道路干扰对澜沧江流域景观格局的影响

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.06.008

自然资源学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 969-980.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.06.008

道路干扰对澜沧江流域景观格局的影响

张景华^1,2, 封志明², 姜鲁光¹, 杨艳昭¹, 刘晓娜^1,2

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2012-02-02 修回日期:2012-11-20 出版日期:2013-06-20 发布日期:2013-06-20
通讯作者: 封志明,男,河北平山人,博士,研究员,主要从事资源地理与水土资源可持续利用研究。E-mail:fengzm@igsnrr.ac.cn E-mail:fengzm@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:张景华(1982- ),女,山东烟台人,博士生,主要从事遥感、GIS应用及土地利用研究。E-mail:zhangjh.09b@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41271117);中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所"一三五"战略科技计划项目(2012SJ008);科技部基础性工作专项(2008FY110300)。

Effect of Road Disturbance on Landscape Pattern in the Lancang River Valley

ZHANG Jing-hua^1,2, FENG Zhi-ming², JIANG Lu-guang¹, YANG Yan-zhao¹, LIU Xiao-na^1,2

1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2012-02-02 Revised:2012-11-20 Online:2013-06-20 Published:2013-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

道路交通在促进人类社会经济发展的同时,也给生态环境带来了诸多影响。研究道路交通的干扰强度、空间格局及其影响,对保护自然环境、维持生态系统健康意义重大。研究基于道路等级、道路所处的环境特征等因素构建道路干扰指数,定量评价了澜沧江流域道路网络的干扰强度,系统分析了流域道路干扰的空间格局特征及其对流域景观的影响。结果表明,澜沧江流域道路网络干扰程度存在明显的区域分异,中游和下游地区明显大于上游地区。流域道路干扰域为边界复杂的不规则多边形,呈现出以离散的强干扰区域为中心,干扰强度向外围逐渐减弱的空间格局。对比不同等级道路干扰域内的景观格局及其变化特征发现,耕地和建设用地等代表人类活动的景观集中分布于道路强干扰区域内,并且强干扰区域内景观组分的变化幅度远大于低干扰区域。从上述分析结果可以看出,道路对其沿线景观格局的变化具有很强的驱动作用,流域道路发展应避开生态环境敏感区域。

关键词: 道路网络, 道路生态, 干扰, 澜沧江流域

Abstract:

Road plays an important role in the development of economy and society, but it also imposes a threat to environment and ecosystems. Research on such an effect is urgent for environmental protection and ecosystem conservation. This paper quantified the intensity of road network's disturbance in the Lancang River Valley with a road disturbance index, which was established based on the characteristics of a road and its surrounding environment, and then analyzed the spatial pattern of this disturbance and its impact on landscape. The results showed that there was obvious spatial difference of road disturbance intensity throughout the whole Lancang River Valley, the intensity in the middle and lower reaches was far more serious than that of the upper reaches. The road effect-zones were irregular polygons with intricate boundary and taking the spatially scattered severe effect-zones as centers, the disturbance intensity decreased gradually outwards. Comparing landscape patterns and their transformation characteristics among different road effect-zones, it was found out that cropland and built-up area were mainly distributed in severe effect-zones, and the transformation in severe effect-zones was far more violent than that in a weaker one. The above results suggested that road development was an important driving force for landscape change, so sensitive areas should be avoided in the decision-making for new development in the Lancang River Valley.

Key words: road network, road ecology, disturbance, Lancang River Valley

中图分类号:

X826

张景华, 封志明, 姜鲁光, 杨艳昭, 刘晓娜. 道路干扰对澜沧江流域景观格局的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(6): 969-980.

ZHANG Jing-hua, FENG Zhi-ming, JIANG Lu-guang, YANG Yan-zhao, LIU Xiao-na. Effect of Road Disturbance on Landscape Pattern in the Lancang River Valley[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(6): 969-980.

参考文献

[1] Forman R T T, Sperling D, Bissonette J A. Road Ecology: Science and Solution[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2002.

[2] 李俊生, 张晓岚, 吴晓莆, 等. 道路交通的生态影响研究综述[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(3): 1169-1175.[LI Jun-sheng, ZHANG Xiao-lan, WU Xiao-pu, et al. Ecological impacts from road traffic: A review. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009, 18(3): 1169-1175.]

[3] 蓝兰. 我国高速公路建设"十一五"回顾及"十二五"展望[J]. 交通世界, 2011, 15: 24-32.[LAN Lan. Eleventh five-year plan review and twelfth five-year plan prospect of expressway construction in China. Transpoworld, 2011, 15: 24-32.]

[4] 刘佳妮, 李伟强, 包志毅. 道路网络理论在景观破碎化效应研究中的运用——以浙江省公路网络为例[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(9): 4352-4362. LIU Jia-ni, LI Wei-qiang, BAO Zhi-yi. Application of road network theory in studying ecological effects of landscape fragmentation: A case study with the road network of Zhejiang Province. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2008, 28(9): 4352-4362.]

[5] 胡忠军, 于长青, 徐宏发, 等. 道路对陆栖野生动物的生态学影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(4): 433-437.[HU Zhong-jun, YU Chang-qing, XU Hong-fa, et al. Ecological effects of roads on terrestrial animals. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(4): 433-437.]

[6] 宗跃光, 周尚意, 彭萍, 等. 道路生态学研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(11): 2396-2405.[ZONG Yue-guang, ZHOU Shang-yi, PENG Ping, et al. Perspective of road ecology development. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2003, 23(11): 2396-2405.]

[7] Bates G H. The vegetation of footpaths, sidewalks, cart-tracks and gateways[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1935, 23(2): 470-487.

[8] Hodson N L. Some notes on the causes of bird road casualties[J]. Bird Study, 1962, 9(3): 168-173.

[9] Gregory R R, James A B. Distribution of mule deer and elk in relation to roads[J]. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1979, 43(3): 634-641.[ZK)]

[10] Stoeckeler J H. Drainage along swamp forest roads: Lessons from northern Europe[J]. Journal of Forestry, 1965, 63(10): 772-776.

[11] Kevin M, William H R, Michele C, et al. Cumulative effects of roads and logging on landscape structure in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado (USA)[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2001, 16(4): 327-349.

[12] James R M, Linda A J, Richard L K, et al. Forest roads and landscape structure in the southern Rocky Mountains[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1996, 11(2): 115-127.

[13] Forman R T T. Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States[J]. Conservation Biology, 2000, 14(1): 31-35.

[14] 富伟, 刘世梁, 崔保山, 等. 基于景观格局与过程的云南省典型地区道路网络生态效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(8): 1925-1931.[FU Wei, LIU Shi-liang, CUI Bao-shan, et al. Ecological effect of road network in the typical area of Yunnan Province based on integration of landscape pattern and process. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(8): 1925-1931.]

[15] Saunders S C, Mislivets M R, Chen J Q, et al. Effects of roads on landscape structure within nested ecological units of the Northern Great Lakes Region, USA[J]. Biological Conservation, 2002, 103(2): 209-225.

[16] Tinker D B, Resor C A C, Beauvais G P, et al. Watershed analysis of forest fragmentation by clearcuts and roads in a Wyoming forest[J]. Landscape Ecology, 1998, 13(3): 149-165.

[17] 刘世梁, 温敏霞, 崔保山. 不同道路类型对澜沧江流域景观的生态影响[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(3): 485-490.[LIU Shi-liang, WEN Min-xia, CUI Bao-shan. Ecological effects of different road classes on landscape in the Lancang River valley. Geographical Research, 2007, 26(3): 485-490.]

[18] LIU Shi-liang, CUI Bao-shan, DONG Shi-kui, et al. Evaluating the influence of road networks on landscape and regional ecological risk—A case study in Lancang River Valley of Southwest China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2008, 34: 91-99.

[19] 王娟, 崔保山, 刘世梁, 等. 各等级道路网对纵向岭谷区景观结构健康的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28(2): 261-268.[WANG Juan, CUI Bao-shan, LIU Shi-liang, et al. Effects of different level road networks on landscape structure health in the Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2008, 28(2): 261-268.]

[20] FU Wei, LIU Shi-liang, DONG Shi-kui. Landscape pattern changes under the disurbance of road networks[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010, 2: 859-867.

[21] 刘世梁, 崔保山, 温敏霞, 等. 纵向岭谷区道路网络特征和生态系统变异统计规律[J]. 科学通报, 2007, 52(SII): 71-77.[LIU Shi-liang, CUI Bao-shan, WEN Min-xia, et al. road network characteristics and statistical variation law of ecological system in the Longitudinal Range-Gorge Region. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(SII): 71-77.]

[22] 何大明. 澜沧江-湄公河水文特征分析[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 1995, 7(1): 58-74.[HE Da-ming. Analysis of hydrological characteristics in Lancang-Mekong River. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 1995, 7(1): 58-74.]

[23] 李斌, 李丽娟, 李海滨, 等. 澜沧江流域干旱变化的时空特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(5): 87-92.[LI Bin, LI Li-juan, LI Hai-bin, et al. Spatial and temporal variability of droughts in the Lancang River basin. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011, 27(5): 87-92.]

[24] 刘世梁, 杨志峰, 崔保山, 等. 道路对景观的影响及其生态风险评价——以澜沧江流域为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(8): 897-901.[LIU Shi-liang, YANG Zhi-feng, CUI Bao-shan, et al. Effects of road on landscape and its ecological risk assessment: A case study of Lancangjiang River valley. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(8): 897-901.]

[25] 云燕. 西藏自治区综合交通发展战略研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2004.[YUN Yan. Research of the Traffic Development Strategy of Tibet Autonomous Region. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2004.]

[26] 云南省统计局. 云南统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2011.[Statistical Bureau of Yunnan Province. Yunnan Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2011.]

[27] Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics[J]. Nature, 1998, 396: 41-49.

[28] 马克明, 傅伯杰. 北京东灵山地区景观格局及破碎化评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(3): 320-326.[MA Ke-ming, FU Bo-jie. Landscape pattern and fragmentation in Donglingshan montane region. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24(3): 320-326.]

[29] 邬建国. 景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007.[WU Jian-guo. Landscape Ecology: Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2007.]

道路干扰对澜沧江流域景观格局的影响

Effect of Road Disturbance on Landscape Pattern in the Lancang River Valley

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	吕曾哲舟, 黄晓霞, 王琇瑜, 和克俭, 丁佼, 孙晓能. 玉龙雪山牦牛坪高山草甸的干扰格局分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6): 1223-1231.
[2]	王会来, 刘娟, 姜培坤, 周国模, 李永夫, 吴家森. 森林土壤呼吸对人为干扰因素的响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1240-1255.
[3]	张濛, 濮励杰, 王小涵, 王琪琪, 于雪. 不同干扰强度对滩涂围垦区土壤颗粒组成的时空分异特征的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 845-854.
[4]	张景华, 封志明, 姜鲁光, 杨艳昭. 澜沧江流域植被NDVI与气候因子的相关性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(9): 1425-1435.
[5]	张雷, 黄园淅, 杨波, 李江苏, 程晓凌. 国家能源供应时空协调——基本概念、理论与方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(4): 529-539.
[6]	许中旗, 李文华, 许晴, 闵庆文, 王英舜, 吴雪宾. 人为干扰对典型草原土壤碳密度及生态系统碳贮量的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(4): 621-629.
[7]	丁易,陶建平,张炜银,杨东华,林瑞昌. 海南岛热带山地雨林林隙体系和阶段更新[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(6): 1022-1034.
[8]	席建超, 胡传东, 武国柱, 吴普, 葛全胜, 成升魁. 六盘山生态旅游区旅游步道对人类践踏干扰的响应研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(2): 274-284.
[9]	周华锋, 马克明, 傅伯杰. 人类活动对北京东灵山地区景观格局影响分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(2): 117-122.
[10]	王庆锁, 张玉发, 罗菊春, 冯宗炜. 人为干扰对浑善达克沙地东部森林—草原交错带的影响及其恢复治理的生态对策[J]. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(1): 28-34.
[11]	侯向阳, 韩进轩. 长白山西坡风灾干扰区的恢复和保护[J]. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(1): 29-34.