近20 a中国省会及以上城市空间形态演变

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以多时相、多波段的Landsat TM/ETM+遥感影像为数据源,利用NDBI-SAVI指数提取1990-2010年中国35个省会及以上城市的建设用地信息,通过计算紧凑度和形状指数,研究城市扩张状况,并借助雷达图来分析城市扩张的方向。结果表明:从城市扩张速度来看,东部城市总体上扩张速度高于中部和西部,其中4个直辖市的扩张速度普遍高于其它城市;扩张速度相对较慢的城市多分布在华北和西北等重工业或河谷型城市。从空间形态变化上看,两时期35个城市的形状大都集中于正方形与矩形之间,只有少数城市形状为菱形、星形、H形或X形。综合来看,近20 a中35个城市形状指数的平均值增加,而标准差减小,城市形态趋于复杂;同时,城市紧凑度的平均值减小。有15个城市的紧凑度增加,20个城市的紧凑度减小。城区往往趋向于少数几个方向扩张,"摊大饼"式的扩张不多见。

关键词: 城市地理, 城市空间形态, 遥感, 中国

Abstract:

The urban spatial morphology has always been the core field research focus of urban geography. Large city morphology evolution is the result of long-term social and economic development. The dramatic changes of China’s urban spatial form have brought many problems in economic, social, urban construction and urban environment. To understand the progress and mechanism of urban spatial morphology changes, building appropriate quantitative assessment model for urban spatial morphology is significant for promoting China’s sustainable urban development. Since the 1990s, there are new economic and social backgrounds in China. Due to the new mechanism and dynamic characteristics of urban morphology evolution, it is very important to get some new conclusion for the amendment of city theories. This paper summarizes the current research gaps on the basis of narrating the research progress about the evolution of urban form at home and abroad. Then, it chooses 35 Chinese provincial capital cities or above, analyzed the spatial-temporal characteristics of cities’spatial morphologic evolution in recent 20 years not only with the help of multi-temporal Landsat TM/ETM+ remote sensing satellite imagery,urban land use planning map, socio-economic statistical data and other relevant information, but also with ArcGIS 9.3 software platform and Erdas 9.2 software and some different research methods, such as statistical analysis, Boyce-Clark shape indices, compactness indices,trend analysis. The results show that, during the period from 1990 to 2010, the expansion speed of the eastern cities is higher than that of the western and central cities. Among them,the expansion rate of the four municipalities is generally higher than other cities. Relatively slow expansion cities are mainly located in heavy industrial or valley-pattern cities of North and Northwest China. The shapes of the 35 cities are mostly in-between the square and the rectangle in the period from 1990 to 2010, only a few cities in the shape of the diamond, star, H-shaped or X-shaped. Out of 35 cities, 15 cities showed a decreased trend in compactness indices and 20 cities showed an increased trend from 1990 to 2010. The range of shape indices for Chinese cities varies from 6.82 to 69.32 in 1990 and from 7.56 to 65.81 in 2010. Generally, the averages of the shape indices in the two years are 24.9 and 32.09 respectively, which indicated urban morphology tends to be more complicated. The major way of urban morphology evolution of provincial capital cities or above in China is the intension-type development instead of extension transit during the period of 1990-2010. The urban morphology evolution is the result of both inner and outer driving forces, indicating the complexity of urban morphology evolution. This research is highly valued for planning administration and planning practicality, especially at such a high speed of urban expansion and well-developed city planning in China.

Key words: urban geography, urban spatial morphology, remote sensing, China

中图分类号:

TU984

潘竟虎, 韩文超. 近20 a中国省会及以上城市空间形态演变[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(3): 470-480.

PAN Jing-hu, HAN Wen-chao. Spatial-temporal Changes of Urban Morphology of Provincial Capital Cities or above in China[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(3): 470-480.

参考文献

[1] Piper G. 从北京、上海、广州等大城市的形态改变过程看中国城市形态、结构的转变[J]. 现代城市研究, 2008(4): 27-43.[Piper G. China’s urban transformation:patterns and processes of morphological changes in Beijing,Shanghai and Guangzhou. Modern Urban Research, 2008(4): 27-43.]

[2] 宋飏, 王士君, 叶强, 等. 中国矿业城市空间形态特征及其空间分异[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2012, 31(1): 45-49.[SONG Yang,WANG Shi-jun,YE Qiang,et al. Urban spatial morphology characteristic and its spatial differentiation of mining city in China. Areal Research and Development, 2012, 31(1): 45-49.]

[3] 刘志丹, 张纯, 宋彦. 促进城市的可持续发展: 多维度、多尺度的城市形态研究[J]. 国家城市规划, 2012, 27(2): 47-53.[LIU Zhi-dan,ZHANG Chun,SONG Yan. A multi-disciplinary,multi-scale agenda of urban form studies toward sustainable development. Urban Planning International, 2012, 27(2): 47-53.]

[4] Mike J,Elizabeth B,Katie W. Achieving Sustainable City Form [M]. London and New York:E & FN Spon, 2000.

[5] Chris C,Jay K. Controlling city sprawl:Some experience from Liverpool Cities [J]. Cities, 2006, 23(5): 353-363.

[6] Burton E. Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities [J]. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 2002, 29(2): 219-250.

[7] Gordon P,Richardson H W. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? [J] Journal of American Planning Association, 1997, 63(1): 95-106.

[8] Talen E. Measuring urbanism:Issues in smart growth research [J]. Journal of Urban Design,2003,8(3):195-215.

[9] 杨立国, 周国华. 怀化城市形态演变特征及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(5): 13-19.[YANG Li-guo,ZHOU Guo-hua. Evolution characteristics of the urban morphology and its forming mechanism in Huaihua. Progress in Geography,2010, 29(5): 13-19.]

[10] 赵明. 温州城市形态构成要素演化研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2009, 16(7): 28-32.[ZHAO Ming. Analysis on the evolvement of Wenzhou City’s morphological elements. Urban Studies, 2009, 16(7): 28-32.]

[11] 宋飏, 王士君, 杨艳茹, 等. 东北地区城市内部空间结构研究[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2009, 28(4): 18-23.[SONG Yang,WANG Shi-jun,YANG Yan-ru,et al. Study on the urban internal spatial structure in Northeast China. Areal Research and Development, 2009, 28(4): 18-23.]

[12] 宣国富, 徐建刚, 赵静. 基于ESDA的城市社会空间研究——以上海市中心城区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2010, 30(1): 22-28.[XUAN Guo-fu,XU Jian-gang,ZHAO Jing. An analysis of urban social space based on ESDA-A case study of the central urban district in Shanghai. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(1): 22-28.]

[13] 牟凤云, 张增祥, 谭文彬. 广州城市空间形态特征与时空演化分析[J]. 地球信息科学, 2007, 9(5): 94-98.[MU Feng-yun,ZHANG Zeng-xiang,TAN Wen-bin. Analysis on the spatial-temporal characteristics of Guangzhou City’s spatial morphologic evolution. Geo-Information Science, 2007, 9(5): 94-98.]

[14] 刘雅轩, 张小雷, 雷军, 等. 新疆绿洲城市空间扩展特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2011, 31(4): 1015-1021.[LIU Ya-xuan,ZHANG Xiao-lei,LEI Jun,et al. Spatial expansion and driving forces of oasis cities in Xinjiang,China. Journal of Desert Research, 2011, 31(4): 1015-1021.]

[15] 王新生, 刘纪远, 庄大方, 等. 中国特大城市空间形态变化的时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(3): 392-400.[WANG Xin-sheng,LIU Ji-yuan,ZHUANG Da-fang,et al. Spatial-temporal changes of urban spatial morphology in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(3): 392-400.]

[16] 王新生, 刘纪远, 庄大方, 等. 中国城市形状的时空变化[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(3): 20-25.[WANG Xin-sheng,LIU Ji-yuan,ZHUANG Da-fang,et al. Spatial-temporal changes of the shapes of Chinese cities. Resources Science, 2005, 27(3): 20-25.]

[17] 李倩倩, 刘怡君, 牛文元. 城市空间形态和城市综合实力相关性研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(1): 13-19.[LI Qian-qian,LIU Yi-jun,NIU Wen-yuan. A study of the relationship between urban spatial morphology and urban comprehensive strength. China Population,Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(1): 13-19.]

[18] 赵景柱, 宋瑜, 石龙宇, 等. 城市空间形态紧凑度模型构建方法研究[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(21): 6338-6343.[ZHAO Jing-zhu,SONG Yu,SHI Long-yu,et al. Study on the compactness assessment model of urban spatial form. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011, 31(21): 6338-6343.]

[19] 杨立国, 向清成, 刘小兰. 景观生态学在城市内部形态测度中的应用[J]. 城市发展研究, 2009, 16(2): 70-73.[YANG Li-guo,XIANG Qing-cheng,LIU Xiao-lan. Application of landscape ecology in the estimates of Huaihua urban internal morphology. Urban Studies, 2009, 16(2): 70-73.]

[20] 尹长林, 张鸿辉, 朱建军, 等. 城市规划CA模型在城市空间形态演化中的应用研究[J]. 测绘科学, 2008, 33(3): 133-137.[YIN Chang-lin,ZHANG Hong-hui,ZHU Jian-jun,et al. The research of urban planning CA model in urban morphology evolution. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2008, 33(3): 133-137.]

[21] 程连生, 赵红英. 北京城市边缘带探讨[J]. 北京师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 1995, 31(1): 128-133.[CHENG Lian-sheng,ZHAO Hong-ying. Discussion on the city’s border area of Beijing. Journal of Beijing Normal University, 1995, 31(1): 128-133.]