农户对替代生计的选择及其影响因素分析——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.04.003

自然资源学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 552-564.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.04.003

农户对替代生计的选择及其影响因素分析——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例

江进德, 赵雪雁, 张丽, 侯成成, 李巍, 严江平

西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070

收稿日期:2011-10-13 修回日期:2011-12-05 出版日期:2012-04-20 发布日期:2012-04-20
通讯作者: 赵雪雁(1971-),女,甘肃武都人,教授,博士,研究方向为生态经济。
作者简介:江进德(1985-),男,安徽安庆人,硕士,研究方向为生态经济。E-mail:jiangjinde01@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(91125019,41061051);国家社科基金项目(10CYJ014);教育部科学技术重点项目(210230);教育部新世纪人才支持计划(NCET-11-0910)。

Study on Alternative Livelihood Choice and the Factors Affecting Livelihoods Choice: A Case of the Yellow River Water Supply Area of Gannan

JIANG Jin-de, ZHAO Xue-yan, ZHANG Li, HOU Cheng-cheng, LI Wei, YAN Jiang-ping

College of Geography and Environmental Science, North-west Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2011-10-13 Revised:2011-12-05 Online:2012-04-20 Published:2012-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 论文通过实地调查获得研究数据,分析了农区、半农半牧区、纯牧区农户替代生计选择的结果及特征,采用Logistic回归模型对影响农户替代生计选择意愿的因素进行分析。研究得出:①在替代生计的选择上,纯牧区农户主要选择特色产品加工、做生意、现代畜牧业,农区和半农半牧区农户主要选择做生意、外出打工和旅游服务业;②农户对替代生计的选择表现出生计路径依赖性、区域差异性和多样性特征;③农户对替代生计的选择偏好受生计资本的影响,自然资本、社会资本、家庭整体劳动能力、家庭整体受教育水平、家庭拥有的牲畜数量、户主的学历和年龄分别对不同替代生计的选择影响显著。地方政府应深入了解农户选择替代生计的特点和影响因素,根据不同家庭的情况设计相应的转型政策促进农户尽快提高生计能力。

关键词: 替代生计, Logistic模型, 农户意愿, 甘南黄河水源补给区

Abstract: The research on the choice to alternative livelihoods is of great significance to the implementation of the reasonable alternative livelihoods according to herdsmen circumstances. In this paper, basing on the survey in the study area, the results and characteristics of alternative livelihoods choice were analyzed. Then, the Logistic regressive model was set up to the analyze factors affecting the herdsmen's choice to the alternative livelihoods. Results are shown as follows: 1) Alternative livelihood choice and the diversity of choice differ obviously:As to the selection to alternative livelihoods, the herdsmen in pure pastoral areas mainly choose special products processing, business and modern livestock husbandry while the herdsmen in agricultural and agro-pastoral areas mainly choose business, go out to work and tourism services. In the diversity of alternative livelihood choice, the diversity index in pure pastoral areas is the lowest and the agro-pastoral areas is the highest. Farmers in pure pastoral areas mainly select two kinds of alternative livelihoods while farmers in agricultural and agro-pastora areas mainly select five kinds of alternative livelihoods. 2) The choice of alternative livelihoods has strong path dependence. Business has the strongest path dependence on the original livelihood, followed by animal husbandry, working outside and special products processing. 3) The livelihood capitals have influence on herdsmen's choice preferences of alternative livelihoods. Different capital types, such as natural capital, social capital, the overall labors in the family, the education level of family members, the amount of cattle and sheep, the education background and age of the householder, have different significant influences on the choice of different alternative livelihoods. In order to improve herdsmen livelihood level as soon as possible, the local government should further understand the choice characteristics of alternative livelihoods and the factors affecting the livelihoods choice, then make respective policy according to different circumstances.

Key words: alternative livelihoods, the Logistic regressive model, farmer’s willingness, the Yellow River Water Supply Area of Gannan

中图分类号:

X171.4

江进德, 赵雪雁, 张丽, 侯成成, 李巍, 严江平. 农户对替代生计的选择及其影响因素分析——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(4): 552-564.

JIANG Jin-de, ZHAO Xue-yan, ZHANG Li, HOU Cheng-cheng, LI Wei, YAN Jiang-ping. Study on Alternative Livelihood Choice and the Factors Affecting Livelihoods Choice: A Case of the Yellow River Water Supply Area of Gannan[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 27(4): 552-564.

参考文献

[1] 吴辉. 四川宝兴县综合生态管理示范区替代生计发展途径与对策研究. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2009. [2] Carney D. Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches: Progress and Possibilities for Change [M]. London: Department for International Development, 2002. [3] Chambers R, Conway G. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century . IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton, 1992: 7-8. [4] 李斌, 李小云, 左停. 农村发展中的生计途径研究与实践[J]. 农业技术经济, 2004(4): 10-15. [5] Claire Ireland. Alternative sustainable livelihoods for coastal communities—A review of experience and guide to best practice . The World Conservation Union, 2004: 3-49. [6] Marion Howard. When fishing grounds are closed: Developing alternative livelihoods for fishing communities [J]. MPA News, 2003, 5(2): 1-3. [7] Zafar Adeel, Uriel Safriel. Achieving sustainability by introducing alternative livelihoods [J]. Sustainability Science, 2008, 3: 125-133. [8] 于秀波, 张琛, 潘明麒. 退田还湖后替代生计的经济评估研究——以洞庭湖西畔山洲垸为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 632-637. [9] 杨明, 骆江玲, 明亮. 论替代生计项目在乡村的发展——以NGO在三江平原生态保护项目为例[J]. 农村经济, 2010(4): 101-104. [10] 王富山. 晋西北地区农民生计方式对征地补偿安置的影响分析[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2008, 23(3): 57-59. [11] 张春丽, 佟连军, 刘继斌. 湿地退耕还湿与替代生计选择的农民响应研究——以三江自然保护区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(4): 568-573. [12] 庄孔韶. 可以找到第三种生活方式吗?——关于中国四种生计类型的自然保护与文化生存[J]. 社会科学, 2006(7): 35-40. [13] 姚玉璧, 邓振镛, 尹东, 等. 黄河重要水源补给区甘南高原气候变化及其对生态环境的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4): 844-852. [14] 王济川, 郭志刚. Logistic回归模型——方法与应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001: 59-78. [15] 苏芳. 生态补偿对农户可持续生计的影响——以黑河流域张掖市为例. 兰州: 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所, 2009. [16] 赵雪雁. 生计资本对农牧民生活满意度的影响——以甘南高原为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(4): 689-692. [17] Frank E. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification [J]. Journal of Development Studies, 1998, 35(1): 1-38. [18] Block S, Webb P. The dynamics of livelihood diversification in post-famine Ethiopia [J]. Food Policy, 2001, 26: 333-350.

农户对替代生计的选择及其影响因素分析——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例

Study on Alternative Livelihood Choice and the Factors Affecting Livelihoods Choice: A Case of the Yellow River Water Supply Area of Gannan

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈国鹏, 鲜骏仁, 李广. 林窗对岷江冷杉幼苗种群优势度增长与周期性波动的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(9): 1542-1551.
[2]	肖兴媛, 胡敏悦, 李秀彬, 谈明洪, 赵相伟, 郑璐倩. 基于地块尺度的黑河中游地区农业结构变化及其驱动因素分析——以张掖市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(3): 386-397.
[3]	俞振宁, 吴次芳, 沈孝强. 基于IAD延伸决策模型的农户耕地休养意愿研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(2): 198-209.
[4]	王文娟, 邓荣鑫, 张树文. 东北典型黑土区沟蚀发生风险评价研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(12): 2058-2067.
[5]	吴丹. 中国经济发展与水资源利用脱钩态势评价与展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(1): 46-54.
[6]	李效顺, 林忆南, 刘泗斐, 曲福田, 王辉, 汪应宏. 基于农户意愿的矿区耕地损害补偿测度研究——以庞庄、垞城、柳新煤矿开采为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(9): 1526-1537.
[7]	黎孔清, 陈银蓉, 余雪振. 湖北省随县农村居民点整治现实潜力测算及整治策略——基于农户意愿的调查分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(3): 459-469.
[8]	韩鹏, 黄河清, 甄霖, 鄢帮有, 闫慧敏, 姜鲁光. 基于农户意愿的脆弱生态区生态补偿模式研究——以鄱阳湖区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(4): 625-642.
[9]	朱慧, 张新焕, 焦广辉, 王哲. 三工河流域油料作物的农户种植意愿影响因素分析——基于Logistic模型和240户农户微观调查数据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(3): 372-381.
[10]	侯成成, 赵雪雁, 张丽, 江进德, 李巍, 严江平. 生态补偿对区域发展的影响——以甘南黄河水源补给区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(1): 50-61.
[11]	唐宏, 张新焕, 杨德刚. 农户生态移民意愿及影响因素研究——基于新疆三工河流域的农户调查[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(10): 1658-1669.
[12]	冯艳芬, 董玉祥, 王芳. 大城市郊区农户弃耕行为及影响因素分析——以广州番禺区农户调查为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(5): 722-734.
[13]	沈月琴, 朱臻, 吴伟光, 高宇列, 林建华, 黄坚钦. 农户对非木质林产品经营模式的选择意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(2): 192-199.
[14]	李嘉竹, 刘贤赵, 李宝江, 郭斌. 基于Logistic模型估算水资源污染经济损失研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(9): 1667-1675.
[15]	陈彦光. 人口与资源预测中Logistic模型承载量参数的自回归估计[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(6): 1105-1114.