能值分析理论在耕地可持续利用评价中的应用研究——以南京市为例

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 评价指标体系是耕地可持续利用评价研究的难点,正确选择评价理论与方法,构建科学、合理的评价指标体系,为正确认识耕地利用的可持续性及制定相应政策提供理论与实践依据。文章引入能值理论,在传统评价方法基础上对耕地利用中物流、能流等以太阳能值为统一衡量标准,建立新的指标体系,并对南京市1995~2004年的耕地利用进行评价。结果表明,研究时段内南京市耕地利用是向可持续方向发展的,且其可持续利用经历了两个阶段:①1995~1998年可持续性下降阶段,综合系数从1995年的1逐渐下降到1998年的0.9570;②1998~2004年可持续性上升阶段,综合系数逐年上升到2004年的1.1123。与传统评价方法相比,引入能值理论后的评价结果更能全面、客观地反映耕地利用的可持续状况。

关键词: 可持续评价, 指标体系, 能值分析, 耕地, 南京市

Abstract: In the study of sustainability assessment of cultivated land use, it is crucial but difficult to establish an index system. Although some research progress has been made recently, there're still many problems to be solved. For instance, traditional evaluation indices of economic profit can be influenced by various factors, including market supply and demand, fluctuation of monetary value, unit yields and growth periods of different crops. Furthermore, the traditional methods do not take the consumption of free environmental resources and their contributions into consideration. The theory of emergy analysis presented by H. T. Odum overcomes these insufficiencies in the eco-economic system evaluation by the traditional cost theory and market value theory, and offers an important standard to measure the rationality of cultivated land use. However, when the theory of emergy analysis is applied to the evaluation of sustainable cultivated land use independently, it's difficult to analyze agricultural pollution, policies and some other factors, which can be done directly or indirectly by traditional methods. Accordingly, on the basis of the traditional evaluation methods, the emergy theory is introduced and a new index system is established, in order to offset the deficiencies of both traditional methods and the theory of emergy analysis, and make contributions to the research of sustainable use of cultivated land.Taking Nanjing as an example, the study combines the traditional methods with the theory of emergy analysis to establish a new index system from three aspects of economic, ecological and social sustainability. And then, the study computes the weights of all indices by the method of AHP, to evaluate the cultivated land use from the year 1995 to 2004. The research indicates that the sustainable use of cultivated land in Nanjing experienced two phases. In the first phase (1995-1998), the sustainable use index of cultivated land decreased by 4.30%, from 1 in 1995 to 0.9570 in 1998, mainly because the economic sustainability index decreased to 0.8036 in 1998; in the second phase (1998 to 2004), the sustainable use index of cultivated land increased to 1.1123 in 2004, the highest level in the research period, mainly because the economic sustainability index increased to 1.0898, and the ecological sustainability index to 1.1762 in 2004. On the whole, the cultivated land use system is developing towards sustainability, conforming to the conclusions of some relative researches. All these indicate that it is feasible to apply the theory of emergy analysis to the evaluation of sustainable use of cultivated land. Compared with the traditional evaluation methods, the evaluation index system established in this paper can reflect the sustainability of cultivated land use more objectively.

Key words: sustainability evaluation, index system, emergy analysis, cultivated land, Nanjing

中图分类号:

F301.21

舒帮荣, 刘友兆, 陆效平, 沈春竹, 何守春. 能值分析理论在耕地可持续利用评价中的应用研究——以南京市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 876-885.

SHU Bang-rong, LIU You-zhao, LU Xiao-ping, SHEN Chun-zhu, HE Shou-chun. Application of the Theory of Emergy Analysis to the Sustainability Assessment of Cultivated Lands — A Case Study of Nanjing[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2008, 23(5): 876-885.

参考文献

[1] 潘锋.我国耕地资源与食物安全保障任重道远.http://www.cas.ac.cn/html/Dir/2005/11/21/13/54/89. htm,2005-11-21. [2] 陈百明,张凤荣.中国土地可持续利用指标体系的理论与方法[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(3):197~203. [3] Odum H T. Ecology and Economy: "Emergy" Analysis and Public Policy in Texas [M]. Texas: The Office of Natural Resources and Texas Department of Agriculture,1987. [4] 陆宏芳,沈善瑞,陈洁,等.生态经济系统的一种整合评价方法:能值理论与分析方法[J].生态环境,2005,14(1): 121~126. [5] 蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳.生态系统的能值分析[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002. [6] 陆宏芳,蓝盛芳,彭少麟.系统可持续发展的能值评价指标的新拓展[J].环境科学,2003,24(5):150~154. [7] 李双成,蔡运龙.基于能值分析的土地可持续利用态势研究[J].经济地理,2002,22(3):346~350. [8] 秦红灵,高旺盛,何文清.北方农牧交错带半干旱区种植业系统能值分析——以武川县为例[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(1):157~161. [9] 刘继展.江苏省农业系统能值投入产出分析及预测.南京:江苏大学,2005. [10] 张耀辉.农业生态系统能值分析方法[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(3):181~183. [11] 张凤荣,王静,陈百明,等.土地可持续利用评价指标体系与方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003. [12] 彭补拙,程烨,濮励杰,等.长江三角洲地区耕地可持续利用研究[M].北京:地质出版社,2003. [13] Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M]. New York: Wiley, 1996. [14] Hong-fang Lu, Daniel Campbell, Jie Chen, et al. Conservation and economic viability of nature reserves: An emergy evaluation of the Yancheng Biosphere Reserve[J]. Biological Conservation,2007,139:415-438. [15] Hong-fang Lu, Daniel E. Campbell, Zhi-An Li, et al. Emergy synthesis of an agro-forest restoration system in lower subtropical China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2006,27:175-192. [16] Simone Bastianoni, Daniel Campbell, Ludovico Susani, et al. The solar transformity of oil and petroleum natural gas[J]. Ecological Modelling,2005,186:212-220. [17] 张耀辉,蓝盛芳,陈飞鹏.海南省农业能值分析[J].农村生态环境,1999,15(1):5~9. [18] 刘新卫,陈百明,杨红.粮食生产系统的能值分析——以安塞县为例[J].干旱地区农业研究,2004, 22(2):174~180. [19] 蓝盛芳,霍华德·欧登,刘新茂.中国农业生态系统的能流能值分析[J].生态科学,1998,17(1):32~39. [20] Xinwei Liu, Baiming Chen. Efficiency and sustainability analysis of grain production in Jiangsu and Shaanxi Provinces of China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2007,(15):313-322. [21] 董孝斌,高旺盛,严茂超.黄土高原典型流域农业生态系统生产力的能值分析——以安塞县纸坊沟流域为例[J].地理学报,2004,59(2):223~229. [22] 张芳怡,濮励杰,张健.基于能值分析理论的生态足迹模型及应用——以江苏省为例[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(4):653~660. [23] 吴移生,邱益三.南京农业气候资源利用问题[J].南京农专学报,1997,13(4):1~7. [24] 牛若峰,刘天福.农业技术经济手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1984. [25] 刘巽浩.能量投入产出研究在农业上的应用[J].农业现代化研究,1984,(4):15~20. [26] 于法稳.耕地资源可持续利用的几个问题.http://www.cass.net.cn/file/2007030588003.html,2007- 03-05.