自然资源学报

自然资源学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 901-911.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.06.002

• 资源利用与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

土地督察对土地市场化的影响效果评估

赵雲泰1, 黄贤金1,2, 钟太洋1,2, 张晓玲3, 彭佳雯1, 杜官印4, 肖莉5   

  1. 1. 南京大学 地理与海洋科学学院, 南京 210093;
    2. 江苏省土地开发整理工程技术中心, 南京 21009;
    3. 中国土地 勘测规划院, 北京 100035;
    4. 国家土地总督察办公室, 北京 100812;
    5. 湖南省国土资源规划院, 长沙 410007
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-26 修回日期:2012-01-09 出版日期:2012-06-20 发布日期:2012-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 黄贤金(1968- ),男,江苏扬中人,教授、博导,主要从事土地经济与政策研究。E-mail:hxj369@nju.edu.cn E-mail:hxj369@nju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(40971104,40801063,41101160);"中央高校基本科研业务费"项目(1117020903);"国家土地督察制度实施五周年绩效评估"项目(201114106348);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(南京大学地理学)。

Effects of Land Supervision on Land Marketization in China

ZHAO Yun-tai1, HUANG Xian-jin1,2, ZHONG Tai-yang1,2, ZHANG Xiao-ling3, PENG Jia-wen1, DU Guan-yin4, XIAO Li5   

  1. 1. School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2. Jiangsu Engineering Research Center of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Nanjing 21009;
    3. China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 10035, China;
    4. Office of State Land Supervision, Beijing 100812, China;
    5. Hunan Province Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Changsha 410007, China
  • Received:2011-09-26 Revised:2012-01-09 Online:2012-06-20 Published:2012-06-20

PDF (PC)

赞

被引次数

41 | 3

摘要： 为评估土地督察对土地市场化的影响,论文把目标分解为两个问题:即土地督察制度的实施是否对土地市场化程度产生影响;如果有影响,影响的效果如何。论文收集了2003—2009年的省级面板数据,基于固定效应和随机效应模型估计了土地督察对土地市场化的影响。通过相关检验,采用了固定效应模型的估计结果,并在模型估计的基础上,对影响效果进行了评价。结果表明:①土地督察对土地市场化的发展有积极的促进作用,2007—2009年专项督察覆盖度每提高1%,约能促进土地市场化程度提升0.14%,例行督察覆盖度每提高1%,约能促进土地市场化程度提升1.12%;②通过实施专项督察,2007—2009年全国土地市场化程度分别提升了2.06%、 0.19%和0.55%,通过实行例行督察,2008—2009年全国土地市场化程度分别提升5.01%和12.47%;③2007—2009年通过开展土地督察,全国土地市场化程度分别提高了2.04%、 5.21%和13.02%。

关键词: 土地政策, 土地督察, 面板数据模型, 土地市场, 绩效评估

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to analyze whether the implementation of land supervision is effective in land marketization and assess the extent of the effects. Based on province-level panel data from 2003 to 2008, methods of fixed-effects model and random-effects model were employed to estimate the equations. The test on the models suggests that the fixed-effects model is more appropriate than random-effects model. The effects of land supervision on land marketization were evaluated on the basis of the estimation of the fixed-effects model. The results show that: 1) Land supervision has played a positive role in land marketization in China from 2007 to 2009. The growth of every percentage point in special land supervision coverage brought about 0.14% growth in land marketization degree. The growth of every percentage point in regular land supervision coverage brought about 1.12% growth in land marketization degree. 2) Land marketization degree in China respectively increased 2.06%, 0.19% and 0.55% in 2007, 2008 and 2009 because of the implementation of special land supervision; land marketization degree respectively increased 5.01% and 12.47% in 2008 and 2009 because of the implementation of regular land supervision. 3) On the whole, the implementation of land supervision has promoted the degree of land marketization in China, and accordingly land marketization degree respectively increased 2.04%, 5.21% and 13.02% in 2007, 2008 and 2009. The implementation of land supervision has effectively promoted the development of land marketization. Land supervision on land use and management of local government should be further strengthened, especially in implementing special land supervision on the act of excessive and illegal intervention in land supply of local government, in order to reduce the existence of gray land market and promote the healthy and stable development of land market.

Key words: land policy, land supervision, panel data model, land market, performance evaluation

中图分类号: 

  • F301.21