基于选择试验模型的基本农田非市场价值评估——以浙江省德清县为例

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.11.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

非市场价值是基本农田价值的重要组成部分。对基本农田价值的全面认识与科学评估,有助于基本农田保护经济补偿机制的建立。针对目前中国耕地和基本农田非市场价值研究中尚未引入选择试验模型的现状,论文尝试将选择试验模型引入基本农田非市场价值评估研究,并以浙江省德清县为例展开实证分析。在问卷调查的基础上,首先分析城乡居民对于基本农田保护的认知差异;然后运用选择试验模型分析城乡居民对于基本农田非市场价值的认知偏好及其可能的异质性来源;最后评估并比较城乡居民对于基本农田非市场价值的支付意愿,得出德清县基本农田的非市场价值。研究得到如下主要结论:①城乡居民对基本农田非市场价值的认知偏好存在差异,其认知偏好受年龄、教育程度、家庭人口数、收入、行为和态度变量的影响;②城镇居民的支付意愿普遍高于农村居民,城镇居民平均年支付意愿为143.04元/户,农村居民平均年支付意愿为27.47元/户,城乡居民的收入差异显著影响其支付意愿;③Mixed Logit模型能够揭示不同个体之间存在的选择偏好的异质性及其可能来源,且模型拟合程度更高,解释力优于MNL模型,但是,在应用MNL模型和Mixed Logit模型评估属性的支付意愿时,估计结果存在差异;④计算结果表明,2009年德清县基本农田非市场价值为2.58×10⁸元,单位面积非市场价值为1.27×10⁴元/hm²,占基本农田总价值的54.17%。

关键词: 基本农田, 非市场价值, 选择试验模型, MNL模型, Mixed Logit模型, 支付意愿

Abstract:

A comprehensive understanding and scientific assessment of the value of prime farmland is an important prerequisite for building the economic compensation for the protection of prime farmland. This paper proposes the initial attempt of the introduction of choice experiment model to the study of non-market value of prime farmland, and makes a case study taking Deqing County, Zhejiang Province as an example. Based on face-to-face interview, it discusses the cognitive differences of urban and rural residents for the protection of prime farmland, and analyses the cognitive preferences and its possible sources of heterogeneity of urban and rural residents for the non-market value of prime farmland by applying choice experiment model. Finally, urban and rural residents’ willingness to pay for the non-market value of prime farmland is evaluated and compared, and the non-market value of prime farmland in Deqing County is obtained.
Based on it, this paper concludes that: 1) both urban and rural residents had known the non-market value of prime farmland to some extent, and recognized the need and importance for continuing the protection of prime farmland, however, the urban residents’ cognition of non-market value of prime farmland is more comprehensive and profound compared with that of rural residents. 2) Urban and rural residents paid more attention to the social value of prime farmland, and the cognitive preferences of urban and rural residents for the non-market value of prime farmland are influenced by age, education, family size, income, behavior and attitude variables. 3) Urban residents’ willingness to pay is generally higher than rural residents’, urban residents’ willingness to pay per year is 143.04 yuan per household while rural residents’ is 27.47 yuan per household, and gender, age, family size, income and attitude variables have a major impact on their willingness to pay. Besides, the income of urban and rural residents significantly affects the level of their payment. 4) Mixed Logit model reveals individuals’ heterogeneity of preferences and its possible source, and it also shows higher degree of model fit and better explanation than MNL model. However, the estimated results were different in the application of assessing willingness to pay for the property by MNL model and Mixed Logit model. 5) The results show that, in 2009, non-market value of prime farmland in Deqing County is 2.58×10⁸ yuan, and non-market value per unit is 1.27×10⁴ yuan/hm², accounting for 54.17% of the total value of prime farmland.

Key words: prime farmland, non-market value, choice experiment model, MNL model, Mixed Logit model, willingness to pay

中图分类号:

F321.1

谭永忠, 陈佳, 王庆日, 牟永铭, 刘怡, 施雅娟. 基于选择试验模型的基本农田非市场价值评估——以浙江省德清县为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(11): 1981-1994.

TAN Yong-zhong, CHEN Jia, WANG Qing-ri, MOU Yong-ming, LIU Yi, SHI Ya-juan. Estimation of Non-market Value of Prime Farmland Based on Choice Experiment Model——A Case Study of Deqing County, Zhejiang Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 27(11): 1981-1994.

参考文献

[1] 陈美球, 刘成, 彭丽娜. 试论我国基本农田保护机制的构建[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2009, 22(9): 21-23. [CHEN Mei-qiu, LIU Chen, PENG Li-na. Suggestions about the construction of mechanism of basic farmland preservation. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2009, 22(9): 21-23.]

[2] 李广东, 邱道持, 王平. 三峡生态脆弱区耕地非市场价值评估[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(4): 562-575. [LI Guang-dong, QIU Dao-chi, WANG Ping. Assessing non-market value of cultivated land in ecologically fragile areas of Three Gorges Reservoir. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(4): 562-575.]

[3] 郭贯成, 吴群. 农地资源不同价值属性的产权结构设计实证[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(4): 143-147. [GUO Guan-cheng, WU Qun. On farmland resource value attributes, design of property rights structure and protection of peasants’ land property. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(4): 143-147.]

[4] Bowman T, Thompson J, Colletti J. Valuation of open space and conservation features in residential subdivisions [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90: 321-330.

[5] Ready R C, Abdalla C W. The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2005, 87: 314-326.

[6] Irwin E. The effects of open space on residential property values [J]. Land Economics, 2002, 78: 465-480.

[7] Roe B, Irwin E G, Morrow-Jones H A. The effects of farmland, farmland preservation, and other neighborhood amenities on housing values and residential growth [J]. Land Economics, 2004, 80: 55-75.

[8] Navrud S, Ready R. Environmental Values Transfer: Issues and Methods [M]. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2007.

[9] Kroeger T. The Economic Value of ecosystem services in four counties in northeastern Florida [R]. Companion report to the Kiker and Hodges (2002). Defenders of Wildlife, Washington DC, 2005.

[10] Kiker C F, Hodges A W. Economic benefits of natural land conservation: Case study of Northeast Florida . Final Report for Defenders of Wildlife. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville, FL, 2002.

[11] Johnston R J, Duke J M. Willingness to pay for agricultural land preservation and policy process attributes: Does the method matter? [J] American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 89: 1098-1115.

[12] Boyle K J, Semra zdemir. Convergent validity of attribute-based, choice questions in stated-preference studies [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 42: 247-264.

[13] 蔡银莺, 李晓云, 张安录. 耕地资源非市场价值评估初探[J]. 生态经济: 学术版, 2006(10): 10-14. [CAI Yin-ying, LI Xiao-yun, ZHANG An-lu. The application of contingent value method in non-market value of cultivated land resource. Ecological Economy, 2006(10): 10-14.]

[14] 徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋. 生态经济学理论方法与应用[M]. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2003. [XU Zhong-min, ZHANG Zhi-qiang, CHENG Guo-dong. Ecological Economics Theory and Application. Zhengzhou: The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2003.]

[15] Hausman J A. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment [M]. Amsterdam, New York: North-Holland, 1993.

[16] Diamond P A, Hausman J A. Contingent valuation debate: Is some number better than no number? [J] Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8(4): 45-64.

[17] Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: A review [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24(1): 89-124.

[18] Brouwer R, Martin-Ortega J, Berbel J. Spatial preference heterogeneity: A choice experiment [J]. Land Economics, 2010, 86(3): 552-568.

[19] Campbell D, George H W. Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements [J]. Environment and Planning A, 2009, 41: 97-111.

[20] Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

[21] Campbell D. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: Combining mixed logit and random effects models [J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 58: 467-483.

[22] Termansen M, Zandersen M, McClean C J. Spatial substitution patterns in forest recreation [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2008, 38: 81-97.

[23] Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006, 60: 145-156.

[24] 王瑞雪, 赵学涛, 张安录. 农地非市场价值条件评估法及其应用[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(3): 105-110. [WANG Rui-xue, ZHAO Xue-tao, ZHANG An-lu. An application of CVM in the assessment of non-market value of agricultural land. Resources Science, 2005, 27(3): 105-110.]

[25] 姜昊. 基于CVM的基本农田非市场价值评估研究——以江苏省涟水县为例[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2009. [JIANG Hao. Study on Non-Market Value of Cultivated Land by the Method of CVM. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009.]

[26] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉市农地资源非市场价值研究[J]. 资源科学, 2006, 28(6): 104-111. [CAI Yin-ying, ZHANG An-lu. The assessment of non-market value of agricultural land resource in Wuhan. Resources Science, 2006, 28(6): 104-111.]

[27] 景莉娜, 刘新平, 罗桥顺. 基于CVM法的乌鲁木齐市耕地非市场价值评价[J]. 现代农业科学, 2008, 15(2): 64-67. [JING Li-na, LIU Xin-ping, LUO Qiao-shun. Non-market value of cultivated land resource in Urumqi by the method of CVM. Modern Agricultural Science, 2008, 15(2): 64-67.]

[28] 诸培新, 任艳利, 曲福田. 经济发达地区基本农田非市场价值及其居民支付意愿研究——以南京市为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(6): 50-55. [ZHU Pei-xin, REN Yan-li. Non-market value of cultivated land resource and its influencing factors based on urban residents’ pay willingness: A case study of Nanjing and Yancheng. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2010, 10(3): 57-62.]

[29] 李明利. 基于条件价值法的基本农田资源非市场价值评估研究——以南京市为例[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2009. [LI Ming-li. Evaluation of Non-Market Value of Cultivated Land Resource by the Contingent Valuation Method: A Case Study of Nanjing. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2009.]

[30] 李广东, 邱道持, 王平, 等. 基于忠县农户调查的耕地保护经济补偿机制需求分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(9): 33-39. [LI Guang-dong, QIU Dao-chi, WANG Ping, et al. Analysis on the demand of economic compensation mechanism of farmland preservation based on a farmer survey in Zhongxian County. China Land Science, 2010, 24(9): 33-39.]

[31] 张蕾, Jeff Bennett, 戴广翠, 等. 中国退耕还林政策成本效益分析[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2008. [ZHANG Lei, Jeff Bennett, DAI Guang-cui, et al. Cost-benefit Analysis on the Program for Conversion of Cropland to Forest Land in China. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2008.]

[32] 蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉市农地非市场价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(2): 763-773. [CAI Yin-ying, ZHANG An-lu. The assessment of non-market value of agricultural land resource in Wuhan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(2): 763-773.]