基于土地利用变化的区域生态安全评价 ——以鄂尔多斯市为例

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.04.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在人类活动导致的生态环境问题中,土地利用变化对区域生态安全起着决定性的作用。选择地处我国北方农牧交错带的鄂尔多斯市作为案例区,以GIS和SPSS软件为平台,通过区域生态安全评价指标体系的构建、指标标准阈值的确定、区域生态安全评价模型的建立,对研究区1988、2000及2008年的区域生态安全状况进行了研究。结果表明:①研究区20 a来整体生态安全状况呈现"先恶化、后改善"的趋势,与2000年后"退耕还林还草"、"禁牧和休牧"政策的实施直接相关;②高覆盖度草地是最安全的土地利用方式,其次是中覆盖度草地,林地的生态安全水平非常稳定,水域和低覆盖度草地的生态安全多处于"临界安全"水平,相比之下,耕地、建设用地和未利用地最不安全;③各旗区生态安全水平差异较大,鄂托克旗"较为安全",鄂托克前旗和准格尔旗为"临界安全",达拉特旗和东胜区的生态安全值最低。研究结果可为当地生态环境管理提供更为有效的理论依据。

关键词: 区域生态安全, 土地利用变化, 鄂尔多斯

Abstract: The cumulative effects of human activities on regional ecological security have attracted much attention in recent years. Land use/cover change plays a decisive role to regional ecological security. In this research, we chose Ordos which is located in northern agro-grazing eco-tone as the study area. Basing on GIS and SPSS software platform, we constructed indicators system of ecological security assessment, calculated the threshold and constructed model of ecological security assessment in 1988, 2000 and 2008. From the studies above, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1)The ecological security situation of the study area got worse at first, but then improved in the year of 2000, which was directly related to the policies of returning farmland to forest (grass) and fencing and delaying grazing. This phenomenon indicates that economic activities such as land use and the enacting of policies affect regional ecological security level significantly. In addition, policies are playing a more and more important role in not only the development of agriculture and livestock, but also guiding the overall ecology. 2) Grassland with high coverage rate got the highest level of ecological security among all land-use types, and grassland with middle coverage rate got the second. Ecological security of forestland was very steady. Water and low coverage grassland were often at a critical stage, and could be easily affected by precipitation, saline soil, as well as desertification. In contrast, farmland, built-up land and unutilized land were at the lowest ecological security level. 3) Otog Banner was at the level of better security. Otog Front Banner and Jungar Banner were at the level of critical stage of security. Dalad Banner and Dongsheng District were at the lowest ecological security level. During the past 20 years, the ecological security has been getting better in Dongsheng District and Ejin Horo Banner, it first decreased and then increased in Otog Front, Otog, Hanggin, Uxin and Jungar banners to different degrees. The results could be beneficial for providing references to regional ecological management for the local government.

Key words: regional ecological security, land use change, Ordos

中图分类号:

F301.24

蒙吉军, 赵春红, 刘明达. 基于土地利用变化的区域生态安全评价 ——以鄂尔多斯市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(4): 578-590.

MENG Ji-jun, ZHAO Chun-hong, LIU Ming-da. Regional Ecological Security Assessment Based on Land-Use Change—A Case Study in Ordos City[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2011, 26(4): 578-590.

参考文献

[1] 肖笃宁, 陈文波, 郭福良. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(3): 354-358. [2] IGBP, IHDP. Global land project—Science plan and implementation strategy. 2005. [3] 史培军, 宋长青, 景贵飞. 加强我国土地利用/覆盖变化及其对生态环境安全影响的研究——从荷兰"全球变化开放科学会议"看人地系统动力学研究的发展趋势[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 161-168. [4] Margaret Brusascomackenzie. Environmental security—A view from Europe . ECSP Report, Issue 10, 2004. [5] Richard Matthew, Btyan McDomld. Networks of threats and vulnerability: Lessons from environmental security. ECSP Report, Issue 10, 2004: 36-42. [6] Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260. [7] Kreuter U, Harris H, Matlock W, et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39: 333-346. [8] Liana Talane Mcmamus. Global change in the coastal zone: The case of Southeast Asia //Abstracts of Global Change OpenScience Conference. Congres Holland BV, Amsterdam, the Netherland, 2001. [9] 喻锋, 李晓兵, 王宏, 等. 皇甫川流域土地利用变化与生态安全评价[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(6): 645-653. [10] 史培军, 王静爱, 冯文利, 等. 中国土地利用/覆盖变化的生态环境安全响应与调控[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(2): 111-119. [11] Ojima D, Lavorel S, Graumich L, et al. Terrestrial human－environment systems: The future of land research in IGBPⅡ[M]// Global Change Newsletter Issue No. 50. 2002. [12] 蔡运龙, 陆大道, 周一星, 等. 中国地理科学的国家需求与发展战略[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 811-819. [13] 张百平, 姚永慧, 朱运海, 等. 区域生态安全研究的科学基础与初步框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(6): 1-7. [14] 史培军, 江源, 王静爱, 等. 土地利用/覆盖变化与生态安全响应机制[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004. [15] 刘纪远, 张增祥, 李秀彬, 等. 20 世纪90 年代中国土地利用变化的遥感时空信息研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005. [16] ZUO Wei, ZHOU Hui-zhen, ZHU Xiao-hua, et al. Integrated evaluation of ecological security at different scales using remote sensing [J]. Pedosphere, 2005, 15(4): 456-464. [17] 左伟. 基于RS、GIS的区域生态安全综合评价研究[M]. 北京: 测绘出版社, 2004. [18] 杜巧玲, 许学工, 李海涛, 等. 黑河中下游绿洲生态安全变化分析[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2005, 41(2): 273-281. [19] 赵哈林, 赵学勇, 张铜会, 等. 北方农牧交错带的地理界定及其生态问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(1): 740-749. [20] 罗海江, 白海玲, 方修琦. 农牧交错带近十五年生态环境变化评价——以鄂尔多斯地区为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2007, 30(4): 474-481. [21] 安树伟. "鄂尔多斯经济现象"对我国西部大开发的启示[J]. 内蒙古财经学院学报, 2002(2): 87-91. [22] 许炯心. 土地利用变化对鄂尔多斯高原周边地区沙尘暴的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2004, 23(4): 463-468. [23] 战金艳, 邓祥征, 岳天祥, 等. 内蒙古农牧交错带土地利用变化及其环境效应[J]. 资源科学, 2004, 26(5): 81-89. [24] 李增慧, 刘惠清. 基于遥感的鄂尔多斯农牧交错区生态环境变化研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2005, 25(5): 68-70. [25] 贾宝全, 孙鹏森, 慈龙骏. 景观格局分布特征的区域差异分析——以鄂尔多斯高原伊金霍洛旗为例[J]. 干旱区地理, 2003, 26(3): 202-207. [26] 马金辉, 蔡迪花, 肖桐. 鄂尔多斯地区沙漠化遥感定量评价[J]. 兰州大学学报, 2007, 43(4): 1-6. [27] 程晓莉, 安树青, 钦佩, 等. 鄂尔多斯草地退化过程中植被地上生物量空间分布的异质性[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(8): 1526-1532. [28] 黄永梅, 张明理. 鄂尔多斯高原植物群落多样性时空变化特点[J]. 生物多样性, 2006, 14(1): 13-20. [29] 马广铭, 张荣旺, 张敏. 伊盟地区自然灾害时空分布分析[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2001(5): 99-101. [30] 阎德仁, 武智双, 石瑾. 鄂尔多斯气象灾害与沙漠化防治对策[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2005(3): 35-38. [31] 史培军. 地理环境演变研究的理论与实践——鄂尔多斯地区晚第四纪以来地理环境演变研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991. [32] 伊克昭盟地方志编纂委员会. 伊克昭盟志[M]. 北京: 现代出版社, 1994. [33] 伊克昭盟土壤普查办公室. 伊克昭盟土壤[M]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古人民出版社, 1989. [34] 内蒙古自治区统计局. 内蒙古统计年鉴(1988, 2000, 2008)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1988, 2000, 2008. [35] 国家环境保护总局. 生态环境状况评价技术规范[S]. 2006. [36] 程晋南, 赵庚星, 李红, 等. 基于RS和GIS的土地生态环境状况评价及其动态变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(11): 83-88. [37] 谢花林. 基于GIS的典型农牧交错区土地利用生态安全评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(1): 135-139. [38] 王再岚, 李政海, 马中, 等. 鄂尔多斯东胜地区不同生态功能区的土壤侵蚀敏感性[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(1): 484-491. [39] 中华人民共和国水利部. 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准( SL19—96)[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1997: 14-16. [Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China. Standards for Classification and Gradation of Soil Erosion (SL19-96). Beijing: China Water Power Press, 1997:14-16.] [40] 房世波, 谭凯炎, 刘建栋, 等. 鄂尔多斯植被盖度分布与环境因素的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(1): 25-33. [41] 马瑛. 北方农牧交错带土地利用生态安全评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2007, 21(7): 53-58. [42] 韩文权, 常禹, 胡远满. 景观格局优化研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(12): 1487-1492. [43] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 邱扬, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区土地利用结构与生态过程[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2002.