.com E-mail:peihong_y@163.com
作者简介:王媛(1977-),女,天津人,副教授,博士,主要研究资源与环境管理。E-mail:w_yuan77@163.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金"中国贸易隐含碳转移变化与国际产业分工"(11YJCZH177);国家社科基金"全碳效率"测度与区域生态经济评价研究(12BJY025);国家自然科学基金"基于全球生产网络的中国对外贸易中CO₂ 转移排放研究"(41201591)。

Research on Regional Characteristics of China’s Carbon Emission Performance Based on Entropy Method and Cluster Analysis

WANG Yuan¹, CHENG Xi¹, YIN Pei-hong², ZHANG Xue-hua³

1. School of Environmental Sciencing and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2. Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy, The Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100029, China;
3. Department of Environmental Economics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2012-06-26 Revised:2013-01-04 Online:2013-07-20 Published:2013-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

论文选择影响碳排放绩效的主要指标,基于熵值法确定各指标权重,采用系统聚类分析的方法,以中国省域为研究对象,将全国分为7类区域。分析结果显示:区域分工特征是造成目前中国省级碳排放绩效区域差异的主要影响因素,其次是高碳产业工艺特征和能源结构特征,而经济结构对解释省级碳排放绩效区域差异的贡献有限。北方地区高碳产品生产份额高且工艺水平相对低,能源消费中极高的煤炭比例加重了负面影响,造成其二氧化碳排放绩效水平低,特别是华北地区;近年来东南沿海地区高碳产业也逐步增加,但由于其工艺先进,在一定程度上抵消了高碳产品份额高的负面影响;中西部地区目前高碳产品份额虽然低于东部地区,但工艺水平也低,造成了其低水平的二氧化碳排放绩效。由于各省历史发展、自然资源禀赋、区域分工角色等因素不同,且遵从经济宏观发展客观规律和经济区位理论,除了少数发达地区之外,中国其他区域短时间内很难改变其经济和能源结构,低碳政策制定的重点应放在提高高碳产业工艺水平方面。

关键词: 环境科学, 碳排放绩效, 熵值法, 区域差异, 聚类分析

Abstract:

The main influencing factors of carbon emission performance include economic structure, energy consumption structure, regional division of work and technical level of high-carbon industry. Although these indicators are in a certain degree of influence on CO₂ emissions per unit of GDP, it is difficult to measure the contribution of each indicator. In this paper, we selected the four main indicators mentioned, according to the entropy method to measure the weight of each indicator, applying multi-indicators cluster analysis methods under the index system, and dividing the whole country into 7 typical areas. The analysis result shows: the characteristic of the regional division of work, which has the largest weight of 0.4567, is the main factor resulting in regional differences in China’s provincial carbon emissions performance, then the energy structure and the technical characteristics of high carbon industry take the second place. The indicator of economic structure, with a weight of 0.0971, has a limited contribution to explain the regional differences at the provincial level of carbon emissions. In northern regions, the high share of high-carbon production market and low technical level results in low carbon emission performance. Especially in North China, the high proportion of coal in the energy consumption has a negative effect on carbon emission performance; in southeast coastal areas, due to its advanced technology, the negative effect from high share of high-carbon production has been offset to some degree; although the share of high-carbon production in central and western China is much lower than in the eastern regions at present, yet the technical level is low. The carbon emission performance decreased with a backward technical level. There are differences among the historical development of provinces; natural resource endowment and regional division of work, complying with the macroeconomic development of objective laws and economic location theory, in addition to a small number of developed areas, the other regions in China are difficult to change their economic and energy structure in a short period of time. The low-carbon policies should be focused on improving the technical level of high-carbon industries.

Key words: environmental science, carbon emission performance, entropy method, regional differences, cluster analysis

中图分类号:

X321

王媛, 程曦, 殷培红, 张雪花. 影响中国碳排放绩效的区域特征研究——基于熵值法的聚类分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(7): 1106-1116.

WANG Yuan, CHENG Xi, YIN Pei-hong, ZHANG Xue-hua. Research on Regional Characteristics of China’s Carbon Emission Performance Based on Entropy Method and Cluster Analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(7): 1106-1116.

参考文献

[1] Mielnik O, Goldemberg J. The evolution of the "carbonization index" in developing countries[J]. Energy Policy, 1999, 27(5): 307-308.

[2] Ang B W. Is theenergy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change?[J]. Energy Policy, 1999, 27(5): 943-946.

[3] Sun J W. The decrease of CO₂ emission intensity is decarbonization at national and global levels [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(8): 975-978.

[4] Ramanathan R. Combining indicators of energy consumption and CO₂ emissions: A cross-country comparison [J]. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 2002, 17(3): 214-227.

[5] 谭丹, 黄贤金. 我国东、中、西部地区经济发展与碳排放的关联分析及比较[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(3): 54-57. [TAN Dan, HUANG Xian-jin. Correlation analysis and comparison of the economic development and carbon emissions in the eastern, central and western part of China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(3): 54-57.]

[6] 彭觅, 吕斌, 张纯, 等. 中国能源碳排放的区域差异及其影响因素分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2010, 17(7): 6-11. [PENG Mi, Lü Bin, ZHANG Chun, et al. On the spatial differentia of carbon emissions in energy and its influencing factors on provincial level in China. Urban Studies, 2010, 17(7): 6-11.]

[7] 刘占成, 王安建, 于汶加. 中国区域碳排放研究[J]. 地球学报, 2010, 31(5): 727-732. [LIU Zhang-cheng, WANG An-jian, YU Wen-jia, et al. Research on regional carbon emissions in China. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2010, 31(5): 727-732.]

[8] 何建坤, 刘滨. 作为温室气体排放衡量指标的碳排放强度分析[J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 44(6): 740-743. [HE Jian-kun, LIU Bin. Analysis of carbon emission intensity as the main index for greenhouse gas emission mitigation commitments. Journal of Tsinghua University: Science & Technology, 2004, 44(6): 740-743.]

[9] 张雷. 中国一次能源消费的碳排放区域格局变化[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(1): 1-9. [ZHANG Lei. A changing pattern of regional CO₂ emissions in China. Geographical Research, 2006, 25(1): 1-9.]

[10] 熊永兰, 张志强, 曲建升, 等. 2005-2009年我国省域CO₂排放特征研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(10): 1766-1777. [XIONG Yong-lan, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, QU Jian-sheng, et al. Research on characteristics of provincial CO₂ emissions from 2005 to 2009 in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(10): 1766-1777.]

[11] IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Eggleston H S, Buendia L, Miwa K, et al. IGES, Japan. 2006.

[12] 汪澜. 再论中国水泥工业CO₂的减排[J]. 中国水泥, 2008(2): 36-39. [WANG Lan. CO₂ emission reduction of China’s cement industry (II). China Cement, 2008(2): 36-39.]

[13] 孙建卫, 赵荣钦, 黄贤金, 等. 1995-2005年中国碳排放核算及其因素分解研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(8): 1284-1294. [SUN Jian-wei, ZHAO Rong-qin, HUANG Xian-jin, et al. Research on carbon emission estimation and factor decomposition of China from 1995 to 2005. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(8): 1284-1294.]

[14] 朱方霞, 陈友华. 确定区间数决策矩阵属性权重的方法——熵值法[J]. 安徽大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 30(5): 4-6. [ZHU Fang-xia, CHEN Hua-you. A method of entropy for obtaining the attribute weights of interval numbers decision-making matrix. Journal of Anhui University Natural Science Edition, 2005, 30(5): 4-6.]

[15] 王群伟, 周鹏, 周德群. 我国二氧化碳排放绩效的动态变化、区域差异及影响因素[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010(1): 45-54. [WANG Qun-wei, ZHOU Peng, ZHOU De-qun. Research on dynamic carbon dioxide emissions performance, regional disparity and affecting factors in China. China Industrial Economics, 2010(1): 45-54.]

影响中国碳排放绩效的区域特征研究——基于熵值法的聚类分析

Research on Regional Characteristics of China’s Carbon Emission Performance Based on Entropy Method and Cluster Analysis

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王美知, 魏凤. 哈萨克斯坦粮食生产效率动态演进及区域差异[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 594-605.
[2]	张锐, 刘焱序, 赵嵩, 傅伯杰. 中国城市居民对青藏高原生态资产的支付意愿——以中国27市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 563-575.
[3]	王大伟, 白军红, 赵庆庆, 卢琼琼, 张树岩. 黄河三角洲不同类型湿地土壤盐分的剖面分异特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 438-448.
[4]	范峻恺, 徐建刚. 基于神经网络综合建模的区域城市群发展脆弱性评价——以滇中城市群为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2875-2887.
[5]	张彪, 李庆旭, 王爽, 谢高地. 京津风沙源区防风固沙功能的时空变化及其区域差异[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 1041-1053.
[6]	卢新海, 匡兵, 李菁. 碳排放约束下耕地利用效率的区域差异及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(4): 657-668.
[7]	韩增林, 夏康, 郭建科, 孙才志, 邓昭. 基于Global-Malmquist-Luenberger指数的沿海地带陆海统筹发展水平测度及区域差异分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1271-1285.
[8]	甄霖, 王超, 成升魁. 1953—2016年中国粮食补贴政策分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 904-914.
[9]	张欣莹, 解建仓, 刘建林, 朱记伟, 姜仁贵. 基于熵权法的节水型社会建设区域类型分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 301-309.
[10]	沈晓艳, 王广洪, 黄贤金. 1997—2013年中国绿色GDP核算及时空格局研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(10): 1639-1650.
[11]	李鸿雁, 原若溪, 王小军, 张蕾, 于文泉. 吉林省泥石流易发区的降雨特征分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(7): 1222-1230.
[12]	肖建红, 王敏, 刘娟, 张然. 基于生态标签制度的海洋生态产品生态补偿标准区域差异化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(3): 402-412.
[13]	陈伟, 彭建超, 吴群. 基于容积率指数和单要素DEA方法的工业用地利用效率区域差异研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(6): 903-916.
[14]	朱兰兰, 蔡银莺. 土地用途管制下基本农田发展权受限的区域差异及经济补偿——以湖北省武汉、荆门、黄冈等地区为实证[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(5): 736-747.
[15]	邓吉祥, 刘晓, 王铮. 中国碳排放的区域差异及演变特征分析与因素分解[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(2): 189-200.