转型期城市旅游业绩效评价及空间格局演化机理——以泛长江三角洲地区为例

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.01.015

自然资源学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 148-160.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.01.015

转型期城市旅游业绩效评价及空间格局演化机理——以泛长江三角洲地区为例

曹芳东, 黄震方, 吴江, 徐敏

南京师范大学地理科学学院, 南京 210023

收稿日期:2011-09-26 修回日期:2012-05-07 出版日期:2013-01-20 发布日期:2013-01-19
通讯作者: 黄震方(1963- ),男,江苏扬中人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事旅游地理与旅游规划研究。E-mail:zhfh@263.net E-mail:zhfh@263.net
作者简介:曹芳东(1984-),男,江苏徐州人,博士研究生,主要从事旅游地理与旅游规划研究。E-mail:qichen84@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41271149);国家社会科学基金项目(08CJY051);博士学科点专项科研基金(20093207110008);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目。

Evaluation on Urban Tourism Industry Performance and Formation Mechanism of Pattern Evolution during the Transition Period —A Case Study of the Pan-Yangtze River Delta

CAO Fang-dong, HUANG Zhen-fang, WU Jiang, XU Min

School of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2011-09-26 Revised:2012-05-07 Online:2013-01-20 Published:2013-01-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

论文从经济、市场、效率、公平四个方面构建了旅游业绩效的评价体系,运用熵值法综合测度1998、2003、2008年泛长江三角洲城市旅游业绩效,并结合GIS的空间分析模块,系统分析了泛长江三角洲城市旅游业绩效空间格局的演化过程。结果表明:泛长江三角洲城市旅游业绩效空间分异明显,总体上呈现提高态势,3个时间断面均呈现东西方向递增,南北方向倒"U"型分布格局;相邻地域单元表现较弱的空间集聚特征,绩效系统内部整体协调度不强,部分城市旅游业绩效水平与协调度高度耦合;针对旅游业绩效区域差异格局演化的形成机理剖析表明,经济驱动、市场驱动、产业链驱动、政府驱动及其相互间的综合驱动共同作用促使了城市旅游业绩效空间格局的演化。

关键词: 转型期, 旅游业绩效, 泛长江三角洲

Abstract:

This article builds the evaluation system of tourism industry performance from four respects including economy, market, efficiency as well as equity, measuring comprehensively urban tourism industry performance of the Pan-Yangtze River Delta in 1998, 2003 and 2008. Moreover, combined with GIS spatial analysis model the paper analyzes systematically the evolution process of spatial pattern of urban tourism industry performance of the Pan-Yangtze River Delta. The results display: the regional difference of urban tourism industry performance of the Pan-Yangtze River Delta is distinct, most of the urban cities are listed in the low value area while presenting the advancing situation on the whole. At the same time, the differentiation of the spatial pattern is obvious, in detail, all the three time sections have presented the distributional pattern, namely East-West direction increasing and South-North direction having the inverted "U-shaped" pattern. Adjacent geographical units show the characteristic of the weaker space concentration, the overall coordinated degree of inner performance system is not strong, the coupling between the performance level and coordinated degree of partial urban tourism industry is good. The anatomy of the formation mechanism of the regional difference pattern of tourism industry indicates that there are some main factors influencing tourism industry performance level, such as economic factor, market size, service level, traffic conditions as well as human resources. The common effects of driving force including economy, market, industrial chain, government and synthesis motivate the spatial pattern transition of tourism industry.

Key words: transition period, tourism industry performance, the Pan-Yangtze River Delta

中图分类号:

F592.99

曹芳东, 黄震方, 吴江, 徐敏. 转型期城市旅游业绩效评价及空间格局演化机理——以泛长江三角洲地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(1): 148-160.

CAO Fang-dong, HUANG Zhen-fang, WU Jiang, XU Min. Evaluation on Urban Tourism Industry Performance and Formation Mechanism of Pattern Evolution during the Transition Period —A Case Study of the Pan-Yangtze River Delta[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(1): 148-160.

参考文献

[1] 朱道才, 陆林, 晋秀龙. 空间格局及其经济效应的分析——泛长江三角洲FDI实证[J]. 地理科学, 2010, 30(2): 185-189.[ZHU Dao-cai, LU Lin, JIN Xiu-long. Spatial pattern and its economic effect—Analysis of Pan Yangtze River Delta FDI empirical. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(2): 185-189.]

[2] Landy F J, Farr J. Performance rating [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87: 72-107.

[3] 陈捷. 绩效评估研究新进展[J]. 南京师范大学学报: 社科版, 1997(3): 81-85.[CHEN Jie. Research on the performance evaluation of new progress. Journal of Nanjing Normal University: Social Science Edition, 1997(3): 81-85.]

[4] Noah D C. Institution Change and Economic Performance [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

[5] Archer B. Tourism and island economy: Impact analyses [M]//Cooper C P. Progression Tourism, Recreation and Hospitality Management. Volume 1. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1989: 125-134.

[6] 梅国平. 基于复相关系数法的公司绩效评价实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2004, 12(1): 145-146, 149.[MEI Guo-ping. Empirical study on corporation performance evaluating based on multiple correlation method. Administration World, 2004, 12(1): 145-146, 149.]

[7] 茆英娥. 地方财政应用科技项目专项指出绩效评价指标体系探析[J]. 财政研究, 2006(7): 67-70.[MAO Ying-e. Analysis on evaluating indicator system of disbursal performance in local financial application items of science and technology. Study of Finance, 2006(7): 67-70.]

[8] 周峰, 濮励杰, 彭补拙. 苏锡常地区土地利用变化及其绩效分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.[ZHOU Feng, PULi-jie, PENG Bu-zhuo. Analysis on land use change and its effectiveness in Su-Xi-Chang area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(3): 392-400.]

[9] 班茂盛, 方创林, 刘晓丽, 等. 北京高新技术产业区土地利用绩效综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.[BAN Mao-sheng, FANG Chuang-lin, LIU Xiao-li, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of land use performance of Beijing high-tech industrial zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 175-184.]

[10] 郑美群. 高技术企业绩效评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2004, 25(7): 68-72.[ZHEN Mei-qun. Research on structuring index system of high-tech enterprise's performance evaluation. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2004, 25(7): 68-72.]

[11] 马晓龙. 基于绩效差异的中国主要城市旅游发展阶段演化[J]. 旅游学刊, 2009, 24(6): 25-30.[MA Xiao-long. On evolution of tourism development stages of China's major cities based on their performance differences. Tourism Tribune, 2009, 24(6): 25-30.]

[12] 赖斌, 杨丽娟. 基于Website的旅行社电子商务运营绩效影响因素研究——以四川省为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2007, 22(6): 86-90.[LAI Bin, YANG Li-juan. Website based travel agency electronic commerce operational performance influence factor research—A case of Sichuan Province. Tourism Tribune, 2007, 22(6): 86-90.]

[13] 安景文, 杜蓉晖, 韩朝. 旅游饭店经营绩效综合评价方法探讨[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 1998(10): 35-38.[AN Jing-wen, DU Chun-hui, HAN Zhao. Turist hotel operating performance comprehensive evaluation method. Application of Statistic and Management, 1998(10): 35-38.]

[14] 薄湘平, 薛晶晶. 湖南省旅游业绩效评价[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2002(3): 69-73.[BO Xiang-ping, XUE Jing-jing. Hunan province tourism performance evaluation. Hunan Social Sciences, 2002(3): 69-73.]

[15] 苏建军, 黄解宇. 基于主成分分析法的旅游业经济绩效评价指标体系实证研究——以山西省为例[J]. 技术经济, 2008, 27(3): 100-104.[SU Jian-jun, HUANG Jie-yu. Based on the principal component analysis of the tourism industry and economic performance evaluation indicator system empirical study—A case of Shanxi Province. Technical Economy, 2008, 27(3): 100-104.]

[16] 郭显光. 改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1998(12): 99-103.[GUO Xian-guang. Improved entropy method in evaluation of economic benefit in application. System engineering theory and Practice, 1998(12): 99-103.]

[17] 乔家君. 改进的熵值法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用[J]. 资源科学, 2004, 26(1): 113-119.[QIAO Jia-jun. Application of improved entropy method in Henan sustainable development evaluation. Resources Science, 2004, 26(1): 113-119.]

[18] Getis A, Ord J K. The analysis of spatial association by the use of distance statistics [J]. Geographical Analysis, 1992, 24(1): 189-206.

[19] Cliff A D, Processes O S. Spatial Processes, Models and Applications [M]. London: Pion, 1981: 10-23.

[20] 吴一洲, 吴次芳, 罗文斌. 浙江省县级单元建成区用地绩效评价及其地域差异研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(2): 330-340.[WU Yi-zhou, WU Ci-fang, LUO Wen-bin. Research on land use performance and its geographical difference at county level in Zhejiang. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(2): 330-340.]

转型期城市旅游业绩效评价及空间格局演化机理——以泛长江三角洲地区为例

Evaluation on Urban Tourism Industry Performance and Formation Mechanism of Pattern Evolution during the Transition Period —A Case Study of the Pan-Yangtze River Delta

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0