黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤物理属性的影响

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.08.006

自然资源学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 1316-1326.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.08.006

黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤物理属性的影响

高丽倩^1,3, 赵允格^1,2, 秦宁强², 张国秀², 杨凯²

1. 中国科学院、水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2011-12-26 修回日期:2012-03-11 出版日期:2012-08-20 发布日期:2012-08-20
通讯作者: 赵允格(1971- ),女,陕西咸阳人,博士,研究员,主要从事生物土壤结皮及土壤水分、养分运移方面的研究工作。E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn E-mail:zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(40971174);中科院"西部之光"人才培养计划项目。

Impact of Biological Soil Crust on Soil Physical Properties in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region, China

GAO Li-qian^1,3, ZHAO Yun-ge^1,2, QIN Ning-qiang², ZHANG Guo-xiu², YANG Kai²

1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS and MWR, Yangling 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China;
3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2011-12-26 Revised:2012-03-11 Online:2012-08-20 Published:2012-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生物结皮在干旱、半干旱地区广泛发育。迄今,有关生物结皮发育过程中土壤物理属性的响应仍不明确。论文采用野外调查与室内分析相结合的方法,定量研究不同生物量生物结皮对土壤物理属性的影响。结果表明:①生物结皮的发育能够细化土壤,当生物结皮由初期藻结皮演替至60%~80%苔藓结皮时(5等级),生物结皮层粗砂粒含量降低了86%;②随着生物结皮生物量的增加,生物结皮层土壤容重和硬度较初期分别降低了15%和68%,田间持水量和孔隙度分别增加了36%和14%;生物结皮层粘结力是下层土壤的6~7倍;③生物结皮的发育对土壤物理属性的影响与生物量有关,当苔藓生物量达2.91±0.12 g/dm²时,其土壤物理属性基本稳定。研究结果为揭示生物结皮抗侵蚀机理提供了科学参考。

关键词: 生物结皮, 生物量, 发育过程, 土壤物理属性, 黄土丘陵区

Abstract: Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are ubiquitous living surface covers in many arid and semi-arid regions. It has been demonstrated that the coverage of biocrusts was over 70% in the hilly Loess Plateau region of China and it played many important roles, such as exerting observably impact on soil properties and improving soil antierodibility. But the response of soil physical properties to the development of biocrusts has been unclear so far. The objective of the study was to determine the impact of development of biocrusts (i.e. with variable biomass) on soil physical properties in hilly Loess Plateau region. In this study, soil samples were collected after biocrusts and vegetation coverage survey, and the soil physical properties including soil bulk density, soil porosity, field water holding capacity, cohesion and hardness of biocrusts in different developmental stages were determined. The results showed: 1) Fine particles content increased due to the development of biocrusts. The content of coarse sand decreased by 86% while fine sand increased by 45% with biocrusts developing from cyanobacteria dominated to moss dominated (biomass of moss was 4.31±0.12 g/dm²). 2) With the development of biocrusts, soil bulk density and hardness were reduced while field water holding capacity, soil porosity and cohesion were increased significantly. Along with the development of biocrusts, soil bulk density was dropped by 15%. Soil hardness of biocrusts in later development stage was reduced by 68% compared with the early stage. Field water holding capacity was increased to 57%, adding about 36% compared with the early stage, while soil porosity gone up to 58%, increasing by about 14%. Cohesion of biocrusts was 6 or 7 times as much as that of subsurface soil (0-2 cm). 3) Impact of biocrusts on soil physical properties was closely related to biocrusts’biomass. When biomass of moss in biocrusts was to 2.91±0.12 g/dm², soil physical properties changed no longer significantly. 4) Soil physical properties not only in the layer of biocrusts, but also in the subsurface soil under the biocrusts were affected by the development of biocrusts. In conclusion, the results of our study suggested that soil physical properties were influenced by the development of biocrusts significantly. The study would likely provide scientific basis for the mechanism of soil antierodibility improvement by biocrusts.

Key words: biological soil crusts, biomass, development of biocrusts, soil physical properties, hilly Loess Plateau region

中图分类号:

S154.1

高丽倩, 赵允格, 秦宁强, 张国秀, 杨凯. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤物理属性的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(8): 1316-1326.

GAO Li-qian, ZHAO Yun-ge, QIN Ning-qiang, ZHANG Guo-xiu, YANG Kai. Impact of Biological Soil Crust on Soil Physical Properties in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region, China[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 27(8): 1316-1326.

参考文献

[1] Belnap J, Lange O L. Biological Soil Crust: Structure, Function, and Management [M]. Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.
[2] Eldridge D J. Dynamics of cryptogamic soil crusts in a derived grassland in southeastern Australia [J]. Austral Ecology, 2000, 25: 232-240.
[3] Harper K T, Pendleton R L. Cyanobacteria and cyanolichens: Can they enhance availability of essential minerals for higher plants [J]. Great Basin Naturalist, 1993, 53: 59-72.
[4] Belnap J. Soil surface disturbances in cold deserts: Effects on nitrogenase activity in cyanobacterial-lichen soil crusts [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1996, 23: 362-367.
[5] 肖波, 赵允格, 邵明安. 陕北水蚀风蚀交错区两种生物结皮对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(11): 4662-4670.
[6] 赵允格, 许明祥, 王全九, 等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮对土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3): 441-448.
[7] Lange O L. Photosynthesis and water relations of lichen soil crusts: Field measurements in the coastal fog zone of the Namib Desert [J]. Functional Ecology, 1994, 8(2): 253-264.
[8] Jeffries D L, Link S O, Klopatek J M. CO₂ fluxes of cryptogamic crusts I. Response to resaturation [J]. New Phytologist, 1993, 125(1): 163-173.
[9] 赵允格, 许明祥, Belnap J. 生物结皮光合作用对光温水的响应及其对结皮空间分布格局的解译——以黄土丘陵区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(17): 4668-4675.
[10] Lange O L, Belnap J, Reichenberger H. Photosynthesis of the cyanobacterial soil crust lichen Collema tenax for arid lands in southern Utah, USA: Role of water content on light and temperature response of CO₂ exchange [J]. Functional Ecology, 1998, 12: 195-202.
[11] 张元明, 杨维康, 王雪芹, 等. 生物结皮影响下的土壤有机质分异特征[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(12): 3420-3425.
[12] 赵允格, 许明祥, 王全九, 等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮理化性状初报[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(8): 1429-1434.
[13] 王蕊, 朱清科, 卜楠, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区生物土壤结皮理化性质[J]. 干旱区研究, 2010, 27(3): 401-408.
[14] Bowker M A, Belnap J, Chaudhary V B, et al. Revisiting classic water erosion models in drylands: The strong impact of biological soil crusts [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(9): 2309-2316.
[15] 徐杰, 白学良, 田桂泉, 等. 腾格里沙漠固定沙丘结皮层藓类植物的生态功能及与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(2): 234-242.
[16] 范文波, 李小娟. 涂膜法测定黄土结皮容重[J]. 山西水土保持科技, 2001(3): 9-10.
[17] GB 7845—87. 森林土壤颗粒组成(机械组成)的测定[S].
[18] LIU Guo-bin, XU Ming-xiang, Coen R. A study of soil surface characteristics in a small watershed in the hilly, gullied area on the Chinese Loess Plateau [J]. Catena, 2003, 54: 31-44.
[19] 许明祥, 刘国彬, 温仲明, 等. 黄土丘陵区小流域土壤特性时空动态变化研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2000, 20(1): 21-23.
[20] 肖洪浪, 李新荣, 段争虎,等. 流沙固定过程中土壤-植被系统演变对水环境的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(6): 809-814.
[21] 崔燕, 吕贻忠, 李保国. 鄂尔多斯沙地土壤生物结皮的理化性质[J]. 土壤, 2004, 36(2): 197-202.
[22] 卜楠. 陕北黄土区生物土壤结皮水土保持功能研究. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2009.
[23] ZHAO Yun-ge, XU Ming-xiang, Belnap J. Potential nitrogen fixation activity of different aged biological soil crusts from rehabilitated grasslands of the hilly Loess Plateau, China [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2010, 74: 1186-1191.
[24] 冉茂勇, 赵允格, 陈彦芹. 黄土丘陵水蚀区生物结皮土壤抗冲性试验研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2009, 24(3): 37-40.
[25] 逯海叶, 李平. 地表温度和土壤颗粒组成对抗剪强度的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2005, 26(1): 75-78.
[26] 沈晶玉, 周心澄, 张伟华, 等. 祁连山南麓植物根系改善土壤抗冲性研究[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2004, 2(4): 87-91.
[27] 尹乐, 倪晋仁. 黄土丘陵区土壤抗水蚀能力变化的动态评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(5): 724-734.
[28] 朱显谟. 黄土高原水蚀的主要类型及其有关因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 1982(3): 40-44.

黄土丘陵区生物结皮对土壤物理属性的影响

Impact of Biological Soil Crust on Soil Physical Properties in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region, China

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	戴尔阜, 汪晓帆, 朱建佳, 王晓莉. 采伐与人工更新对红壤丘陵区森林面积和地上生物量的影响模拟——以会同县磨哨林场为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2995-3006.
[2]	饶滴滴, 于秀波, 李鹏, 夏少霞, 孟竹剑, 刘影. 鄱阳湖碟形湖泊（常湖池）春季苔草生物量遥感估算[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(9): 2001-2011.
[3]	王冬至, 张冬燕, 蒋凤玲, 许中旗, 张志东, 黄选瑞. 三个主要树种单木生物量及其器官分配模型[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1390-1402.
[4]	张蕊, 李飞, 王媛, 马丽娜, 桑潮, 王力, 郭瑞英, 赵学勇, 尚占环. 三江源区退化天然草地和人工草地生物量碳密度特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 185-194.
[5]	王忠禹, 王兵, 刘国彬, 刘佳鑫, 李兆松. 黄土丘陵区典型植被枯落物坡面分布及混入土壤对土壤性状的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(11): 2020-2031.
[6]	徐伟义, 金晓斌, 杨绪红, 王志强, 刘晶, 王丹, 单薇, 周寅康. 中国森林植被生物量空间网格化估计[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(10): 1725-1741.
[7]	张福平, 王虎威, 朱艺文, 张枝枝, 李肖娟. 祁连县天然草地地上生物量及草畜平衡研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1183-1192.
[8]	朱桂丽, 李杰, 魏学红, 何念鹏. 青藏高寒草地植被生产力与生物多样性的经度格局[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 210-222.
[9]	霍高鹏, 赵西宁, 高晓东, 王绍飞, 潘燕辉. 黄土丘陵区枣农复合系统土壤水分利用与竞争[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(12): 2043-2054.
[10]	郑拴丽, 许文强, 杨辽, 高亚琪, 李建军, 王蕾. 新疆阿尔泰山森林生态系统碳密度与碳储量估算[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1553-1563.
[11]	李娅芸, 刘雷, 安韶山, 曾全超, 李鑫. 应用Le Bissonnais法研究黄土丘陵区不同植被区及坡向对土壤团聚体稳定性和可蚀性的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(2): 287-298.
[12]	徐明, 张健, 刘国彬, 邱甜甜, 郑明清. 不同植被恢复模式沟谷地植被-土壤系统耦合关系评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(12): 2137-2146.
[13]	汝海丽, 张海东, 焦峰, 郭美丽, 薛超玉. 黄土丘陵区微地形梯度下草地群落植物与土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量学特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(10): 1752-1763.
[14]	金远亮, 王忠, 张林. 西藏当雄县高寒草地NDVI的海拔分异特征及其指示[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(6): 928-937.
[15]	冯秀绒, 卜崇峰, 郝红科, 杨延征, 张广军. 基于光谱分析的生物结皮提取研究——以毛乌素沙地为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(6): 1024-1034.